Compliant blockchains are all traceable - also to keep out criminals so better try not to hide - later moan https://coingeek.com/digital-currency-evolves-in-the-eyes-of-irs/For some ppl price is the only thing to 'watch' and celebrate for decent ones it is compliant global use Funny that this must be explained but there are fundamental different ppl on the planet - for good reason |
|
|
|
Imagine where bitcoin will be in another ten years..seriously..all you fucks that feel like you missed out..all you hopeful daytarders that sold early and are hoping to rebuy and stack a few more sats. This is still the beginning..understand that...embrace it...dont be looking back when the price is over $100k and hodlers are rockin out at a once in a millennium party while the unbelievers and the timid continue to live a life with regrets. Is bitcoin risky? Yes..you bet it is..but life is full of risk..and without risk there is no reward. #dyor 1h  4h   D  #stronghands  hehe - beware, the green christmas tree has a red star on top and is just half complete  |
|
|
|
Haltet Fiat bereit um nachzukaufen!
Sry ich fahre Ferrari und Porsche  Lol - der fiat zerfällt nur beim hodln - kann man auch nicht mehr reparieren  |
|
|
|
The market decides and bsv has been rejected
Bitcoin was declared dead - how often? Happy to speak to the 'market' But good: No need to troll any longer, right ? Why trolling, when - it's decided in the 'markets' :- Merry xmas  Thx - you too |
|
|
|
The market decides and bsv has been rejected
Bitcoin was declared dead - how often? Happy to speak to the 'market' But good: No need to troll any longer, right ? Why trolling, when - it's decided in the 'markets' :- |
|
|
|
Ich weiß noch, wie mir 2017 mein gesamtes Umfeld erzählt hat, dass der Bitcoin nie wieder die 20k erreichen wird
Ich weiß noch, wie mir 2011 ein bitcointalker erzählt hat, dass der Bitcoin nie wieder die 20$ erreichen wird.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27348der meinte wahrscheinlich da schon 'von oben'  |
|
|
|
I just want the two of you to know that I love you with all my heart.  watching price and walls is not investing, so why ? |
|
|
|
Hab mal eine Anfrage bei meiner Bank gestellt: Sehr geehrtXXXXXX,
Ihr Anfrage, ob grundsätzlich eine Kreditvergabe gegen Bitcoin-Guthaben als Sicherheit, über unser Haus möglich ist, haben wir intern besprochen.
Aufgrund des historischen Kursverlaufs des Bitcoins, teils mit erheblichen Kursschwankungen sowohl nach oben als auch nach untern, halten wir eine Kreditgewährung gegen Bitcoins als Sicherheit nicht für opportun. Das Sichrheitenänderungsrisiko und der erforderliche Überwachungsaufwand wäre für uns zu hoch.
Wir bitten um Ihr Verständnis.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Ich frage dann in einem Jahr noch einmal. Ich glaube nicht, dass das ein Bankmitarbeiter geschrieben hat. Ist aber stimmig - und enthält sogar 'Kursverlauf' |
|
|
|
BTC als Zahlungsmittel ist denke ich ungeeignet, eher ein Wertspeicher wie Gold. Die Transferkosten sind unattraktiv, da gibt es andere Coins die günstiger und schneller transferiert sind.
Sogar Bitcoin C(r)ash.
oder z.B. LTC Litecoin https://litecoin.getblockcard.com/Dann doch lieber pure Bitcoin, das Original (ohje - elender 'block-maxi' ego - aber ich bin Code/Protokoll-Minimalist aus Erfahrung - weils skaliert) |
|
|
|
Right - Bitcoin is all in for ransparency , just don't use it for crime / ML whatever. Those projects who try to introduce crime / ano - features like mixers, LN , ... wont survive the regulations. Bitcoin must be a plain simple ledger (persistant excel) - no shit features and hooks in the protocol to have problems with regulation and scaling, just like tcp/ip as no 'crypto' stuff in it. Ponzi folks will learn, price is fcking their brains |
|
|
|
Derzeit sind hier ziemlich viele Legastheniker unterwegs. Gibt es zu dem Phänomen historisch belastbare Daten zur Auswirkung auf den Kursverlauf? Es interessiert sich keiner mehr die Bohne für Rechtschreibung. Ich auch nicht. Das macht Whatsapperei aus einem Sprache ist eh ne Krücke, ständig wird am Konsensus, Wörtern, Bedeutung und Schreibweise rumgeforkt - da kommt kein vernünftiger Kursverlauf zustande, dem alle folgen können |
|
|
|
It was on Bitcoin.org forum... only |
|
|
|
Jimmy keeps it on point and the drama out that others want to run.
