While I did not think you have been especially vocal about those who evade bans and break forum rules in the past, I was not sure of just how vocal you have been above those who were evading bans and breaking rules. So I decided to gather some statistics about the last ~3 months of your posting history.
...
While I can appreciate the effort it must have taken to gather this information, I don't believe it best represents my opinions on either of those matters. To begin, I would say that analyzing a 3 month period is a fairly small sample for someone who has been involved with issues regarding the forum from about September 2015. While I don't expect you to go that far back, it is something to keep in mind. In addition, a few of the sections in the break down can be bundled together and perhaps be combined to create one section about general information regarding the rules of the forum. Things such as 'Rule Breakers', 'Clarification of rules' and 'Locking threads/deleting posts' could be put into this section. Also, despite what I said, my post history shouldn't be made to make a definite conclusion on how involved I am with understanding and enforcing the rules. I expect that my report statistics, while not fantastic, can help back this up: "You have reported 463 posts with 97% accuracy" Regarding my previous involvement with Ban Evasion, I do not understand how the amount of posts made in threads relating to bans give any sort of conclusive evidence. I believe my post on a thread by girlbtc gives an idea of my feelings towards ban evaders, that they should 'follow the rules of (their) ban and stay away'. There is little for me to do once a report has been made other than to wait for a moderator/admin to take care of it; posting "yeah you should be banned" or some variant in every thread would be spamming.
With as many posts as you are making defending/supporting Lauda (20 in the last 3 months in Meta, 24 in Meta/Reputation), it is easy to understand why you were creating a thread that would have helped Lauda's extortion attempt.
If things such as this are being taken into account, then I don't believe you are the best person to be making the judgement as to whether or not I am involved. Considering your (very vocal) dislike for Lauda there is a clear conflict of interest between the two of us. I believe a statement made by a third party (such as the one by Shorena) would be best suited to give a conclusion on my involvement. |
|
|
|
The OP actually admitted to breaking rules that he learned about after the fact (in other words he was not aware of the rules at the time of the violation). It is the expected behavior to break a rule multiple times if a person is not aware of said rule. While I do agree that the fact that the OP engaged in copy/paste posts makes it appropriate to ban him, your logic is flawed.
He should have researched the rules when he made his first account, or at least after that one was banned. Being uninformed isn't an excuse for breaking the rules, especially when the information is freely available and easy to find. |
|
|
|
I dont understand what is wrong with my english.I am from Croatia and it is normal that I dont write on english 100% correctly.
That may be the case, but this forum isn't Croatia. Your english certainly isn't the worst I've seen, but it's not the best. I dont think to make a new account to break rules again I am trying only to get accounts unbanned or if I cant I will ask admin can I create 5 new accounts to join with every account to different signature campaign and earn some money.
And you will probably be told 'no' or ignored. |
|
|
|
It is upto you but considering his level of English understanding proficiency,I doubt he even understood half the words you said.We could convey the same point without assuming he's an idiot.
I'm not talking about what I'm saying, I'm talking about him seeing the words 'You are banned' several times and thinking 'Oh, I'll just make a new account! I am still allowed to be here'. Anyone that thinks that way is an idiot. Provided, learning English as stated in my post,would help.
Admittedly, if he became proficient in English he would possibly be allowed back onto the forum and could be helpful. However, chances are that he won't. If this is the case, he wouldn't help anything coming back. |
|
|
|
A bit harsh..I'd rather appreciate man's honesty.
So just because he admitted to breaking the rules (after doing it more than 5 times) he should be treated nicely? No. The OP is an idiot and a waste of the forum's resources.
I would suggest you to take some English lessons and then think of making other account or contributing to the forum because with that English you'd still copy paste for signatures.
He has already evaded his ban several times, telling him to make another account doesn't help anything. |
|
|
|
minifrij I posted normal things in last 3 weeks I didnt posted any spam I really dont understand you.
That's no excuse. You did spam, you did break the rules and you did disrespect the forum and the staff several times by evading your ban. Just because you posted 'normal things' recently doesn't change any of that. |
|
|
|
You had over 5 accounts banned and you still didn't understand that you're not welcome here? Fuck off. Regardless, from what I saw of your old accounts you were posting shit just for signature campaign payments, so I'm glad that you are banned. You and your father should go out and get a real job rather than spamming shit on a forum for pennies. With some details and warning I would stop that,I didnt had really enought time for reading rules I still go to school I have 18 years now,today world is fast and dont have enought time,I am so busy.
You didn't have time to read the rules, but time to create and spam with more than 5 different accounts? People like you are what is making this forum worse. Leave and don't come back. |
|
|
|
PM me the min price for the LLLN.com
I would like about 0.1 BTC for it, however I am open to offers.
what does LLLN means?
