Also disagree. Based on your theory, why reward anyone with merit at all, if you can, as you say, sell them?
I think exactly the same. In general, it's time to close the topic. The user is banned.
I'll leave it open a little bit more, in case someone else wants to reply/add something to the selling merits issue. If the thread doesn't die by itself, and I see that the replies (if any) don't add much to what has already been said, I'll lock the thread, as I have done other times.
|
|
|
Selling sMerits is not a problem unless who selling those sMerits is a merit source.
I don't agree with that at all. Theymos explicitly prohibited merit sources from selling merit. That does not mean that he allows others to sell them. I saw this discussed on the forum in some thread in the past, but I can't find it now.
|
|
|
I'd like to share a case that I'm not 100% sure it's plagiarism. This user replies to a thread I created: Venezuela increased its monthly minimum wage by 289%, or 64 US cents, to $2,4 at the Bank of Venezuela's estimated rates, while the price of a kilogram of meat is $3,75. The government of President Nicolas Maduro has raised the minimum wage twice this year, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, severe economic slowdown and hyperinflation. Although Venezuela relaxed its economic controls two years ago, allowing for increased foreign currency transactions, many workers continue to receive wages in the depreciated local currency. Honestly, I don't know if this is a positive news or not, since it does not mean much for the current lives of indigenous people.
I was about to report it as low value, because he is not adding anything. But then I realized that the style sounded too journalistic. I googled it and saw that he took a reuters article that I had already quoted in the OP and simply copied bits and pieces, changing a little bit here and there, without citing the source.The only thing he has written without copying is the last sentence. What do you think?
|
|
|
-snip
Hey! How have you discovered that? Googling it? I doubt you have gone through all the post history of the three accounts comparing. EDIT: Answered via PM so as not to give scammers any clues..
|
|
|
I've had to rewrite this post because the article you link to is misleading. The title says: 78% of US Dollars created in the last 12 months
And then it says: Jan 2020 there was $4 Trillion, now there is $18 Trillion. $14 Trillion was created since Jan 2020 - that's a 78% increase
That's actually a 450% increase. If that's true we are heading to hyperinflation non-stop, but given how the info is presented I'll wait until I see more evidence. And even more so when all I had heard so far was that 20% of the total had been printed by 2020: STRATEGIST: ALMOST 20 PERCENT OF ALL U.S. DOLLARS WERE CREATED IN 2020 ALONEAs for the dollar losing its status, we cannot know a priori, but it is more endangered than ever since the Bretton Woods agreements. Bitcoin enthusiasts say so, that Bitcoin will be the world's reserve currency, and I would like that.
|
|
|
Hi, welcome to the forum, I like your nickname ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 1.) Is a passport required to use exchanges? I can't just use a drivers license?
I haven't used exchanges for a while but you have the answer on their webpage: A valid US photo ID (e.g. Drivers License, ID card, Passport)
2.) Some wallets advertised rates to buy bitcoin. Are some of these wallets, that are just advertised as wallets, actually exchanges also?
Quite likely. Can you give us an example? 3.) Am I on the right track for being able to buy Bitcoin and hold long term as far as what I've been trying to do? Exchanges, wallet and way to make paper wallets?
I'd say so. I would just get a hardware wallet for storing but if you prefer a paper wallet, just do it right, in a secure way. 4.) I have heard that KYC could be a problem later down the line. Anyone know if this is true and what issues could occur? (I'm still going to look into this further myself.)
Unlikely if you just want to buy and sell through exchanges and you can prove your ID. 5.) An alternate for swan if I can't use that was kraken. Is that a good choice in your opinion? ( https://www.kraken.com/) I don't know but someone else might help you on this.
|
|
|
I was trying to find a lower-ranked member to give him some merit, when I came across this case: User wsxqaz123 has 10 merits. In January 08, 2021 he created a thread, Lost in my life: Where should I go in the virtual currency world?I don’t have the funds to invest. I don’t have a premium account for bounty and signature tasks, but the cruel reality does not have much time for me to learn.
