Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2018, 01:55:55 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 193 »
  Print  
Author Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012)  (Read 922874 times)
TradeFortress
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 28, 2013, 11:10:07 PM
 #861

Quote from: NastyFans Policy page
for a poll choice to result in a action there must be at least a three-fourths majority for that poll choice (seats owned by a membership in suspension have no voting rights and are not counted)

ok so ... even though I voted 50% I'd be happy with any non-zero amount of re-investment... Basically, we're not gonna have a stalemate here because it's not technically a policy-changing poll?

... like gonna re-issue a poll so we can enact the policy once the most popular "percentage to reinvest" is determined or what?

This is just an opinion poll. I imagine it will lead us to determine what amount would be appropriate for a policy change poll to create a savings account for future NASTY MINING purchases. I will have to discuss with nonnakip how the savings will be handled and who will be responsible for safeguarding it.
Deleting posts to retain a leet post count?  Smiley
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
1529546155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1529546155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1529546155
Reply with quote  #2

1529546155
Report to moderator
Carnth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 634
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 28, 2013, 11:20:28 PM
 #862

Deleting posts to retain a leet post count?  Smiley


Et tu TradeFortress?


nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
March 01, 2013, 08:46:20 PM
 #863

Distribution 223791 is complete.

The fanclub says thank you for all donations big and small.

Carnth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 634
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 01, 2013, 08:54:46 PM
 #864

Who ever did this, thanks for the laugh:



Yogafan00000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 05, 2013, 02:35:09 PM
 #865

When the 750Gh/s from BFL comes online NastyFans will be mining 65BTC per day!  At $40 a piece, we are all going to be rich!  Shocked

1YogAFA... (oh, nevermind)
kuzetsa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 368
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 05, 2013, 10:00:11 PM
 #866

When the 750Gh/s from BFL comes online NastyFans will be mining 65BTC per day!  At $40 a piece, we are all going to be rich!  Shocked

@Yogafan00000 -- The ASICs we have ordered are 60GH/s each. How did you come up with your total of 750?

EQUIPMENT ORDERED:
10x BitForce Single 'SC' 60GH/s
2x BTCFPGA bASIC 72GH/s - refund pending

@Yogafan00000 -- I don't think you did the math right:

10 x 60 = 600

EDIT: I just confirmed, it looks like 60GH/s is still the currently stated "design specs"
... http://products.butterflylabs.com/featured-products/60gh-bitcoin-miner.html

Quote from: Official BFL product page for BitForce Single SC
60 GH/s Bitcoin Miner
...
Processing Power: 60 GH/s (+/- 10% running variance)
Power Consumption: Approximately 60 Watts
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
March 05, 2013, 10:42:31 PM
 #867

When the 750Gh/s from BFL comes online NastyFans will be mining 65BTC per day!

You mean NASTY MINING will be mining many BTC per day. nastyfans does not mine.

At $40 a piece, we are all going to be rich!  Shocked

If the fanclub receives many donations we may be rich. Either way I will dance in the street when OgNasty finally gets the Singles. Then things get really fun.

Yogafan00000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 314
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 06, 2013, 08:42:15 PM
 #868


@Yogafan00000 -- The ASICs we have ordered are 60GH/s each. How did you come up with your total of 750?


@Yogafan00000 -- I don't think you did the math right:


Currently, we have an estimated 29.76MH/s in ASICs ordered per seat (including mine).  That is roughly a 3,000% increase over today's MH/s per seat.  I have also started brainstorming a plan to increase our...

My math is right, you are using information that is out of date!

I did 25,000 x ~30MH/s = 750GH/s, but I'll forgive you because I'm wrong about the $40.  It's now $46! So we will all be even moar rich!  Shocked

1YogAFA... (oh, nevermind)
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 1274


nastyfans.org/mint


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2013, 09:01:47 PM
 #869

Our bASIC orders are pending a refund so that is where you guys (gals?) are getting different numbers. What happens there is anyone's guess.

Also, it may appear that I'm sitting on my thumbs with regards to NASTY MINING but there are 2 separate projects being worked on by nonnakip and myself that will take both NASTY MINING & NastyFans to the next level. In addition to those as of now top secret plans, some of you may have noticed that while the difficulty has begun skyrocketing, our donations have barely budged. This is due to me pointing a few of my personal miners at the NASTY MINING pool address (listed in the OP) along with continued donations to the club. Hopefully my generosity is appreciated while we all deal with the excruciating wait for NASTY MINING to become an ASIC powerhouse. I suspect that the next few months will bring us all lots of excitement and even more fun in ways that aren't currently being anticipated.

