That's relative. Market makers can set the buy walls lower, because pumping the price right after the airdrop would just mean that dumping would just happen with higher price.
And it would eat way more liquidity then to insert the liquid after airdropped tokens have been dumped in a low price to the hand of investors / market makers.

But while there will be always dumping from bounty hunters, so there will be from people buying the token sale, no matter what the project is there will be people who bought just to flip it when it comes to markets. Sometimes in loss.

My networth would have to grow pretty high from here for me to even consider that. Also i am not looking for followers and it seems like these kind of stunts are often done to lure in more followers. They are just done in a smaller scale. Like saying that they give nts to random followers (which they in most cases don't).

I totally understand that, because investing into your followers is an effective way to build following. You don't even need clever content for that.  And bigger the gesture is, more followers they get.

I get why they do it too. Followers bring more money, more power and more attention. But i don't get why people want to follow them just because they are rich. Maybe they that some of that gold will rub on them somehow. It's weird.

I have been using delta.app and it has suited my needs in the past. It can be used for linking wallets, but most of these apps had still issues with that by somehow messing up tx fees and money you used for purchasing or trading the cryptos. But you obviously can just manually set up purchasing price to zero and stuff like that.

But may i suggest taking a look at Notion. You can use that among many things to to track your portfolio real time, by installing notion api connector. It takes some tweaking and learning curve might look overwhelming at the start (if you haven't yet been using it for something else). And of course you can use free notion templates just designed for your investment tracking if it seems difficult.

I have paid back $180 USDT to the address you provided, it was internal transaction so i don't have tx details Please check your account and confirm.

And thank you for the loan.

At this moment, if i had money it would be these 4

1. ETH
2. SOL
3. DUSK
4. BNB
5. New coins or projects that i don't know about yet.

I would keep some in usdt just because i know the pain of not having any more money to invest a good opportunity appears out of the blue.
I am also dividing it more then just 2 because i am certain at least one of them isn't taking a part in bull market and keeps on growing in usd because eth is growing even more.

I can't agree with ARB and pepe, as i quite like the ARB, i don't see the point with the token (markets probably disagree with me)
And pepe... Well it's a joke got out of hand. Could be valuable but i can't tell my kids that i have blown my retirement money on memecoins.

I agree that you onlly need math to see that these burnings are nominal gestures without actual value. They are sending a strong signal about commitment but anyone looking closer can see the actual significance.

If they however would burn more, then money for that would need to all come from their own pockets, so i see this as unlikely. It would be an act of charity, and i can't remember them ever doing charity in any form. And considering how much they want to talk with their users in here, i don't think that their userbase, or their token price are their main focus right now.

Govcoin isn't anything new like you mentioned, and there's a reason why it isn't hyped. Because it's not anything special or revolutionary. Banks want in on issuing small amounts of their own fiat representation tokens to some crypto network is just testing waters. More like pilot programs and not even comparable to systems that already exist. There will be CBDC at some point, but now it's more like a playground that doesn't stick.

I would love to see that being a huge thing, especially on ETH. But trusting XRP on that in bigger scale doesn't seem likely or realistic scenario.

As long as you accept it as a real thing that can to happen to you, it's a possible avoid it. Because accepting that as a real thread makes you take serious countermeasures against it.

But most people with addictions deny their addiction and often can't see gambling or anything else affecting to them. Addicts don't often know they are addicts, because it might not be affecting to them as much it's affecting to their closest circle of family/friends. Of course there are cases where everyone else sees something as a problem even if you are handling it, but if you know that you have trouble keeping it in check, i am advising making strict rules for yourself and following them. Because bending the rules slightly leads to no rules what so ever. As lying to oneself is easier that anything else.

Oh, right, then it was basically semantics, as i thought you were talking about diving dividends to pseudonymous token holders, which is against securities laws in most countries that have laws in the first place.
Buying the token back from the market and burning it is a clever way to get around that, as it doesn't promise income vi dividends or price growth, even though with right tokenomics can definitely do that.

I am aware how utility tokens work, but it's a common mistake of thinking that any token sale outside US would fly. SEC is just most famous organization that's overseeing securities in US and investment opportunities that companies outside US are offering to US citizens. Other regions have their own versions of securities regulation oversight, and it's not just a wild west in everywhere else, in fact regulations can be tighter.

I am pretty positive that their team has legal section that is giving them solid advices on this, and they know their stuff, but i've been seen token sales going south so many times before, that it makes me skeptical.

Well, it's nice to know i am not totally heading on wrong direction with my strategy. There are several suggestions that i live by like not losing more then i could afford. I just thought that there might be clever ways to use

Like "handicap", "set" and "total" markets etc.. Because it''s hard to me to grasp how can i utilize those efficiently.

I thought it might not be, even though it's currently working for me. Eventually i will lose.

This i didn't quite understand. Do you mean that if i play often, i will take unnecessary risks? As i know that i am not supposed to reach and try to risk more just because i want to gamble more.

I gamble on everything i know basic rules about, like how log each round, set or game takes? How much points there are even possible to make and in what time. And in overall how fast can games change and for what reason. But i do lack some basic knowledge about some sports. Like cricket for example. And i am not touching that until i read the rule book no matter what the odds are. Odds to me are pointless unless i know how i am risking my money. Just like i am not gambling with all the betting types that i don't know anything about.

