I think plagiarizing is the right word for these. My point of view about this one since a lot of accounts are involved is maybe there is a possibility that neither of the three accounts own that Youtube channel. From what I see these Youtube channel specializes in a lot of things crypto related aside from reviewing cryptocurrencies they also have tutorials on earning crypto in various social media websites. It seems like a lot of users here are just grabbing this videos from this Youtube channel to take it on their own. This can easily be solved if either one of these linked people can provide a screenshot over their Youtube Channel Page where they are clearly logged in, until then the best way to handle this is I think for a DT member to tag all of them until someone provides a screenshot.

I'm pretty sure that before someone gets interested with the company they must know what the company is about and also their current financial situation, because as or right now it only looks like you are offloading one of your failed company. Can you be more specific about the nature of business of your company with regards to the crypto industry? And since financial statements are public documents can you upload your financials as well? This could really help a lot of members determining if your company has really any value for them. Legally speaking I don't think the process of turning over a company can be done online so I am definitely sure that at least three parties need to meet with each other physically may it be himself or with a proxy.

Is there any possibility that this could be an inside job? Like it is one of their devs who found the exploit or is even the one who have created the exploit to steal some crypto out of their users? I know this things could be a big possibility since its a its easier for them to get off a "hack" since they are decentralized but if we are talking about normal exchanges here like Binance or Cryptopia the government will be all over them.

You are probably right, during their latest match you can see a defensive and a hesitant Deontay Wilder on the right which is totally different compared to what we see when he box other weaker opponents. Wilder needs to focus on what he is strong at and don't be eaten out on how fast Fury is since this is where he eats his punches the most. He needs to fight Wilder toe-to-toe and not wait for him and hope he can block his punches.

Did your friend/coworker's account got blocked too? Since if you are winning and they suddenly got suspicious with your connection to your friend's account it would really be strange if your account is the only one terminated. Also have they given you a specific reason or explanation what kind of connection they have found with your friend's account? Like have you been playing in the same internet connection or are you withdrawing funds in the same wallet? It's hard to find some lose connection in this types of cases where accounts are suddenly terminated when the player is winning.

Here is the account of NitrogenSports here in Bitcointalk you can pm this account and ask for a reply regarding this situation.

I predicted that Wilder will win during the previous match and I was wrong so as my prediction with AJ against Andy Ruiz so this time I know it will be hard for me to at least consider anyone this early since heavyweight matches for the top class seems to be getting unpredictable at the moment especially if a lot of them knows how to adjust their game during a rematch. If Wilder adjust and learn from his mistakes from the previous match then this would be an even fight just like what we have watched during the first fight he might even score a KO this time if he is better. But if Fury continues to outbox him then there is no question that he will be winning again and this time it will bury the hatchet on this two.

Exactly what fundamentals are you talking about here? Because even if this is a high volume crypto FA will be the most useless thing you can do in analyzing a crypto. Fundamental analysis involved the study of an asset through its financial performance which means there earnings, expenses, cashflow, or basically all of the financial aspect in play which for a crypto basically has no data to show for that. The only way FA can be involved in an analysis is if we are talking about security tokens the ones that acts like a stock of a company/project and security tokens as well is just a minority in the crypto market. Regarding low volume coins you are corrrect TA would essentially be useless since the data involved is really not sufficient for you to have an accurate prediction.

These three doesn't work well even if you combined the three as your main indicator for trading.

Volume - this only shows you the number of trades happening for that given asset, it doesn't really tell you much if you don't add in other indicators such as moving averages and RSI

Momentum - is simply looking at a plain chart and you are at risk for any reversals that might happen.

Orderbooks - can easily be manipulated especially in the crypto market. Traders or group of traders can easily pad the order to make it look like there is a demand or selling that will happen.

With just this three alone as if you are like a trader who really don't know what technical analysis is since you have failed to even go down deeper in other indicators which will help these three.

This are only done by shady crypto exchanges, they inflate the volume so that they somehow influence the market and make it look like their exchange is one of the active ones. Aside from that they also put up fake bids and ask so they can also manipulate the market from it as well. But if you will prevent joining and trading in these kinds of crypto exchanges you can be confident that what they are inputting are real time data without any dirt to it. The SEC and central banks of countries are also strict now when it comes to data manipulation and all it takes is just one wrong move for them to be brought down so I really trust that big exchanges wouldn't do this technique at all.

My guess is it won't be neither of the two but if you simply mean Bitcoin being treated as "gold" to an asset then you are right. In the first place most of us here involved in the crypto industry treat Bitcoin as an investment and not some other alternative for payment, even if majority of the hodlers are using Bitcoin for payment most of their holdings are still intact hoping for it to grow. We all know that during a recessions all assets are vulnerable to drops and that includes real estate as people are liquidating their assets for money due to financial losses from lost of jobs to businesses. This is what will happen to Bitcoin if they predicted the recession correctly, we all see how the markets reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic, I believe it would be nearly the same when the recession hits us.

