I'm afraid that you can expect a big premium for a paypal trade since paypal is reversible. This is especially true since you have not gained a good reputation here, yet. Also, it appears that there are scammers who are hacking into "reputable" bitcointalk accounts, and convincing newbies to send them paypal funds via family and friends options. For your safety, I recommend that you use a service like localbitcoins to execute this type of trade. I know that you do not want to pay big fees. However, you are setting yourself up to get ripped off for the whole amount, just to save yourself a few bucks in fees. Please note, I am personally not interested in trading my BTC for your paypal. My intent of this message in to just give you some advice, and save yourself from frustration.

    Well, you can start by learning the difference between two, too and to. I can understand someone confusing too and to, but using two in your above sentence is just inexcusable.   (Using 2 would have been acceptable, I guess.)
    Furthermore, I reviewed your short post history. If you want to become a legendary, you are going to have to provide a bit more content than insubstantial one liners... Of the 5 posts that you posted so far, I couldn't even find one that I'd consider giving even one mercy merit to.

     I believe that he wants to be the one responsible for bringing down another trusted member. Just like he went from hero to zero, I'm sure he'd relish someone else going from hero to zero.
     Furthermore, in this particular case, I suspect QS finds suchmoon's efforts as a threat. If he is still running an account farm, suchmoon's efforts must be frustrating his efforts to rank up his accounts. I am sure suchmoon is reporting much more infractions besides plagiarism. Although posting low quality and off topic posts won't get an account immediately banned, it may lead to that eventually. Also, having posts deleted by the staff can definitely effect revenue, if any alt accounts are enrolled in signature campaigns.

    It is a user manually reporting posts. They are just using some tools to make it more efficient. There is no bot implemented by the staff.

     Since it appears the guy is only trying to get a job and he limits it to less than once a day, I was going to recommend giving him a break. However, when I look at his untrusted feedback, there is a recent complaint against him. Unfortunately, it does not appear the complainer has made a dedicated thread on the subject, as written in the complaint, and the complaint was made on 05/22/2019.

   I'm glad tk808 was made a merit source. The altcoin boards needed a little more love thrown their way. Many of us merit sources are leery to sift through that garbage heap, although I'm sure there are quite a few gems that we are missing.

   I certainly hope any future potential clients of Hhampuz also take into consideration that the OP of this thread also was being paid by him and got the sack after 5 weeks. Or shall they believe that you are really free of any bias on this matter and are earmarked to be instantly canonized by the Pope, as soon as you are the 4th person to be assumed into Heaven?

   Why on Earth should someone be required to run a full node just to transact?  Especially transact on the LN, which is a second layer solution. If the developers of LN went that route, an alternative second layer solution would be offered. After all, the original white paper already laid the ground work for SPV nodes. People should not be required to run a full node unless they want to. Furthermore, the problem is not keeping up, it is trying to catch up if you have to start from scratch. It already takes most people who run a home node several hours, if not days to complete the verification if the have to start from scratch. If I were a potential new user and wanted to try out the LN to buy a cup of coffee, I would probably lose my patience in several seconds. Not many are going to be willing to wait several hours or days to explore this payment option.
   I suppose that a blocksize increase to 8 mb with a 3% increase per year is okay. However, good luck getting anywhere near a consensus on that proposal.

     I suspect that if HHampuz had just left the BTC untouched, in UTXO that Hhampuz has full control over, QS would have opened a similar thread raising suspicion on why Hhampuz was keeping funds in UTXO that he had full control over. Also, if Hhampuz moved the funds to any other address, QS would find some narrative to paint him in a bad light. And if Hhampuz came up with any plausible explanation, QS would construe that too, to fit his narrative.

These agreements don't come with any severance clauses or bonuses for completing the campaigns? Too bad.

     I don't care how obedient a dog happens to be. If I leave a big fat steak unattended on the kitchen table in front of the dog, I should not be surprised if the steak comes up missing.  

Unfortunately, we do not know the terms of the contract between Hhampuz and BestMixer to arrive at a conclusive determination. I don't believe that Hhampuz should reveal the contract just to satisfy anyone's suspicions. Also, if you look at the last transaction where he paid the signature campaign participants, it lacks a bigger output of ~ .077 BTC that the earlier transactions have. For all we know, the ~.50 BTC covers the pay HHampuz is entitled to under his contract.

   Sometimes what these new troll accounts have to spew forth is so absurd that I can't help but belly laugh though. Perhaps this newest troll should stick to posting NSFW confessions. Perhaps not here, since they will end up in the trash can. However, the internet is full of forums where he can find a suitable audience for his material.

Yes, just because someone made a fuck load of money doesn't necessarily mean that they are good at retaining a fuck load of money.
e.g.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

     What baffles me is why theymos decided to take a chance on you and make you a merit source, given your history. (TBH it baffled me a little that he gave me a shot, initially.) I certainly hope he allocated a small introductory amount to you. Even if you are truly reformed, giving you source merit is about the same as giving a gambling addict full access to a source of money.

From what I can tell, the tool will only report when a human being interacts with it. So it all depends on what the tool user thinks. Then a mod has to review the report an make a determination as well. So, basically two human beings have to agree that the post is plagiarism before a ban occurs. I suspect that if someone really had a bot that totally automated the whole process, the staff would probably be overwhelmed with a huge back load.

     You may get a better understanding by reading through this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=853522.0. Don't forget to also read through the thread that Tecshare references in his OP as well. There is probably much more to the story, though. DYOR

     First of all, let's get something straight. When an account gets hacked, the main blame goes to the hacker. It's not like hackers are some wild predatory animals that just can't control their instincts. I'm not suggesting that Bitcointalk holds people's hands. I'm just suggesting an additional tool for users to implement.

Here is the thread in question that I am talking about. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5150479.0 I am leaning toward believing that the OP is telling the truth; however, it is possible that it is just an excuse. Unfortunately, no information from the OP on thread to indicate exactly how he may have gotten compromised.
Here is a similar described incident. But I don't think the telegram scammer actually had access to the bitcointalk account to confirm the credentials that he was giving. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5148419.0

   It appears that some scammers on Telegram are trying to gain confidence from people by telling them they are a bitcointalk member. It appears one scammer may have gotten access to a reputed members account and sent PMs under the member's nose. Unfortunately, for the reputed member, there is really no way to prove definitively that he was "hacked." Now he is being asked to potentially make up for the victim's loss. I just want to make it harder for scammer's to use another person's account on the down low. I realize that e-mail notification is not a fail-safe. However, offering as many tools as possible to give people notification that their account may be compromised is a good thing. I personally don't want to force additional security options on people though. I think it should be up to the person to use the extra tool or not.