Either you misunderstood or i am missing some key information here. To my knowledge they aren't distributing any profits for tokens holders, but they are using profits to buy those tokens from the market and burn. Which is actually way better and way more legal method.

And yeah, i do get the liquidity pool part. I just don't agree that raising money that way would be a good idea. Token sales clash with regulators all the time, because they are often marketed illegally.

I am not sure where in the world this happened but it certainly wouldn't fly in here. Those gambling places would basically be holding an illegal register, even if the register contains one person.
Not even bars can have pictures of banned people, they will just have to remember them. Also it's far from effective, and might have worked 100 years ago when regulations were looser and moer people used to know each other in the same village or city.

Like you said, all you need to do is change the scenery and play in somewhere else. Or just play online. If the person wasn't grounded and offline, there's only so many ways to restrict them. Better way would be convincing them not to gamble, and find them something else to do. Something else to fill their time with.

I've been recently trying live betting, with a strategy of betting for winners after a quick evaluation of how is the game going, and how much of it is left to play. I am accepting even smallest multipliers like 1.05+ if i am quite certain i would win. I've done many of them for few days now and so far i've been happy for my system, and i already have 3x my initial starting bet.

But i can't help wonder if i am making some noob errors that come back to bite me later. As i know that there are no 100% safe winning, i think i will start losing at some point, and with small multipilers, all it takes is few losses to get back to where i started from. I am quite noob at this so i am probably doing every newbie mistake.

So i wanted to ask from experienced gamblers here, who make live bets; how do you choose your bets and what kind of bets are you preferring (other then betting for winners).

Also are there some good tips on how to make most of from those? Because to someone less informed like myself, most of the other kind of bets seem like shots in the dark. I am assuming that there are more profitable strategies. Like what kind of other bets are worth looking into?

It's about educating yourself on raising children, and not being a main character of your life anymore. You sometimes need to put your life on hold as it was and focus on what's important.
When you get your first child, your priorities and some of your values will shift. You should put more focus on practicality and psychological well being rather than delegating your work to some spirit, or what ever you believe in.

You can pray if you want or not to pray if it suits you, but that doesn't really affect the outcome, especially if you are trusting solely in praying. It might relax you as a form of meditation, but don't count that as a parenting. You need to do parenting yourself and not trust invisible dad from the sky to watch your kids. There's an actual physical parents that child needs to be present and noticing them in order for them to grow up as emphatic, and balanced, good human beings.

You don't need to worry about that. BD-level of crazy is whole another scale and government will take custody of those children in no-time.

What ever is cheapest and fastest to move. I rather not gamble with stablecoins as i just need more crypto. And when crypto is moving up i feel like i am losing if i am not making more then the altcoin gains against usdt.

I might use usdt if prices are moving down i can send it via fast L2 like arbitrum, polygon or bsc. But i rather not because that doesn't really differ in anyway from playing in normie fiat money casinos. And i feel we lose something important ideologically, if we move away from real cryptos to stablecoins and fiat money.

Then again, in the bullrun, people who get the airdrop wouldn't have been invested per se, but there would be definitely people investing. Meaning, like you said, they would be most likely buying overpriced tokens. And i myself wouldn't mind as they would be buying from us.

I don't have an opinion about the public sale, that's apparently happening with SHFL as well, because i don't have enough data on that, but i feel that's a little iffy, and i don't get why they would need to do this. If they indeed are selling them against crypto.

And it's not like everyone would be dumping at once. These 3 reasons are enough for many people to hodl or even buy more. Especially buyback and burn with fixed supply sounds juicy.
 

I am not sure what the conflict of interest would be. It's not like they can affect the outcome of the match. Maybe with large enough bets they could affect to multipliers, but that would be affecting against them. But if there would be a way it would be unethical or conflict of interest, that i don't see, it would be against regulations and these casinos are constantly audited, so it really wouldn't make sense.

And when you take a look how much money they are making i a year, then you quickly notice that making even insane large bets (that would instantly be flagged by auditors) wouldn't even affect the income in any meaningful way. So i am guessing they don't need to gamble.

I am certain that there's a group of people that this could help with small amount of money, but i don't think it's the majority of people. In worst case scenario it will have an opposite effect.
When we are talking about enough money, we can't grasp the value just by looking at it. And then there's the fact that you would probably feel like you had more money when you constantly saw it as a cash form. Psychologically it would just make you probably value it less, as that would be constantly in your sights.

Nfts have already been used for representing liquidity pools in uniswap. You are talking about that tech linked to some images. They can be linked to anything. Also, i am quite concerned that people are using same arguments about nfts as nocoiners are using about countless tokens and cryptos. That they are a scam and have no real value, except when people decide to give them value. Just like with most cryptos out there. Only difference being that they represent unique assets and are illiquid. But most cryptos out there are illiquid and dead.

I don't know, money from huge heists is hard to launder, and $3M risk free money must sound appealing. But i don't understand why anyone would believe it's not a trap.
That contract wouldn't be binded by law, and paper contract like that would be laughed out from any court if the criminal decides to take it.

Why would they give hacker anything after that? They would take the money and try to hand the hacker to police.