Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 05:49:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 119 »
441  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk forum social media channels? on: March 15, 2019, 11:27:22 PM
If theymos wants to socialize bitcointalk little more, he should create an official btt account on instagram, right now its the best place to grow a community, but of course the account needs to be active for that.

If there are any new ones that have popped up, let me know!
I know this thread is old, but I haven't heard of anything since you started it.  I don't use social media myself, but I'm pretty sure I would have heard something about a FB or Twitter happening for the forum around here.  Theymos did start a thread in Meta about maybe creating a Youtube channel, but that thread sort of died out with nothing being resolved as far as I remember.
Yeah, a youtube channel isn't gonna go anywhere,  not unless the content is really good and attracts people. 99 bitcoins started theirs, and I can't tell if their channel helped people or not. Youtube is more or less starting to become hmmm.. old-fashioned, as some would say. 
442  Other / Meta / Re: SUBFORUM STICKIES FOR UNOFFICIAL RULES on: March 15, 2019, 11:12:48 PM
To add on to what others have said, there should definitely be one very elaborate explained thread in the mining and hardware section, because there seems to be a lot of confusion over there. I know, this thread exists, but still a more detailed explanation for the apparent heavy moderation there should be explained a lil more, don't ya think?


Yeah, you're right. Thanks. Shows you how long it's been since I clicked a thread in there.
Global Mod btw. jk don't ban me pls.

A welcome message should be made a priority as it will save a lot of time from staff and also a lot of users from being needlessly banned. I think theymos' proposed message should be trimmed down with only the most important rules and the rest of the info being linked to in another thread so people can read that if they wish. I think in addition to having those warnings shown all in red in each sub board as a reminder would also help a lot. Nobody would have excuses for breaking the rules then. Maybe once you hit a certain rank then you can toggle them off if people find them annoying.
Has the ban rate gone down or up in the recent months? , you know instead of keeping the important or rather suggested threads on top of the board, why not keep on the side. Something similar to what reddit does.

Oh speaking of suggested threads, can that be implemented? Like the most merited threads could be sorted by that, or something that separates the shitposted fuckfest threads from the genuine ones?
443  Economy / Collectibles / Re: Bitcointalk.org collectible coin? on: February 17, 2019, 09:46:06 PM
What makes them superior from other users of this forum? Posting quality? Oh man, what has posting quality to do with collectibles?
Posting quality means in one way, you contributed to the forum, and besides, it was a sarcastic remark. 

That's certainly a very bad idea. It would become a hectic work for the coin maker or probably the coin will never come out actually! It should be of similar patterns with numbering from 1-1000/2000 and giving them out on the basis of account age of the user. For instance if the user registered on 2010 they would be receiving the first set of coins and later on.
Not really. If these are going to be rare coins, might as well make it count!

Just so you know, almost 95%(Ddmr Ddmr/LoyceV, you can correct me of course with the right stats) of users registered in 2010 aren't active, and they *left* the forum.

My say is that the coins should go to those who deserve the most, for the years of contributing some people have done here, the least they could get is a collectible.  Lips sealed


So basically only Chipmixer campaigners get it?  Roll Eyes
Lol, I don't know about that but I would certainly like to know what those criteria would be--and I'd absolutely love to own such a neat thing.  I don't even care if the coin was made out of precious metal or loaded with btc or anything else.  It's a great idea, IMO, and I fully support it.
UM ME TOOO!!!!

It'd be cool , if we all chipmixer participants have a collectible coin of our own too, to remind us of how much we have tortured the scammers, nae the faint-hearted.
444  Economy / Collectibles / Re: Bitcointalk.org collectible coin? on: February 17, 2019, 04:58:58 PM
Oh me likey likey!!!!

to users who meet some to-be-determined criteria.
So basically only Chipmixer campaigners get it?  Roll Eyes

Features:

Each coin to be specially designed as per each user's UID and have their UID engraved in it. Or even better, engrave the user's avatar and name on one side, and a default bitcointalk logo, or anything that exclusively defines bitcointalk on the other side.

How about THAT?

Also if possible, load the exact amount of satoshis/ ubtc/mbtc equivalent to the merit/post count of the person receiving it?
445  Other / Meta / Re: Do not count posts in 'Off-topic' on: February 17, 2019, 04:52:27 PM
Post count doesn't matter anywhere, so even if they are spamming, it won't fetch them any merit, and besides most posters there are bots, and no matter what you do,its gonna end up being useless. And like others mentioned, more and more fucktards would come to meta and fuck up words, not to mention that they'll start meowing at Lauda.  
446  Other / Meta / Re: Reporting very old posts? on: February 15, 2019, 08:27:46 PM
Besides reporting posts that are a bannable offense, report the posts of users, that have their profiles more or less active in the last 3 months, otherwise its just a waste of time and effort I reckon.

Don't go too much on reporting old posts, it doesn't really help the forum, but its your decision.
447  Other / Meta / Re: Black screen when loading forum pages in chrome. on: February 12, 2019, 07:51:02 PM
Have you tried using firefox? It works just as fine for me.

