Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:46:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 150 »
661  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Auction] 2014 Sol Noctis MS-69 on: March 15, 2017, 10:14:18 AM
0.05BTC
662  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] CS:GO Case keys on: March 14, 2017, 11:01:48 PM
I may also be interested depending on the price. How much are you asking for?
663  Economy / Services / Re: Pretty Addy Giveaway - part 2 on: March 14, 2017, 07:29:29 PM
Preferred Prefix: 1Simeon or 1Simi

Public Key: 04EBC9D04C38E67B740CC2699BB7E3CF36CE1570B075A03BD99E7B1AB4B31342F2CE3AF114A9EA6 0828D35D39BD4E9E58E0F918E9EABF967A00F72CF96DDDA8D11
I generated 1Simi for this one. First time, so hopefully this works.

Address: 1SimipDZBRVcvfE5RV3UUjumy9yDpgyNE -
PartPrivKey: 5JEd7hxRWY652uzfGPtpfknCTE6B2bh4p14spHpYsPT7yY2N6wR

1Simeon was too difficult for me, even with insensitive case. I'll leave someone else to attempt that if they feel like it.
664  Economy / Reputation / Re: Requesting proof of trade between Zepher and TMAN[Zepher engaging in fake trades on: March 13, 2017, 05:31:10 PM
snip
You didn't answer my question, and in general you made a pretty confusing post.

The difference between Zepher's price of 4.425 and the face value is 0.425 BTC, and at the time this was worth about $425.
So is this what you think the proper declared value of the parcel would be? In which case, would you not then be incorrectly declaring value due to the loaded BTC on the coin (of which makes up the majority of all value)? If we are not counting the Bitcoin loaded onto the coin, then why should anything other than the metal's spot price be declared? What's to stop someone else valuing said coin higher and shouting about tax fraud as you are now?

Your logic is wrong, and is contradictory to the law anyway.
I fail to see how, care to explain?

Zepher knows what he is doing is wrong because he is saying that the coins might get seized by customs.
That is because a certain someone may or may not have sent a tip off to said customs. Not that you'd know anything about that.
Also, even if he marked his BTCC coins as $25 each there would be no reason for customs to seize the coins. The coins have no face value (in USD or any other FIAT currency) and are essentially just a hunk of metal with a sticker on it to anyone unsure on how physical bitcoins work.

I think you just contradicted yourself bro Smiley
I don't think I did bro Smiley

You said that you didn't want to engage in any 'illegal activity', or at least what you considered to be as such. I suggested that you didn't, and instead request for the 'full value' of the coins to be marked on the shipping (whatever you and/or Zepher decide that may be).
665  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 12, 2017, 08:31:59 PM
Im not wish you to be hack,but never say never. And why i must accept your position if its not have any sense exactly in my situation? Im easy agree with you about possible ways how user can put its accounts in danger.You are make a mistake when You are make a mistake in your conclusions about me and the fact that you can surprise me with your knowledge of security. You refuse to consider the fact that I have observed all the basic principles of security, ignore the fact that this is the first hacked account in my Life and it is very strange that it occurred on this forum. But this is all the lyrics.
Indeed, let's just agree to disagree on this.

In the my first post in this thread, I indicated that I fulfilled all the necessary conditions for recovery, but the account has not been returned to me yet, you explain it to yourself that the requests about recovery have a low priority for administrators,so its mean that administrators not want to help users in their main,real important for users,sort of available problems,I'll ask you again, is this normal,really? so it should be?
I never said it was normal; the speed of account recovery is generally rather terrible on this forum (and seems to have been for a long time). As to why:
I'm not going to make excuses for Cyrus

If it were up to me there would be lots of changes made to the way that this place is run, but it isn't. It's not 'interesting' as to why I didn't answer your question, it is simply because I have no idea.
666  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 12, 2017, 03:23:07 PM
"Regardless, there is no point in focusing on how your account got hacked now; it is in the past." - Lol,stop throlling me,enought.
I don't feel like giving a rundown on every possible way that you could have put your account in danger, so it's best to just focus on getting it back. I don't see how that is trolling at all.

Wish you never be hacked "wise" man. Or if that would be done,read at first your own posts here.
I've never had my Bitcointalk account hacked and probably never will. I stand by what I wrote, and you're probably only ignoring it because you don't want to accept it.