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
kroneko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 11



View Profile
March 06, 2013, 09:44:20 PM
 #870

...some of you may have noticed that while the difficulty has begun skyrocketing, our donations have barely budged. This is due to me pointing a few of my personal miners at the NASTY MINING pool address (listed in the OP) along with continued donations to the club.

I was wondering how that was being maintained!  Thanks OgNasty!  We appreciate your hard work and generosity!
Akka
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2013, 09:47:28 PM
 #871

...some of you may have noticed that while the difficulty has begun skyrocketing, our donations have barely budged. This is due to me pointing a few of my personal miners at the NASTY MINING pool address (listed in the OP) along with continued donations to the club.

I was wondering how that was being maintained!  Thanks OgNasty!  We appreciate your hard work and generosity!

Wow! Thank you.

I was wondering how the donations could stay so stable, too.

That's much appreciated.

All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
l3sny
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 842
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 06, 2013, 09:55:17 PM
 #872

Thx Nasty, you're star! I am so happy to be one of the Nastyfans Cool


     ███
      █████████████████████
       ███████████████████████
          ██████████████████████
                         ████████
         ████████████      ███████
          ███████████        █████
            █████████        ██████
                █████         █████
                █████         █████
                █████        ██████
                █████        █████
                █████      ███████
                █████    ████████
                ███████████████
                █████████████
                ██████████
IDivi ProjectI
  ◤
  ▶
  ◣
❖❖❖ CRYPTO MADE EASY ❖❖❖
IDesigned for mass adoption by billion of people.I
  ◥
  ◀
  ◢
ICO
◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆
Oct. 27th - Nov. 23rd
  ◤
  ▶
  ◣
♦ Whitepaper
♦ Telegram
♦ Website



plasticAiredale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 07, 2013, 05:32:53 PM
 #873

You're the bee's knees there Oggy!

Very interested in hearing more about the top secret plans. Does it involve a monkey?
kuzetsa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 368
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 08, 2013, 08:19:17 AM
 #874

UPDATE:
A Motion has been raised to update the terms of our contract to reflect the higher output of our newly ordered ASIC mining equipment.  Please vote.

https://glbse.com/vote/view/78

This Motion passed with over 97% of the //outstanding shares// voting 'Yea' to update the contract to reflect the new ASIC upgrade.

I've requested this update with GLBSE support and we should see it reflected in the contract soon.



That was from like 8-10 months ago (it's like 3 in the morning here, so "8-10 months" is close enough mathing for this hour of the night) ... but like, I just realized something... previously, the majority were "treasury shares" back on GLBSE with no voting power or dividends (distributions of donation in the new nastyfans fanclub thingy) ... who is controlling the votes on these "seats" now that everything is on nastyfans.org? It's very different than the way things were handled previously -- On GLBSE, things were more "normal-like" where a distinction was made between:

  • outstanding shares (regular members / users / shareholders)
  • treasury shares (no voting rights or distributions / dividends)

So what's going on?

[member opinion] cancel bASIC orders with BTCFPGA
     no: 2650 (10.8%)
     yes: 21867 (89.2%)
     abstain: 145
     RESULT: CANCEL bASIC ORDERS WITH BTCFPGA

Note there were only 145 "abstain" votes... and again with this vote:

[unowned seats] lottery for unclaimed seats
     no: 2655 (10.8%)
     yes: 21963 (89.2%)
     abstain: 44
     RESULT: HOST A LOTTERY FOR UNOWNED SEATS

that one only had 44 abstains.
kroneko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 11



View Profile
March 08, 2013, 11:39:54 AM
 #875

Know BFL's thinking they may get some of the first orders out by the end of next week - any word yet to send in the FPGA units?  Also, thought I saw another post somewhere that said you may have the option of doing a deposit and ship the FPGA's back once you get the ASICs.  Just was curious and figured you'll [OgNasty] be the first to know of anyone  Grin
flipperfish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


Dolphie Selfie


View Profile
March 08, 2013, 01:03:24 PM
 #876

UPDATE:
A Motion has been raised to update the terms of our contract to reflect the higher output of our newly ordered ASIC mining equipment.  Please vote.

https://glbse.com/vote/view/78

This Motion passed with over 97% of the //outstanding shares// voting 'Yea' to update the contract to reflect the new ASIC upgrade.

