Yeah, that is 100% true. Unfortunately many people I have talked to that quit crypto world all kept calling it a scam to steal your money. That shows how they do not even understand the market. I mean sure if you wagered on a shitcoin and then got rug pulled then I would understand but these people called it after bitcoin went down.

So, it is clear that there are too many people who do not understand much about crypto and assume the worst. We need to educate people a lot more to stick around and learn more before they quit, even if they do not keep on investing.

I have seen great necrobumping and I have seen totally irrelevant ones. I wouldn't say it is totally bad, it just needs to be relevant. Like "I guess in 2021 we may see 60k+" when we never saw even above 1k back in 2013 could be necrobumped and the OP that wrote that could say "I told you guys so" and that would be awesome. But this one doesn't make sense.

I would say there are experts for sure, not like clear cut  profit by them that makes everyone rich type of deal, but I can name like 100 people who are better traders than me, I am not an amazing trader and I would never call myself amazing at anything, but there are people who do it better than I do. Would that make them experts? No, but it would make me trust them with my money if I knew them enough, like a friend for example and not some twitter influencer.

It is cool to finally see superhero type of movies getting some acclamation in the disguise of production design and all that but we have to realize that this s basically not a "best movie" category anymore, it is just "which one had a better message with better acting" and that's it.

The day we didn't see End Game on Oscars best movie list, was the day I stopped caring about it as well. Can you imagine? I mean a whole series of movies that started in 2008 with Iron Man and lets say the infinity saga ended with End game (it had far from home) that would be around 25 billion dollars total box office.

I do not care if you like them or not, but if you do not nominate the movie that is the biggest grossing movie ever in existence (avatar reruns made it go back to one) then I am sorry but you are actually not fair and Oscars are a fake sham organization for me.

I do not remember any season where Spurs made this many trades. Eubanks and White are gone and we did not get anyone that is worthwhile, maybe Dragic but since we have an all-star at the guard position now, I do not know why we even needed him. It was mainly for the first round picks, we have 3 first round picks this season which could be packaged and be given to a team, hell even more for next season and also second round picks as well, so if you could package like 4-5 picks together and offer that to Magic, they "may" take it, or if not then we could trade for a bit lower.

One of the picks estimated to be 7th, so that is really good, and other two is still first rounders, so I am guessing we could get higher. In that case "maybe" it will make a sense if we could pick a great player but that is all we can assume right now, it is not tangible yet.

Anyone who said that we will be going up during the crisis must be very new in the crypto world. We always go down with the world before we start to go up. Look at the march 2020 just recently, because of pandemic the price of oil, gold, stocks and even fiat value all dropped like crazy and crypto went down with them. Look at it after a year when stock market went high and you could see how it was crypto peak as well.

All those Elon Musk at 300+ billion days were bitcoins peak times as well. So, I would have to say that it is not really too different, there are of course periods where they act differently but that is not all the time, it is only rarely that it works together.

I think such a law was set by those who don’t like cryptocurrency. And it’s quite possible that they have done this as a way to discourage people from investing in cryptocurrency. But their plans are not really going to work because this would only make a lot of people to leave centralized exchanges and start moving to decentralized ones.

The tax amount is quite big and shouldn’t be what people are expected to pay for investing in cryptocurrency. It’s quite clear that anyone who have set such a law is someone who doesn’t like crypto currency, because I don’t see why anyone would be expected to pay as much as 30% tax For profits that are made through cryptocurrency.

Look I can get West Side Story being the last, even though the play was wonderful and amazing, and movie could have been great if done properly, but it wasn't great at all. Belfast is basically the proof that Oscars care about the movie as much as the message it is sending out as well. It has become too political and I am saying this as someone who is progressive as well.

I mean we get it, there have been wrong things in history, are we going to just shoot one each year and give that an Oscar? Is that how it is going to be? Movies that are original will not get credit? Don't Look Up has stirred the pot a lot this year and that is political as well, and the odds are very weird. Like what the hell is 4.00 odds for a movie? That's as sure as it gets, that's terrible, it is not even close to make you want to guess.

Honestly all exchanges are a bit wild when I start using them. We have like 6-7 local exchanges in my country, most of which work between banks and crypto so that you could turn your fiat into crypto or vice versa. I have used 3 to 4 so far (I used 3, but the fourth one was just a few time deal and not a long term deal), and all of them had problems.

Basically they just kept the money in their accounts longer than I liked, that was always the issue. When you withdraw money then it should be in your bank account at most in 1 hour, it is just a bank wire, how long could it take, it is a very local one as well anyway.

However, one of them took literally 12 days, 12! and not like they were keeping it as a punishment for not following rules or something, they just said they had a problem with the bank and that's it. It could be true but why would I use a place with a bank problem?

Other coins are up as well, and some of them are much higher than bitcoin too in this spike (not price, just % amount they went up). If this keeps up, we are going to have a bull season for sure. When people start to make a lot of money from crypto, they put more money in and there is a very good period where everyone just throws money at everything and things go wild. I do not know if that will be the case here as well but I know that it will certainly look great for a while longer.

The trick in the market is that when things are looking fine and everyone is happy with what they have, it is very rare that you could make "all" of them shocked, because there needs to be at least someone profiting from market movements changing, if you find that, you find when.

Bitcointalk Profile URL:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152752
Post count (Including this one):  4234
Your BTC address (segwit):  bc1q94yaf5g2f6szd02v6w9cfevjsmttlpt5jsm54s

Honestly it just doesn't make sense to me for people to come here with invalid feedback and then expect them to be respected. Isn't there a valid way to give a feedback? Of course there is, I have told thequin that the design of the website requires a makeover for a year and either they are still working on it or they didn't care about it but at least I told something decent. Like literally the most honest feedback possible without meaning anything, "The design needs a makeover" and that is it. THIS is a valid criticism, whereas saying silly stuff and worthless garbage and all that is not valid, it is just a trolling attempt and that's it, will not get anyone anywhere.