Good Luck.
Thanks, you too.
667  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 12, 2017, 01:34:20 PM
So,you mean its a normal practice? All that years ,im think that cryptocommunity at first its a most honest community,because all here are build on trust and help each other,and ppl here respect one another and are equal to each other.
Don't be silly. This community has some of the worst scumbags of any community I've been in before. Accounts get hacked and stolen on a regular basis.

Its 11 day in a row,not one day.
Cyrus answer me yersterday

And where im use word "excuse"? or im ask you to "make excuses"?
I meant that I don't know why Cyrus doesn't recover accounts faster, so I'm not going to pretend like I do and give excuses for it.

So,you are did a mistake here,about me.Its easier way to try explain all only "user  mistake" and "user not using proper password security",but its not always сorresponds to reality.Im changed password and not once.My previous post  include all information about what i  do and how its happen.And im never sell my account (even not think about that).
Did you reuse the password anywhere else that could have been hacked? Was your password random, or made up of dictionary words? Did you log into your account anywhere that the connection could have been snooped?
There are several questions that you have to ask if an account gets compromised. Regardless, there is no point in focusing on how your account got hacked now; it is in the past.
668  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 11, 2017, 07:01:12 PM
Its still not so easy to recover its with proof too,im wait second week now,all that time myhacked was online twice and by few minutes,most of time accountis offline,im use many resources ,but for all time that im using internet at all i was hacked and its happen here with my  Legendary account,three years using growth from newbie to Legendary with +60 trust points ,sign message,proof from exchanges,from other members of that forum about my identification
As I said, account recovery is a low priority for staff to deal with (apart from special circumstances). It can be up to months before you get your account back.

Cyrus answer me yersterday after 10 times PM with requests,that he look into it and get  back to me ,and quit again.
I'm not going to make excuses for Cyrus as to why he may not answer, however it has only been a day. Wait a few more and try again if nothing is solved.

Anyway if account was using long time with good activity ,real owner have a information that cannot be hacked,why so much request about hacking last time here? May be,because  accounts prices are grow or may be any problems with security here,like in 2015 year or in 2016?
I'm not entirely sure what you're asking, so I will answer what I think you are.
In May 2015 there was a hack on the forum which released everyone's hashed passwords and such. If your password was weak and you didn't change it since then, it is possible for someone to bruteforce the hash and get your password out of it. That accompanied with account sales/scammers is likely a reason that a large number of older accounts are suddenly being hacked. Other than that, it is just people not using proper password security and paying the price for it.
669  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 10, 2017, 11:23:10 PM
I read thymos post about the recovery process, it's helpful but only if you have a bitcoin address used through the hacked account. People who don't have such an account  are asked to forget about recovering their old account and let the  hacker use it as he sees fit; the effort needed to rectify the issue is considered not worth it.
Other than a staked Bitcoin address, how would you suggest that hacked accounts be proven (that does not take a lot of investigation/time by staff)? Email addresses and other such information is not proof, as that can also be hacked.

Is ignoring the problem the only solution?
The optimal solution is not letting your account get hacked in the first place. Doing so is your own problem, and therefore a low priority for staff to clean up after.

If returning the account to its rightful owner is too time consuming why not just delete the account or at least flag it as suspicious? As a warning to fellow forum members who might be dealing with an unethical hacker through this hacked account.
That's not the Staff's problem necessarily. If you have sufficient proof, request a DT member flag your account until further notice (however if said proof was already given it is likely that this would have already been done).

670  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.14.0 released but forum headers says 0.13.2 on: March 10, 2017, 08:35:48 PM
It appears to have been updated since.
671  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [BUYING] Collectible cryptocurrencies on: March 08, 2017, 10:33:04 PM
I'll be honest, it's going to be hard to find something in your budget. BTC0.03 isn't really enough to buy any physical cryptocoins.
It won't be as easy as finding coins with a larger budget, but there are several options for those without a large budget. Keep in mind you will not be able to afford any precious metals like Silver, though you can still get some nice Brass/Plastic/Other tokens for cheap. Examples include:
  • Satori chips, as mentioned previously. These are not made of metal, but still look rather nice IMO,
  • Ometeotl and Quetzalcoatl coins (however I wouldn't recommend buying coins directly from this user for privacy reasons),
  • The Bitcoin Penny (Website). These are currently out of stock, however there is a new series in the works coming soon,
  • Cryptocracy coins. These coins are slightly over your budget, however you could possibly find someone on the forum willing to sell you them for less.
  • Other poker chips such as the ones here.
You can also find other coins being sold by other users such as the ones here or here.