Get a lawer, get professional- stay compliant for the globe.
Don't fiddle around with Bitcoin, it was set in stone only by Satoshi
Yes, for sure! Jimmy describes a blatant reality! It's a shame, though, that the people who invited him to speak seemed not to be interested in understanding how Bitcoin is descriptive, or even its usefulness and innovative developments. For them BTC / XBT declared as Bitcoin but yet is not at all in the image of what was the original engraved work of Satoshi, is that misleads people! Many forces are working to try to sabotage BSV, even here and reported fan accounts blocked! Can the law and compliance really make a difference in people's heads in your opinion? If Bitcoin is really a thing for the future, it must be disruptive, anti-fragile and getting stronger with any attack So it is way stronger than we think and doesn't care about single ppl, forums, devs, whatever Relax and try to learn what it does best. Its a great public ledger, storing more and more of our history- pseudonymously. Ppl should learn first, nothing to hide any more |
|
|
|
Es gab mal eine Seite die den Kursverlauf von Sonntag auf Montag speziell dargestellt hat. Da ja am diesem Wechsel immer wieder größere Schwankungen auftraten. Kennt die Seite noch jemand?
Nö, an so eine Seite kann ich mich nicht erinnern. Kurz nach "Weekend Dip" gegoogelt, hat auch nix gebracht. Trotzdem eine interessante Analyse gefunden: cointelegraph: Sundays Are the Perfect Time to Buy the Bitcoin Dip, Data ShowsStatistisch gesicherte relevante 3-Punkte Vermutung? |
|
|
|
Industrial Big Blocks - fit for any logistic solution - world wide trade helps anyone That’s very true but this is a level 3 riddle that could be a 1,000x return. It’s a sub 1 penny coin now. Folks understand only the coin part of bitcoin. The harder is make use of all the bits and even harder of the 'invisible' connection between both. The protocol BitCoin So many riddles here, but level 3 is just too hard, and so there will be not much ppl / liquidity incoming before there is a mega usecase adopting the thing? Not really, next big pump which I think is about to begin should do it. MicroStrategy just borrowed $650 million to buy bitcoin. MassMutual, an insurance company just bought $100 million in bitcoin. This is just the beginning. Everyone will want some bits and it looks like boomers will be last. Thanks for the $20 trillion wealth transfer. If I d like to manipulate price, I d try exactly what they do... go to twitter and do PoSM... In such intransparent and unregulated 'markets' btc and tether ++ are traded anything helps to manipulate What if they buy paper btc via futures or whatever they say, it could just mean no real exposure in sum for them... nah, its all bare speculation, gambling or even money laundering Genius should know |
|
|
|
|
Banks wanna make money by trading shitcoins. Still. Usecase is low and most in moneylaundery ponzi and sell to greater fools
Big banks have better risk / compliance dpts. I wonder if they take the crap
|
|
|
|
Industrial Big Blocks - fit for any logistic solution - world wide trade helps anyone That’s very true but this is a level 3 riddle that could be a 1,000x return. It’s a sub 1 penny coin now. Folks understand only the coin part of bitcoin. The harder is make use of all the bits and even harder of the 'invisible' connection between both. The protocol BitCoin So many riddles here, but level 3 is just too hard, and so there will be not much ppl / liquidity incoming before there is a mega usecase adopting the thing? |
|
|
|
Blockchain will stay a buzzword until everyone unites behind one chainHaving the world use one distributed ledger will support technical uniformity, interoperability of applications and a more honest planet.
Blockchain will stay a buzzword until everyone unites behind one chain
Despite being, perhaps, the biggest tech buzzword of the last decade, blockchain technology has largely remained just that: a buzzword. While its best-known implementation, Bitcoin (BTC), has become a household name, the technology that underpins it remains little more than a mystery for most.
By and large, this can be attributed to slow progress in the adoption of the technology for consumers and businesses, caused by divided attention. Rather than a collective push to build advancements only on the Bitcoin blockchain, we’ve instead seen a clamor to build too many alternate blockchain platforms.
Resources that could have been used to scale the Bitcoin blockchain and develop new applications of its underlying technology have instead been applied to proliferating thousands of competing digital currencies and hundreds of alternate blockchain or distributed ledger technologies, driven by the pursuit of quick riches from launching a new venture’s own coin yet diversified by little more than three-letter ticker symbols.
And so, our understanding of blockchain technology and its immense potential has largely failed to progress beyond its original use case for peer-to-peer electronic cash. Despite promises of a future in which smart contracts, identity management systems and data are all powered by the Bitcoin blockchain as part of everyday life, progress remains quantified solely by lines on trading charts.
