Why didn't you even start with a complete quote so we know the source? On the Dogecoin issue, you should know that Elon didn't become Twitter's CEO at the time he started shilling Dogecoin and so I don't see what will change if he isn't CEO anymore or some weird stuff like that. That Doge is dropping in price cuts across, even Bitcoin itself has its fair share of the dip. I don't think there's anything wrong with Doge ATM and no; it's not dead.

Then that's where the dilemma lies. No one, even mods, is certain what engaging discussions the zero-effort post can lead to and that's why users don't bother reporting them or mods bother deleting them. It's really a burden if we take a look at it from that perspective. To be honest, you do have a point in there.

Opinion – Discussion.
Discussion – Opinion.

Your observation is right OP. However, I don't think it's because they can't hold a discussion down. It could be other reasons. We get to see more of such scenarios with lower ranked accounts (I'm not saying this condescendingly) and I want to believe it's because they may not know how to watch or remember topics/threads they've commented on to do a follow-up on them. Except one has the BTT bot notifier, it's a huge task following up on discussions if one didn't put them on watch. Sometimes it could be that they get their answers in all within a few responses and don't feel the need to spam in order to meet weekly quota.

The zero effort in texts like that makes it very boring to read. Personally, I always skip them once I sight posts like that. It's the same thing I do when I find wall of posts in quotes. I like to think that those who do such are either ignorant of how annoying their posts are or simply don't know how to write well. Mods should make it a call to duty to always delete OPs with zero contributions to articles that only just quote and put source links.

Well, to tell you the truth I don't really give a damn with what he does with his investment or money provided he doesn't double speak. We've to admit that he brought Dogecoin to the limelight with his shilling. We know Bitcoin maxims don't like him for talking down on Bitcoin and offloading his hodling when he did but it's his decision to make. He who calls the Piper dictates the tune. What I detest about Elon (or any other human) is double speaking. If he talks about freedom then it should be all encompassing.

If that will even be any thought for reactivating the forum's account on Twitter, I think Twitter isn't necessary for BTT then. Let it remain inactive and Elon Musk can do with it whatever pleases him.

Musk's type of freedom of speech is laced with hypocrisy. He's trying to force subscribers into doing what he wants while crying freedom. Where's the freedom, then? It's good iconoclasts are daring him on that.

Yes, we should take important note of that, regarding expenses often surpassing income. This is where proper planning comes in. Those expenses that we don't have control of like food and healthcare should be made priority while those which are luxurious in nature should be jettisoned or reduced to the bearest minimum. That was why I talked about rentals not exceeding 10% of whatever one earns. Some people earn less but won't like living in environments they can easily pay rents. They want to be reminded or chased around by property owners before they renew their rents.

I wanted to read and leave when I realized the issue was specifically addressed to singles until I saw the rental thing. Let me quickly address that. If hypothetically someone on that salary scale decides to spend as much as what you've mapped out there, they should know they aren't getting it right. Your rentals shouldn't be more than 10% of your earnings. If you earn $3k monthly, it will be ok to limit your rentals to $250 – $300 monthly. Anything above that means living above one's means because other aspects of one's life will suffer it.

You must be a fast learner to have come to this salient conclusion. I like the realization, actually. For what it's worth, every speculation shouldn't be taken as a certitude. Speculation is prediction and narrowing it down; it's a guess. However, what makes this type of guess different is the many indicators that guard it. As humans can fail, indicators too do fail. This is what rules out certitude in speculations. That's what it's.

You're one of the reasons this place continues to serve as a repertoire of crypto knowledge. Your ease of responding to these issues and the time you expend in doing it effortlessly and blessing others with that knowledge is an admiration, honestly.

Good a thing we now have alternatives to the json file stuff. How I hated that process and still loathe it even till date.

😂😂😂 I had to suppress my laughter when I read the "red" situation. You now see why I said CZ didn't come across to me like someone who's impulsive. He must've thought out the tag situation too. Again, I'm cocksure he has an account here. Otherwise, he wouldn't have remembered the said comment of Satoshi something made some 13 years ago on the said day and tweeted it. The same way I believe CZ is here is the same way I'm sure all major players in the industry have accounts here too.