I've requested this update with GLBSE support and we should see it reflected in the contract soon.



That was from like 8-10 months ago (it's like 3 in the morning here, so "8-10 months" is close enough mathing for this hour of the night) ... but like, I just realized something... previously, the majority were "treasury shares" back on GLBSE with no voting power or dividends (distributions of donation in the new nastyfans fanclub thingy) ... who is controlling the votes on these "seats" now that everything is on nastyfans.org? It's very different than the way things were handled previously -- On GLBSE, things were more "normal-like" where a distinction was made between:

  • outstanding shares (regular members / users / shareholders)
  • treasury shares (no voting rights or distributions / dividends)

So what's going on?

As far as I know, OgNasty owns the treasury "seats" (25000-~7000 outstanding=18000) now. He said he will activate donations for them as soon as ASICs arrive.
When I bought my shares at GLBSE I was in the belief, that these shares are "stock", which are sold at a later point in time, to raise money for expansion. As it turned out, I misinterpreted that somehow.
kibblesnbits
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 555
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 08, 2013, 01:46:41 PM
 #877

Know BFL's thinking they may get some of the first orders out by the end of next week - any word yet to send in the FPGA units?  Also, thought I saw another post somewhere that said you may have the option of doing a deposit and ship the FPGA's back once you get the ASICs.  Just was curious and figured you'll [OgNasty] be the first to know of anyone  Grin

I'm in the very low 1800s order number and no email yet.  Og is before me but not by a separate shipping date (I hope)

ASICMINERTUBE
   
  The Best $/Gh Bitcoin Miner So Far
   ►►►   DISCOVER NOW !!!   ◄◄◄
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 1274


nastyfans.org/mint


View Profile WWW
March 08, 2013, 09:27:01 PM
 #878

... who is controlling the votes on these "seats" now that everything is on nastyfans.org?

I am.


any word yet to send in the FPGA units? 

Nope.

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
kuzetsa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 368
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 09, 2013, 01:59:21 AM
 #879

blockchain.info is unavailable right now so I'm posting this week's thingy
(The transaction has 93 outputs, numbered 0 through 92 so I'm assuming it means 93 fans are accepting donations this week.
...I don't have access to the actual nastyfans database, just able to view the transactions with my own bitcoin client like anyone else
)

Code:
decoderawtransaction ...
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 3/8/2013 20:21 (Local NY time)

"txid" : "29cf301ed39a3797520e2ebe62473358f7d026378d97544bc206679f5b846844",

(...lightly parsed...)

"value" : 0.03009821,
"n" : 0,
"addresses" : ["146YGY4NkzfQpuZAGi7Jokpn79MJk2VxK9"]

"value" : 0.00970910,
"n" : 1,
"addresses" : ["1HXxASKNBBt5s1dtEmBk85aFQB2iyn8Wik"]

"value" : 0.00194182,
"n" : 2,
"addresses" : ["17zbDCKtNozzCyQ3aG1TN2QVgobVTXHLxv"]

"value" : 0.13107285,
"n" : 3,
"addresses" : ["16Uo6MjFXhdu7JeeZEwyjQF7cyaZYapgV8"]

"value" : 0.10194555,
"n" : 4,
"addresses" : ["13tJL8tCnBoXQhjxd5qXjhtA256xNB4bYw"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 5,
"addresses" : ["15sQNELfzVGv6iLnZVhnVXZZP7myvkPjSp"]

"value" : 0.01650547,
"n" : 6,
"addresses" : ["1A1pFSZMZaoex4sec86EgGqydNjpZ6EcdA"]

"value" : 0.01941820,
"n" : 7,
"addresses" : ["1QBcGaBMpNRPcwvw7xccYENVceFtUvUzcK"]

"value" : 0.01456365,
"n" : 8,
"addresses" : ["18VyeE5MLQYqrnkuU49SGZcgiVfDbuPUhj"]

"value" : 0.14952014,
"n" : 9,
"addresses" : ["1Ju55fRAosH79uS1esNhvhE7Q8bnku1HTL"]

"value" : 0.01165092,
"n" : 10,
"addresses" : ["1DqnWoASirE3jA5RaPeK1Yg6NiRi9tX3Ys"]

