GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[RoomBot]

We'll never forget the time Josh Garza thought a "Selfie" was made with a photocopier.

[1714174303]

1714174303

[1714174303]

1714174303

[1714174303]

1714174303

[1714174303]

1714174303

[1714174303]

1714174303

[WayForward]

What kind of Retard takes a selfie with a photo copier

Hmmm Going to have to think about that one in picture form.
























Couldnt find the cartoon coining one that ALWAYS makes me laugh. But a brief snapshopt of someone who is that retarded to take a selfie with a photo copier.

[WayForward]

Oh wow Homero is a moron

You have no idea..this could go on for days, weeks.. there as this one time he rented out a house, almost burnt it to the ground and decided to rewire it, steal a ladder and ruin the pool...

[cryptodevil]

What kind of Retard takes a selfie with a photo copier

Naaah, that's not what it was. I told you before, this was obviously his "On top" face he wanted to send to, well, his missus and/or anyone else he was sexting at the time.

*shivers*

[owlcatz]

Couldnt find the cartoon coining one that ALWAYS makes me laugh. But a brief snapshopt of someone who is that retarded to take a selfie with a photo copier.

[maildir]

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu. 

Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 

[truckinusa]

Bump for suchmoon if your access to the court docs are still valid. Their last chance to close the deal against Uncle Stu. 

Monday, January 09, 2017
63       respm Memorandum in Opposition to Motion  Mon 8:05 PM

Memorandum in Opposition re61 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Denis Marc Audet, Michael Pfeiffer, Dean Allen Shinners, Jason Vargas. (Kindall, Mark)

 
 

What does all that mean anyways?  Is it going to be thrown out?

[maildir]

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

[RoomBot]

GOTTA bump this one!  Too funny because it's all true.  Well done!



The really embarrassing thing about the dildo pics-with-stripey-socks is that they're not the least bit sexy.

Shout-out for the plastic surgery fail review too.  "He practice is incredibly unprofessional!"   

Garza has NEVER apologized for any fallout on his family.

He probably never will.

[truckinusa]

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

[maildir]

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

[suchmoon]

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html

And here are all others:

http://ia601907.us.archive.org/18/items/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576/gov.uscourts.ctd.112576.docket.html

Edit: keep in mind that at this point it only has to be good enough for the judge to not dismiss the case outright. "Reasonable expectation" and all that. Further dirt can be dug up during discovery, which is one of the reasons Fraser doesn't want this to go that far. Anyway, I'm on page 6 and so far it sounds quite "reasonable", IANAL of course.

[RoomBot]

It is the plaintiff's last chance explanation/reason why it should not be dismissed.  It better be good otherwise game over.

When is that deadline for the plaintiff's to explain?  I am reading this motion from the 7th of January and didn't quite understand what that was.

That is the explanation. We are waiting for suchmoon to retrieve it so we can all read it. It was due on the 27th December but for some reason only showed up now for public viewing.

Here is the doc #63:

https://www.docdroid.net/CZ8B9MQ/govuscourtsctd112576630.pdf.html

OUTSTANDING, thanks @suchmoon

This Plaintiff plea to "survive" the Motion to Dismiss is so full of circular arguments it practically flushes itself down the loo!!!

[maildir]

Excellent!

That is a great point. Just needs to sway the judge. Very tricky having read it, while impressive it is an argument with backup vs. the defendant's statements of fact. Tough call. Kind of like black and white versus grey. Up to the judge if he's he stickler for facts or open to even discussing them. I imagine of the guy is lazy he would let this continue, if he's got an issue of any kind with the plaintiff's he'd see it dismissed.  Seems such a fine line. Defendant can simply say not a single piece of paper formal or otherwise, business registration, other confirms he was a equal partner, while these guys are trying to show a pattern of it being so.

Don't know.  Not even sure what the next step is? Judge's decision time I think. Don't recall there being an indication of another tit  tit for tat for tit. 

Nail biter for both sides now for sure. Will scope out Homero's activities to try and get a read on how he is taking it. Probably no new pictures to put up if he is glum. 

[truckinusa]

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

[RoomBot]

While the Plaintiffs so shamelessly threw in the Judge's face the low bar for proceeding at the "Plea" level, I would still love to see the Judge throw the whole thing out on blatant witness tampering and other legal shenanigans....and / or turn them both over to the SEC & other ABCs to "SORT 'EM OUT!"

#GitErDone

(Please do not underestimate RoomBot's apparent cultural anachronisms.

Software was created in USA.

It could happen!)

[suchmoon]

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".

[RoomBot]

I think bank records from either side would show who benefitted from the ill gotten gains.  Maybe Fraser was smarter than that?  

When will the judge decide or is that up in the air?

It's probably not that simple. Even if he didn't benefit directly he could still be found to have caused damages.

Another thing to keep in mind is that this is a civil lawsuit. So not "beyond reasonable doubt" but "more probable than not".

Every allegation against Fraser directly implicates Garza, and vice versa.

There is no separating the two.

It's all or nothing, IMO.

Judge could easily throw it out -- or delay 5.000 years until after SEC makes its move.

Stay tuned.

[Phildo]

is there a way to pin down fraser without testimony from garza in court? Not just discussions with the gawsuit lawyers in court. How can Garza testify with the SEC hanging over his head? How does anyone think this is a good plan.

[RoomBot]

Good question.

Garza has ZERO credibility anyway.