Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:56:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 291 »
1361  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Lost wallet with virtual machine, have BTC address, can I recover coin? on: November 13, 2013, 10:18:46 PM
This thread has been brought to my attention

Two remarks:
 - I HIGHLY recommend wxHexEditor, I love it
 - Pywallet recovers private keys from bitcoin-qt deleted wallets, using key headers. So if armory private keys do have headers (etotheipi?), it can easily recover them. I don't know about encryption and such, but once you have all the data you're kinda saved anyway
1362  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: New Pywallet 0.0.1a2 on: November 13, 2013, 10:11:03 PM
The project is kind of paused as I've been really busy lately

1. on the pywallet thread, someone proposed WalletWizard. What do you think?

2.
I wonder what wallet formats are searched on "recovery"?
In fact, there's a sad Armory user trying to scan his HDD for a lost wallet.

Alan just wrote what one would scan for:

[..]
For CircusPeanut or anyone else that would like to take a stab at raw binary searches for wallets, you can probably search for \xBAWALLET\x00 which will appear as the first eight bytes of any wallet file.  After that, you can look four bytes later for the network magic bytes \xF9\xBE\xB4\xD9.  Once you have that, you can use the binary map I linked above to figure out how much data to copy.

Ente
It looks for the few bytes that are just before the keys on the disk, then retrieve the keys themselves
Thanks for taking this to my attention, I hope I can help

3.
I will send an alpha version to the people who asked me, soon. I now have the file with me, so it should be a matter of days (fixing severe bugs)
A public alpha release will come soon anyway
1363  Other / Off-topic / Re: Celebration when price hits 420 on: November 13, 2013, 09:54:14 PM
This will take a while..
1364  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: [BOUNTY: 2.0 BTC] [CLAIMED] Message Signing in Armory on: November 13, 2013, 08:36:33 PM
The new version is online, I tested only with a message of 400 characters but it should be ok

You're not duplicating anything (sadly)
I think the readme is clear enough but tell me if you have trouble parsing things
1365  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: [BOUNTY: 2.0 BTC] [CLAIMED] Message Signing in Armory on: November 13, 2013, 07:53:22 PM
I thought I fixed that before releasing the code!
Sorry for that, I'll push an update in the following minutes
1366  Other / Meta / Re: Rules on: November 13, 2013, 07:45:52 PM
1. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
Lol

2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
Lol

3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
Lol

Lol

Rules are so 2011
1367  Other / Meta / Re: Req to introduce "New Posts " on: November 13, 2013, 07:23:06 PM
Do you mean the "Show unread posts since last visit." link at the very top of each page?
1368  Other / Meta / Re: Ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny on: November 13, 2013, 08:11:30 AM
1369  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed transaction (1BTC bounty paid for resolution!) on: November 12, 2013, 05:22:57 PM
Bsddb is broken in OSX, you can find how to fix that in the pywallet thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=34028.0
1370  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.39 on: November 12, 2013, 03:24:18 PM
Looks like I've been misunderstood Grin
I don't want BT++ to tag anybody as trustworthy, I want to flag the people in your trustlist (the theymos' one)

But yeah, why not a in front of the username
1371  Other / Meta / Re: Tired of censorship here on bitcointalk.org on: November 12, 2013, 08:20:07 AM

i am not going to let this ruin my veterans Day.Being a solider who seen actual combat and fought for freedom . This is small . Goodbye enjoy your small amount of authority
nice red herring.  Roll Eyes


for reference, this was his posting that was "censored":
The Private Bitcoin Elite community has went DARK
for 24 hour test run of the Invite System

send me a PM if you want to be invited to join the community

Private Bitcoin Community

http://www.bitcoinsniper.com/forum


you have to me logged in to see the discussions
27 more days before the official Lockout after that time you will have to get an invite to join

Advanced platform:
-Group Personal messages
-Video Chat
-File sharing
-private and secure
- much more

"Elite", "private", "sniper", "secure"

LEGIT AS FUCK!
1372  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: We got trust issues... on: November 12, 2013, 08:15:21 AM
As far as ease of use is concerned, I think companies like Coinbase and inputs.io are doing an excellent job of making it simple and easy for people to create accounts and deposit money. This is the type of trust I'm talking about - easy to register, user friendly website, helpful in explaining bitcoin, etc. They are the future of Bitcoin.
Easy, convenient, trustworthy, user friendly, social. Glad you like them ...   Sad


