That wouldn't be possible there are thousands of contributors, all would have to agree. CC is largely single source (us), the very few external contributors had no objection.
You cloned and used parts of original Trezor open source code, and that is ok because they are the first original hardware wallet, and now you are bitching that someone else used and changed your open source code. I found that extremely egoistic and hypocritical, but you can do whatever you want, it's your product. Passport released everything including hardware as open source, and they used totally different hardware than Coldcard, so you are obviously going in totally different directions. Good luck to both of you.
|
|
|
Almost identical wording to the not-an-audit that Mazars performed for Crypto.com, which as I point out in this post, is completely meaningless. And again, just like the Crypto.com one, absolutely no mention of their centralized token they can print out of thin air to prop themselves up and use to buy enough bitcoin to make everything look peachy. Oh but Binance can ''burn'' they tokens and they are doing this circus trick to fool all the people how their token is special, scarce and very valuable. I posted their official reserves chart several times and they have extreme high amount of their own printed stable coin BUSD, that should be red alert for everyone, even without all the other crap they are doing. I said t before and I will say it again CZ = Scam Bankman, so don't be surprise to see more arrests in future... I don't care what this crooks are doing, but governments will blame Bitcoin for this and they will try to push for more strict regulations in future.
|
|
|
Not e for self It's best to use Bitcointalk UserNote script made by TryNinja, for this purpose: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5411599.0I see that JollyBad tagged many users in similar way (to himself) with neutral tag, so this sounds more like a Negative feedback from him, that would allow him to get pass other DT members criticism. I wouldn't worry about neutral feedback from anyone, but you could improve your post quality joker_josue, and avoid posting in his duplicated self-moderated gambling topics. Some of his duplicated topics probably need to be deleted for breaking forum rules.
|
|
|
OP this is obvious case of multiple accounts being used to abuse sportsbet casino, so don't expect to hear from them on any of your email addresses You also deserve to have negative feedback on your forum account for cheating, lying and trying to get support from bitcointalk community.
|
|
|
Sensitive and private information found in medical records could be used against people if it were made public. in my opinion, would not be an acceptable use case.
Your medical records are probably already online with your centralized government system, so they can already be hacked much easier and even without quantum computers. Bitcoin exist for more than a decade, it was never hacked and it is running 99.9% of the time, that stats doesn't exist in any centralized system. That being said, I don't want my sensitive information stored on blockchain, but Bitcoin was never created for that purpose.
|
|
|
We found a balance with MIT+CC, you can indeed fork, change it, sell it, the intention is Commercial Limitation; ie cloning the whole code base and starting a competing product as it was done. Funny enough little on the hard stuff we built that was clone has changed on the fork.
Imagine Bitcoin developers started changing BTC open source code to CC after first shitcoin forks showed up Lame excuse from you nvK and I don't agree with you that nothing or little was changed in Passport wallet, but it's not very hard to compare two github repositories to see the difference, so I don't have to trust your words. Someone could correct me if I am wrong, but I think that you also didn't release your Seed XOR (version of Shamir Secret Sharing) as open source, just showing how wrong your thinking is. But hey, do whatever you think is best for your product, if you are selling better than ever like you say, you have nothing to complain about.
|
|
|
Which method is the most effective?
Why wouldn't you use all of them, and I would also add Joinmarket in that bunch. There are also other options like using Lightning Network, or using Layer 2 Bitcoin wallets like Mercury that uses statechains. I like to have more options when I want to have more privacy, and combination of more tools is certainly giving better results.
|
|
|
Can anyone recommend a noncustodial Monero wallet?
Trezor model T and ledger hardware wallets are supporting monero last time I checked. There are several software wallets, but one that looks a lot like Electrum is called Feather wallet. Also what about decenterlized exchanges besides Bisq, RoboSats and LocalMonero? Any thoughts on LocalMonero?[/color]
Last I heard is that someone from Cake wallet team is working on forking Bisq exchange and they are calling it Haveno, but things are not moving very fast. Telegram owner Durov recently announced they are working on their own version of decentralized exchange, but nobody knows how and when is that coming out. There are no other real decentralized exchanges as far as i know, but LocalMonero, AgoraDesk and HodlHold als also working fine.
|
|
|
How exactly can this method be used offline? I just tried to do Reshuffle and I got presented with eternal google captchas that I couldn't solve after many attempts, that makes it unusable for me at the moment. To make it work I would have to wait for some time, or use different browser until google decides i am human being and it lets me solve captchas. For anything like this to be used, it must be released as Open Source and inspected by Bitcoin security experts, but I think it's adding extra complexity that could result in losing of coins.
|
|
|
SHOPINBIT is a official Reseller of Blockstream products in Europe.
Good news for everyone who wanted to receive their Jade wallet faster in Europe, but is it appears to be sold out already... I can currently see only preorder option for €69.99 on ShopinBit, and on official Blockstream website there is still in stock for $49.99. Do you only have regular black case version, or you are also offering transparent green case version for the same price?
|
|
|
The limit is 10M$ per transaction i highly doubt someone will reach it.