"value" : 0.01165092,
"n" : 11,
"addresses" : ["1Acx3Z4L7hnaChmC9GULTQrvTB5RiRqjy8"]

"value" : 0.06019642,
"n" : 12,
"addresses" : ["1JRycWdtVaLUv8yhD25dbZ3N4Pv3NgFcjX"]

"value" : 0.00582546,
"n" : 13,
"addresses" : ["136S9AEN3ZhPgRYvd6V45mBX8e9SHHvb8Z"]

"value" : 0.07864371,
"n" : 14,
"addresses" : ["1GAFgLxYtyBujzhEYJHwkX3DaMCP93eDVu"]

"value" : 0.00194182,
"n" : 15,
"addresses" : ["1GqPXsFpzgSNmaDZm2DGrSMDj6jniEcoBp"]

"value" : 0.00485455,
"n" : 16,
"addresses" : ["14U2krSi8vgRmj7PQdrwhUvP7Ny2Eu1WDX"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 17,
"addresses" : ["1LT8a8QZdu3T72ckGvozyMc9McGzSxwswu"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 18,
"addresses" : ["16CLdHcoSN3aipVXL8HGpM7bayxpv3gNDQ"]

"value" : 0.02524366,
"n" : 19,
"addresses" : ["12YRv8UEago9Aug9JS9VYmss5KRrh49qXb"]

"value" : 0.02427275,
"n" : 20,
"addresses" : ["17QM9LAKHjHCjT4bopw2nqf1QWcTubsmDz"]

"value" : 0.00388364,
"n" : 21,
"addresses" : ["1GSU378ft2GY7YjWmynsAhvNe3rgQyc4D6"]

"value" : 0.00970910,
"n" : 22,
"addresses" : ["1KGXFBfN6iLkdVfw8TPQ7PjvpM5KLdcLD1"]

"value" : 0.11650920,
"n" : 23,
"addresses" : ["1DsPbq3dxezodQkojKwx8UbtrcZytzHqok"]

"value" : 0.00291273,
"n" : 24,
"addresses" : ["14ga5u17C6BDHuYsMgf46cosHtheWhdDwD"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 25,
"addresses" : ["1LJSyr1Z8mgbZ8kMHf5LLwJGhFwcSWjvVy"]

"value" : 0.01941820,
"n" : 26,
"addresses" : ["17iqXQcGfjjHSsJK993mu75sPBnLFSEp8F"]

"value" : 0.00776728,
"n" : 27,
"addresses" : ["16G9exTaqVfTMEPg1Y9Ymi8mXuwc2q7QiM"]

"value" : 0.03883640,
"n" : 28,
"addresses" : ["16iB3nKHoi5tWwe16hnFyUw9r4DddHr36u"]

"value" : 0.08738190,
"n" : 29,
"addresses" : ["1C8q9ZbuyULGsjsUKpRPfXPTSaYeB7VSkG"]

"value" : 0.09806191,
"n" : 30,
"addresses" : ["14gx3CCGA2jDosYN6Z67hgiizDHQxsPLoS"]

"value" : 0.05922551,
"n" : 31,
"addresses" : ["1PoHREauh2BszTpiVKShvxqF6yepQK9sWh"]

"value" : 0.01504962,
"n" : 32,
"addresses" : ["1BGK9ThhJq1Gt5L7YqaBaJ6HMbQkDDh4Zz"]

"value" : 0.00485455,
"n" : 33,
"addresses" : ["1PnAbtTnQJTiZ1N1RVHLq2vop77PWwsCoC"]

"value" : 0.03689458,
"n" : 34,
"addresses" : ["1KmRkry1sxs5uurkZSKt8vP2JfjwZu7MrF"]

"value" : 0.38836400,
"n" : 35,
"addresses" : ["19nHa3Muf3xbRK4Q9fZoVcaKuTsHVUAGr3"]

"value" : 0.10000373,
"n" : 36,
"addresses" : ["15RfHTzVkLC354QSisxjMc7f6KENtyRcLp"]

"value" : 0.00194182,
"n" : 37,
"addresses" : ["19TkMEt7nd9h7GMxysD1HPDQzYSpEi9CwS"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 38,
"addresses" : ["1G6poS4J3hKHZpHc27rtsJPTCLc3M5H47f"]

"value" : 0.01553456,
"n" : 39,
"addresses" : ["1J4X7VFxUsDPDKLefyfJJFXyvCzdLrRPXy"]

