|
elokk
|
 |
October 21, 2016, 05:27:59 PM |
|
#4 and counting....
wan0220
|
t.me/bitcoinasic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
-EOS-
|
|
October 21, 2016, 05:28:42 PM |
|
YES!!
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3853
|
|
October 21, 2016, 05:29:13 PM |
|
not claiming post hoc ergo propter hoc, but bad luck period almost exactly correlates in time with S9 and BM miner introduction.
We shall see if it continues or not. I am willing to give it another two-three mo and see if it/luck goes to 98-99%.
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7824
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 21, 2016, 06:03:58 PM |
|
not claiming post hoc ergo propter hoc, but bad luck period almost exactly correlates in time with S9 and BM miner introduction.
We shall see if it continues or not. I am willing to give it another two-three mo and see if it/luck goes to 98-99%.
Well to be fully fair one would need to see all pools since the s9 assuming the s9 has a clever piece of software that hurts pool x but not pools y and z. Kano has stated s-9's seem to have bad luck on this pool so far. the real question is not that . it is what about all the other pools. If indeed the s9 mining software intentionally works poorly with kano and all ckpool software is a good question to know the answer to. BTW right before the ½ ing we were monster killer hot and the s9 was out in the field in smaller % |
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3853
|
|
October 21, 2016, 06:19:11 PM |
|
not claiming post hoc ergo propter hoc, but bad luck period almost exactly correlates in time with S9 and BM miner introduction.
We shall see if it continues or not. I am willing to give it another two-three mo and see if it/luck goes to 98-99%.
Well to be fully fair one would need to see all pools since the s9 assuming the s9 has a clever piece of software that hurts pool x but not pools y and z. Kano has stated s-9's seem to have bad luck on this pool so far. the real question is not that . it is what about all the other pools. If indeed the s9 mining software intentionally works poorly with kano and all ckpool software is a good question to know the answer to. BTW right before the ½ ing we were monster killer hot and the s9 was out in the field in smaller % question re other pools is too difficult to crack, especially if you are just a miner. I was actually trying to look at real time stats after the block (by others). There is something strange (like significant RT hash rate drop) going on right then, but maybe it is just interface glitches, it is difficult to say. Could be perfectly normal. Next time i decide to check it, i will try to see if S9 are affected differently by this than S7 (probably not). |
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
October 21, 2016, 08:25:50 PM |
|
#4 and counting....
wan0220
Wow, 4 blocks today! 14 out of our last 15 blocks have all been 13+ block rewards! Also, 16 of the last 20 have been 13+  |
|
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 21, 2016, 08:56:01 PM |
|
#4 and counting....
wan0220
Wow, 4 blocks today! 14 out of our last 15 blocks have all been 13+ block rewards! Also, 16 of the last 20 have been 13+ Indeed...and my per block revenue is 60% higher now than it was in Aug when the pool rate was around 40. My math tells me I'm still breaking even comparatively, at the worst case. Haven't been able to run any thorough guesswork, though.  'Scuse while I go bleed a brake cylinder or two...or four. C'mon, blocks! C'mon, A7! |
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
|
Sierra8561
|
|
October 21, 2016, 11:55:44 PM |
|
Kano it would be interesting to know if s9's are in some way having a negative effect on your pool. If they are it would be in the best interest of the pool that they go somewhere else including mine. Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 22, 2016, 12:22:57 AM |
|
Kano it would be interesting to know if s9's are in some way having a negative effect on your pool. If they are it would be in the best interest of the pool that they go somewhere else including mine. Just curious.
Well for miner types directly connected to the pool (not via a proxy) Since they first existed: 67.76844935 BDR for 60 blocks - so not excellent, but not impossible: CDF[Erl] 0.842606Since the halving (excluding the data before the halving): 63.99816529 BDR for 57 blocks CDF[Erl] 0.825166 (thus a little better) But since the halving there are worse - the longer term figures are (usually) statistically more relevant (there seems to be a v2 bmminer that's found no blocks so far, but the BDR is only 0.07520162) They do have the worst luck and the worst CDF on the pool for miner types connected directly to the pool. But the numbers aren't in the realms of improbability - and it doesn't include any using proxies. However there is (only) one "proxy type" with a worse CDF stratehm-stratum-proxy-0.8.0 7.76724928 BDR 3 blocks: CDF[Erl] 0.983517 |
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 22, 2016, 01:34:56 AM |
|
Thanks for the input, Kano. It's clear. There's just no smoking gun...yet...but one helluva warm barrel, methinks...
|
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
October 22, 2016, 01:52:57 AM |
|
Kano it would be interesting to know if s9's are in some way having a negative effect on your pool. If they are it would be in the best interest of the pool that they go somewhere else including mine. Just curious.
Well for miner types directly connected to the pool (not via a proxy) Since they first existed: 67.76844935 BDR for 60 blocks - so not excellent, but not impossible: CDF[Erl] 0.842606Since the halving (excluding the data before the halving): 63.99816529 BDR for 57 blocks CDF[Erl] 0.825166 (thus a little better) But since the halving there are worse - the longer term figures are (usually) statistically more relevant (there seems to be a v2 bmminer that's found no blocks so far, but the BDR is only 0.07520162) They do have the worst luck and the worst CDF on the pool for miner types connected directly to the pool. But the numbers aren't in the realms of improbability - and it doesn't include any using proxies. However there is (only) one "proxy type" with a worse CDF stratehm-stratum-proxy-0.8.0 7.76724928 BDR 3 blocks: CDF[Erl] 0.983517Hi Kano, since Juvia is 100% S9s connected directly to the pool, she could probably save a few white hair and get the pool up to its usual lucky self.... just tinkering like Sierra, if Juvia mines elsewhere. I will probably take the Spock route, for the good of the pool, unfortunately with no A7 in sight. |
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 22, 2016, 02:05:40 AM |
|
Hi Kano, since Juvia is 100% S9s connected directly to the pool, she could probably save a few white hair and get the pool up to its usual lucky self.... just tinkering like Sierra, if Juvia mines elsewhere. I will probably take the Spock route, for the good of the pool, unfortunately with no A7 in sight.
Seems a good way to observe the raw data with a degree of certainty...almost no confounding variables. And yeah...no A7 in sight. It's been 2 weeks now and I don't have an RMA on the A6. Kinda wondering wassup. |
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
|
dance191
|
|
October 22, 2016, 02:52:03 AM |
|
Block, by yours truly!!!  |
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
October 22, 2016, 02:55:11 AM |
|
Block, by yours truly!!! Way to get us started on block Saturday dance191! |
|
|
|
|
|
dance191
|
|
October 22, 2016, 03:01:45 AM |
|
Block, by yours truly!!! Way to get us started on block Saturday dance191! We are all trying... The 5 block luck is now up to 122.94%, so it is on an upswing |
|
|
|
|
firetreeactual
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 22, 2016, 03:14:11 AM |
|
Well...all righty, then! I knew feeding the kids chicken last night could help...  |
To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
|
|
|
fvineyard
Member
Offline
Activity: 135
Merit: 11
|
|
October 22, 2016, 04:39:46 AM
Last edit: October 23, 2016, 03:23:55 AM by fvineyard |
|
Then I certainly (hope) more chicken is on the menu |
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4480
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 22, 2016, 07:26:05 AM |
|
Block by citronick |
|
|
|
|
dance191
|
|
October 22, 2016, 07:31:00 AM |
|
Block by citronick Go Citronick!!! Last 5 blocks up to 271.27%! |
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
October 22, 2016, 07:44:56 AM |
|
Block by citronick I think Juvia and her minions refuses to be evicted.... |
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
|
