Many many words...
+10 WOsMerits  Somewhere back we where having a delightful conversation...its buried and half forgotten. *Hugs* ....moving forward. Really? Not one single joke about Rick being Dick?
If I make crude joke Arri...are you going to question peoples intelligence again?  Could it be this way?  Should have a better idea at the close of todays candle. GBG Actually I have never questioned the intelligence of anyone in this thread. But it's tempting sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
Really? Not one single joke about Rick being Dick?
|
|
|
|
scammers of cypherdoc/jbreher class
Exactly what do you assert I have done to scam anyone? Pretend Bcash was a helpful and useful upgrade to Bitcoin instead of admitting it is a pre-mined (EDA) scam of the first order. We don’t readily forget your fraud nor Peter R nor any other of your pals. Let's unpack this. In what way is Bitcoin Cash a scam? In all ways possible. |
|
|
|
Downvoted the vid and closed it just from the way he looks and the first two seconds. What a fucking creep.
That's enlightened. Ignore the message because of the way the messenger looks, and the fact that in the first two seconds, he introduces himself by name? You do realize who this is? Yes, it is Dick Greger Augustsson. Who later changed his name to Rickard Falkvinge, and then again to Rick Falkvinge. Falkvinge, by the way, means falcon wing. (Falk=falcon vinge=wing). |
|
|
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. Aaand there's the left with their obligatory ad hominem. No arguments, just attack the guy who says things you don't like, cause, like I'm right so you must be an idiot. lol, you came here - went to the pages of wo posts and this triggered you to defend him? he said, when it comes to kids: "No. I come first. Then my kids - (...). based on only this i stated that i doubt he has kids. because if he had kids, he most probably wouldn't write such egoistic, selfish, self-serving crab. that is not ad hominem. it is an assumption, based on what he wrote. then I stated that if he really had kids - and still believes he is more important than his kids - then I would feel sorry for them. how is it ad hominem to feel bad for kids who have a selfish, egoistic dad, that he himself proclaimed to be?to become a parent is the most overwhelming thing that can happen to you. it is fulfilling your biological/genetic reason to be on this planet. it usually completely blows away selfishness in any possible way. life has a meaning when you have kids. if your meaning in life is "no. I come first" then I feel ultimately sorry for you (not ad hominem) and i would conclude that you are a complete ugly stinking fucking arsehole with a character that should not aim for reproduction (maximum ad hominem  ) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. That's the ad hominem. I think you are misunderstanding him, If the parent for some reason goes under the kid will too, that's why it's important to put the parent first. The same reason why you are ordered to put your own oxygen mask on first, and then put your kids mask on. Parent first IS putting your childs wellbeing first. |
|
|
|
"The BTC fork of bitcoin", that's when I stopped listening. Downvoted the vid and closed it just from the way he looks and the first two seconds. What a fucking creep. It's weird how he got derailed and started preaching the gospel of Bcash. He's otherwise a smart guy who did a lot of good defending privacy in general and digital/internet privacy in particular in the European parliament. And I have been following his series of (the lack of) digital privacy as compared to the strong analog privacy rights we have. It's really interesting reading. https://falkvinge.net/2017/12/16/analog-equivalent-privacy-rights-01/ |
|
|
|
I have been doing some chart reading to see if my hunch was right.
And I have spotted some patterns.
I will not post any charts because I have no photoshop on my new computer yet.
There is always a dip in September-ish, this dip is always followed by a big rise that ends in late January/end of year.
There is always a big dip in December that lasts till mid/end of February when a slow rise starts.
And there seems to be mostly sideways or slow upwards action during spring/early summer followed by a slight bubble that ends with the aforementioned September dip.
This macro pattern can be spotted in the charts of the last three years.
my conclusion based on this pattern is that we are now out of the woods and will see a steady rise the coming months.
I look forward to seeing your analysis. Thanks, and I look forward to having photoshop on my computer again. Might take a while though, I'm probably going to install W7 instead of the W10 that it came with first. I found two versions on the web, I going to test them the coming months. |
|
|
|
"The BTC fork of bitcoin", that's when I stopped listening. |
|
|
|
|
I have been doing some chart reading to see if my hunch was right.
And I have spotted some patterns.
I will not post any charts because I have no photoshop on my new computer yet.
There is always a dip in September-ish, this dip is always followed by a big rise that ends in late January/end of year.
There is always a big dip in December that lasts till mid/end of February when a slow rise starts.
And there seems to be mostly sideways or slow upwards action during spring/early summer followed by a slight bubble that ends with the aforementioned September dip.
