The "hope" for pump is not a bad thing because every time we "hoped" for a pump the price actually did went up. Look at history of bitcoin and you will see that it always goes up and it will always go up, there is no scenario where in 10 years bitcoin is not higher than right now, we all know it will. So why would we not get hyped about a pump? You know how rare it is to know that you can buy something and you are 100% guaranteed to make money in 10 years? Probably more money than you can imagine?

This is why people are very excited about the situation and that is why you see people getting hyped about it constantly. Will it be tomorrow? Probably not, but we know that it WILL happen and that is what matters, doesn't matter when it will happen as long as it happens and that is the key reason why we are getting hyped about it at all times even when it is going down.

Unfortunately USA will not care about inflation right now considering all the shit they are going through. We are talking about a nation that literally had people storming the capitol building to kill senators, LITERALLY KILLED A POLICE OFFICER, and there is nothing going on with it right now, there is no larger check on balances, everyone got away with it, just the people who did kill the cop will be persecuted and zero politicians are held accountable, senators who hided or senators who held the doors closed shut from fearing their life ended up saying it was nothing just to get more votes.

Not like that was enough already, they are now making voting incredibly hard, as hard as it could get in the state level, which means they are trying to make sure that less and less people vote, and democrats are just watching, they are bunch of proper idiots as well, so democracy is going away as well. Inflation is NOTHING compared to these type of things they are dealing.

Why exactly? Why can't they "decide" who should win? First of all they do not decide, they just let people write and do not let some of them write, that is all they do and nothing more which is totally under their own rules because it is a company and they can allow one person to write and the other not to write just with the basis of "I do not want to" and they can do it, they do not need any more reason than that, just if they dislike a guy just ban him that's it. Why? Because they are a company and they can just decline to offer someone their services, just like how you can decline to work with someone, simple as that, any shop owner in all of USA could decline to give you a product, it is allowed.

About the political stuff, we have fox news constantly pumping lies about politics EVERY HOUR, literally saying batshit crazy lies and when they were sued they literally defended themselves with "we are not news channel, we are entertainment, nobody sane would believe we are a news channel", so they literally act as news channels but claim they are not in order to be able to tell lies, according to Fox News, their "news" is literally like SNL news, a stand up to make people laugh, that's their defense.

If republicans can use fox news that way without any crimes broken, I am sorry but I hope twitter bans EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN, that's how this game should be played, either make it all fair, or screw them all.

Kawhi seems to be returning for game 6, that is the latest that I could find. Which means if Clippers could snatch one more win at home (which Kawhi would have been amazing for if he could just play at home) that means even if they lose game 5, they will have their star player back for 2 games at game 6 and 7. That is why this next game will be the utmost importance, it is at home, you need just one more game not to get eliminated and then you are going to have your star player at the very important games, he didn't miss much so I think he will not be that bad when he comes back.

Obviously series is still up for grabs by any team, even with Kawhi returning we could see Suns winning, they were better without CP3 which was a shock to me, without CP3 they were tanking last year and this year with CP3 they were better but for the past 2 games they were better without him, I do not know how to feel about it.

Bitcointalk Profile Link:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152752
Current amount of posts (Including this one):  3894
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 4
SegWit BTC Address:  bc1q94yaf5g2f6szd02v6w9cfevjsmttlpt5jsm54s

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152752
Current amount of posts (including this one):  3894
bech32 BTC Address:  bc1q94yaf5g2f6szd02v6w9cfevjsmttlpt5jsm54s
Earned merit in the last 120 days: 7

I would have to say Chelsea is not really doing that bad, I mean you do not have to be champions to be a "good" team because you can still be a good team without winning the league, you wouldn't become the best team (that's City for me) but the reality is that good team is enough to be happy about.

Chelsea could have won the last game and would have made a better end of season but Tuchel actually end up not doing that bad, took a team that was doing very bad and made them into a champions league team once again and that's a good comeback, if you take that Tuchel period and put it on the whole season that would be a very very good team. Let's see what they will be capable of doing next season.