It's the format of the domain - L(etter) L(etter) L(etter) N(umber).com. |
|
|
|
While this is the case, it can be seen from my post history that I understand and (at least try to) enforce the forum rules and that I do not particularly like those that evade bans. It is more of a case that I didn't previously have the evidence for getting someone banned prior to someone else posting it. If some of the specifics of the facts are changed, but the principal remains the same, then it would read as follows:
-Corrupt FBI agent A asks citizen X for money, or else he will bring up bogus charges against citizen X’s daughter [1]
-FBI agent A opens a grand jury investigation on citizen X’s daughter, starts to present bogus evidence against her and makes citizen X aware of this
-FBI agent B pulls over citizen X’s daughter for speeding, who also does not have a driver’s license on her
-FBI agents A and B are peers, and neither has any authority over the other
-FBI agent B does not normally pull people over for speeding [2]
-citizen X, being aware of both the bogus grand jury investigation and the pending arrest of his daughter for driving without a license, asks FBI agent A to stop everything regarding his daughter so he can “negotiate”
-FBI agent B, at FBI agent A’s request, lets citizen X’s daughter go without a ticket [3]
-two days later, FBI agent B arrests citizen X’s daughter for driving without a license when he originally pulled her over (she was not driving at the time of the arrest) [4]
-What is FBI agent B’s involvement? This also doesn't properly depict the situation. [1] - The evidence that I brought up in my thread is absolutely factual, to which Zeroxal will (and has previously) agreed. By the fact that theymos has publicly said that any past rule-breaking has been cleared, it can be assumed that he also agrees (I'm not talking about any evidence brought up by anyone else as I haven't personally verified it). [2] - This would make more sense if it were 'FBI agent B has always been against those who speed, however has never seen a case himself prior to another officer handling it'. [3] - I didn't, and never have, said to Zeroxal or anyone else that I would let him go without approval of an admin. I have always been clear that I was going to pursue the case regardless of any other outcome, which I did. [4] - This implies that Zeroxal wasn't ban evading when I reposted the thread, which is false. He was ban evading and there was no public evidence of an admin forgiving it, therefore the allegations were still legitimate. |
|
|
|
I'll take slot 'D' if possible. TXID |
|
|
|
pm me the domain name
It can be seen in the OP - LMP4.com |
|
|
|
Hello, I am looking to sell a LLLN.com domain. LMP4.com- Expiry Date: 16/01/2018
- Registrar: Dynadot
- Asking Price: ~0.1BTC, though I am open to offers
The domain has slight traffic, however not too much. You can see rough estimates on the A-Ads page. Feel free to PM me or post here if you are interested. Thanks, -Minifrij |
|
|
|
But what would be the point in posting a staff accounts alleged password?
To try and scare people perhaps? No idea. If that is the correct password than  That isn't achow's password, it is the stored hash of the password. If his password is strong (which I expect it is) and if he's already changed it (which I expect he has) then it would be impossible to get his current password from what that user posted. |
|
|
|
Trying to hide drama doubles it.. put it on the table do what ya gotta do and move on.
Why would I admit to something I didn't do? People who have nothing to hide do not delete topics  I've explained this before. I've also reposted the exact same thread since. Please keep up. |
|
|
|
minifrij claims to not be a part of the extortion conspiracy
Which I'm not. however he was claiming to be well aware of the status of the extortion payment I have no idea about the status of the extortion payment, if it happened at all. I have already explained this to you. Why do you just ignore information that isn't what you want? and he did oblige (archive of his entire post) to removing his thread when zeroaxl and TMAN were "negotiating" Removing a thread ( which was later reposted) that will cause nothing but unnecessary drama now means that I am in on an extortion plot? Please. May I also add that I am in good contact with all those involved due to being a member of a Slack channel for coin collectors. If this hadn't been the case, I doubt that I would have been requested to remove the thread. immidiately after zeroaxl received an extortion demand.
You really have no idea when any of this happened, do you? The thread was originally posted at around 3AM, which was a few hours after the extortion demand had been sent. The threads were then taken down at 5PM the same day. There was over 12 hours between the extortion demand being sent and the threads being removed; that is not immediately. minifrig seems to just follow the heard.
I follow what I think is right, regardless of what anyone else thinks. You also seem to be having serious problems spelling our names. They're not that hard. |
|
|
|
No receipt, it was given to me at Xmas as a prezzie, and gift cards are non refundable so my uncle didn't keep recipt.
Eh sure, considering it is only one card I'll give it the benefit of the doubt. Send me a PM and I'll reply when I get home. |
|
|
|
I had never checked before how activity works on bitcointalk, but couple of days ago my post count and activity were the same 770, but then the activity stopped and post count started increasing, guess I have stepped into the random zone  Your activity doesn't stop increasing once you reach Legendary, you just used up all of your potential activity by posting. Now your activity will increase by 14 every two week period providing that you post at least once (until your activity exceeds your post count). |
|
|
|
You seem like the kind of guy that would go to a party and call the cops when the music gets too loud
Cool irrelevant comment.
I am assuming that your "negotiations" did not go very well for you.
I said that I would be reposting this regardless of what happened, please pay attention.
which means, he was not even evading any bans? is the josef2000 not the owner of Zeroxal?
may i gotta know how they could sum up Zeroxal is a ban evader?
I believe what he means is that Zeroxal has broken the rules in the past, however due to exceptional circumstances he says it is ok.
Zeroxal was cleared of past rule-breaking.
Thank you for the confirmation. |
|
|
|
This is a repost of a previous thread that was removed by myself. From what I understand this user has been given a pardon, however it would be nice to have public confirmation from an admin to back this claim up. If confirmation is given I will gladly lock this thread and not further the subject.
Original thread:The user Zeroxal (archive) is evading several bans from the accounts josef2000 (archive) and bittyfree (archive). Here is an image showing how the three accounts are connected:  Archive of the post shown by Timelord - Archive of the post shown by josef.2000. In addition, the user himself has admitted to evading a ban in a Slack channel:  This isn't acceptable. I'd appreciate if he were to be banned. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
