Is anyone tasked with starting a merchant manual?
|
|
|
Where can I read about the "Brick & Mortar DASH Merchant"?
Any easy to follow tutorial on how to set up a merchant or escrow webpage with DASH? I would like to set up something for Steam community items.
Hi Kenta. You can view us on our Facebook page, Misconduct Wine Co. And the Portuguese/Spanish Tapas Bistro... The Kitchen @ Misconduct Wine Co.... www.thekitchen-mwco.com. You can reach out to me if you wish to ask me how we do it. My name is Richard da Silva. Very simple... We ring it through our till as a "cash" sale... And I personally buy out the DASH at the end of the week by swapping the DASH for fiat. Hope that helps... I just use a simple android qr wallet.
|
|
|
Luck? Merits? Is there prize in the end? What is your point exactly? I'm not following. Ok fella's...take it out back! No scarping in the living room.
|
|
|
SPLAWIK! Did you just get suckered punched by a troll? Lol Wake up.... Have some coffee... And stop that.
|
|
|
Thanks Udjin. I see this as a positive thing for sure, I equate that to liking to drink other wines from other wineries around the world, even though I own my own winery....it gives me perspective and ability to look or taste things from a different angle in which I can then apply to my own wines. . Cheers
|
|
|
Update about Pay all your bills easy and fast with BitBill.eu..They had some problems with the change of the name...The working on a solution for Dash! So you can pay soon your Bills with Dash.....
Gr Zeero
There's a school of thought that says all adoption is good. I might disagree. If BitBill.eu simply dumps the DASH on receipt in order to avoid the risk of carrying it, where is the net good? Is the increased publicity worth the automatic market dump? Possibly. Possibly not. I disagree. In order to make crypto a success, we are eventually going to need to "close the loop." Customers use Dash to pay retailers, retailers pay suppliers, suppliers pay manufacturers, and everybody along the way pays employees in Dash (or with an option to collect payment in Dash). Yes, you are correct in that ultimately the loop must be closed. But first we have to fill in pieces here and there. I'm content with merchant adoption (with merchants "dumping" straight to fiat) as a first step. Maybe the next step will be vendors paying suppliers in Dash. Go from there...one step at a time. I absolutely agree as well with this. It is going to take one step at a time.
|
|
|
Where is the rule "ABSTAIN do not have a vote" Why we need to count on them?
I think, to be nimble, in the future, votes will work on a quorum or something. But for this first vote, we want it to be a popular vote (meaning, a majority of all the Masternode owners need to feel good about this idea). Frankly, I'm shocked that it's taking so long to get half the MNds to vote. Where is everyone? Is it too hard to do? Perhaps there are that many people on the fence, but I can't imagine there are so many out there without an opinion! It seems some 1,395 MN did not vote. Otoh himself has about 50% of these MNs so if he did not vote yet, herein you have a half of your answer, And there are other big holders, one with more MNs than Otoh... I dont know where you get your information but that is not correct. Otoh is the #1 holder there are no other holders with more nodes, plus he invested a large amount and bought all coins on the market. good grief...I feel like a small fry with my MN's , but I did my part and voted! From his own statement - in a discussion about "someone else" having more - but that does not matter, who has 1 or 500++ MN. All I said was a speculation. If he had not voted... Yeah...I'm not sure what the current count is at. But not everyone is glued to their system either. What might be cool is coming up with a alert system to page MN operators when there is something urgent to go over....just a thought.
|
|
|
Where is the rule "ABSTAIN do not have a vote" Why we need to count on them?
I think, to be nimble, in the future, votes will work on a quorum or something. But for this first vote, we want it to be a popular vote (meaning, a majority of all the Masternode owners need to feel good about this idea). Frankly, I'm shocked that it's taking so long to get half the MNds to vote. Where is everyone? Is it too hard to do? Perhaps there are that many people on the fence, but I can't imagine there are so many out there without an opinion! It seems some 1,395 MN did not vote. Otoh himself has about 50% of these MNs so if he did not vote yet, herein you have a half of your answer, And there are other big holders, one with more MNs than Otoh... I dont know where you get your information but that is not correct. Otoh is the #1 holder there are no other holders with more nodes, plus he invested a large amount and bought all coins on the market. good grief...I feel like a small fry with my MN's , but I did my part and voted!
|
|
|
Hi Tungfa...whats the current vote status?
|
|
|
guys if i abstain from voting does it count as a no?
I believe so....
|
|
|
-snip- This is the decentralized vision that I see. Each project owner controls his/her own wallet with the funds. Each project is directly paid similar to masternodes getting payments over time from block rewards, only the project owner receives and controls the funds. Quick, simple, no 'central fund' at risk, no fund manager/s. Each project would get paid their specific % of the block rewards they request so there isn't any funds sitting in a queue waiting accumulate before they can be sent out each month. The funding mechanism would also be the voting mechanism. 51% yes votes gets a project in the queue, and highest yes% gets priority until the 10% cap is reached. Projects get voted in every 3 months and each project has a set limit for 3 months of block rewards.