It's all about choice, what you like and also the level risk you're ready to take. Since cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, a lot of people tend to avoid it and go for stocks that are not as volatile as cryptocurrency. You might be saying this because you only hear stories of people that got rich through cryptocurrency and you never get to hear of those that have lost and became even more broke.

So the thing here is that if you're going to be doing something you should be doing what works for you and not just because it works for others. Even cryptocurrency may require a long time patience before you can benefit from it, it's not every time that the profit comes quickly, sometimes you might have to wait for a year or more than that, and the good thing is that when it comes, it's going to be huge. But not everyone can wait that long.

I do not blame Elon at all, you know why? Because if people give him that much power, then he will definitely use it, why not use that kind of power when you have it? It is every single person who makes trading decisions based on Elon that is the problem and as long as those people exist, we will keep having this kind of problem for sure.

We are not going to have any type of problem with crypto if we could just ignore Elon and any other person who might want to talk about it, but if we keep trading based on what Elon says or someone else says, that is not going to change and we can't blame Elon for "dropping the price" because he wasn't the one who dropped the price, it was the people who sold their bitcoins because of his tweet that we should be blaming, they shouldn't have sold their coins based on what Elon says but they did and they are the ones to blame.

It was Elon that caused it as well, that is the funny thing. He talked about how his company Tesla, after just few months, will not sell cars for bitcoin because of "environmental fear" and then all the crypto prices crashed. He asked about "should tesla accept doge" a bit before that as well. It is an obvious attempt that he wanted to get doge above bitcoin, even if not above marketcap, it should be above in profitability, the price dropped after his SNL sketch and that is why he wanted to recover it but now with the bitcoin tweet he destroyed all of it.

This is basically the reason why I believe he wanted to do something but failed miserably while doing that, because when bitcoin drops everything else drops with it. In the end we are in a world where crypto is tied together and people like Elon should not have this much power over it at all.

All these methods you have mentioned are good, but most of them has certain requirements you have to meet before you talk about doing them , it may be something that has to do with experience, skills, or even status. Let's talk about staking, that's the easiest anyone can do , it's really easy for anyone to do it, as long as you have enough funds , you can stake it and make extra profit (although there are some risks, but some platforms are now providing means to avoid those risks).

Then talk about ICOs, wouldn't be good for newbies, they will just end up being frustrated. That happened to me when I was still a noob and had no experience, every single one of them never paid off, and I was kind of frustrated that all my hard works there never paid. So it's best to study them first before you go ahead, and also be ready for what comes with it.

Trading is good, if you have funds and you can trade, then why not? I trade whenever I have the time, and I have friends that trading is part of their daily jobs they do, they don't miss doing it for a single day.
As for NFTs, it will be hard to get it sold if you are not popular on social media lol. I think that's all I have to say for now.

This is definitely a psychological suggestion.

When you heartfully thank for what you get then probably you may not go greedy further; when you are not feeling grateful and then not showing gratitude, you will definitely become more greedy which is the point your emotions are getting more power to control you.

Yeah, it is all about self-control.

Self-control will help a trader to stick within plans. Your plans must include when to enter and where to exit. This simply eliminates the chances of being aggressive or being panic. Just going by plan will get rid off psychological dominance.

I cannot agree or accept your point. Market is moved by whales but not all the times. When individuals like you and me are trading in same direction, we will make impact like whales and I do believe these days, this kind of market movements are happening time to time, by considering the adoption level of bitcoins globally.

Yeah reputed coins and technical parts are perfect combination to make easy profits from crypto markets and when we are trading with the help of technical and fundamental analysis then trading is becoming a scientific approach and definitely not a gamble.