Maybe just maybe if you tried to stray away from the marketplace section and altcoin discussion you'll find it easier to earn merits in your part. These sections are typically avoided by merit sources since there is no real conversation going on. Based on your post history you aren't that bad of a poster so really you have better chances of earning merits in other sections where members value what you post. Do not be one of those newbie and low ranking members thinking that merits are a hindrance of ranking up since they are the obvious ones who aren't really contributing anything to the forum.

You shouldn't be comparing the two since it caters to different people. Binance is for people inclined to trade cryptocurrencies while Shapeshift.io is for people who want to buy/exchange crypto instantly they call it "instant" crypto exchange by some people. In Shapeshift.io you cannot really set the asking/selling and the bid/buying price since the amounts are set by the Shapeshift itself, also the cryptocurrencies bought/exchanged by you are sent directly to your address and is not held in a wallet from your trading account. So if you are an active trader or will be putting up orders both in the buy and sell side Binance would be a better fit for you or look out for other crypto exchange that will be bank friendly with your country.

This shouldn't be a surprise at all since bother South Korea and Japan have said their orders regarding anonimity based  cryptocurrencies or what they call privacy coins in which the authorities will have a hard time on tracking. Monero isn't the only one since even Zcash and Dash are also potential cryptocurrencies to be delisted in these countries. Even though both countries are recognized as one of the most crypto-friendly countries out there it doesn't stop them on having a tighter regulation when it comes to privacy cryptocurrencies especially when they have proven that these crypto are now being used in illicit activities more compared to Bitcoin.

Well the only fault they have is they are too gullible when it comes to readings news especially the ones from crypto news websites which specialized clickbaity headlines and incomplete reports. These crypto news websites always feed them either wrong information or try to make everything related to crypto that's why a lot of people in the crypto industry also create assumptions aligned to the news they have read from these kinds of websites. When will this stop? I don't think it will as long as there are people who really just believe on what they can see they can also be part of the ones spreading false news and assumptions in the market.

They most certainly have used some of it since the Gram sale happened last two years ago but I don't believe that they have depleted that 1.7 billion dollars this easily especially if the lawsuit against them was filed in October of 2019. With them running in donations I believe that they still have the capacity to pay the 175 purchasers back aside from that Pavel Durov is also a billionaire in terms of his net worth after all. I do agree with you that the investors here are irresponsible but they have no play regarding the the emergency action filed against them, it was all SEC's doing and all the witch hunt they are doing in the crypto industry.

The price of Bitcoin is still down because it was cause by FUD together with all the traditional markets out there. Even if there is physical evidence that adoption had increased because of promoting contactless payments to the affected countries it is still not enough to push the price up back to its normal range since new demand or an increase in it couldn't make it recover to what is currently happening to us now. Also don't believe in the crypto news websites you are seeing about Bitcoin being the main option for these countries as their contactless payments. Countries like Iran are using credit cards and debit cards when they say contactless payments and Bitcoin wasn't even one of the ideal options for them.

I do agree with you that those posts doesn't deserve any merit at all but like I said them getting a negative feedback will depend if the DT members wil be agreeing on your side. But in my point of view the evidence is simply lacking that only one or two time he have merited the user cannot simply convince or deemed substantial for any DT member here. If they sent several merit transactions to the same user and have sent some back to them then this might be a more convincing situation. I know that you want them all to be tagged but my advise is wait for them to slip a little bit more and gather more evidence against them to make your case more convincing to DT members.

It seems like you already integrated the ticker tape of trading view in your website which looks cool. However in my opinion it would be much better if you somehow integrated it on top of your website and make it dynamic so your viewers will still see the price ticker even if they scroll down the page, this widget would really be useless if it is some sort of display on the top and viewers won't see it if they just scrolled down the page. It can also be in the bottom of the page as long as it is viewable even if the page is scrolled up or down.

That's why miners need to always adjust in order to mine profitably. We always have seen news and releases where antminers aside from being more efficient also consumes lower electricity, we have seen foreign crypto miners migrate to other countries which have cheaper electricity, and we also have seen crypto farms using renewable energy to cut down their electricity expenses if not entirely. Crypto miners always need to adjust and I think they will still do this when the halving comes. The increase in mining difficulty only means that there are more miners now running their operations and I think it just shows there are still a lot of people willing to mine BTC even if the BTC halving is coming.

It looks like DT members might have loosen their belts when it comes to these kinds of situation. Where in the members you have posted they only have interacted with them at least once or twice which doesn't  really make them guilty of anything even if these newbie members only have received merits from one source it still doesn't make any it prove that they are abusing the merit system. DT members might have a different view with these regarding what kind of posts these members have been merited too but the sample size might still be to small for them to hand them down some negative feedback.