Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 01:58:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 482 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!  (Read 1514104 times)
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 12:45:28 AM
 #601

Besides this, more importantly, each hash (ie difficulty of 1) has the same probability of solving the block as 1/1024 of a miner hashing at difficulty of 1024 (accepted share with difficulty 1024)?

Only a difficulty share 39.5 Billion or higher will solve the block at this difficulty level.  A diff 1 has no chance of solving a block as it doesn't meet or exceed the current difficulty, neither will a diff 1024.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
1713880698
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713880698

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713880698
Reply with quote  #2

1713880698
Report to moderator
1713880698
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713880698

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713880698
Reply with quote  #2

1713880698
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713880698
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713880698

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713880698
Reply with quote  #2

1713880698
Report to moderator
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 12:46:50 AM
 #602


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Besides this, more importantly, each hash (ie difficulty of 1) has the same probability of solving the block as 1/1024 of a miner hashing at difficulty of 1024 (accepted share with difficulty 1024)?

And when my miner has difficulty set, there are no accepted shares below that difficulty.  So I'm assuming that 934/1024 doesn't show up, because it's not accepted.  My understanding is that 1024 is a larger fraction of 39.5B to be solved.
None of your shares count for anything unless they are a block.
Flooding the server with hundreds of shares per second that count for nothing would be a bad design.
Using a difficulty is - as already stated - simply to show your hash rate in cgminer.

A person with 1PHs (1,000 THs) would expect to find on average "about" one block every 2 days.
It may be 1 minute, it may be 20 days. 2 days is just an average expected value for 1,000THs

Also note that 1PHs would be ~14 million 1diff shares a minute.
Yeah that would be a really bad idea to send that to any computer ... instead you'd send ~20 ~700,000 diff shares a minute.
Same result, either one finding a block would still submit the block, but if it was 14,000,000/minute there's also the fact that the pool would die for various reasons (network, CPU) and you'd probably lose the block if you ever found one.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 12:47:05 AM
 #603


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Because you don't have 286541.40 Ths of hashing power.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Kexkey
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 237
Merit: 100

Smile while thinking.


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 12:55:25 AM
 #604


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Besides this, more importantly, each hash (ie difficulty of 1) has the same probability of solving the block as 1/1024 of a miner hashing at difficulty of 1024 (accepted share with difficulty 1024)?

And when my miner has difficulty set, there are no accepted shares below that difficulty.  So I'm assuming that 934/1024 doesn't show up, because it's not accepted.  My understanding is that 1024 is a larger fraction of 39.5B to be solved.

Competition is not against the other miners, but against... Well... Probability.  There's no competition actually, only probability.  A hash of difficulty 1 has no chance of solving a block of difficulty 39B.  A hash of diff 39B or more can "solve" it.  Your miner submits hashes to a pool just to prove to the pool that your miner is working.  Otherwise, you shouldn't have to submit shares below the current network difficulty.  When you solo mine (not in a pool), you don't need to submit hashes below the difficulty.  Pool diff and network diff are two different things about the same concept of the "target".

It actually took me some time to understand this!  :-)

This digital signature is not a digital signature.
fresca
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 29, 2014, 02:42:36 AM
 #605


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Because you don't have 286541.40 Ths of hashing power.

Call it what you want, but that is competition.  That's the exact reason there are pools and hardware races for new technology.  If your not solving a block, someone else is.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4102
Merit: 7762


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2014, 03:36:47 AM
 #606

I think ck is a female.  Ck stands for Cynthia King (no relation to Martin Luther King)
1. No.
2. How is that relevant?

he quoted my post in which I refer to his server runs this pool.

Frankly I don't know if he is just kidding.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
gallery2000
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


Live Stars - Adult Streaming Platform


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 04:10:50 AM
 #607

I think ck is a female.  Ck stands for Cynthia King (no relation to Martin Luther King)
1. No.
2. How is that relevant?

