Admissions of ban evasion, and links to several alts including a permanently banned member indicating a permanent ban evasion... Of course since Chuck washes all the right balls this will be ignored by the clown car so vigorously persecuting people over much, much less. Of course those people dared to say critical things about them, so they don't get the ball washer pass.
More fly-by trollery from another troll with a sore lack of reading comprehension and an axe to grind. So you think its worth banning somebody because they posted outside of meta twice with an alt account during a temp ban? As far as the mods are concerned, that issue is the only one that they would be likely to act on. It seems he has acknowledged his mistake. If you care so much, you report him. Thanks for proving my point Nutilduuuuh. |
|
|
|
|
Admissions of ban evasion, and links to several alts including a permanently banned member indicating a permanent ban evasion... Of course since Chuck washes all the right balls this will be ignored by the clown car so vigorously persecuting people over much, much less. Of course those people dared to say critical things about them, so they don't get the ball washer pass.
|
|
|
|
it would be an interesting collusion probably able to numerically outvote most senior DT1 members. This is exactly why you and your toadies attack them so vociferously. Not out of a public service, but because your little 3 ring circus network would be out on their asses. |
|
|
|
|
I have said it before, I will say it again. These people don't keep you out of the default trust because they are racist or hate Turks (except maybe Lauda). They do it because you are a unified group outside of their control which would be a direct threat to their unilateral control of the trust system and cornering of the signature market via extortion, threats, and trust system manipulation.
|
|
|
|
This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor.
I didn't report your MS Paint masterpiece, and I certainly didn't remove it. I'm just pointing out the most obvious rule that would likely apply here. If your workplace allows dick drawings that's great but you might want to rethink posting that stuff here. You can still post a link just don't embed the picture and you won't have to whine about it getting deleted. Or not. I would kinda miss the whining if you suddenly started respecting the rules. Rules only get applied to some people around here. |
|
|
|
...I'm curious: is there any more recent evidence of the trust system being used against Chipmixer applicants or participants? No, this is just more D.A.R.V.O. tactics as is standard operating procedure by the worst abusers. If negative ratings are no longer effective, they shouldn't be of a threat to anyone.
And if proven scammers are actually threatening to red tag people, their threats aren't worth anything because they aren't even on DefaultTrust.
Sorry but this logic is garbage. They are pointless in achieving their goal, that being protecting new users from fraud. They do however serve as an effective way to get those same users to avoid trading with people who really shouldn't have them. Additionally a lot of these "proven scammers" have shitloads of alts as well as people loyal to them still on DT taking retribution on their behalf. It is really simple. If I put 20 plastic Easter eggs in a bowl and fill them each with $100, and you pay $50 to pick one it is a great deal right? If I then dump 40 more empty ones into the bowl, it is not that great any more is it? Now imagine 20 of those 40 eggs are filled with poisonous spiders. Now the once great deal becomes a liability. This is exactly what is happening with the trust system. It has gone from useful, to not very useful, to counterproductive via over use of negative ratings, dilution of their effectiveness in achieving their goal, to becoming a liability to the user base by allowing them to be used to hide and perpetrate fraud. The only way to even begin to mitigate this damage is to require evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before rating or flagging. Anyone can accuse anyone else freely without substance, if evidence is required, that also requires the manufacturing of evidence to make a false accusation, which is a much more difficult bar to reach. The trust system as it is, is far from useless, it is now counterproductive. |
|
|
|
It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP.
Or it could be just your absurd refusal to read the forum rules... you know, the thing you care so much about when you want to apply it to other people. 10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.
This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor. |
|
|
|
OP is lunatic who is following me around, harassing and trolling me in random topics and spreading defamatory and very serious lies about me. At this point, he is directly attacking service and running defamation campaign against it because he has something personal against me. Nothing in this topic is true. This sounds a whole lot like what you do on a daily basis. |
|
|
|
Anyway, ever since I started participating in Reputation discussions and flag support on this forum, I know I will be beaten someday. It doesn't matter, as long as I know I'm clean  You are just being probed. I think that is fair especially when somebody gets active in this section. The bolded part matters. So far there is no good link here, but some other interesting information has surfaced. Lauda loves probing people, especially anyone who has criticism for the clown pope or any of the clown bishops. Wait a minute! Only the clowns are allowed to probe people in retribution after there is a conflict! |
|
|
|
|
More 3 ring circuses from the clown car accusing everyone of exactly what they themselves are guilty of.
|
|
|
|
How am I different? In a decade, I've made a few mistakes, the most recent being overestimating my ability to handle alcohol after a serious medical incident.
I don't scam, I don't support scammers, and all my negative trust came from that one event.
Vod again refusing to take responsibility for any of his actions and blaming his behavior on alcohol. |
|
|
|
I'm sure you did stupid things the first time you drank, Techy.
You are an old man Vod, not a teenager. You never take responsibility for any of your abuses here. |
|
|
|
There is absolutely no need for liking or gaining respect of other members.
...
I am disappointed in you vod in the very early days preceding these noob scammers and scammer supporters you were a very different member. I feel that circumstances and differences with other senior members have contributed to you throwing hat in with some real scumbags. I still hope that you will find the path back.
How am I different? In a decade, I've made a few mistakes, the most recent being overestimating my ability to handle alcohol after a serious medical incident. I don't scam, I don't support scammers, and all my negative trust came from that one event. You mean your inability to control yourself? The alcohol didn't dox OGNasty and report him to the IRS, you did. Don't blame substances for your lack of self control. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