It turns out that on March 15, user sanada.motokage gave him 4 merits for 4 different posts (3 in Chinese or Oriental language). This user is atm with no negative trust but Lauda, who is no longer in DT but I think she was before, left him negative trust as an account trader. Apart from that, in May 5, cherry11800 gave him the 6 merits he lacked to be promoted to junior member. This user woke up recently from a long period of inactivity. He hadn't posted anything in a year and just wrote two posts the same day, May 5. What do you think of this? As in another case I discovered, we cannot be 100% sure but personally I am 99% sure that he has bought the merits he needed (in the other case, the user confessed). I've left him negative trust.
|
|
|
You do not really need to comment, if you 'like' a post, you can drop a merit, If you like a post, you can merit such post.
We have 'merit' system which serves kinda same purpose, but there isn't abundance of it so you gotta be careful where you spend.
The problem I see with that is that sometimes merits are given to a post simply because you agree and I don't think that was the original intent of the system. I understand that merits should be given for a thoughtful post or sometimes for being helpful or funny. Sometimes even a one-liner, if what it expresses is a key idea about what is being discussed is worthy of merit. But giving merits simply as a like, as is sometimes done, I understand that it should not be done. Anyway, the system is not perfect, but I understand that it is quite good.
|
|
|
Hi Brainboss! I would like to change my payment address to a native segwit one. bc1q3mfmfk57sjank4m2uedhpj5yxg8yuj07x6r2d8 Best wishes ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Does people actually know that transaction fees over the Bitcoin network has been cheaper than their favorite alts recently?
Yes but the point is how long that will last because it's already back up. Let's wait for a sharp rise in price, or a fall, and we'll see. The strange thing has been that today and yesterday we have had some hours with fees as cheap as on Sunday. Let's hope that in the next few days it keeps like that and we can consilidate small transactions. I've got one still pending.
|
|
|
-snip
Hi, thanks for you work! Remember what I was asking? ... Is there a preference to rank up horizontally or vertically? ...
I've seen how people have ranked up and it seems to me that it depends more on how long they have been waiting. Is that right? Just to clarify for next time. I wasn't really expecting to rank up as I already did last week. I do hope you get accepted in the CM campaign btw. Kind regards. EDIT: Brainboss must be still having connection problems. He's replied to me via PM: Ranking up goes by first come first served for users that are eligible to rank you. You can upload on thread.
Regrads, Brainboss
|
|
|
OK.. no need to write an essay. Let me summarize it - the billionaires in the United States own $4.4 trillion in wealth. The socialists want all that wealth to be seized and redistributed to the "poor" people. If you are living in a socialist utopia, then this is the perfect plan. But think for a moment for how long this $4.4 trillion is going to last. As per your own calculation, there are 40 million poor. Divide this $4.4 trillion by 40 million, and you will get $110,000. Now this may be enough for the poor to love comfortably for 2-3 years. After that, what you will do? Billionaires are gone. So you are going to target the millionaires? The cycle will go on until no rich people are left. Then what? From where you will steal once the rich people are gone?
Of course. We must also think that the US is more capitalist than Venezuela, of course, but it is not the paradigm of free market and absence of regulations. There are many things I don't like there, and some of them have been mentioned by @dezoel, but communist style redistribution always ends in disaster. As I was saying in another thread: It is the old idea that in a communist world everything would be wonderful, when the pure reality is that if all the wealth of the world were confiscated and distributed equally, the next day there would be rich and poor again, because some would save and invest and others would spend it all immediately on whores and drugs (to give extreme examples).
The only way to ensure "equality" would be, the day after, to confiscate again those who save and invest to give it to those who have spent it on whores and drugs.
And we would all live happily ever after.
And then, someone who lived in a comunist country added: I was told that back in primary school: you would be able to get any goods for free. I kept wondering that then why would anybody work at all and how who would produce those goods... Then the shortages started and they stopped insulting our intelligence with that crap.
|
|
|
I do not believe the news as it is told. Newspapers live by causing emotions in people, both positive and negative, and the Mirror even more so. The way the story is told, it seems as if the protagonist had an ideal life, without any previous problems, and suddenly, overnight, he developed a serious gambling addiction problem. maybe drugs as noted in a comment: “I was a train wreck,” he said. “I was shut off, I was drinking more, I felt so down, so hopeless and so ashamed - I didn’t want to tell anyone, not even my family.