The main issue I can imagine you running into is shipping, considering the country you live in. However, you may be able to negotiate a lower price with some sellers depending on how much care you want to take.
672  Other / Meta / Re: Why People are getting Banned for using Security Question as Recovery Method?? on: March 08, 2017, 12:14:37 AM
Does this mean we have no way to recover our account if we forgot our password? That is a pain. I have my account in remember forever. I am now afraid to logout because I might not get the password right and lock me out of my account.
You can ask an admin to change the password of your account, however for low priority cases this can take up to a few months. You can also reset your password via Email I believe, if you have an Email attatched to your account.
You should probably change your password, install a password manager like LastPass and save it in there. That way it can be very secure and you won't lose it.
673  Other / Archival / Re: . on: March 06, 2017, 03:18:29 PM
0.2BTC
674  Other / Meta / Re: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) on: March 06, 2017, 02:28:37 PM
Anyway I wanna ask what happens if someone breaks the rules of the campaign by taking off the sig, puts another sig, and then getting the original back on again behind the campaign manager's back?  Will it depend on the manager to let it slide or is it supposed to be an automatic ban?
I ask because there seems to be a situation in the Fortune Jack campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1713944.220
If a user breaks the rules of a signature campaign and the manager finds out it would make sense that they would be kicked/banned from the campaign. However, it is of course the manager's decision as to what they do with a user that breaks their rules. If the manager decides they want to allow the user back in, it is their choice.
675  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Launch a VPN for a day with Bitcoin (No account needed) on: March 06, 2017, 12:38:41 AM
Would it be helpful if I showed the price separate from the QR code?
While it can be seen by hovering over the QR code, it's not very intuitive. I think that showing the price would be a good idea.

Regardless, fantastic idea for a service. I may be giving this a try some time. One question however, what are your policies with logs?
676  Other / Meta / Re: Title Bug on: March 04, 2017, 12:25:58 PM
I found the thread and was unable to navigate to a page number on mobile.
I expect that this was caused due to Arabic reading right to left, which causes bugs with part English part Arabic titles. Perhaps forcing Arabic to the left side (straight after the English) could solve this.
677  Other / Meta / Congratulations to rickbig41! on: March 04, 2017, 03:00:43 AM
As some may have noticed, a new member of the Staff team has been promoted - rickbig41. Congratulations!



Not to discredit or disrespect this event, however may I ask why this user has been promoted rather than others? It seems like a somewhat bizarre choice from my perspective. Congrats regardless!
678  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: March 03, 2017, 08:01:38 PM
LOL are you willing to open your mouth each time someone point your guru ?  ( Lutpin) ....
You're being hypocritical again, I can't help but point that out. It's not my problem that you have some sort of a vendetta against Lutpin.

go back to ACE scam  preparation ... Wink
ACE isn't, and never will be a scam. Feel free to check on me in a year or two and that will still be the case. In the mean time, how's about you sell some more of those 'silver' bars?

( or maybe even another  extortion tentative made up storyCheesy )
FTFY.

minidickfrij
Sharp as a brick as always I see.

you should really go back in Paris to take pics of  statues ass
I've never been to Paris, nor do I see why this is relevant.

this wont really help you  .. that's a promised.
I'll be expecting you. Smiley
679  Economy / Reputation / Re: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone on: March 03, 2017, 02:25:58 PM
Wasn't it beaten as a dead horse mexxer-2 is not luptin? Undecided
Defcon has trouble with basic reasoning; if he thinks he is right then he will keep shouting about it regardless of how  much proof against him is shown.
The best thing to do is ignore him, if you try to disprove him it just shows that you're just another alt account sucking up to Lutpin.
680  Economy / Auctions / Re: USD100 Steam Wallet Code (Global) on: March 02, 2017, 01:39:24 PM
0.032BTC
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 150 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!