...One could argue it could turn in a sell the news event with the new upcoming updates..
Seems unlikely. I have argued before that this is not really a rumour-news event, because no one really knows the date of the new release. I would agree with you if there was a set date for the upcoming release. One little remark, this is crypto, so you could be right. EDIT: Also, we had that little spike last week one huge volume. It could very well be that those buyers dumped later because the "spike" lost momentum. i also do not think it will be a rumor-news thing. many allready tried to frontrun it and got burned by doing so. the big news is the hardfork in march and my guess it this is not yet priced in. but it will come, even if 0.9 is released in february if i understood correctly. with the first hardfork there wont be this full 6 months cycle. (please tell if wrong) so yeah there is a date somehow and it will be a very big event for monero. we still have a lot of transactions with mixing 0, this hardfork will increase default functionality for everyone and make monero a much much better coin. having a pimped client with less ram and new db etc is only the bonus if you ask me, its all about the minimum mixing. btw yes i very much agree on the liquidity thing. since we all provide liquidity, why cant it be higher like it was earlier? in my view it really has a lot to do with polos kyc rules. am i wrong? or are you guys just broke?  at least the polo kyc is the main reason for me. i do not want to get full registration. so could an exchange without kyc/aml help against the liquidity shortage? or is it just a general market phase that many coins/markets experience If there is any confusion around the hardfork, read this -> https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3n06qw/there_seems_to_be_some_confusion_around_the/Regarding polo and liquidity. It is a bit of both. First, back in the day the max withdrawal limit was the same for everyone. In other words, everyone could withdraw an unlimited (might have been 25k, not entirely sure about that) amount. Thus, it was fairly easy to get out your money quickly. With the KYC in place, polo literally needs to know everything about you before you have this 25k limit. Name and country will only give you a limit of 2k, which is quite small if you want to provide liquidity. Even the 7k limit, that you get after filling in some additional data, such as address if I recall correctly, is quite small if you want to provide liquidity. Certainly with the current BTC prices. At last, providing KYC data to companies is a huge turn off for people involved with cryptocurrency. It isn't necessarily that they are warry of providing the data itself. Just that they are warry of the possibility that their data might leak after a hack. Like I said before, polo literally needs to know everything from you to raise your limit to 25k (including photos if I recall correctly). If this data gets leaked somehow, that's a huge personal risk (think of identity theft, which is certainly no joke). |
|
|
|
Hello All,
I was wondering if someone might be able to help me out. I have been using monero since last summer and never had any issues sending coins, however yesterday afternoon (about 24 hours ago) I sent XMR from one of my wallets to another one of my wallets with simplewallet synced via bitmonerod. The transaction said "money successfully sent", but the coins never showed up in my receiving address. Not only that, but 24 hours later I still have a difference between my locked and unlocked balances in the sending wallet. I sent 1200 coins with a mixin of 5. Has anyone else experienced anything like this before, or I am just screwed?
Not sure what to do here given I have over 1200 XMR in limbo right now that cannot be accessed or seen, so any help of any kind would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help ahead of time. Happy Holidays!
AKW
Perhaps a stupid question, but have you actually refreshed both of your wallets? If not, just type refresh in simplewallet (make sure bitmonerod is fully synced). Also, what happened to your other account? Not Stupid! The answer is yes, I was refreshing about every 2 minutes while synced with bitmonerod. From right when the coins where sent until right now some of the coins in wallet 1 are still locked from this tx, and in wallet 2 there is nothing. No coins have been received. BTW, I have sent between these two wallets multiple time, even recently, with no issues. I am positive the address was correct. Any ideas?! I'm kind freaking out... Cheers! I have had this happen to me before. I was using a usb-ethernet dongle and I was refreshed/current with the network, but right before I sent the coins the dongle lost power or something and the transaction never actually went through, though it said it did on my simplewallet. I only figured out what happened about a month later when it happened again and I watched the lights of the dongle go out and put 2 and 2 together. Turns out the funds never left the wallet to begin with, it just looked like it did. Check to see if you have the same amount of monero as before you sent the transaction, maybe check your log or something, but i feel like this is the same thing that happened to me, hope so at least. According to the reddit thread, something similiar happened. The coins are back in his original wallet, so the issue is resolved :-) |
|
|
|
Another update from ShenNoether (NobleSir) regarding Confidential Transactions (CT) for Monero: edit 12/15/2015: I'm starting to play around with some c/c++ stuff that will help me implement this thing for real - I'll probably take a couple weeks off for xmas holidays though starting next week, so expect no updates dec 17-jan 4 All updates & links are in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3pw30d/ringct_for_monero_updated_versions/Another one: edit 12/17/2015: I have updated the draft on eprint.iacr.org in response to some knock-off versions of this math showing up without citation. Link: http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098Where did "knock-off versions of this math" show up without citation? Is someone trying to plagiarizer your work?It's Shen Noether's (NobleSir) work, so you should credit him. Yes seems so to bolded. |
|
|
|
Anyone speculating on a bearish price?