Sorry to differ on that. There's something not adding up as I discovered that OP was registered in this forum in 2018 and has just 3 posts to their name. It's absurd. There must be something also fishing with OP. They aren't without experience. We can't say lack of experience caused an account as old as OP that, can we?

Yes, anyone who is joining 1xbit campaign isn't doing themselves any good, knowing they will sooner than later make their account reddish with tags. Why taint a spotless account because of mere pittance? To be candid, I don't think 1xbit will ever resolve its issue to get all tags removed here in this forum. It's now sour grape type of situation with that company for allowing the issue to linger unnecessarily without resolving it at once. Its reputation is in tatters.

It's the same thing that happens with the @BTTSuperNotifier_bot. You get to receive notifications when a user on your ignore list quotes you directly in the forum. That can be annoying too. You don't even know it's a user on your ignore list until you go to read their stuff in the forum. That's when you discover they're on ignore. Yes, I know that users do improve in their posts style and writing and that isn't a reason I would ignore anyone. There are more cogent and tangible reasons to put anyone under ignore, especially if you think they become irritants. To get quoted by such users and one gets to see it is like putting it out in one's face again. Perhaps, the creator of that bot should tweak it a bit to exclude ignored users.

Do you by your imagination think that Binance winding up will be to the benefit of this industry? You seem excited that something bad should happen to Binance. Trust me, if that happens it will rattle this industry beyond what anyone expects.

That account barely lived beyond 30 seconds. I believe it would be an imposter who later thought otherwise and abandoned it. It wouldn't be CZ himself, from observation of his personality, the maverick CZ would've thought out the implication of using his real name before embarking on opening that account. He doesn't sound to me like someone who's impulsive.

It baffles me when I see users getting their accounts destroyed over pittance as loans or when they enrol in obvious scam campaigns like the 1xbit stuff. What for? Now the same campaign is asking for accounts without red tags to join. It's an irony they don't want tagged accounts any more even when those accounts got tagged because they joined in their campaign.

---

OP, you did well by calling that user out. I think I've seen one or two accounts with neutral tags for loans they've not repaid (I'm not sure it's from you though) even after several months they collected it. Scammers shouldn't be allowed to fester, otherwise they will ruin everything.

Not, "it might bring security risks". It actually brings security risks. Once you stake you've entrusted your tokens to the staking site and that makes you vulnerable to whatever happens to the site and even to the token itself (let's say the staking site is different from the token website). Once the project shuts down, that's farewell to your investment. I experienced this first hand. So, always consider the risk more than you would dream of the profit to be made from it. Most times, the profit to be made from it isn't even worth the risk.

Nope, the bear season is far from being over. If anything, I think it will extend to 2023 and should stretch to the last quarters of that year. This isn't to scare anyone but remind us that past data have shown it's a possibility for history to repeat itself. The little run upward we get now shouldn't be seen as a bull run starting. This is December, most investors don't invest at this time. So, I don't see any huge money going into the market at this time. Whatever we have now should be taken as a bull trap.

I greet all man wey dey storm here to keep am busy even wen I nor dey around. E really show sey bird wey dem see for nest, na im get d nest. Una try wella. I hope una dey also apply these ogbenge yarns for una daily interactions with people offline too because na there d beauty and sense dey oh. People go begin envy you once you begin mix your yarns with proverbs bc dem go dey reason you every time as Solomon. I dey tell una dis from experience.

Abeg, make we dey keep here purely pidgin, apart from wen we dey explain the meaning of the proverb.

What I think? Well, for starters, I think you're just making a wild accusation there by mentioning that it's a ploy to lead Binance's dissatisfied customers to Coinbase. What are your facts on this issue? No?

Yes, there's a possibility that traders and investors are trading their altcoins for Bitcoin. That could be the cause for today's pump we've witnessed so far. However, we can't be sure they're doing the buying and selling on Binance. It can be on any other exchanges.