Chrome works well for me as well. What's your hardware and software spec list?
448  Economy / Reputation / Re: Remove marlboroza (me, me) from DT2 on: February 12, 2019, 03:47:43 PM
idc about your stupid rule, but please tell me you're NOT leaving this forum.


Ik you're probably sick of how bad things are, and how annoying it gets, but just wanted you to know that things happen for a reason.

I strongly suggest you to talk to someone, either a therapist/trustworthy friend/family member, about anything, and figure your shit out. Take a break, stop caring A LOT, but don't just quit things.

Take care of yourself, and I'll have you know that, a lot of us here love you too, and respect your decision.
449  Other / Meta / Re: Why is it so hard to start community projects in the Bitcoin Talk forum. on: February 09, 2019, 09:56:04 PM
Community projects bond members of a group, and can be mutually beneficial. It seems almost impossible to start and maintain such project, and this seems to apply to fun activities as well as more serious commercial activities. Why is this? Is it that we don't trust each other, or that we don't want to work together? I appreciate that there is a wide diversity of skills and interests in the forum, but there must be a few groups with common interests.
Trust issues, personal agendas, different community perspectives et al. That's from the dramatic side.

Scams, pyramid schemes, other illegal activities that have been prevailing here, has caused the community to grow this way. What else do you expect, when some of the most trusted people here(example: Master-P), just scam innocent people for a few pennies.

Most people come here for money, and only that. As much as I hate saying this, Bitcointalk is no longer a proper home for community projects, its very rare to see some actual initiative.

450  Other / Meta / Re: Request @theymos: Can you show userIDs instead of user names in trust.txt.xz? on: February 01, 2019, 09:16:08 PM
Rather why not change the whole format of the file?

It needs to be easy to parse. JSON, XML, CSV...

I'm not a big fan of LoyceV's format without separators, it would require pre-processing or custom parsing to load into tools that I use.
Can we not just have an area dedicated to this whole file, as in when we go to the trust page, we could see the table content of who trusts/distrusts who?

Won't it make things easier? Im a dumbhead, ignore me if I am too stupid to understand things.
451  Other / Meta / Re: The clubroom - another radical idea from Jet Cash on: February 01, 2019, 08:52:16 PM
I like this idea, it definetely needs to be tweaked here and there, but I would like this idea be a real thing.

Just like how VIPs and Donators have access to a special board, we could actually keep a board for discussions that's helpful, that's more or less diverted to guiding things for anyone who's looking for new information or to debate about something real.

My view over this idea is entirely different, and I quite don't really know how to explain it. I just want this forum to be a place to actually ask questions around ffs, and less of drama. I have read more about DT and merit in the past year, than what I have of bitcoin. WHAT THE FUCK EVEN!
452  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: length limitation to trust ratings on: February 01, 2019, 07:43:25 PM
He did; we discovered an unusual case of >2k ratings sent by a single user due to new features introducted to BPIP.
Right.  

I still don't see a good enough reason for why one needs to give more than 5 legitimate feedbacks, let alone 10.

Really? why is that?
I see things going two ways:
- The trust mod abuses his power, and until things get resolved, the whole forum would be upside down.
- The trust mod does his job, and some people would just create a fucking myriad of accounts , try to defame him in every way possible, and one mod won't be able to handle every single scenario instantaneously,people will start raging.  And besides, he'd act based on his opinions, and a lot of people won't like his judgement regardless of the fact that however fair he is in terms of trust moderation.

453  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion: length limitation to trust ratings on: February 01, 2019, 12:09:25 PM
We need a trust mod, but who would trust the trust mod?
NOPE!  BAD idea, very bad idea.

This place will become into a absolute shithole if that ever happens, because of obvious reasons.

He only acts upon it in very extreme cases.
Didn't he delete some spam-feedback a while ago?

Instead of limit ,  a trust feedback cool down meter can be implemented. You can give only one feedback a day to a specific user. This will help in reducing trust spamming where a user is giving 50 long feedback in a day to a single user.
For length, I like the idea of view more, or fix the length of  trust feedback and user who like to write more can create a post and link to the feedback.
There have been instances where shills log in every day, just to give spam-feedback to those who they despise so badly. So your idea might not really end up working.

semi OT question, What if mods nuke/ban this account? Will the feedbacks go away too?
They don't go away, AFAIK.

Isn't such behavior simply spam? And doesn't spam qualify for .. ban?
Nope its different, technically. No one has ever been banned for this, from what I can remember.

semi OT question, What if mods nuke/ban this account? Will the feedbacks go away too?

I think that it'll stay. So somehow it has to be limited or maybe somebody should be allowed to edit = shorten that mess, else anybody can create more newbie accounts just to fill the forum with garbage.
I think Lauda's idea to limit the number of feedbacks is more than enough, besides, people can delete and repost their feedbacks anyways.  Roll Eyes
454  Other / Meta / Re: Request @theymos: Can you show userIDs instead of user names in trust.txt.xz? on: January 31, 2019, 04:07:21 PM
Rather why not change the whole format of the file?

