This thread has been brought to my attention
Two remarks: - I HIGHLY recommend wxHexEditor, I love it - Pywallet recovers private keys from bitcoin-qt deleted wallets, using key headers. So if armory private keys do have headers (etotheipi?), it can easily recover them. I don't know about encryption and such, but once you have all the data you're kinda saved anyway
|
|
|
The project is kind of paused as I've been really busy lately 1. on the pywallet thread, someone proposed WalletWizard. What do you think? 2. I wonder what wallet formats are searched on "recovery"? In fact, there's a sad Armory user trying to scan his HDD for a lost wallet. Alan just wrote what one would scan for: [..] For CircusPeanut or anyone else that would like to take a stab at raw binary searches for wallets, you can probably search for \xBAWALLET\x00 which will appear as the first eight bytes of any wallet file. After that, you can look four bytes later for the network magic bytes \xF9\xBE\xB4\xD9. Once you have that, you can use the binary map I linked above to figure out how much data to copy. Ente It looks for the few bytes that are just before the keys on the disk, then retrieve the keys themselves Thanks for taking this to my attention, I hope I can help 3. I will send an alpha version to the people who asked me, soon. I now have the file with me, so it should be a matter of days (fixing severe bugs) A public alpha release will come soon anyway
|
|
|
The new version is online, I tested only with a message of 400 characters but it should be ok
You're not duplicating anything (sadly) I think the readme is clear enough but tell me if you have trouble parsing things
|
|
|
I thought I fixed that before releasing the code! Sorry for that, I'll push an update in the following minutes
|
|
|
1. Swearing, SHOUTING etc. make your post more likely to be removed.
Lol 2. No zero value posts or threads, like "SELL SELL SELL"
Lol 3. No pointless or uninteresting threads.
Lol Lol Rules are so 2011
|
|
|
Do you mean the "Show unread posts since last visit." link at the very top of each page?
|
|
|
Looks like I've been misunderstood I don't want BT++ to tag anybody as trustworthy, I want to flag the people in your trustlist (the theymos' one) But yeah, why not a ✔ in front of the username
|
|
|
i am not going to let this ruin my veterans Day.Being a solider who seen actual combat and fought for freedom . This is small . Goodbye enjoy your small amount of authority
nice red herring. for reference, this was his posting that was "censored": The Private Bitcoin Elite community has went DARK for 24 hour test run of the Invite System send me a PM if you want to be invited to join the community Private Bitcoin Community http://www.bitcoinsniper.com/forumyou have to me logged in to see the discussions 27 more days before the official Lockout after that time you will have to get an invite to join Advanced platform: -Group Personal messages -Video Chat -File sharing -private and secure - much more "Elite", "private", "sniper", "secure" LEGIT AS FUCK!
|
|
|
As far as ease of use is concerned, I think companies like Coinbase and inputs.io are doing an excellent job of making it simple and easy for people to create accounts and deposit money. This is the type of trust I'm talking about - easy to register, user friendly website, helpful in explaining bitcoin, etc. They are the future of Bitcoin. Easy, convenient, trustworthy, user friendly, social. Glad you like them ... Haha, no. Inputs.io just got hacked and is now in debt of 4,100 bitcoins! I'm SO glad I'm paranoid with money and not even considered this garbage in my wildest dreams! Seriously, after mining and trading alts, it starts to get on my nerves to see accumulating more than 0.05 - 0.1 BTC at the exchange. Why the hell would I deposit in an online wallet for no purpose at all??? Because humans never learn Or some of them like to be scammed, I don't know
|
|
|
Q1 et 2: parce que le premier texte raconte n'importe quoi Q1: pour faire un bloc, tu prends le dernier dans la blockchain, et tu utilises son hash. Tu rajoutes un nonce aléatoire et 2-3 autres trucs, et tu calcules le hash correspondant à tout ça. Si le hash est plus petit que la cible, le bloc est valide, sinon il est invalide. Si ton bloc est invalide tu auras beau l'envoyer à qui tu veux, tout le monde le refusera, donc il n'ira pas dans la blockchain. Donc pas de vérification supplémentaire à la création d'un bloc.
Q2: Débilité de l'article. Si les transactions du bloc précédent ne sont pas valides, comme dit au-dessus, le bloc est invalide, donc il n'a jamais été dans la blockchain. Donc, bah, il ne peut pas être un "bloc précédent" à qui que ce soit
Chaque nouvelle confirmation diminue le risque de renversement puisque le nombre de blocs à refaire augmente
Par exemple si je veux renverser ta transaction qui est dans le bloc 100, et qu'on est actuellement au bloc 103, je dois recréer une sous-chaîne à partir du bloc 99 plus longue que l'actuelle: je dois créer de nouveaux blocs 100 à 104, c'est-à-dire 5 blocs à refaire A l'instant où un 104è bloc arrive dans la chaîne "normale", pour renverser ta transaction je dois créer une sous-chaîne 100 à 105, donc 6 blocs
|
|
|
Il n'empêche que la transaction ne sera pas acceptée par les mineurs
|
|
|
And it's not the server: ~6ms to build the page
By the way I don't think we need some yet but if you think about tabs to add, just tell me
Also I'm looking for a small icon (32x32 max) meaning "trust". Google Image is not helping much. Ideas?
|
|
|
Lower the refresh rate? That might help, dunno.
Nope... The page receives the server answer ~13seconds after sending the request Whereas for the BT++ chat it is nearly instant
|
|
|
It's normal it's a 404 because the page doesn't exist In IE/firefox/chrome the 404 page is modified by BT++ though I can change the page if it doesn't work for you WhiskChat's back up now, add it as an option, please The hack was due to using free hosting providers, and social engineering. I now hash passwords with 5000 rounds of SHA512 and do not expose the DB to the internet. Safe now I'll see what I can do when I have some time (yes, it's again a "i don't have much time" period) The outside chat lags a bit, because of the fast refresh rate when you are not logged in.
Yeah I saw it was lagging but didn't get why... It lags the same when logged in
|
|
|
|