unless i'm missing something this seems like a much better/easier way to at least start this new system. the new/latest proposal seems very complicated but is probably the best for a long term plan as it allows more precision but at the cost of (temporary?) centralization. i guess the main complaint about evans original plan was that a project could be over funded. i see that as a small sacrifice to preserve a more decentralized system. seems like the dev could just return extra funds to a advertising wallet or something like that. if they did not they would be cut off. it's all pretty complicated so i could be wrong. My 2 Main concerns. A mandatory 10% tax will eventually turn into pork barrel projects along with an incentive for those getting the funding to increase that tax. A central escrow/wallet for projects will cause problems with theft/loss/confiscation/tax. These will be bigger problems as time goes on and it makes a lot more sense to get around these issues now. The blockchain is forever so any mistakes that happen now could be traced back in the future. Switching to the voting system today....This masternode voting system is bulletproof. I moved a masternode to a different IP address to see if it was possible to manipulate extra votes. It turns out as soon as the old node stops, that vote gets deleted. Even trying to use the same masternode key on 2 nodes didn't fool it. I am totally impressed! The system is designed to be highly resistant to waste. I think once we get something on testnet and show how it will work and how these issues have been resolved, people will realize it should work pretty efficiently. The starting version is going to have a very low amount of money to be used, so the priorities of that money are going to be on things that are more urgent in nature. After a few iterations we should have something humming along, that has very few downsides and can react pretty quickly to waste and eliminate it. As for your concerns with theft/loss/confiscation/tax, the way we'd implement multi-sig is highly secure and not subject to theft or loss. I think we can also work around possible confiscation/tax issues (which we could discuss later if we end up doing it). However, I think I've come up with a solution that gives the best of both worlds, exact payments directly from the blockchain. You know the mantra around here, nothing is ever written in stone. I'll write something up tomorrow. Nice! Looking forward to reading more.
|
|
|
We need some action:
Otoh is on Sark, there are about 10 people who live there. If we all phone around, we could probably get someone to walk down and let him know he needs to vote
OTOH is in Amsterdam, I will ask him tommorow night ;-) What? For real? I'm in Amsterdam on the 25 the for a few days. If you chat with him... Let him know it would cool to meet up while I'm... Another Lil dash meet up
|
|
|
We need some action: Otoh is on Sark, there are about 10 people who live there. If we all phone around, we could probably get someone to walk down and let him know he needs to vote BigR is probably in the tasting room, flat out drunk because he refuses to spit out the stuff he's been growing for a few months. Might have to wait until tomorrow for his votes Just posted up my votes. I did some last night and I did the rest today. Cheers.
|
|
|
Does this mean that Dash version 0.11.2.23 will include the automatic backup function and will also include all fixes & additions incorporated into the Master branche on github after 11th of april 2015 (when Dash version 0.11.2.22 was released) ? If so we need perhaps a bit more documentation about this update.
i do not think that is in there this is only for the voting system , as not mandatory update i just downloaded version 0.11.2.23 and automatic backups are definetely in there, therefore we should have more information about this new update as it implements more than only the voting revision. I will wait for more details before I update everything incuding my MN's. That will be a great feature. Looks like it adds that backups folder inside the data directory and stores the files with a walletname.date-time. Extension isn't obvious (no .dat) either. A+ That's great news. Does it back up every time you open or close the wallet... Or is that configurable?
|
|
|
Does this mean that Dash version 0.11.2.23 will include the automatic backup function and will also include all fixes & additions incorporated into the Master branche on github after 11th of april 2015 (when Dash version 0.11.2.22 was released) ? If so we need perhaps a bit more documentation about this update.
i do not think that is in there this is only for the voting system , as not mandatory update i just downloaded version 0.11.2.23 and automatic backups are definetely in there, therefore we should have more information about this new update as it implements more than only the voting revision. I will wait for more details before I update everything incuding my MN's. That will be a great feature.
|
|
|
.
got to love haters!
|
|
|
Could it be those transactions don't show in Master wallet because it is not updated (you mention it is not connected to the internet)?
Sorry bertlebbert...I didn't make that clear. Yes I had synced the Master Wallet immediately afterwords. Well, hope you get it sorted... Only other thing comes to mind would be to make sure the Master wallet definitely contains the Private keys for the addresses that sent those transactions Hello..I'm still @ work. The main wallet contains all the addresses of the MNs. There are two wallets which contains 50% of the privkeys that are in the seperate offline PC. The strange thing is that once the MNs earnings are moved from the wallet A or B the main wallet with all privkeys should follow. No magic. That is strange that it didnt happened. Bigrcanada? The earnings from group 1 & 2 were moved but on the main wallet they are still there or not? Hey Splawik... I believe so. Udjin is also helping me to understand. I'll explain when I get up in the morning. But the coins are accounted for I think. But I'll chat up more in the morning (my morning lol). Cheers Bigrcanada wake up men it`s 8.00 a.m. in your place check msg from me..... you should be calm as baby as the funds which has been moved from your masternodes in the end landed in your main wallet address from which you`ve funded the nodes. If you don`t see them run the wallet with -rescan parameter...... meaby that will help Hey...I'm out in the vineyard at 7am with our crew. I'll be in for coffee at 9.
|
|
|
Could it be those transactions don't show in Master wallet because it is not updated (you mention it is not connected to the internet)?
Sorry bertlebbert...I didn't make that clear. Yes I had synced the Master Wallet immediately afterwords. Well, hope you get it sorted... Only other thing comes to mind would be to make sure the Master wallet definitely contains the Private keys for the addresses that sent those transactions Hello..I'm still @ work. The main wallet contains all the addresses of the MNs. There are two wallets which contains 50% of the privkeys that are in the seperate offline PC. The strange thing is that once the MNs earnings are moved from the wallet A or B the main wallet with all privkeys should follow. No magic. That is strange that it didnt happened. Bigrcanada? The earnings from group 1 & 2 were moved but on the main wallet they are still there or not? Hey Splawik... I believe so. Udjin is also helping me to understand. I'll explain when I get up in the morning. But the coins are accounted for I think. But I'll chat up more in the morning (my morning lol). Cheers
|
|
|
|