This first naming clearly hints for it's legit purpose. Not just a store of value - with high fees... And sure Satoshi was the creator of a new eCash - so he knew that he might Need highest privacy - and still ppl do not reall know who he is. - So he was good to manage that bit. Bitcoin protocol is NOT that private - at will, for a purpose. It lacks a lot of 'anonymity features' - thogh for a purpose - it's was designed that way. > To get accepted by the globe (incl financial institutes, gov, mearchants, ...) for honest business. |
|
|
|
Latest development in the Craig Wright case. Claim by : Jurgen Etienne Guido DEBO   Oh -- fine. Case closed - Satoshi finally found |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is valuable because the blockchain works nice with incentives and is kinda balanced game open for anyone to invest into and mine blocks.
It is not only valuable by pure speculation, it needs to do all sorts of things where one needs a time stamping machine. Therefore only an fully onchain scalable and stable solution- the very original one will have long term sustainable value imo.
|
|
|
|
Not really, but how will Bitcoin go global without being properly fit for institutions and big business?
Miners, exchanges are already btw...
We see they look into and find only the minimal initial protocol is on legal purpose and no issues with any regulator.
CSW is not the person who would make Bitcoin famous rather the users and community is.. Bitcoin is already global and more used and respected than your BSV shit FYI. Mostly global for speculation ponzi shit and illicit clusterfuck. Yeah thats true. But dont expect more. Rather global shutdown of all the illegal exchanges |
|
|
|
Lol, this guy doesn't know how it really works. You cannot de weak PoSM, u need to provide hard proofs . PoW anywhere |
|
|
|
No, the good thing is that many trustworthy institutions will run enough infrastructure for anyone in the world
CSW invented banks? Genius. Not really, but how will Bitcoin go global without being properly fit for institutions and big business? Miners, exchanges are already btw... We see they look into and find only the minimal initial protocol is on legal purpose and no issues with any regulator. |
|
|
|
|
Trump seems to be a big blocker. He wants to make Bitcoin with big blocks great again, for onchain use first.
|
|
|
|
Man muss das im Konsens verfasste EEG nicht gutheisen, aber es umfasst den Ausstieg aus Atomkraft, Kohle, etc. mit dem zumindest grundsätzlichen Anliegen, Gesundheitsrisiken für Bevölkerung und Umwelt zu reduzieren. Auch wenn es viele nicht wahrhaben wollen und sich zuweil bevormundet fühlen, ist es die einzige logische Konsequenz zur Abwendung weiteren Schadens.
Gegen den Ausstieg aus der derzeitigen "wirtschaftlichen" Kernspaltung ist nichts einzuwenden, da die realen Kosten sozialisiert wurden (das Unfallrisiko trägt die Bevölkerung, Versicherungen schliessen die Haftung für Schäden durch Kernspaltung flächendeckend aus, Folgekosten wurden - zwangsläufig - sozialisiert) und der tatsächliche Preis die angegebenen Kosten bei weitem übersteigt. Die Forschung einzustellen halte ich dagegen für falsch. Trotzdem solltest Du die geschichtlichen parallelen beim aktuellen 2 Minuten Klimahass erkennen und sehen was hier in Wirklichkeit passiert. Die wirksamen(!) Konsequenzen wollen nämlich die wenigsten der Mitläufer tatsächlich umsetzen. Dagegen unterstützten sie die Rädelsführer, was für diese am Ende ein gigantisches Geschäft wird, während zur Lösung des tatsächlichen Problems genau gar nichts passieren wird. Das EEG bietet hierfür ein anschauliches Beispiel und mit dem CO2 Ausstoss (der übrigens ziemlich direkt am Rohstoffverbrauch und Konsum hängt) wird es genauso laufen und die blinden nützlichen Idioten schreien mal wieder "Hurra!". Das naheliegendste und beste Konzept, auf das erst kürzlich die Elite-Forscher der ETH Zürich gekommen sind, ist flächendeckend viel Wald anzupflanzen bzw zu schützen. Lol no brainer aber richtig. Das wird natürlich nicht befolgt... warum auch |
|
|
|
Thanks to all who supporting us. Ahead we have very big plans for scaling. The project is successfully developing and gaining community. BSV - is a future. Right choice. Original Bitcoin. Satoshi Vision
Yeah, we try. But so many good news posts getting deleted- i wonder why? But Bitcoin is totally about PoW, so folks need to fetch stuff from different places by own work, Bitcoin and Satoshi do not owe anyone more. Things are all out for anyone to analyze and make up own mind and decisions. |
|
|
|
I just have yet to see an intellectually honest argument that suggests BSV has merits beyond its creator supposedly being Satoshi Nakamoto.
Of course not. You are coming to this with an internal bias that prevents you from honest analysis. If you can't see that the capacity for increased numbers of transactions is additional utility, that's on you. An additional utility at what cost? At the cost of an unwieldy blockchain and leading down the slope toward centralization. I'll refer to that sentence as A. As I previously mentioned, we already have a big block experiment and it currently averages around 160 KB per block.
I'll refer to that sentence as B. Claiming both A and B is logically inconsistent. BSV won't start to become relevant as a technically meritable until BCH's blocks get filled.
Well, on the blocksize basis alone, I'd need to agree. However, there are other characteristics that distinguish these two chains. Regardless, there are clearly other merits besides one of its prominent promoter's claim of being satoshi. Block size limitation has fostered innovation the likes of which BCH and BSV can only dream of, which is why they hate SegWit LN to the absurd degree that they do.
No. Porting SegWit to BSV would be a straightforward task. We prefer Bitcoin SV to Bitcoin SegWit -- in part -- as Bitcoin SegWit provides additional attack vectors that are not present in the original protocol. I always enjoy reading my fav bear's arguments being on point as well as in such an eloquent English only mother lang might be able to.  |
|
|
|
the lack of negativity is only a good thing  As much as the lack of 'protocol features' where applications will do all the fun on a stable backbone |
|
|
|
No, the good thing is that many trustworthy institutions will run enough infrastructure for anyone in the world, and hobby guys can still run btc raspi shit.
If that's the future you wish for then we may as well go full Libra. At least they're serious, competent and well funded. I'd choose Libra over a small group of psychopaths any day of the week. I cannot believe that u really got mixed up the setups for Bitcoin, where all can be part of, - sure u need enough money to buy miners, and Libra where Zucky might want to allow u to buy in. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