Maybe a proper constructed table like this maybe? .


|
User_ID
|
User
|
Trusts
|
Distrusts
|
|
35
|
theymos
|
xxx
yyy
zzz
|
aaa
bbb
ccc
|
|
03
|
satoshi
|
xxx
yyy
zzz
|
aaa
bbb
ccc
|
455  Other / Meta / Re: Daily quiz on: January 31, 2019, 03:57:54 PM
~Snip~

This quiz thing might be helpful for a lot of people who don't really know a lot about bitcoin, at least in the technical aspects. I like this idea, and would love to see the idea taken into implementation, in some way or the another.

I'm not sure about the whole idea of the knowledge point thingy, but i'm sure a lot of us would be down for something new around here.
456  Other / Meta / Re: I locked my beginners price discussion thread, on: January 31, 2019, 01:44:52 PM
Can we have some sort of policy decision on the direction BT is to take in the future, and a bit of training for some of the mods might help as well.
Mods don't really need training, cause all of them know their shit all too well. The mods were only appointed after their year(s) of experience in reporting, and there are hardly any new mods, the last newly appointed mod was Welsh and he was modded months ago, it must be at least 6 or more months since that happened.

I wanted to start a topic for beginners, and to help them to learn a bit about Bitcoin price movements, and it seemed to start reasonably well. However it has been moved onto the speculation board, and I think this is a spammers board and I have it on ignore, so I will not be revisiting the thread.
You're wrong about it this, Speculation Board isn't really a spam-fest. A lot of good posters post there, and the spam isn't(comparatively) bad. You could just unignore the section, if it bothers you so much, or don't bother creating topics at all.

457  Other / Meta / Re: Query for mods regarding reports on: January 25, 2019, 10:34:19 PM
I agree with you there. Perhaps I should have been clearer that I'm meaning spam threads in Bitcoin Discussion, like this one as a random example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5077882.0. There is nothing in the last several pages that hasn't been said multiple times before, and >90% of posts are just shitposts. There is zero chance that someone is going to come in on page 12 with some groundbreaking new information or amazing post and salvage that thread. There is no good reason to leave it open.
Threads like these could be locked, yes, but its pointless knowing the fact that only more threads pop up.

Only because we are letting it be pointless. If we actually clamped down on these spam threads early, before they became 10/20/30 pages long, and locked old threads which are being necrobumped, it would go a long way to cleaning the place up.
So what would you do? Just keep locking up threads? That is not going to stop users. Even banning them won't. We should really make signatures an earnable thing after you reach a certain rank or whatever, and not a free privilege. That might possibly help out, who knows.
458  Other / Meta / Re: [Userscript] Report to moderator on post history on: January 25, 2019, 09:47:08 PM
I'll be on to this.
Thanks.

As with the discussions on some thread, it will be helpful in the local board to show the trust score, not necessary in off-topic, archival board and Politics & Society.

Also, make the Trust depth to 4 as default (currently 2), since there are instances that only DT3-4 leave some -ve trust to some scammers but these newbies or any rank cannot see those feedbacks and still continue to trade and end up of being scammed.
Like suchmoon said, bad idea. It'll fuck up things for the worse. Scammers would have a better reputation and will seem more trust-worthy than the scam-busters, if such a disaster were to happen.

I think both options can be fixed with bookmarks, if you bookmark the modlog and seclog you have access to them with one click and you can also bookmark the report history ( if you have 300+ good reports ) It's the same.
Yes, but very few of them are aware of such links, and there's only so much of bookmarks that you can possibly have in your bookmarks list. Idk, just thought it might be worth mentioning, maybe not.

Is it possible to create a script that provides a checkbox option in a thread which allows to report multiple posts that fit under the same category?
459  Economy / Reputation / Re: Anti DT gang behind the newbie mask. on: January 25, 2019, 09:39:59 PM
With the new "election" just a week away there's probably going to be more of it.
There is? Is it the every monthly thingy?

Oh yeah. And until DT1 fills up with 100 members there's going to be drama every month due to new members being added. And after that there's going to be drama every month due to random selection of the 100.
This is going to be SOO FUN. Especially for people like me who aren't on either side of it.  Roll Eyes God love me some nice drama.

Part of me wishes somehow some dumbasses get into DT1 and cause a whole chaos around, just to see how the aftermath of it would be.
460  Economy / Reputation / Re: Anti DT gang behind the newbie mask. on: January 25, 2019, 09:24:27 PM
With the new "election" just a week away there's probably going to be more of it.
There is? Is it the every monthly thingy?


If you are on right way then don't wear nebiwe mask, come on with your real account and describe your problems and opinions. No one will tag you for your opinions and suggestion.
Okay, here's the thing. DT members don't tag users for their opinions, at least most of them don't.

There's a reason why people use fake accounts to tell stuff:

- Either because they are scared that someone would go through their history, find any links that could their other accounts, and make their whole basement life a massacre.
- Or because they want to lie about DT members and try to ruin their reputation, using a fake throwaway account makes things easier.
- In the past, there have been many circumstances where people couldn't explain their issue properly to DT members, and in  the journey of making things better, they did things like retaliation and what not, which some DT members don't take it easily.


There's so much more but sometimes just common sense is all you need, ffs.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 119 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!