I wish he would find some other board. With all these programmers here cannot someone just make a site for him where a bot just agrees with him and parrots back his ravings?
How are you sure everyone here is human?  Maybe he's an anti-Sembot! |
|
|
|
|
Considering there's about 11 million BTC in circulation right now, he would be correct to say he was Bitcoin.
Also, I have six nipples. I am dog.
|
|
|
|
one of the reasons:
stupidity
You're right, Socialism is a pretty stupid way to run an economy. he was describing his posts. he is bipolar and the other self was reading them. That would explain why he always posts in succession. |
|
|
|
|
For some reason, women aren't quite as interested in Bitcoin as men are, despite Bitcoin not being targeted at any one gender.
I find this extremely unusual. Upsetting, even. So what are women interested in? What could be more interesting than this?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to say a decentralized exchange will help. However, as long as we compared Bitcoin to Dollars, this will always be an issue.
Once a real economy is centered around Bitcoin, this will begin to change. As the dollar is the dominating currency right now, we're all at its mercy, until we, together, stop using it.
|
|
|
|
You myfriend, think you have some sort of rep/status on this forum. You have no idea how shit works with your grand 64 posts. I do not charge for drafts, all you must do is pm meyour concept, im not asking for trust, im asking for the CHANCE to build it, which is more than fair
Just post some examples in your OP so people can see what you are capable of. You must have done prior work, or practice work, at some point in time. Do shops hide all their merchandise until you say you want to buy something? |
|
|
|
|
I think the DDoS let up. It's going okay for me now.
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's a "chargeback". But since most people will just want to buy some Bitcoin and the rate of fraud can be easily(?) determined, why not offer it as a high-fee service?
Chargeback on high fee, too. And nobody's gonna go for it if they're not trying to chargeback. |
|
|
|
|
I'll say it.
Nobody's gonna help you out. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Potential dumbfuck I don't even. |
|
|
|
Ghandi should have written to Churchill too. After all, they did not mind Stalin attacking Poland.
Have you ever tried to write a post with more than 100 words and 10 sentences? My address is in the sig. Also, a quick peek at posting history will answer your question. Welcome, grammar Nazi! I'm an idiot, please help me. Good thing you have me. How else would you learn anything on the Internet? If he gave you a short answer, it's because that's all that was needed. Nobody needs three novels to explain why the Earth is round. You could probably fit that explanation into one or two sentences, couldn't you? Pro tip: don't be a smartass, and then take offence to the backfire. |
|
|
|
|
At least FirstAscent made sense of his views. This guy's in his own fantasy world.
|
|
|
|
Ghandi should have written to Churchill too. After all, they did not mind Stalin attacking Poland.
Have you ever tried to write a post with more than 100 words and 10 sentences? My address is in the sig. Also, a quick peek at posting history will answer your question. |
|
|
|
|
Good god. This site can't get any more unusable right now.
|
|
|
|
Should a Jewish restaurant owner be forced to serve a skinhead?
Sure! And why not? Palestine saw what happens when jews have too much wiggle room.
Isn't there a skinhead forum floating on the web somewhere? I'm sure you'll find lots of fascits just like you. |
|
|
|
The problem with Ivy League geniuses is that they spend their days spinning empty theory, and they so rarely go out and run real-world experiments to test their hypotheses.
Exactly this. Ivy leaguers are completely disconnected with reality, their knowledge is mostly regurgitation and the rest is baseless BS about the world they think they live in. It's sad to anyone who understands why saying "less-sophisticated" means nothing except "I'm a douchebag and your thoughts aren't made of gold like mine are." |
|
|
|
|
500 BITCOIN HAHAHAHAHA
Op is all like, "Those Americans are so rich and stupid! Surely they'll send me all fheir money for a measely secret!"
|
|
|
|
|
It works like this: if the state tells you to do something, you must do it. If you do not, you will be forced to. If force means we must kill you, then so be it; the law comes before your life. Is this not in direct violation to basic human rights? Will you deny my right to live for the sake of "order"?
It is immoral to support this system. By voting, you are agreeing that it is perfectly okay to use this system against me, even if that means killing me. I have done nothing to you. You do not know me. And yet your vote, no matter the direction, will be used against me. This is statism; this is your power to vote given away to the government. There are many ways to vote, but a yae or nay to use the power of state force against me, a stranger, is immoral.
|
|
|
|
Or, in my analogy, sign non-aggression treaties, make trade agreements, and join "treaty organizations" (DRO's).
Certainly; the key point is to admit rights by admitting other's rights. As long as this is upheld, you could subscribe to any form of living you'd like, with others, or without others. |
|
|
|
Way I see it, attempting to strive for the peace using a violent system is fruitless.
This statement makes sense. However, the jump from there to "no voting whatsoever" strikes me as odd. If there is a system which incorporates violence, yet allows a nonviolent vote to stop the violence, how can that vote be immoral? With less rhetoric (actually just more words): Consider an area where marijuana is prohibited by force. If the majority of the citizens vote to legalize marijuana (unconditionally), then nothing happens except the force stops. In this case the vote is certainly not immoral, and it might even be moral (though it probably stops short of imperative). You're right; the force stops. However, because the system is still in place, marijuana can just as easily be abolished once again. Laws are never permanent, they are always changed, and they are always at another's expense. Politics center around one thing: rob Peter to pay Paul. So the problem is law. To participate in such a system is to agree that violence is the answer; even though you may not agree that violence is the best answer, you may even despise violence with all your might, by participating in violence to revoke violence temporarily, you admit that it's an acceptable form of action. I don't believe it is. Cut off one head, two more grow in its place. So you attack the heart. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
