Updates
- Added Coinroll
- Added Coinroll verifier
- Added Rollin verifier

Pretty much all estimates in this topic are a joke :X

- $200 - $400 to develop a gambling site? "the coding can be done by anybody and it is easy"? Lmao. If you want to be hacked or scammed, that sounds right. But if you want a trusted and good developer, you can add some zeros to that amount and be surprised how difficult getting such developer is.

- $6 a month for a VPS? Can be... (my site easily runs on such VPS) but you can't expect to process millions of bets a day on that The bigger sites generally do pay hundreds of dollars a month for proper servers.

- PD earns 100 bitcoins a day? It's actually easy to have a theoretical estimation of profits. Just look at my site. HE *  wagered, easy. Variance can be more sick than you think though.

In addition people generally overestimate their genius ideas, no offense. Perhaps it doesn't exist yet because people don't care for it. And altho unique ideas can be awesome (like bustabit), sometimes people are hesitant to try something new.

Actually there are some unique games that I like, for example 64blocks.com - and it's even properly developed / good UI / etc. Still almost no traffic/players. Good unique idea, properly developed, trusted owner (Dabs), .... still no players. Just put in some "marketing" and "SEO" is also a lot harder than you think



Overall: people highly overestimate how easy it is to get a gambling site running with a decent amount of players.

Just run bitcoind, own electrum server and build electrum 2.5 from source. Easy.

Lol, but I obviously agree. I think the above way is the only way, but pretty difficult / time consuming / heavy on computer / etc Hope to see an easier way soon Still fully love my trezor though, by far best way to store/use bitcoins.

Some more highroller action. Two huge bets: BTC125 bet to win BTC50 and BTC100 to win BTC100, although all bets were pretty big:



Safe to assume this is same as "bbbye" He up BTC31 on this account too atm.

Haha wow I didn't even think about that. That could definitely be the meaning lol

Some nice highroller bets here. Including a BTC100 bet for a BTC50 win. bbbye up 35 coins atm.





PRC currently leading in the Wager WARZ with BTC924 wagered vs BTC488 wagered of BetterBets: http://dicesites.com/wager-warz But it's only the first few days so anything can still happen in that competition

The addresses are mixed up in second "daily" post

Also ideally you could remove the addresses from first. So odds are still there (as archive) but no one makes bets without seeing the new odds in second post.


Daily bets cool idea tho

In general adding subforums is a bad idea, I have seen ideas before to create: sportsbook, dice, etc subforum and obviously that would only make things less clear (gotta visit a lot more forums to browse through gambling sites.) That being said, I think a seperate Gambling Discussion board is needed and I was actually thinking about that only the last few months (without noticing this topic.)

Tradionally AFAIK (note: 60% of my posts are in Gambling so I do really lurk there a lot ), most topics were from gambling sites. Each site had one topic. And sometimes we had some discussion topics. Then begin '14 the half of the threads were from ponzis so Micon, me and others complained and new subforum was created, which was great. Now I, and apparently others according to this topic, see an increase in "discussion threads" and I think it's time to make it a separate forum for it.

The distinction for me is sites and non-sites (I think name "Gambing Discussion" is fine though). I think it's great for players to just have a list of actual sites that they can use to gamble and separate discussion threads in a subforum. Especially for new players joining the bitcoin gambling community. Now normally I wouldn't mind to mix it, like we did before. But there are really a lot of discussion threads these days. I just opened the first page of gambling and found the following threads:


Discussion
International Games Prediction Thread
BEST FREE FOOTBALL BETS #1 TIPSTER✔(W725/L180)PREMIUM PICKS FOR ONLY 0.01 BTC!!!
Cricket match prediction discussions
Has anyone here used FishBitFish?
What gambling site that you can earn 1 btc or profit 0.9 btc with invested 0.1?
Betting on Elections
II FREE Tipster Competition -sponsored by DirectBet- Registration Open
Asia League Prediction Thread
My goal to earn 1,000bitcoins within 3years
A Simple Gambling Trick
Start a Gambling Site
Tennis League All Thread
Premier League Prediction Thread (EPL)
Ice Hockey League All Thread
Challenge: What's the best way to win 1 BTC with 1 BTC?
Betterbets.io vs PocketRockets Casino
Spanish League Prediction Thread (La Liga)
Volleyball League All Thread
How to make Cricket betting more profitable
Sportsbook Strategies
tennis bets on Fairlay - Winnings: over 1 BTC
Getting a living from Gmabling alone is possible?
Am I the world's unluckiest affiliate partner?

Sites
Dicecoin.io - Provably Fair | 1k FREE Faucet | 1 BTC Max Profit | 1% House Edge
SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game
♛ BitCasino.IO - 700+ games / 63,900+ BTC Jackpot / MICROGAMING, NETENT, BETSOFT
[ANN] BubblesBit.com 1% house edge New Type of dice
BetterBets.io |Win Apple Ipad Air 2!|Weekly Rake+VIP|DICE★PLINKO★HORSE RACING
Primedice.com | Most Popular & Trusted Bitcoin Game | Huge Community | Free BTC
★ Crypto-Games.net | DICE, BLACKJACK, SLOTS | Jackpot, Ivestments!
FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair
Horse Racing♞ Trifecta ♞ Horse Racing ♞ UNIQUE ♞ Jackpot ♞ 0-1% EDGE
BitcoinCasino.info | All you need to know about Bitcoin gambling!
[New] ★ Casino ★ French Roulette with "La Partage" Rule ★ Quick & Regular Spin
☼ ☁ Weathbet.com ☁ ☼ - Bet on weather condition - BTC, LTC, DOGE
Seuntjies DiceBot -Multi-Site, multi-strategy betting bot for dice. With Charts! <<<< this one could be discussion, but it actually links to his bot-site
MoneyPot.com :: The bitcoin gambling wallet
Bounty of 0.5 BTC on 10k roll | Pachinko - Come and get addicted |Start Rollin'


So that's probably more discussion threads than you would expect.


Personally I do like to join some of the "discussions", but I think there is a clear distinction between these types of topics and I think it benefits everyone to split those. I am sure there are plenty of people just looking to play at a site for their entertainment and not looking for betting tips on some Spanish team or how to start a gambling site.

http://dicesites.com/wager-warz is now updated

GL to both sites, may the luckiest site win and GL to those who bet

You are bumping a thread from 2014


I have played on GridPoker for a while. However the site was closed and the software was bought by SWCpoker. So if you want to play some poker with this software, go to https://www.swcpoker.eu/ (bitcointalk thread)

I am quite sure it's not on my side. Using it daily for many other sites.

I got the same error again:

I will change the dicesites.com page tomorrow.

Try https://rebit.ph or https://paylance.ph

Obvious ponzi scam is obvious. Nice design too, looks a bit like www.clixmansion.com - I guess you use the same HYIP scam script "EvolutionScript".

This guy had a pretty sick win

I might add them in the future if they become more popular. Feature-wise it looks all pretty good

I did notice that the (test?) bets of the admin are still there. That is a bit strange since it's an invest-site and besides that it would have wrong "total" stats (which means I cannot add them to my site.) So I hope that gets fixed.

See main thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=866998.0 Owner chazley is legit, but I never have been a fan of those tasks-sites (and obv don't have experience with this site.)

Thanks for reporting that. And Ryan thanks for changing the CloudFlare settings, the crawler indeed got the CF JS verification page. I hope MP doesn't get DDoS attacks in the future or DiceSites might be out of stats again hehe

No, that list is sorted by "most unused activity" and includes people with 1k+ activity too, your example is actually also there

So the highest with 812, means he had 453 activity at that time, but could had up to 1274 activity. Which is a bigger difference than your example (and therefor higher in that list.)