Sorry, I got brain fucked because I used his BFS.   On 31 August 2009, Kolivas posted a new scheduler called BFS (Brain Fuck Scheduler).[12]

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 04:27:01 AM
 #608


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Because you don't have 286541.40 Ths of hashing power.

Call it what you want, but that is competition.  That's the exact reason there are pools and hardware races for new technology.  If your not solving a block, someone else is.


If you want to think of mining as a competition then fine have it your way.  But your descriptions that I've seen so far are not correct.  Also you are not being harmed or losing anything by the initial 1024 difficulty before it adjusts down.

I wish you luck in your competition.
Take Care,
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
ads2003uk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 110


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2014, 03:30:11 PM
 #609

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

5 Blocks found by renting rigs @ http://tinyurl.com/qencw96
Free BitCoins every hour http://tinyurl.com/zdwezeo
Free Bitcoin Slots @ http://tinyurl.com/freeBTCslots
cisahasa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 04:10:13 PM
 #610

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 04:18:35 PM
 #611

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

I would hold onto the 2 BTC.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 29, 2014, 04:54:48 PM
 #612

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

I would hold onto the 2 BTC.

The approximate odds of finding a block in 5 hours would calculate to:

~320,000 Th/s bitcoin network
700 Th/s your hashrate
30 blocks (1 block per 10 min, 30 blocks in 5 hrs)


320,000 / 700: 1 in ~457 per block

457 / 30: 1 in ~15 for 5 hours timeframe.

Do you feel lucky?  Can you afford to lose those coins?


ads2003uk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 110


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2014, 06:41:44 PM
 #613

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

I would hold onto the 2 BTC.

The approximate odds of finding a block in 5 hours would calculate to:

~320,000 Th/s bitcoin network
700 Th/s your hashrate
30 blocks (1 block per 10 min, 30 blocks in 5 hrs)


320,000 / 700: 1 in ~457 per block

457 / 30: 1 in ~15 for 5 hours timeframe.

Do you feel lucky?  Can you afford to lose those coins?




I know it's a risk, 1 in 15 is good odds.
I've spent more on horses and casino. It would be a kind of 1 off thing

5 Blocks found by renting rigs @ http://tinyurl.com/qencw96
Free BitCoins every hour http://tinyurl.com/zdwezeo
Free Bitcoin Slots @ http://tinyurl.com/freeBTCslots
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 29, 2014, 07:00:29 PM
 #614

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

I would hold onto the 2 BTC.

The approximate odds of finding a block in 5 hours would calculate to:

~320,000 Th/s bitcoin network
700 Th/s your hashrate
30 blocks (1 block per 10 min, 30 blocks in 5 hrs)


320,000 / 700: 1 in ~457 per block

457 / 30: 1 in ~15 for 5 hours timeframe.

Do you feel lucky?  Can you afford to lose those coins?




I know it's a risk, 1 in 15 is good odds.
I've spent more on horses and casino. It would be a kind of 1 off thing

Same here.  Right now, 2 btc is a day in Vegas  Grin
ads2003uk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 110


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2014, 07:42:03 PM
 #615

So tempted to spend 2btc on 5-6hrs mining @ 700Th

would use same money to longer mining time slower hash

I would hold onto the 2 BTC.

The approximate odds of finding a block in 5 hours would calculate to:

~320,000 Th/s bitcoin network
700 Th/s your hashrate
30 blocks (1 block per 10 min, 30 blocks in 5 hrs)


320,000 / 700: 1 in ~457 per block

457 / 30: 1 in ~15 for 5 hours timeframe.

Do you feel lucky?  Can you afford to lose those coins?




I know it's a risk, 1 in 15 is good odds.
I've spent more on horses and casino. It would be a kind of 1 off thing

Same here.  Right now, 2 btc is a day in Vegas  Grin

Ah but a block is a weekend, show and hooker..

