This would be connected if majority of the investors here are holding a significant amount of Bitcoin which isn't the case, still the crypto market isn't that a big of a market in terms of the number of investors they have, so even if the feds cuts or even increase interest rates you wouldn't see a big connection on how it had contributed to the price of Bitcoin. It doesn't really show any connection whatsoever, its just a mere coincidence that all the media outlets we have are taking advantage of and unfortunately they are misleading a lot of us.

I only see two ways on how you can buy Bitcoin that much one is from exchanges and two is from localbitcoin sellers. In crypto exchanges it would heavily depend on the level of verification you have on how much you can cash in and out of their exchange, the thing is you will be the one who will handle matching the prices of what you want. Localbitcoins are much more convenient but it is riskier especially if we are talking about big transactions since you will be dealing directly with a third party seller, maybe having a escrow is advisable in this kinds of transactions since its your only guarantee that it won't fall back.

If he means Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in general will be controlled in terms of proper regulation then I am also with him. Its our only way to be generally accepted by the community and our desire for mass adoption would go straightforward from that point on. For a man who has a strong ambition to be Nakamoto I think this is one of his statements that I won't laugh at.

Even Robert Garcia stated that its much harder to be a champion on eight different weight classes compared to being a 50-0 undefeated boxer. A coach who have been known to be against Pacquiao (He sided with Thurman picking him to win against Manny) have even agreed on that fact so I don't think you could argue with that. Oh and By the way Floyd was never an undefeated boxer he also experience a lost during his amateur career so I couldn't call him a true undefeated boxer.

I don't know but I think some sellers in LocalBitcoins can also be a trusted way to sell your Bitcoin with Paypal. I know that transactions are reversible there but the thing is you can always go for the most trusted one so that you are assured that the Paypal fund will be sent to you. Comparing the rates also you won't have that kind of liberty in Coinbase as you don't have any choice aside from what they are already offering.

He might have a point on when the developers are the ones matching theirbown Bids and Asks in the crypto exchange. This is possible if they are also the only ones participating in that trade. It's similar to crypto exchanges faling the volume but the guilty ones here are the developera itself. You cannot really trust every data you see online as they can easily be faled to manipulate people, that is why if you don't want to be victims of fake volume you should always stay away from unreputable exchanges.

It already visited 10,000$ several times already as after the 400$ rally we have it is now consolidating in the 9,900$ level to 10,000$ level although I see that this consolidation stage for Bitcoin will be shortlived as Bitcoin might attempt to ho up anytime soon now judging by how many times it got back up anove 10,000$ level. Aside from that Bitcoin is looking more and more bullish ever since it has risen from 9k, so I'll expect to have abig play soon from Bitcoin.

If you would just have provided a little bit of more information about the chart. You didn't even mention the EMAs use in your chart and aside from that you only have the volume as an indicator, you just basically provided a screenshot of ORS/BTC's price chart with really nothing on it. We cannot really tell anything just by looking at it.  Technical analysis is something sensitive so you should have at least provided your own analysis so we could have tackled it properly.

I don't think that there is really a lot of options for the Indian cryptocurrency industry when it comes to what they can declare as their crypto earnings, the difficult part their is determining whether or not the income they earned is legal or not because if they declared something illegal then they would definitely be charged with a crime. Right now only capital gains is the only thing I see as a legal way to earn in crypto in that country.

Sarri might still think that Premier League players are better than Serie A players that is why he thinks a forward like Lukaku can be a star in the league. I doubt that will happen on everyone as proven by a lot of flop big transfers made by Serie A teams, they either end up wasting their money or overpaying a subpar player. I just wish that they keep Dybala instead as he is really valuable for the team.

You are probably right, if local mods can do it then OP wouldn't brought this up in the meta section in the first place. I know back then that local mods are not even allowed to create their own childboard within their local board and big changes like that for the local board should be brought up to the admins. It's the same thing for this title change as simpley they don't have the power to do so.

Yes that's really the way on catching them because you cannot fake a real website's URL, if they can trick you with their email you must not be fooled by their fake website URL. That's the beauty of having domain names being unique. Aside from you being knowledgeable about the domain name you must also check for the other security features such as the padlock icon and security badges (like Norton and McAfee below their page) for the website for you know to that it's the real website you are visiting in.

It's simple, if the bounty campaign you join in says “no multiple accounts allowed in this campaign” but you still applied with your two accounts you simply cheated it.  Even without them telling it directly to the thread its a simple rule used by many bounty managers for anlong time now in the forum. Just admit it that you and your alt account are cheating a bounty campaign or hide stay silent together with your “he's my friend” story.

I cannot say that a 2% price increase is something out of the ordinary, we did experience 9,600$ to 9,700$ last two to three days ago and. It cannot clarify anything that this consolidation is over and we may still very well be in the consolidation stages. Maybe we could start the talks of another good bull run when BTC goes back up above 10,000$ and starts a breakout around that area.

Why can blockchain replace banks if banks are already trying to implement them with their system? Remember blockchain is just a technology and can be use by anyone who wants to implement it with their organization or business. A lot of companies are already filing their patents for their own version of blockchain so I doubt that one kind of tech could kill a certain industry when they are already part of it.

Just watched the trailer and at first I thought it was defaming Bitcoin more but now its the other way around. Its a movie against banks and for cryptocurrency, its like the movie wants us to realize something that banks are profiting from our own money and Bitcoin and blockchain have found a way to slow them down. I would love to watch it but I am not used to watching at the same time reading subtitles, hoping they will realease a English-dubbed version for their international viewers.

Just by looking at the email address of the sender you will see it's not coming from Paypal. What you need to be more aware of are the ones with the convincing ones which are way too similar to the official email address as if you aren't used to opening up emails from your financial accounts you would barely see the difference. You should always ask yourself why did you have that refund if you haven't transacted with them in the first place or why you have won a prize when you aren't joining any contests. People are way to jolly when they see money coming in they forget to the fact that their is a big chance it's fake.

One thing I know that will make your customers go up is assuring that your existing ones are having a good time with your website. You should not always focus about the in-game mechanics but also focus more on giving up contests and events that would make your loyal gamblers happy. The more they are happy the more chances you have that they will invite friends to play in your website. Just focus on retaining them and you'll see that your gamblers will grow in number.

It's a pre-season game I don't think that any team is serious when playing just in the pre-season especially when the health of their players are on the line. Based from my experience pre-season games are just like a pick-up match to test out their new tactics, and Milan having a new coach would see it beneficial playing against a world class team. Milan won't even compete in Europe this season so they might just as well focus more on winning Serie A games when the season starts.

I guess the mandatory requirement for registered exchanges requiring them to submit transaction records of their customers are really paying off. That's the only way they know that these citizens are holding and earning cryptocurrencies.  View it as violation of privacy but taxes are taxes and its their obligation to pay it, with a disturbing amount reaching to thousamds of people I think they should be alarmed that the IRS are always on their radar, it's either they comply or the the whole US crypto industry suffer the consequences.