"value" : 0.56021507,
"n" : 40,
"addresses" : ["12mwAvJywtQF5rJXHzdBQd4yq8EVD7NZqX"]

"value" : 0.05825460,
"n" : 41,
"addresses" : ["1P6wXCa5yWTu2oUw9TyMHJyY35u5HVxS84"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 42,
"addresses" : ["1HV6R2qGtm7xKnogd3FLicinQ6dUEwWyDo"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 43,
"addresses" : ["1rabbitDmWWDExJsZ4oQedjxGUqZRnsYy"]

"value" : 0.01359274,
"n" : 44,
"addresses" : ["1ByohJYGMW19aA3sbfgFrTWkynhJ1pkTa8"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 45,
"addresses" : ["188NZ4wigrM4d7J19A3etAczc7NSfb36uJ"]

"value" : 0.02427275,
"n" : 46,
"addresses" : ["1L2V1pJSiLDGaUGxqwgdenmrBc2N62SSLr"]

"value" : 0.05825460,
"n" : 47,
"addresses" : ["1ACTe5wfGKjvHYWMRk7m2EAmczLQaX5ted"]

"value" : 0.02038911,
"n" : 48,
"addresses" : ["1FjAVJatNfP1SxBHz15kWV9b2PKz11rLpT"]

"value" : 0.07281825,
"n" : 49,
"addresses" : ["1Q5iWXpmfWoVXagk6a6zpGtY8cNYJy94sF"]

"value" : 0.00388364,
"n" : 50,
"addresses" : ["14e9aJJjcsyqNsK82QoPhLTNWYyBhAfCtS"]

"value" : 0.05437096,
"n" : 51,
"addresses" : ["1NeRjTidKKvjhPmtbWJFkbNdh6WXVgoLF"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 52,
"addresses" : ["1AkofkCF6cwJUp9uRWywq6vWUD4jyb8oW"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 53,
"addresses" : ["12GWxAYCJcX2N2VfxhWaoUBLtAqFusnGAi"]

"value" : 0.46603680,
"n" : 54,
"addresses" : ["18qVuDSTdCzr9EDY4rbD6Sb78sFeYKnRpe"]

"value" : 0.01359274,
"n" : 55,
"addresses" : ["1JPWgw4DrUEpzYMQvTTneXkWgrMS2pKjbZ"]

"value" : 0.00873819,
"n" : 56,
"addresses" : ["15DTrHkSmuNNxPD6eq75g5J77wt14Sbpje"]

"value" : 0.13010194,
"n" : 57,
"addresses" : ["1Q2YoMpJgEuuRjRJsqLUG5oxNPV9QV7H4t"]

"value" : 0.19709473,
"n" : 58,
"addresses" : ["19rBGCdQ41F5u4PyxtWLGQKQZ6DyEgT1CD"]

"value" : 0.21942566,
"n" : 59,
"addresses" : ["1P5SzMc9dNzpVbDx7q8ffubWS1DfbuunRR"]

"value" : 0.07087643,
"n" : 60,
"addresses" : ["1KVwdgXnQeYPiqccSBFnP1w4NimDtFMUAn"]

"value" : 0.00194182,
"n" : 61,
"addresses" : ["1JWSDsYxeFEfcoUY6CAizzWs4SyoDkncpG"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 62,
"addresses" : ["1Kpg7LNpXF5Dav4qUrZaq8kfjf6C6dVaXq"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 63,
"addresses" : ["1ERbdXozeEkwa8fS8kFqEseBG2yFCFyP2s"]

"value" : 0.00582546,
"n" : 64,
"addresses" : ["1PRx8wS76aYqssAirRJC55LEG6s2nWP2i7"]

"value" : 0.79614620,
"n" : 65,
"addresses" : ["1EcWnU55PLuxnzNQD65Kj41cMVNAFqzwM5"]

"value" : 0.00485455,
"n" : 66,
"addresses" : ["1ErnyjydPmHVNfdCoh93rd1zfv31nYYJy2"]

"value" : 0.00873819,
"n" : 67,
"addresses" : ["1GMys8gSUi5L3JrqZNPRB4s87JCwiQURvX"]

"value" : 0.09709100,
"n" : 68,
"addresses" : ["16EuoSwPgjwrLYqMRAyjmTXqrDrdX88wtK"]