Also, I remember that long back someone notified about thequin's signature was not related to freebico.in (then their signature campaign was not launched and I remember thequin was wearing chipmixer signature, not sure). I feel that also must be a valid feedback and they responded over the time and when feasible for them.

The sad thing about this situation is that, I have seen plenty of people who lost in gambling in "impossible" ways and keep blaming the casino for it. Like just because you had 10-20 in a row loss at 50% chance dice doesn't mean that casino is scamming you. I know that the chance of that happening is low, but the more you gamble the bigger it gets, having 20 loss in a row in just 100 bets is rare, but having it in 50k+ bets is very common, you get it at least once, most probably.

This is why I believe that we should focus on provable scams, duelbits is not a scam and we all know that they are doing a legit job running a very good casino and we love them for it (and also their support is awesome as well).

Who did they lose to? To Sheriff, a team who has been to group stages of champions league for the first time and a whole roster valuation less than just one player Real Madrid has, and they lost to them team. Which shows you, are they good enough to go up with only one loss, or are they bad enough to say they lost to Sheriff? Obviously they are generally good and just one had bad game with a shocking result, but that is basically what we are seeing in elimination games.

One bad game and you are probably out. Doesn't mean that PSG won't have that bad game neither, who knows? We have seen Barcelona beat Liverpool 3-0, and then Liverpool who missed Salah, ended up winning 4-0 in return. So, we can't really say that one team or the other will win, we just need to wait and see.

I would guess that it is not really ideal for Milan but at the same time they are still not "that" far back, just 4 points. I know there is one game more for Inter as well, which could take it to 7, if that happens (which it will likely happen) then Milan could be a bit more in trouble.

I kept saying that Inter had a bigger chance but nobody cared, I mean what is the point of actually having championship level players if you are going to get beaten by 40 year old striker team. I mean okay I should be less biased but Milan doesn't have the roster Inter has, and that is why I believe that there is no way they could have deserved a championship, Inter is doing as well as expected from them.

Dude has an account started in 2012, either he is one of the earliest investors, or he doesn't care as much and didn't just write too much, or more likely outcome could be that someone sold their "old" account and this is a new user who uses the account for signature campaigns and constantly writes nowadays. In any case, he doesn't look like a newbie, all three possible options show that it is someone who knows crypto.

Crypto investment is the only thing you could do with a haste, crypto trade is not the one that should be done in haste. If you "invest" that word means you are buying, you can buy at any point at all times and as long as you can keep holding it, then one day you will profit, it is the trade that you can't do with haste since it could cause you to lose a lot of money.

Unfortunately it is the truth. I mean the price is VERY low compared to ATH right now, and if you think that we will break over ATH once again in the future, then you should be buying the hell out of the current price, right? There are so many people complaining about the current situation that we are talking about something that is something not really there for many people and they act as if the drop is.. like some final thing.

Yes, it is a bad thing but it is not the final period, not like we are closing bitcoin down in 2022, it will continue to exist for years and years, so why are we even worried? I do not get the whole thing, people act as if they are not allowed to buy and profit from it, like somehow this is something that was done against THEM personally and not the market movement. Yes, it goes down and yes it goes up, it is always like that.

Spurs finally had a decent game. It came down to Houston of course and they are a tanking team so having a great game against Houston doesn't mean anything and we are as good as tanking at this point. However, it is at least good to see the flashes of potential in that team. Warriors had a great game as well, they are not working like a well oiled machine and that is always great to see.

It is also a proof that they didn't need KD to be this good, even without him or barnes or anyone, the big trio is making everyone around them be better, Kerr needs to get some credit for it as well since he is a great coach that can take most out of you.

Lakers winning is a great thing for them, with AD back and all they will need a few more wins, but looking at the 6th spot, Denver is a lot more ahead and I do not think that Lakers could be there anymore. It is either 8th or 7th for Lakers if you ask me, and that is "usually" means first round exit.

I believe it is not even about being in more shape, they need more players. They do not have players that play with Barcelona tiki taka style that Xavi grew up with and now uses as his tactics. Don't get me wrong, there are some players who uses that tactic but not all of them. Which is a proof that they need players either coming from youth like ansu fati and pedri.

They need to also stay healthy as well, ansu show some brilliance when he played but keeps getting injured all the time, I do not think that you can be a star player when you are always injured. All in all I believe that we should probably see Barcelona change a lot of players in order to get better, not just getting used to the tactic and all that.

I believe that it is not about home advantage, it is about Saint Ettiene being a horrible team this year. They are at the bottom of the league and mainly losing games as well. This should result with them being a bit easier opponent to anyone that plays against them. Angers is not a great team or anything, but they are certainly better than a team at the bottom of the league.

This is why I believe that we should not be really so shocked that they would end up winning this game. These type of "extra" games never really get me excited, not many games today that I would like to wager, and I am not sure if I want today to have just one wager with Angers, looks quite easy bet, but doesn't really worth it with the odds and being alone.

I would guess that people are talking about stuff like quantum computing. Not that it is out yet, but it could be one day, or at least that is what people are saying. In that case, even just one of them would be enough, we would see a big big problem with a single quantum computer managing to crack everything, but that is probably a problem for everything and not just crypto. All of the worlds passwords would be in trouble, all websites would be in trouble, whoever gets their hand on a quantum computer would be in big big trouble.

This is why there are so many securities in place for the works of it, you can't just make one in your home, that would not work. I guess it would not come down to crypto being broken by quantum computing anytime soon, and even if the danger is there one day, we could easily implement something that could stop a possible attack as well.