car1999
|
|
July 25, 2017, 02:24:49 AM |
|
cat /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus)"
gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
dpkg -l | grep gcc ii gcc-5 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler ii gcc-5-base:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package) ii gcc-5-multilib 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler (multilib support)
you have to find this compat gcc version... its on a ppa
my gcc version is as same as yours, maybe it is an openssl version issue, my openssl is 1.1, I will downgrade it to 1.0 and rebuild. https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/327https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/wiki
|
|
|
|
car1999
|
|
July 25, 2017, 07:29:40 AM |
|
cat /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus)"
gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
dpkg -l | grep gcc ii gcc-5 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler ii gcc-5-base:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package) ii gcc-5-multilib 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler (multilib support)
you have to find this compat gcc version... its on a ppa
my gcc version is as same as yours, maybe it is an openssl version issue, my openssl is 1.1, I will downgrade it to 1.0 and rebuild. https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/327https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/wikiAfter downgrading my openssl from 1.1 to 1.0, it builds.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 25, 2017, 07:36:17 AM |
|
cat /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus)"
gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
dpkg -l | grep gcc ii gcc-5 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler ii gcc-5-base:amd64 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package) ii gcc-5-multilib 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4 amd64 GNU C compiler (multilib support)
you have to find this compat gcc version... its on a ppa
my gcc version is as same as yours, maybe it is an openssl version issue, my openssl is 1.1, I will downgrade it to 1.0 and rebuild. https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/327https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/wikiAfter downgrading my openssl from 1.1 to 1.0, it builds. for openssl 1.1 ... all code that uses openssl is required to update to the openssl 1.1 level ... we found that also with fedora 26 x64 ... even though there are workarounds in various os - 1.0.2 is the 'base version most codes use ... though i would think that when most of the operating systems update to openssl 1.1 - most of the code will have to follow suit also ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
Mattthev
|
|
July 25, 2017, 09:15:46 AM |
|
The CCminer 2.1 is about 2% slower for LBC mining than 2.0
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 25, 2017, 10:07:55 AM |
|
nothing changed for lbry
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 25, 2017, 11:30:32 PM |
|
Dropped this in your PM, but posting here for more visibility. Getting stratum receive line errors from your pool on miners I restarted. Is that DDoS protection giving me a false positive?
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 26, 2017, 01:06:54 AM |
|
Periodically miners working fine are getting 'connection interrupted' followed by 'stratum connection refused' and wait for 30s, which sometimes is up to five minutes before they're allowed to reconnect.
Edit: Pool is shitting itself. Looks like a DDoS.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 26, 2017, 02:16:25 AM |
|
yep, i had to do a quick fix to handle some china autobus
|
|
|
|
remeron
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
July 26, 2017, 01:18:03 PM |
|
is the ccminer-2.2 skunk windows have better hashrate for gtx 1070 than the opensource linux version?
I have just complied the newest ccminer and I'm getting 18mh/s.
Tried running ccminer-2.2 windows in wine but I'm getting your system does not support CUDA
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 27, 2017, 05:25:57 PM Last edit: July 29, 2017, 11:42:18 AM by scryptr |
|
is the ccminer-2.2 skunk windows have better hashrate for gtx 1070 than the opensource linux version?
I have just complied the newest ccminer and I'm getting 18mh/s.
Tried running ccminer-2.2 windows in wine but I'm getting your system does not support CUDA
CODER PALGIN IS USING ALEXIS78' VERSION OF CCMINER-- Just like sp_, palgin decided to buid with Alexis78' version of CCminer. It is pretty fast. He released a linux binary, and you will have to message him to get it. <link removed by request of thread owner> I have not tried it myself. It is a "static-linked" build. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
July 27, 2017, 06:13:56 PM |
|
My Nvidia rig is stable so now how do I mine skunk using my AMD rigs running Linux?
|
|
|
|
remeron
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:17:53 AM Last edit: July 29, 2017, 02:03:19 PM by remeron |
|
is the ccminer-2.2 skunk windows have better hashrate for gtx 1070 than the opensource linux version?
I have just complied the newest ccminer and I'm getting 18mh/s.
Tried running ccminer-2.2 windows in wine but I'm getting your system does not support CUDA
CODER PALGIN IS USING ALEXIS78' VERSION OF CCMINER-- Just like sp_, palgin decided to buid with Alexis78' version of CCminer. It is pretty fast. He released a linux binary: --deleted-- I have not tried it myself. It is a "static-linked" build. --scryptr Will try compiling that and give it a try. Right now I'm dual booting windows 10 just to run windows version of the palgin skunk ccminer. My Nvidia rig is stable so now how do I mine skunk using my AMD rigs running Linux?
May I ask, which software you're using for your nvidia rig?
|
|
|
|
car1999
|
|
July 28, 2017, 03:45:19 AM |
|
looking forward the improvment of ccminer2.2 on SIGT hashrate.
I'd suggest miners donate Epsylon3, ccminer 2.2 is the only opensource and under development nvidia SIGT miner. I did few.
|
|
|
|
dandyret
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 28, 2017, 10:00:48 PM |
|
Is there any way of choosing wich CPU's to use with CCMiner so my computer can be used at the same time with CPU 0?
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
July 28, 2017, 10:07:41 PM |
|
Is there any way of choosing wich CPU's to use with CCMiner so my computer can be used at the same time with CPU 0?
--cpu-affinity or --cpu-priority.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
July 28, 2017, 11:33:16 PM Last edit: July 29, 2017, 06:31:00 PM by NameTaken |
|
is the ccminer-2.2 skunk windows have better hashrate for gtx 1070 than the opensource linux version?
I have just complied the newest ccminer and I'm getting 18mh/s.
Tried running ccminer-2.2 windows in wine but I'm getting your system does not support CUDA
CODER PALGIN IS USING ALEXIS78' VERSION OF CCMINER-- Just like sp_, palgin decided to buid with Alexis78' version of CCminer. It is pretty fast. He released a linux binary: I have not tried it myself. It is a "static-linked" build. --scryptr Will try compiling that and give it a try. Right now I'm dual booting windows 10 just to run windows version of the palgin skunk ccminer. My Nvidia rig is stable so now how do I mine skunk using my AMD rigs running Linux?
May I ask, which software you're using for your nvidia rig? Ccminer for Nvidia, Sgminer for AMD.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 28, 2017, 11:35:35 PM |
|
could be nice not posting potentially unsafe binaries links in my thread thanks (or quoting them)
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
July 29, 2017, 01:27:22 AM |
|
sub'ed
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 29, 2017, 11:57:31 AM |
|
could be nice not posting potentially unsafe binaries links in my thread thanks (or quoting them) APOLOGIES-- The link was removed from the original post, and steps have been taken to clean up the spill. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
kopija
|
|
July 29, 2017, 02:21:10 PM |
|
Greetings, I am finding conflicting info on which driver to use for ccminer. I am currently on latest 378 version but sp_ claims that 384.94 is recommended for his version of ccminer. Some other users claim it is not so. I am mostly running Alexis so I am wondering is it worth upgrading from 378 branch to 384? Thanks.
|
we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
|
|
|
|