One could argue it could turn in a sell the news event with the new upcoming updates. We saw huge liquidity, some bigger holdings definitely changed the hands, and they need the liquidity they get from news like the upcoming update, to be able to cash out larger amounts of XMR.
Any ideas?
Seems unlikely. I have argued before that this is not really a rumour-news event, because no one really knows the date of the new release. I would agree with you if there was a set date for the upcoming release. One little remark, this is crypto, so you could be right. EDIT: Also, we had that little spike last week one huge volume. It could very well be that those buyers dumped later because the "spike" lost momentum. |
|
|
|
Git updates since last time:
Since last post: - more wallet refresh speedups - a few more berkeley db key fixes - fixups for databases created with an early version of the db branch - compatibility with older libdb - new --offline daemon argument - fixes to potential crashers in DB code - optional use of TCP for DNS requests (plays nice with Tor) - atomic wallet cache save (to avoid some types of corruption) - misc tweaks to the README (using Tor, rlwrap) - cleanup in daemon headers, to speed up builds - a couple daemon exit hang fixes, and crash on ^C Quoting because Bitcointalk is borked it seems. |
|
|
|
Another update from ShenNoether (NobleSir) regarding Confidential Transactions (CT) for Monero: edit 12/15/2015: I'm starting to play around with some c/c++ stuff that will help me implement this thing for real - I'll probably take a couple weeks off for xmas holidays though starting next week, so expect no updates dec 17-jan 4 All updates & links are in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3pw30d/ringct_for_monero_updated_versions/Another one: edit 12/17/2015: I have updated the draft on eprint.iacr.org in response to some knock-off versions of this math showing up without citation. Link: http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098 |
|
|
|
Hello All,
I was wondering if someone might be able to help me out. I have been using monero since last summer and never had any issues sending coins, however yesterday afternoon (about 24 hours ago) I sent XMR from one of my wallets to another one of my wallets with simplewallet synced via bitmonerod. The transaction said "money successfully sent", but the coins never showed up in my receiving address. Not only that, but 24 hours later I still have a difference between my locked and unlocked balances in the sending wallet. I sent 1200 coins with a mixin of 5. Has anyone else experienced anything like this before, or I am just screwed?
Not sure what to do here given I have over 1200 XMR in limbo right now that cannot be accessed or seen, so any help of any kind would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help ahead of time. Happy Holidays!
AKW
Perhaps a stupid question, but have you actually refreshed both of your wallets? If not, just type refresh in simplewallet (make sure bitmonerod is fully synced). Also, what happened to your other account? Not Stupid! The answer is yes, I was refreshing about every 2 minutes while synced with bitmonerod. From right when the coins where sent until right now some of the coins in wallet 1 are still locked from this tx, and in wallet 2 there is nothing. No coins have been received. BTW, I have sent between these two wallets multiple time, even recently, with no issues. I am positive the address was correct. Any ideas?! I'm kind freaking out... Cheers! Actually not sure what happened then. I hope someone else can chime in and provide you with an answer. Perhaps try what saddambitcoin suggested? EDIT: You can check the blockheight on https://moneroblocks.eu |
|
|
|
Another update from ShenNoether (NobleSir) regarding Confidential Transactions (CT) for Monero: edit 12/15/2015: I'm starting to play around with some c/c++ stuff that will help me implement this thing for real - I'll probably take a couple weeks off for xmas holidays though starting next week, so expect no updates dec 17-jan 4 All updates & links are in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3pw30d/ringct_for_monero_updated_versions/Another one: edit 12/17/2015: I have updated the draft on eprint.iacr.org in response to some knock-off versions of this math showing up without citation. Link: http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098 |
|
|
|
Hello All,
I was wondering if someone might be able to help me out. I have been using monero since last summer and never had any issues sending coins, however yesterday afternoon (about 24 hours ago) I sent XMR from one of my wallets to another one of my wallets with simplewallet synced via bitmonerod. The transaction said "money successfully sent", but the coins never showed up in my receiving address. Not only that, but 24 hours later I still have a difference between my locked and unlocked balances in the sending wallet. I sent 1200 coins with a mixin of 5. Has anyone else experienced anything like this before, or I am just screwed?