Transactions in a broader sense
In large part, this is because people embraced too narrow a view of Bitcoin, thinking its blockchain was only intended for transferring monetary value. At its base level, a blockchain is simply a distributed data ledger used to permanently record transactions in an open, chronological, verifiable manner.
When thinking about transactions, particularly as they pertain to blockchain technology, it’s easy to focus solely on payment transactions. But data transactions are a foundational aspect of modern life — in business, economics, law, politics, etc. Transactions that exchange information are everywhere around us. Yet how we deal with information transactions and the tools we use to manage them have failed to keep pace with the digitization of the rest of our lives.
And with blockchain, our understanding of transactions must broaden further.
Every communication, every contract, every task, every process and every payment can ultimately be distilled to a data transaction, similar to how every activity on the internet is ultimately broken down into data packets to be transmitted across the World Wide Web.
As with blockchain, the internet initially developed from a first use case of the underlying data network: email for researchers over the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network, or ARPANET. Building upon the TCP/IP communications protocol implemented over ARPANET, internet pioneers developed and scaled the internet to become the critical infrastructure it is today. Essential to realizing that vision was a commitment to a foundational common protocol, without which the openness and interconnectedness of the internet that transformed the world as we know it would not have been possible.
And therein lies the issue with the development, so far, of blockchain technology. In a rush to capitalize on a growing wave of speculative investment, the numerous new attempted blockchains and distributed ledgers to emerge after Bitcoin have brought with them different variations of blockchain protocols, forcing competition not just on the price of their competing digital currencies but on entire network rulesets and ecosystems.
Hundreds of different competing systems aren’t just inefficient — they undermine much of the transformative advantage of blockchain, which is to eliminate data silos, enable easy transacting with anyone and create a single source of information truth. Had hundreds of competing digital communications networks proliferated in the 1990s rather than consolidated around a single, ubiquitous internet with one World Wide Web, the immense value creation and information awakening that resulted would likely look very different today.
We didn’t let that happen with the internet, so why should blockchain be any different?
It’s time to get serious about the future of blockchain technology. It’s time for one world, one chain.
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph. (Who owns Cointelegraph already? Is conflict of interest possible?)
Jimmy Nguyen is the founding president of the Bitcoin Association, the global industry organization that advances the Bitcoin SV digital currency and blockchain. A well-known advocate for Bitcoin, he was most previously the CEO of nChain — a leader in the research and development of enterprise-grade blockchain solutions. Jimmy also had a 21-year career as an intellectual property and digital technology lawyer, and was a partner at three major U.S. law firms.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/blockchain-will-stay-a-buzzword-until-everyone-unites-behind-one-chain Mr Nguyen's analysis is realistic, I would have added that there is "a lot of rot in the crypto sector and in the so-called specialised media but which in the end only reflects the excess in charlatanism as Cointelegraph proves again" how much to pay for a promotional item at Cointelegraph already? Ethical journalism really?! ... Understand that Bitcoin is a precious technological value that goes far beyond speculation, the facts show it yesterday today and tomorrow to mark multiple innovations, they are there and they are coming, at the service of all. Many people buy BTCs and wait for the miracle to happen when there is no innovation, nothing profound, and nothing useful, just a system of verbal cheating, clan warfare, the pyramid scheme is there, cyclical, waiting for other gogos to come and do the same thing, buy and store and resell, buy and store and resell, buy and store and resell. BTC is under controls, limited - many have never understood Bitcoin, long since filtered: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/commit/d9e890a8f27e46806238e298a346397871fd7e87 so the opponents, like BSV supporters; whistleblowers are silenced, decried, muzzled. BTC is certainly no longer Bitcoin as Satoshi Nakamoto created it. SegWit branch is one more proof of the chimera """BTC""". What global Holder haven't understood is that Bitcoin is meant to be used and that's why it was released. The more the market and the institutions fall into the net of the BTC Ponzi scheme, the more the rules will change, the more people will understand that cupidity, lust and greed leave the taste of bitterness in their mouths, with no possibility of repentance. This statement is irrevocable: BSV is the only ticker that respects the original protocol of Bitcoin. BSV is locked in this way, ensuring lasting trust without anyone changing the rules. BitcoinSV is a multy strength, it is stable, this is compliant of original Bitcoin conception.Jimmy keeps it on point and the drama out that others want to run. Get a lawer, get professional- stay compliant for the globe. Don't fiddle around with Bitcoin, it was set in stone only by Satoshi |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
