up ya merits/rank to post pics.

EDIT: Or get quoted every time 

Oh, that irony  
At least some more sats on my wallet.
But yeah...  Still

I don't even dare mentioning that down-before-** mantra, if may turn against me  


Yeah, they banned mining today :/
I forgot about that and should have waited for the real dip. maaaan 

Yeah, me too,  but these $45.5k-ish levels turned out to be a sweet buying zone.

EDIT: Hit $45.600 and $45.580, after clearing a $45.500 order.  Price can now moon again, thanks  

EDIT2: Reason of this order was a tweet where the author said that $45.500 buywalls would be set up by whales just to be cleared when everybody thinks this is solid support. The author has a history of wrong calls, so i took the chance to set some money right there.

Good day.
Just snapped some Sats at $45.600. Got some more decremental orders below, but maybe they'll never get filled.
 

Scratch that, i confused it with "Kingsman" (Part 1, that is).
Waiting for a quality rip of The King's Man now... 

I remember that i watched it. I kept it on harddrive, so it was good enough to keep an re-watch it.

Anybody seen the new OSS 117 ("From Africa With Love")?

I enjoyed it until Anderson and Morpheus were showing up. From then on it was just a tribute to the original trilogy, but yeah, still ok-ish.
Just watch.
No Time To Die was better imho, but if you're after a funny, femme-violente movie, check out "Gunpowder Milkshake". Good soundtrack, too.

Perfect find!
Marmolada was my closest guess, however.
So is the formation in the background the Langkofel/Plattkofel group?

It is what it is.
Try to make the best out of it. You got one chance 

Actually i've been waiting for the male-british-gay version of Jeanne d'Arc for too long.
But i fear Hollywood will annoy us with Joan Rambo first 
Sigh...

Watched it yesterday, i give it a 8/10 on the OOM movie score 

As for the BTC price action: Just sit tight and assess 

Yorite.
They only add.
Brrrrrrrr 

True, i didn't read the comments.
The article really has that "eat or die" appeal to it, lacking explanations and reasoning.

An opinion, while a strange one, i'd summarize the article.
What stands out is this:


Who should resemble the "operators" of the "ponzi scheme", Bitcoin is accused as in the scope of the article?
Early adopters?
Miners?

As the author wrote all the four observations, of which the above is one, ring true for Bitcoin, without further explanation.


I rather think that China's exit from the crypto market delayed the cycle(s). Not only by taking huge volume out, which has mostly been picked up bravely by other participants, but also by shifting hashpower to different locations, worldwide.
Covid brought us some very time/event correlated dips, but as the uncertainty vanished, the price went up again, to compensating orders.
It's now a question of other nations to follow suit to China, but the impact(s) should be comparably low, imho.

---

OOM's back from christmas "holidays" (which were more like hard work), undersexed again, but wife was starting to try some suggested methods to combat her PMDS (or "light" PMDD) recently. It can only get better, imho.
Hope y'all had an awesome christmas time 

no, no, i say no!
not three buddies in a row!
buddy breaker, yo.

#buddyhaiku

What's that?
A nice lil pump to break $51k for now and forever?  

EDIT: Came true and gained some more momentum seconds after i was posting this  

EDIT2: Time to eat some fucking sellwalls   That's my boy, right there! I love Bitcoin!

EDIT3: Yeah, that didn't age well, did it?

Been already busy doing Christmas stuff the last days. gonna keep it short and go on.
Looking forward to backread a lot of pages of WO  
Wish you all fellas happy christmas, while bitcoin pumps and here is a gay christmas card:

Good day  

Watching Bitfinex BTCUSD chart, i just realized we're back to the trading volume of 2017-ish levels.
So it's starting all over again? Transaction volume growth wise?

Of course, the more hodlers, the less overall volume. More hodling would not be a bad thing for Bitcoin, right?
Active trading, as it seems, was happening mostly in and around China?

Not that i wouldn't embrace it, but what does this volume decrease tell us about the current market situation?

 

I was aware that i have to describe it in a way which should not present any clues about the absolute size.
And it seems to work  

On the "fish" scale i'm pretty low. But it's "better than getting a brick to the head", as some would say in my culture, means it could always be worse
  

So the stash is more like a stashy  

That's the way.
Everybody else could also be anti-vaxxer as well as pro-choice.
The pro-choice part is the consent to define and maintain a society's integrity, while dividing people would be hard to accomplish in such a setting.
This is a viral pandemic, it is a small detail of Life, the way nature (another one of zillions of expressions of Life) handles this is more or less set.
It's us humans who generally identify approach challenges like this as "problems" and the illusion that we can actually fully control it.
The bad news is, we can't. We can try. But it may well be a difficult test for us to accept this and go on, working with what we have, trying to keep what we have achieved before. At the time, a phase of despair seems to establish itself, imho.