Bold is mine.
|
|
|
Yes, I think it is quite likely that that is the previous hint to an announcement. I think Musk did something similar, right? I don't remember exactly but he like tweeted something which implied that it may have purchased Bitcoin before Tesla formally announced that it had done so.
|
|
|
You have made a good mini summary, I would say. What I don't agree with is that The death of US dollar is near. Stop living in denial, if you still think spending all your worthless money is not a financial advice and the best one!! Think again!
I know some announcing the death of the dollar, Max Kaiser, for example, but even Saylor, who was on that line, lately I have seen him saying that the Bitcoin will survive and that the ones that will disappear will be more inflationary currencies of countries like Argentina or Turkey. If things get too far out of hand, they will end up raising interest rates, no matter how much it could negatively affect the stock market and economic growth.
|
|
|
so why people running bitcoin node? just for supporting bitcoin network ? without any profit ?
I'd say so but there are other reasons as well: "6 Reasons to Run a Bitcoin Full Node:
1) Helps the Network
2) Keeps you safe
3) Allows you to choose
4) Gives you a higher degree of privacy
5) It’s not that hard
6) It’s not that expensive"For more visit: https://bitcoinist.com/6-reasons-run-bitcoin-full-node/
|
|
|
all we need is a mechanism of equal distribution/
Bitcoin is money. Money is something you receive for goods or services. Why would one give for free the hard-earned money? Just because that money is called Bitcoin?! It is the old idea that in a communist world everything would be wonderful, when the pure reality is that if all the wealth of the world were confiscated and distributed equally, the next day there would be rich and poor again, because some would save and invest and others would spend it all immediately on whores and drugs (to give extreme examples). The only way to ensure "equality" would be, the day after, to confiscate again those who save and invest to give it to those who have spent it on whores and drugs. And we would all live happily ever after.
|
|
|
Sure, sure franky. On the one hand you take things that I say and twist them to contradict me and on the other hand it seems that you want to contradict me in things that we agree. a milkshake is not the same calorie as a pepsi and a pepsi is not the same as a bigmac
According to today's nutritional guidelines, if you have a basal metabolic expenditure of 2,000 Kcal per day and you eat 1,800 Kcal of coke and MCD, you will lose weight. That is the problem. Not that a Pepsi is not the same as a Bigmac. The effect on insulin, ghrelin or leptin of that food is what's important. And for the other thing you say, I don't bother to answer you because I have already done it before, and you keep on going on and on: you do not need to become as red as a lobster
LOL. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
So this mean that 2021 is not their year? and will resume in 2022?
Yes they say they are not offering that service this year. They also ask you to stay informed by subscribing to their newsletter. In theory it seems that they will offer the service again next year but only time will tell.
|
|
|
If you ponder about it, refraining from doing things is easy you just need to have a proper way to do so. Because when you refrain yourself from not doing certain things, you don't need to pay for that nor have to get any punishment from doing so. instead, you will gain some spiritual and good conduct. Like for example quitting gambling, you don't really need to go to anyone but it is recommended to seek the help of an expert and after that things will be easy because you don't really need to pay for not doing those things anymore.
It sounds easy on paper but if you are actually experiencing it, refraining is a really difficult thing to do. Trust me, I know that when gambling addicts want to stop, they do want to but they seem to not be able to do it. The problem is that if that person doesn't recognize that he/she is having a problem, intervention is useless. I don't know any facilities that caters gambling addiction specifically but rehab programs are a thing in my country although they aren't that famous. Yes, easier said than done. Someone who is addicted to gambling, the moment they recognize it, will make rational plans to stop gambling, but it's not as easy as just making a decision and doing it. He will usually relapse and it is because his emotional state will dominate over him, even though he knows that what he is doing is not the rationally right thing to do.
|
|
|
|