Look at the current difficulty displayed by the miner and check CoinWarz for a chart of all coins and their current difficulties.
Most coins now have Kimoto's Gravity Well implemented, or DigiShield, which is similar. Also, CoinWarz is extremely inaccurate. Try WhatMine. |
|
|
|
No multipools should be mining LTC, at all.
And what other coins does this pool mine? Where is the list?
I'm sick of repeating this. Terk will not disclose what coins we mine on CleverMining. Period. If you really want to know it's not that hard to figure out based on what your miner is doing... Really? I'd like to know how. |
|
|
|
Let's go back to school.
It is not possible. Not even in theory. Probability forbids it. The only way it could happen is through faulty code.
Yes, there is a probability in theory. Prove that there isn't. Also, the point is not about whether we should care about this possibility, it is not about if we should think about things that have a higher probability to occur. The point is that 0.01^ ∞% ≠ 0%. You are bad at math, and wrong. There is no possibility of it happening. It has been discussed, and mathed out, a number of times before. Use the search feature and read instead of arguing on the internet. If you think that 0.01^ ∞% ≠ 0% is incorrect, you seriously need some mathematical help. How is it not possible? It is a thing with a chance so slim it cannot be described, but that is not impossible. Like Danny said, it's possible for all the air in a room to move to one corner so that you suffocate. It is possible. You are simply arguing without a valid point, "search on the internet" is not a point. Also, saying that someone is bad at math directly without knowing a person is simply stupid. Please reconsider before giving opinions. |
|
|
|
Let's go back to school.
It is not possible. Not even in theory. Probability forbids it. The only way it could happen is through faulty code.
Yes, there is a probability in theory. Prove that there isn't. Also, the point is not about whether we should care about this possibility, it is not about if we should think about things that have a higher probability to occur. The point is that 0.01^ ∞% ≠ 0%. |
|
|
|
No multipools should be mining LTC, at all.
And what other coins does this pool mine? Where is the list?
I'm sick of repeating this. Terk will not disclose what coins we mine on CleverMining. Period. |
|
|
|
So where did the "Administration" link go for providers?
If I click on a rig to edit details, there's no way to get back to the admin page without clicking the back button on my browser a bunch of times.
Also the frequent session expiration and captcha are really making the site difficult to use.
Providers link at top right of page. Also, i have been forced to use my last resort, which is to make Google Chrome remember the ridiculously long passwords. |
|
|
|
Ghash Multi!!! Guys come on... Stop this nonsense at once please!  WTF! Oops! My apology - looks like I have been credited after some delay. Sorry Ghash  What settings (What coins have you selected) are you using? |
|
|
|
Can I ask again, since everyone ignored me,
what happened to the transferred shares on BitFunder?
Nothing, we are waiting to be allowed to trade on either counterparty, coloured coins or cryptotrade. So far it's wait and see. How about the dividends? Are they accumulated and then paid out once exchange is up? |
|
|
|
Is not it possible that a same address is being generated by 2 clients?
As long as the wallet is using a source of random numbers with significant entropy? No. If there is a bug in the computer such that the "random numbers" that the computer provides aren't "random enough", then yes, absolutely. Or 2 persons at 2 different parts of the world are creating brainwallet from same passphrase ?
This is VERY LIKELY. This is why people should not use brainwallets. Most humans aren't capable of creating and memorizing a brainwallet passphrase that is random enough to reduce collision chances to acceptable levels. That is correct, but I would just like to point out one thing. It is possible that the wallets are indeed using a source of random numbers with significant entropy, but it can still generate the same address. The chance is extremely low, so low it is like impossible, but extremely low chance does not equal impossible. It is also possible that all the air in the room will spontaneously collect in one corner suffocating everyone in the room. The chance is extremely low, so low it is like impossible, but extremely low chance does not equal impossible. Now ask any lay person if they think that it is possible for all the air in the room to suddenly collect tightly in a corner leaving everyone to suffocate, and we'll see if "impossible" in general use means what you think it means. Well, that is why I am pointing out most people are wrong. Also, why would all the air in a room suddenly collect tightly in a corner? |
|
|
|
|
Can I ask again, since everyone ignored me,
what happened to the transferred shares on BitFunder?
|
|
|
|
Is not it possible that a same address is being generated by 2 clients?
As long as the wallet is using a source of random numbers with significant entropy? No. If there is a bug in the computer such that the "random numbers" that the computer provides aren't "random enough", then yes, absolutely. Or 2 persons at 2 different parts of the world are creating brainwallet from same passphrase ?
This is VERY LIKELY. This is why people should not use brainwallets. Most humans aren't capable of creating and memorizing a brainwallet passphrase that is random enough to reduce collision chances to acceptable levels. That is correct, but I would just like to point out one thing. It is possible that the wallets are indeed using a source of random numbers with significant entropy, but it can still generate the same address. The chance is extremely low, so low it is like impossible, but extremely low chance does not equal impossible. |
|
|
|
Pools Dev seems to have pulled what is now known as a "MiddleCoin" Raised his fees and we have not heard form him since..  I left this pool because of it.. Where u getting this info? Are you talking about CleverMining or MiddleCoin? Terk, the pool operator of CleverMining, set the fee to 2%, and we have heard from him after that. |
|
|
|
|
Just out of interest, to others on the multipool, what Coins have you ticked and which ones you haven't?
How much are you earning with your hashpower?
|
|
|
|
tell me why please
Its spelt universe... not univers.... |
|
|
|
Difficulty is impossible to predict. Either outcome is possible.
Out of curiosity, what hardware do you guys use? What devices, what manufacturers? Can we have photographic proof? |
|
|
|
Your referral link is very misleading, you should change that. I wish I could get that deal! 0.64BTC for 100 GHs  How is it misleading? That's what you pay for 100 GHs at pbmining currently... Yeah. 0.0064 BTC = 1GH/s 0.064 BTC = 10GH/s 0.64 BTC = 100GH/s. That... is simple maths. |
|
|
|
Are we down?
As it says, it is under maintenance. All rented rigs will continue hashing as normal. |
|
|
|
|
Open cmd, cd to the CGminer path, execute cgminer.exe.
Then, copy the error and paste it, otherwise we have no idea.
|
|
|
|
May I ask what the heck happened to the BitFunder shares?  |
|
|
|
|
So it would translate to $99.95 per share, or 0.2185BTC, giving you a hashpower of 2.5Mhash/s?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
