It's absurd because it doesn't match a dictionary definition of that word and you need to have a consensus on what words mean if you want to have a conversation with someone outside of your mirror.

If you make up a definition of word "shit" to mean "a sweet food made from sugar or chocolate", and start saying that you like to eat shit and that this is objective reality, it would still be laughable to everyone else.

I hear you man. Those pebbles can be ruthless.

I don't want to dismiss your pebbles but you might be overthinking some of it. For example in my previous job of ~5 years my spouse was never inside my office because it was just easier for me to get outside. We had an annoying sign-in-and-get-a-temporary-badge process for visitors and also very thin walls unfit for private conversations.

And even if what you're thinking is true, it's not like you could have changed much (or anything). Don't beat yourself up about it.

Fuck, I'm gonna have nightmares with this face now... ugh.

Having said that, Twitter has always been a shithole. Can't think of a better way to destroy it than by throwing 40 billion fiats into the bonfire.

People change. Sometimes they change together, sometimes apart unfortunately.

It sounds like you will have an amicable separation, which is better than most divorces. Stay strong. Try to focus on routine stuff for a while, don't make big decisions. Life sometimes hits you where least expect but also has a habit to sort itself out with time.

Oh no, Winnie doesn't agree with me, what will I do.

You do realize that Wuhan is not in Ukraine? Right? RIGHT? But it's ok if you don't. Here is your well deserved prize.




Not sure about mosquitos but lice attacks have been confirmed:

How is that relevant to the absurd definition of "anglo-saxon"?


Because no one wants to waste time on something that is obviously made up. Any sane judge would throw out a case like that in court, they wouldn't say "let's investigate and study the evidence that Bob is ready to provide about Alice being a wolverine".

Yeah let's do it. I figured that even in flex Lockett might be a slightly better option for me.

Keep in mind that if you accept the trade now you won't be able to use Goedert this week since he already played. I might be able to use Lockett, not sure. Or you can wait to accept after the weekend.

I sent you a trade offer through Yahoo.

Not an accusation, quite contrary. It doesn't match any known definition of "anglo-saxon" so I'm curious where you got it from. It is somewhat similar to how some white supremacists use it (white English-speaking population). But if you made it up - that's fine. Just don't expect anything more than a laugh at this nonsense.

~15 points in one drive... I mean that's not necessarily a good thing but I'll take it.




Well, as every investment advisor will tell you - "past performance is no guarantee of future results". I don't know yet what I will do. Keeping Goedert for flex might be an option.

I doubt anyone cares to negotiate his "moral standards" of sockpuppeting trollfuckery. There is enough of that crap in this forum.

Looks like you guys need a bigger stadium. Unless you can invent some contraption, maybe some box connected somehow to the stadium, that would allow you to see the action remotely. Might be worth a try.

Kidding aside, I know there is a lot of interest in NFL in Europe, just don't get why every attempt to expand there is doomed to fail eventually.

Do we know for a fact that Royse777 has money problems severe enough that he'd be tempted to steal $2000?

Here is the problem, or at least how I see it. Royse777 seems to be trying to rebuild his reputation. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is a whole other discussion (I personally am a big fan of second chances but not so much of 3rd/4th/etc chances). The point is, he's doing it. By engaging in an activity that he's good at as far as I know. It'd be more worrying if he tried to e.g. buy/sell small trinkets to farm trust or some shit like that. However the only real way to prove trustworthiness is to show that you don't scam when you have a chance to do so. If you use escrow or go first in a transaction you can't prove that you're trustworthy (and positive trust ratings in such situations are worse than worthless IMO). So the reality for Royse777 is that he must ask for other users to risk their money - in this case campaign earnings - and show that he is paying it out, if he wants to rebuild trust in the community.

This is not an endorsement. For all I know he could do just fine with $2000 but build up to a larger exit scam later. Just saying that this escrow set up alone is not an indication of anything nefarious.

I wouldn't call it a lie. While it would make more sense to have a different escrow in Royse777's situation, as long as the campaign participants trust him (which they probably do as evidenced by applying to the campaign) and are aware that he's the escrow I don't see this claim as false. Campaign manager acting as an escrow is quite common as you probably know

Can you please share a link to the Russian newspeak dictionary you pulled this definition from?

Yeah it's a gamble but I'm kinda forced to bet on the opposite here. I'm so thin on RBs now that Henderson is apparently on McVay's shitlist ("breathing issue" LOL) - even had to put Goedert in flex for this week...

You wouldn't start a new cronjob for every scrape, and even if you did - there are ways to start them more often than once a minute (e.g. multiple jobs with different sleep intervals at the beginning). Anyway, the point is that scrapers can catch new posts within seconds.

So now Sweden is in on the "conspiracy" too

Meanwhile in the real world suspects and random conspiratards usually aren't allowed into crime scenes. Once investigators are done I'm sure Putin will be given a folder with the results. Possibly redacted by FSB a bit to not harm his fragile ego.

It's a visual aid for dimwits that don't know who "anglo-saxons" were.


Except there is no proof of either, just some speculation. Not too long ago kremlinists were adamant that it could only be the US that benefits from damaging the pipeline and is able to do it and there was a helicopter circling around etc etc. Now it turns out they were not able to do it on their own and had to hire James Bond LOL. Obviously Kremlin is making shit up to fit the narrative du jour.

Yeah we do get some of the same players and I'm quite sure you snatched a few off the wire right before me. But no, you can't have Jacobs

I had Conner (and Edmonds) last year, kinda accidentally/unplanned, and he hauled in some serious pointage for me. Perhaps I'm being sentimental LOL but I think he's still the top RB for Cardinals. Although Eno sure had a good run (no pun intended) in his absence.