I appreciate you are working on supporting no-kyc policy, but you should be more careful with your promises and claims. It's not totally impossible to imagine that some hackers could try to convert that amount of stolen coins using your website and changeNOW exchange. I am interested to know what would happen in that case, and are you using some third party exchanges other than changeNOW? You should also add more information if you are saving IP addresses and all other details from your custoemrs. I compared your rates with other similar instant exchanges, and I am getting much lower rates on your website. Maybe you could contact owners of kycnot.me website, so they could test and rate your website.
|
|
|
Does anyone have example of long term gov honeypot?".
I don't know exactly how long encrypted ANOM phones existed but I think it was much longer than examples you mentioned. Wikipedia article claims that initial device distribution was in October 2018, and they revealed themselves as Operation Trojan Shield or Operation Ironside three years later in 2021. This is not cryptocurrency related, but it is related to privacy, and I think there could be more examples like this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANOMPS There was a seizure of cryptocurrencies (along other things) from people who used ANOM phones.
|
|
|
Yeah, I've got some (long-term) plans to develop a few bitcoin-accepting services, and I can promise you that I won't be participating in any "mandated" checking/flagging of deposits. I'm a fungibility nut, so I simply don't care [1] where funds originate from, I'll accept them without bias and likely mix them on withdrawal, too. Good to hear you are working on that project, and I don't doubt it's going to be something interesting, judging by your recent forum contribution and suggestions for improevement. If I want to be honest, all current centralized exchanges are acting like a mixers, more or less, but I guess they are intended more for high-profile customers. They invented their own detection systems, and my theory is that they conveniently hacked themselves more than once, if you know what I mean. It's much easier for them to blame some unknown evil hackers for everything.
|
|
|
Ne znam što bih mogao dodati za Binance exchange, ali dugo sam upozoravao da se oni i CZ ne razlikuju puno od FTX-a i nosonje Scam Bankmana aka סם בנקמן פריד. Čudno je da se Bitcoin i drugi coini trenutno pumpaju, a BNB shitcoin pada, a njihov BUSD stable coin Binance ima daleko najviše u svojim rezervama. Odličan video za pogledati, Glassnode je danas objavio Bitcoin Onchain analizu i zadnji report za ovu godinu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQuaFGhc5CQOvo nije normalno: https://studio.glassnode.com/dashboards/proof-of-reserves
|
|
|
Any of the Taproot wallets listed support Taproot Address Private Key importation?
Have you tried doing this with Sparrow and all other listed wallets ? I didn't do this test with Taproot private key, but I think it worked fine for me on Sparrow with all previous formats. Thank you for suggestion new addition of wallet I never heard before. I will consider adding it to the list (in future), but it doesn't look very good or reliable to me, and I never like wallets that tried to mimic metamask wallet for bitcoin, they even named it very similar
|
|
|
I recently discovered that in newer Electrum versions you are not able to generate Legacy addresses anymore from a fresh wallet.
I think that Electrum developers also removed optional RBF, so now all transaction will be broadcasted with RBF by default. You can always use alternative open source wallets instead of Electrum, for example Sparrow Wallet is really good and I think you can still use all address formats there. I prefer using segwit format most of the times, but I would understand that in some cases people need to use old formats, for whatever reasons.
|
|
|
Could you share your thoughts with me?
Are you 100% sure there will be NO KYC when using changeNOW exchange page on your website? I know other services who are using the same exchange and people reported cases of customers getting coins frozen, than they needed to submit identification documents, and same thing is written on their website: https://changenow.io/faq/kyc-aml-procedureMore information about this on kycnot.me website: ChangeNow may request KYC. Although KYC is not mandatory to use the service, ChangeNow reserves the right to require KYC for a certain user at a certain moment and may block funds. May be that a transaction is detected as suspicious or any other reason. https://kycnot.me/exchange/changenow
|
|
|
This whole situation shows only how toxic this space can be.
You can't say that the whole space is toxic because you had bad experience with one member from bitcointalk forum. There are a lot of people who are trying to scam people, or they are just trying to earn few sats in any way possible, and when they can get very angry if they don't get what they want. My suggestion is to always check post history of any member in forum and think well before making some deal with anyone, no matter what his rank is. I am going to tag member gondel and I hope to see his explanation here.
|
|
|
For me, being for fungibility necessarily means being for mixers. "Taint" is an idea that needs to be stopped before it takes root too deeply, and mixing is the only way I know of to frustrate attempts at creating UTXO blacklists. I think it's to late for that already, and all we can do is try to make protocol base protocol changes that would include privacy and maybe inbuilt mixing. We can pretend that concept of tainted coins doesn't exist and close or eyes, but reality is sadly different thanks to scammers like ftx ceo Scam Bankman, Binance CZ and others. Alternative option is for us to develop separate services that would accept all Bitcoin transactions without checking address history, but I doubt regulators will tolerate that much longer. They want to limit and cancel cash soon, so I don't see why Bitcoin would be in better position for them I prefer to be on the right side of history (like always) which is not usually the popular position around here.
Most money in the world is probably laundered with gambling, so I don't understand how your ''right'' side of history is allowing promotion of that. I guess double standards is allowed for some people, and coinjoin, privacy, mixers this are all ''evil'' tools in your ''right'' side of history It's really interesting how some people suddenly started to care about money laundering... usually the same people think they are going to ''save earth'' by driving their Tesla's
|
|
|
|