This macro pattern can be spotted in the charts of the last three years.
my conclusion based on this pattern is that we are now out of the woods and will see a steady rise the coming months.
|
|
|
|
Thought experiment. On his way up the dusty trail to retrieve his silver stash, roach encounters ibian asleep. Afraid he might try to steal his silver on the way back down, roach considers poisoning ibian's whisky. And according to the logic of self-interest, he does. Later, ibian shoots roach and robs him. Then he drinks some whisky and dies.
Had roach and ibian cared more about the welfare of others and less about themselves, they would still be alive today.
I think you might be projecting here. A honest upstanding right winger would not even think of killing his fellow man. That's what leftists do. As they did in the Soviet Union, and still do in Cuba, Venezuela, China and north Korea. (Not saying that Roach is a honest upstanding right winger, he's not). The holodomor remains the single most important and underreported disaster in recent times. Envious people, brainwashed by marxism, killed and looted productive farmers. This resulted in nobody having food, so ten million people died. You don't have to go back this far in history. These guys eradicated 25% of their population in just 4 years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_RougeIt never stops to amaze me how the left commits one atrocity after another and still portrays themselves as the good guys, and get away with it. |
|
|
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. Aaand there's the left with their obligatory ad hominem. No arguments, just attack the guy who says things you don't like, cause, like I,m right so you must be an idiot. How is your comment any different? I think you're just here to cause a disruption & not the good kind.Don't bother to reply to my rhetorical question, because you've been *ignored.* Haters gonna hate.... I only hate the leftists, everybody else, regardless of sex, sexual orientation, skin colour, or IQ I'm ok with. I do have a strong dislike for anything dictatorial/non freedom though, but that very often coincides with leftist opinions. |
|
|
|
won't somebody think of the charts?
It's 08:43 now, I started reading this thread at 04:00 and it was entertaining. But I don't mind a chart once in a while. Do you know where I can find yearly bitcoin charts? I want to check a possible macro pattern. And also see if I remember some things correctly. |
|
|
|
|
And now I have catched (I don't know how to spell cought) up with the thread, just in time for everybody else to go to bed apparently.
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. Aaand there's the left with their obligatory ad hominem. No arguments, just attack the guy who says things you don't like, cause, like I,m right so you must be an idiot. What does the term “Women and children first [into the lifeboats]” mean to you? Because that’s what a real man does. The problem with the alt-right is they have no chivalry and no honour. Roaches indeed. I agree with the woman and children first. Save your offspring and their caretaker in order to live on through them I don't know anything about the alt-right, but ordinary right sure does have honour and chivalry. |
|
|
|
To answer the earlier question, the biological father is a deadbeat in another country and irrelevant. The ex-wife takes reasonable care of the kids when they are in her custody and that’s all that really matters. I don’t care for her other lifestyle choices but again irrelevant.
My buddy now has a new wife. And she has taken on the stepchildren as her own as well. Even though none of them are hers. So all of you making a fuss about the kids not being biologically yours, do you think the stepmom should kick these kids out of the house ? Yeah I thought not.
You didn't answer the question. However much of a scumbag the biological father is doesn't matter in this argument, which is about setting a dangerous precedent that poses a serious threat to society. Your buddy also has no relevance to this argument. Whatever choices he freely makes is entirely up to him. Using his choices as a justification for legally forcing somebody to pay for children that are not his is ridiculous. Cmon dude. Taking care of children is a serious threat to society? On a forum where most of us have earned more than the US average annual wage in the past week? You are better than this. Maybe worry about the alt-right muppets who go shoot up a school every second week. It's lefties who go on shooting rampages. You are officially not even worth reading anymore. The latest school shooter was a white supremacist. Like yourself. Own it. Actually he wasn't, that turned out to be fake news by the leftist media. Besides, he's hispanic. |
|
|
|
Thought experiment. On his way up the dusty trail to retrieve his silver stash, roach encounters ibian asleep. Afraid he might try to steal his silver on the way back down, roach considers poisoning ibian's whisky. And according to the logic of self-interest, he does. Later, ibian shoots roach and robs him. Then he drinks some whisky and dies.
Had roach and ibian cared more about the welfare of others and less about themselves, they would still be alive today.
I think you might be projecting here. A honest upstanding right winger would not even think of killing his fellow man. That's what leftists do. As they did in the Soviet Union, and still do in Cuba, Venezuela, China and north Korea. (Not saying that Roach is a honest upstanding right winger, he's not). |
|
|
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
No, it's the woman who put her children in that position that is a piece of shit. |
|
|
|
You planning on being homeless in Fargo or San Diego? Choose one. You planning on backing up your prejudice statement with some kind of source? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