"value" : 0.26408752,
"n" : 69,
"addresses" : ["12YursV58dRT2c9iuZg3jEWfwgTDamBcnd"]

"value" : 0.25632024,
"n" : 70,
"addresses" : ["1ESYU8M62R19cHynPUNcezXFagoyhH1euP"]

"value" : 0.06116733,
"n" : 71,
"addresses" : ["18TwbWyPCcRyNENrGQoECgSBTSV9K3W7jH"]

"value" : 0.12718921,
"n" : 72,
"addresses" : ["1Bw5rNfb3nXv2xFX5yrc5WK4eU95V2wvzB"]

"value" : 0.24855296,
"n" : 73,
"addresses" : ["15tcWQKEjNGmY73GKQtvYDzMVywKfbvanY"]

"value" : 0.04272004,
"n" : 74,
"addresses" : ["1F1vUMwwCaPrckhy1rh5Fjq47zvPAr2Mkh"]

"value" : 0.01068001,
"n" : 75,
"addresses" : ["12iHFZXNv8JkgB5WsPMcrd41ADAMHiPiUW"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 76,
"addresses" : ["15GB6tuP1AfKUHyjetz5UagrbkJXLEZLnG"]

"value" : 0.00485455,
"n" : 77,
"addresses" : ["15DRuQuwwdx68m2GYcRZRULfJTbPdUDJ2w"]

"value" : 0.04174913,
"n" : 78,
"addresses" : ["15kN4RRGAWapscJjSg1VEKbrWtNf192pwk"]

"value" : 0.01262183,
"n" : 79,
"addresses" : ["157GE8tt7NsE8AMSvrSXZhBMxjVSaBNzMN"]

"value" : 0.00970910,
"n" : 80,
"addresses" : ["1JTmKbGMBsHMVbLJpxwLLEsdWqjbM5JJZs"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 81,
"addresses" : ["14aSPgYHesuGn6yKjcsUBPRRwXmatzLJ4i"]

"value" : 0.01456365,
"n" : 82,
"addresses" : ["1BH3JVtBsdZHC6Lce2hbvVkixcJFDsqi3A"]

"value" : 0.00097091,
"n" : 83,
"addresses" : ["1FcznMjGBFxD9YvcFfMCVbhkkKYSACCNcP"]

"value" : 0.03009821,
"n" : 84,
"addresses" : ["1FLawi75W4Z4w5e6quPe5znMgcHJYCFm3Y"]

"value" : 0.06116733,
"n" : 85,
"addresses" : ["1BcGzrN3eLbmTeHCF9wr7Y18owkNv5SaZX"]

"value" : 0.07281825,
"n" : 86,
"addresses" : ["1AwHzDhnCDYjhvBj1yeRTNTyTms2YzZaTq"]

"value" : 0.03495276,
"n" : 87,
"addresses" : ["1DVmqiahSWYjx1cHfWwEYsQbRAJXSgqMzL"]

"value" : 0.00194182,
"n" : 88,
"addresses" : ["1PN4ePKnoE7xfXCiQ2vYiCaBdgxmQV9kJH"]

"value" : 0.48545500,
"n" : 89,
"addresses" : ["12NhsV2L8KZm6NrT4ek3TMaazjR8Ch4i69"]

"value" : 0.11165465,
"n" : 90,
"addresses" : ["1CSw9Ji47ZjrEJD9VdsoKg4m35J7bKxYoW"]

"value" : 0.01941820,
"n" : 91,
"addresses" : ["1CVyBpciWam5ZxB5vmE5CVzDzYncKudsXu"]

"value" : 0.11650920,
"n" : 92,
"addresses" : ["1Ag5iuizsvgKn8juFWWHzkas14Mh7d9RqE"]
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 593
Merit: 542



View Profile
March 09, 2013, 08:35:57 AM
 #880

blockchain.info is unavailable right now so I'm posting this week's thingy

Thanks kuzetsa. The SSL configuration for blockchain.info is broken still so links on nastyfans.org do not work. But I guess they fix that soon.

Distribution 224929 needed many hours to be accepted. The transaction propagation time is also very long. It seems many nodes are not propagating some transactions. I also saw this problem with a nastyfans member purchase order. It was a very simple transaction with even large tx fee but needed 3 hours to propagate to my bitcoind. The result was a expired purchase order.

Are there nodes trying to disrupt Bitcoin network? Or are big miners/pools using new special rules to choose allowed transactions?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 193 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!