I do understand why the game place would be changed, it is both british teams and england put a red alert on Turkey so it is not a shock that there would be some sort of compromise for it. It is still not in england, it is not like "oh if it is two premier league teams let's do it on wembley" type of deal, it is definitely something much bigger than that and they are doing it in Porto I believe, so it is still foreign.

However in a period when England managed to vaccinate over %60 of their people, it would be unwise for them to send 2 whole teams (probably close to 100+ people total, probably 200-300 in the end) to a nation they deem red alert level of bad in corona virus situation. Looking at how Turkey is doing, they had over 60k+ new cases just a few weeks ago and not it is under 15k in 2 weeks, that seems to be a main reason why England believed the numbers to be fake and put that red alert, makes sense.

I am sure you do not care about it neither all that much but there are some gamblers who do and that is why I get the license. But to me, even though it is funny and I know I am rare in this regard, Stake is more trustworthy than curacao license. I don't know who gives licenses in curacao, I don't know if it is a government branch, or a company or whatever but I have seen too many places with curacao license to get "hacked" and nobody got their money back, owners just took off because of it.

This tells me curacao license worths zero in my mind, they are worthless and useless and you might as well not even have one. Not everyone thinks the same I know, there are many who wants to see a license evident from this topic alone where people are looking for it, but that is just people who do not know stake. I may not like it here as much as I used to because of some issues I have, BUT there is no doubt in my mind that Stake is more trustworthy than any license provider in the world.

That is exactly the reason why people are changing their bitcoin into altcoins. I am not doing that just yet because I already made a good enough profit, I did 10x this year already and I do not want to take the risks, when altcoins do 10x during bitcoin going 2x only that is a good time to own altcoin but when the price drops altcoins drop 90% while bitcoin drops 50% so I do not want to really make any sort of risk by going to altcoins now, I already have a good amount of money and I do not think that bitcoin would drop that much anymore.

Long story short I won't, but I also understand people who do, it is not really a bad thing to do because altcoins could make you a lot more money and you should focus on that if you want to take the risks and make a good amount of money, it is definitely something that would be profitable for you if you are right.

These are needed but not limited to. It means just because of having all these will not guarantee big success for a coin. Have seen many good concept based coins got failed due to lack of supporters. It means devs must work on convincing new investors all the times. If a project fails to attract new investors then it may get heavily dumped and the slowly will get delisted from exchanges.

When a project remain attractive for new investors and for existing investors to keep holding their coins/tokens?
It will remain attractive when new features being added and roadmaps is getting updated regularly and when devs interact with crypto community in social media etc.

Overall, active dev team is the most important requirement for success of a coin.

These days with massive circulating supply, new coins are simply enjoying higher rank on coinmarkcatcap easily.
If my memory serves me correctly then in recent times another coin which got listed into top 10 rank was palkadot.

Already we have Hedera and BSC which are promising for providing solutions to scaling problems and being considered for heavily competitors for etehreum in the sector of dapps. So, having another one is definitely not a surprise in this decentralized environments.

I may not invest more than 30% of my currently available funds in altcoins. Because I'm already holding few reputed coins hence I will not be risking more with altcoins. But, I'm looking for bitcoins to dip to buy more. This may be the right time to buy more altcoins but at the same time we need to be more cautious because most of the time altcoins may not find up surge but keep falling down when bitcoin prices will be increasing.

I'm just talking based on what I have observed in the past; when bitcoin was into strong bullish run but most of the altcoins were struggling. So, anything may happen and risking only limited resources will be helpful.

You mean people are understanding like Elon Musk is pumping for his own benefits or for nothing? But, when he's pumping everyone will be getting benefited if they are preferred. Because, I'm not seeing any big differences on his pumping from how stock markets are working. So, I believe that there is nothing about to understand on Elon Musk's tweets and his pumping.

I wish both Tesla and SpaceX will be accepting both bitcoins and dogecoins. Why only one business will be accepting only one coin? This way I believe both of these coins will be having good future in coming years. So, making use of that future is truly in our hand.