Not sure what to do here given I have over 1200 XMR in limbo right now that cannot be accessed or seen, so any help of any kind would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help ahead of time. Happy Holidays!
AKW
Perhaps a stupid question, but have you actually refreshed both of your wallets? If not, just type refresh in simplewallet (make sure bitmonerod is fully synced). Also, what happened to your other account? EDIT: Do you have the viewkey of your receiving wallet/address and the transaction hash? In that case you can use this particular website to check if your receiving wallet/address actually received the coins. http://xmr.llcoins.net/viewkey.html |
|
|
|
Anyone here know, or can guess when 0.9 will be released?
Are the developers paid enough for their development work? It seems the release has been later than the expectations of some people. The core-team works on a voluntary basis, only MoneroMooo and tewinget are funded currently. EDIT: Some others as well btw, all funded work in progress can be observed here -> https://forum.getmonero.org/9/work-in-progress |
|
|
|
erm guys? didnt jojatekok step back from this and his wallet because of his school or career? OP is from february
Yes he did, this isn't the correct thread either :-P |
|
|
|
Hi All, I have a dark coin wallet v0.11.1.25 . I want to send them to a dash wallet.
Do I download the latest dash client and then swap in the wallet.dat from the dark wallet to the dash wallet?
Thanks in advance
Yes. ------------------------------------- But be sure to make a backup of your dark wallet. For anyone that is reading, make sure to always download wallets etc. from the official website. |
|
|
|
So I have fully synchronized with the monero blockchain on 0.9 beta windows. These are inconsistencies I have noticed:
1) The private working set of memory is now manageable and small, unfortunately the whole working set is the same as in previous versions of bitmonerod. Around 8Gb and machine is struggling.
2) I now have a blockchain.bin of around 4.8Gb but also a Db file of another 10Gb which is unacceptable in storage terms.
3) The beta does not work with any of the gui versions but that is to be expected and I assume rectified shortly in development.
The speed of the sync was actually quite faster that I expected and there is good connectivity of nodes which is good as well.
Has anyone else running the beta code noticed issues similarly?
[1] Are you sure it isn't still syncing? Check the blockheight at the daemon and compare that with the blockheight on https://moneroblocks.eu. I think the green line in bitmonerod (stating something like, you are now fully synced and are able to use simplewallet) already appears somewhat before you are fully synced. LMDB only takes what it can take (during syncing). If much of your RAM is already allocated, LMDB won't take it while syncing. In other words, it won't get stuck like for instance the old binaries. After syncing it only takes <100 MB. [2] That seems to be correct, the RAW file is around 2.3 GB. The size reported by you is the database representation used by the daemon. In my opinion, 14 GB isn't that much if you have a decent PC with a decent HDD/SSD. Currently, most of them have plenty of GBs and 14 GB is relatively small compared to that. [3] If you mean the third party GUIs, that is correct. I think the developers of them will merge LMDB when it is officially released. |
|
|
|
Let me try the 0.9 beta. I'll report back how I get on. Sorry about that, I could have sworn this had already been solved with binaries a while back. I must be losing it.
No problem! Might be a bit ambiguous for people who don't follow this thread that often. I am curious about your experience with the new beta. Btw, if you have an HDD it might sync a bit slower. With an SSD, a decent pc and a decent connection it should take around an hour. |
|
|
|
|
What's the point of repeatedly opening these kind of topics?
|
|
|
|
transfer <mixin> <Deposit Address> <amount> <mixin> is optional, and you will get a reasonable default, so you can just transfer <address> <amount> Seems difficult huh? busterzzz is making a valid point. The current official Monero binaries are over one year old, require over 9.2 GB of RAM, a 64bit processor and OS, and crash every few days. If one actually compiles from source then of course the situation is radically improved one actually gets a very lean, robust and efficient cli wallet that when synchronized requires approximately 100 MB of RAM. It also runs on both 32bit and 64 bit processors and operating systems. Monero is a very actively developed coin where a major rewrite of the code has occurred over the last year, but in order to benefit from this one has to compile the code from source. Edit: This is the real place to get Monero software; https://github.com/monero-project/bitmoneroI probably shouldn't act in a passive aggressive manner I'm just over it (both parties involved). I would rather see discussion that is positive and collaborative. I've tried to express this before but got shot down. Anyways I'm *going to attempt to compile monero from source again, as I am not that much of a layman I can give it a try using the link you pasted above. I will report back honestly and fairly because its best if I give this another go instead of giving up. Divide and Conquer, some other group of people will come out on top while people sit here arguing about bs. *edit 1 typo Compiling instructions that might help you -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652305.msg12033096#msg12033096 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