Haha, no. Inputs.io just got hacked and is now in debt of 4,100 bitcoins!
I'm SO glad I'm paranoid with money and not even considered this garbage in my wildest dreams! Seriously, after mining and trading alts, it starts to get on my nerves to see accumulating more than 0.05 - 0.1 BTC at the exchange. Why the hell would I deposit in an online wallet for no purpose at all???
Because humans never learn
Or some of them like to be scammed, I don't know
1373  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: Question à propos de la création d'un block - Architecture on: November 11, 2013, 11:04:52 PM
Q1 et 2: parce que le premier texte raconte n'importe quoi
Q1: pour faire un bloc, tu prends le dernier dans la blockchain, et tu utilises son hash. Tu rajoutes un nonce aléatoire et 2-3 autres trucs, et tu calcules le hash correspondant à tout ça.
Si le hash est plus petit que la cible, le bloc est valide, sinon il est invalide.
Si ton bloc est invalide tu auras beau l'envoyer à qui tu veux, tout le monde le refusera, donc il n'ira pas dans la blockchain. Donc pas de vérification supplémentaire à la création d'un bloc.

Q2: Débilité de l'article. Si les transactions du bloc précédent ne sont pas valides, comme dit au-dessus, le bloc est invalide, donc il n'a jamais été dans la blockchain. Donc, bah, il ne peut pas être un "bloc précédent" à qui que ce soit

Chaque nouvelle confirmation diminue le risque de renversement puisque le nombre de blocs à refaire augmente

Par exemple si je veux renverser ta transaction qui est dans le bloc 100, et qu'on est actuellement au bloc 103, je dois recréer une sous-chaîne à partir du bloc 99 plus longue que l'actuelle: je dois créer de nouveaux blocs 100 à 104, c'est-à-dire 5 blocs à refaire
A l'instant où un 104è bloc arrive dans la chaîne "normale", pour renverser ta transaction je dois créer une sous-chaîne 100 à 105, donc 6 blocs
1374  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: Transferts de petites sommes entre portes monnaie on: November 11, 2013, 10:50:45 PM
Pour effectuer une transaction de petits montants sans frais il parait qu'il faut utiliser le client NFTF (No Forced TX Fee = pas de frais imposés) : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=22434.0
Il n'empêche que la transaction ne sera pas acceptée par les mineurs
1375  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.37 on: November 11, 2013, 09:43:13 PM
And it's not the server: ~6ms to build the page

By the way I don't think we need some yet but if you think about tabs to add, just tell me

Also I'm looking for a small icon (32x32 max) meaning "trust". Google Image is not helping much. Ideas?
1376  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed transaction (1BTC bounty paid for resolution!) on: November 11, 2013, 09:33:53 PM
Before messing with pywallet, (see this thread to see how to do it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35214.0), I would suggest to extract private keys using the dumpprivkey as described by Moebius327 and Buffer Overflow on pg 1.

Some people have reported issues with pywallet
Back in 2012, pywallet only supported uncompressed keys. It was likely the problem in this thread.

You're right though.
ALWAYS back up your wallet when messing with a tool that edit it.


Now that you did it you can start trying to delete the transactions in your wallet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=329954.msg3541978#msg3541978
1377  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.37 on: November 11, 2013, 09:20:56 PM
Lower the refresh rate? That might help, dunno.
Nope...
The page receives the server answer ~13seconds after sending the request
Whereas for the BT++ chat it is nearly instant
1378  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.37 on: November 11, 2013, 09:06:00 PM
I have an issue in Maxthon web browser with violentmonkey

When I try to enter on "BT++ Settings" I get a 404 error page trying to enter on https://bitcointalk.org/btppconf.php?user=MyUserName

Is there any alternative method to enter my password?
It's normal it's a 404 because the page doesn't exist
In IE/firefox/chrome the 404 page is modified by BT++ though

I can change the page if it doesn't work for you


WhiskChat's back up now, add it as an option, please Smiley
The hack was due to using free hosting providers, and social engineering. I now hash passwords with 5000 rounds of SHA512 and do not expose the DB to the internet.
Safe now Smiley
I'll see what I can do when I have some time (yes, it's again a "i don't have much time" period)

The outside chat lags a bit, because of the fast refresh rate when you are not logged in.
Yeah I saw it was lagging but didn't get why...
It lags the same when logged in
1379  Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.37 on: November 11, 2013, 08:14:46 PM
Far from perfect but it should work http://btpp.jampa.eu/chat.php
1380  Other / Meta / Re: Tired of censorship here on bitcointalk.org on: November 11, 2013, 04:29:33 PM
Post or it didn't happen
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!