5 Blocks found by renting rigs @ http://tinyurl.com/qencw96
Free BitCoins every hour http://tinyurl.com/zdwezeo
Free Bitcoin Slots @ http://tinyurl.com/freeBTCslots
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
December 29, 2014, 09:21:07 PM
 #616


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Because you don't have 286541.40 Ths of hashing power.

Call it what you want, but that is competition.  That's the exact reason there are pools and hardware races for new technology.  If your not solving a block, someone else is.


If you want to think of mining as a competition then fine have it your way.  But your descriptions that I've seen so far are not correct.  Also you are not being harmed or losing anything by the initial 1024 difficulty before it adjusts down.

I wish you luck in your competition.
Take Care,
Sam
The only competition in mining is an orphan race.
Otherwise it doesn't matter when anyone finds a block coz you simply switch your work item to a new one and continue searching.
This switch also happens every 30 seconds and every time anyone on the planet finds a block.
Every block found is "randomly unaffected" by every other block found, other than a work switch.
So for example, if someone finds a block here, the next person who finds a block here could find it 1 second later, or 100 days later - they are "randomly independent" of each other.
There is no competition, there is no spoon Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
nhminer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 12:04:02 AM
 #617

The only competition in mining is an orphan race.
Otherwise it doesn't matter when anyone finds a block coz you simply switch your work item to a new one and continue searching.
This switch also happens every 30 seconds and every time anyone on the planet finds a block.
Every block found is "randomly unaffected" by every other block found, other than a work switch.
So for example, if someone finds a block here, the next person who finds a block here could find it 1 second later, or 100 days later - they are "randomly independent" of each other.
There is no competition, there is no spoon Smiley

Warning: Gross simplification ahead

If you need to keep your competition metaphor ... imagine you are in a 2 week long race to find one of 2016 blocks before the difficulty changes;  Everyone who solves a block in that time period wins.  So,  Kano is absolutely right in the sense that finding one of these 2016 blocks is independent of what else has been found.  The first 2016 finishers all win.

And in about 2 weeks, the race ends and a new 2016 block race starts, which might be a little harder or easier than the last.

This all happens transparent to the miner who is happily working on a new math problem provided by the server every so often

BCH - 1EshwUEg9LRbY5WMSw7bkBGQUYQeenkcet
ads2003uk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 110


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2014, 01:22:47 PM
 #618

I'm getting closer ha ha



568k not bad for my little handwarmers

5 Blocks found by renting rigs @ http://tinyurl.com/qencw96
Free BitCoins every hour http://tinyurl.com/zdwezeo
Free Bitcoin Slots @ http://tinyurl.com/freeBTCslots
cisahasa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 30, 2014, 03:36:19 PM
 #619

i guess there is one feature everyone would want:
your "best share" added to stats to see how close you have been finding a block

fresca
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 30, 2014, 05:16:07 PM
 #620


but I don't exactly see it that way because each mining node is competing against all the others.

There is no competition.  Every hash found has an equal chance of matching or exceeding current difficulty, which is around 39.5 Billion.

If there's no competition, then why am I not solving ALL of the blocks?

Because you don't have 286541.40 Ths of hashing power.

Call it what you want, but that is competition.  That's the exact reason there are pools and hardware races for new technology.  If your not solving a block, someone else is.


If you want to think of mining as a competition then fine have it your way.  But your descriptions that I've seen so far are not correct.  Also you are not being harmed or losing anything by the initial 1024 difficulty before it adjusts down.

I wish you luck in your competition.
Take Care,
Sam
The only competition in mining is an orphan race.
Otherwise it doesn't matter when anyone finds a block coz you simply switch your work item to a new one and continue searching.
This switch also happens every 30 seconds and every time anyone on the planet finds a block.
Every block found is "randomly unaffected" by every other block found, other than a work switch.
So for example, if someone finds a block here, the next person who finds a block here could find it 1 second later, or 100 days later - they are "randomly independent" of each other.
There is no competition, there is no spoon Smiley

kind of like gin
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 482 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!