Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:43:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 367 »
961  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Fortunejack refusing to pay 5 BTC *STAY FAR AWAY* on: February 21, 2020, 09:12:36 PM
I am not going to give up and will continue to slander them until they pay me.


Just saying...

Provide more evidence (pictures, conversation with support, games, wins, loss, back up all your words with proofs) or this is FUD.
962  Other / Meta / Re: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP on: February 21, 2020, 08:15:53 PM
I made a new post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg53884804#msg53884804

I figured I would save you the time posting in this thread. Discuss.

Topic is about coronavirus. This article https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related is not about coronavirus.

I won't comment other posts because this already wasted enough of my time, as I can see Flying Hellfish is doing really hard job moderating that board.
963  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 21, 2020, 01:03:08 AM
Why are you spamming? So which one is it? It is pretty much 1 or 2.

Good Luck!

He can't win arguments so he makes sure he can't lose them either by not finishing them.  :/

How many dozens have times have I won an argument only to have him deflect like he is now, that sick fuck.  
It is like talking to a brick wall.

In one thread he holds users directly accountable:
   qwk
    LoyceV

I hold all of you directly accountable for his actions.
Then he starts another thread and doesn't hold the same users accountable:
SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:

qwk
LoyceV
Are they suggested inclusions or accountable(not suggested inclusions) then  Huh

He invites me to this thread:
SUGGESTED EXCLUSIONS:

~marlboroza

Then he doesn't want me to post here:
So now you are so desperate to find ways to attack me

He doesn't even know what is his own topic about:
None of those people are in my inclusions.

Fucking prick, he said to suggest inclusions/exclusions (based on his standards):
Feel free to suggest your own inclusions and exclusions based on these standards.
Then he attacks me for my suggestions (which are based on his standards).
964  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 21, 2020, 12:25:48 AM
This should be a separate discussion.
Are you trying to say that everything what is posted in topic should be in different topic? I am following topic and giving suggestions to TECSHARE! He said "feel free to suggest...", he didn't say "you are not allowed to look in my trust network..." and, followed by his standards, I am suggesting him to not cherrypick accounts if he has so strong opinion about whole thing. My posts are pretty much on topic, question to something which is in topic is still on topic reply! Look, he said:

Quote
Lets work together
I am giving my best to work together with TECSHARE and trying to find reasonable solution for these 4 observable instances  Smiley

~
Why are you spamming? Which one is it? It is pretty much 1 or 2! Which one?

Why you don't want to work on this?

As I now have your attention, can you please:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53879760#msg53879760

Thank you!
965  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 11:36:10 PM
and who the fuck cares about this?

"Care" is a strong word. I'm merely enjoying the sheer hypocrisy of the "standards" gang being so reckless with their facts. Relax, you're in good company. TECSHARE is also refusing to substantiate his wild claims.
This topic is so damn confusing. For example:



All these users tagged account hashman, here is reference link for tags: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190670#post_hashman (account is in in tecshare's trust network btw)

I don't see them in topic so it is either:

1) they have good evidence of theft, contract violation and/or violation of applicable laws and tecshare included potentially hacked account to his trust network (according to tecshare's standards)
2) they are abusing trust and they should be in list number 2 (according to tecshare's standards)

Which one is it?  Huh
966  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 10:52:04 PM
~
Why did you ignore The Pharmacist?

I don't know what box I fit into
Please, tell everyone your opinion and reasoning.
967  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 09:58:17 PM
~
^ I like the way how you ignore me when I post something you don't like

Core tenets:

1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users.

Lets work together to bring a balance of power to this forum and check its culture of rampant and systematic abuse. Feel free to suggest your own inclusions and exclusions based on these standards.


SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
bill gator

Why is this account in "suggested inclusions" list? Why is this account in TECSHARE's trust network? This is not by "techare's standards"!

Observable instances:




Where is evidence of theft?

OH!



Let's work together! Adding request for "suggested exclusions" list:

BayAreaCoins
HostFat
bill gator
968  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 09:07:30 PM
One of accounts in TECSHARE's trust network, HostFat, sent this feedback:



Why is this person adding accounts who are tagging users because they speak and advocating others to exclude users he doesn't like?

Lets work together to bring a balance of power to this forum and check its culture of rampant and systematic abuse. Feel free to suggest your own inclusions and exclusions based on these standards.
I agree, lets work together! TECSHARE I am suggesting you to place 2 accounts to "~ list":

BayAreaCoins
HostFat

More observable instances are yet to come.
969  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 03:05:16 PM
I would be in complete agreement with this, but I don't think this is what TECSHARE is proposing. Without putting words in his mouth, he seems to be arguing for not tagging anyone until after a scam is committed
He is butthurt, that's why,

SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:

BayAreaCoins

@TECSHARE are you going to remove BayAreaCoins and suggest others to do it the same way you suggested other inclusions/exclusions:



Unless you are suggesting that all forum members should follow "your standards" and whenever they tag someone who scammed someone, to write:
"scammer. This user reminds me of the user "TECSHARE". Just trowing that out there"  Huh Huh Huh

Are you suggesting that users should include BayAreaCoins because:



THIS IS MODERATION ISSUE! NOT TRUST ISSUE! TRUST ABUSE!

This thread just beats all the crap you have been posting for the last 9 5 <insert number> years!
970  Other / Meta / Re: The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia on: February 20, 2020, 02:36:36 PM
iCEBREAKER
What the hell is this?

Did you suggest users to include someone because of "your standards" and then you suggested them to not include them because someone told you that this isn't "by your standards"?

Does it mean iCEBREAKER should be excluded or simply not included?

Besides, you fail at number 1:

Quote
Core tenets:
1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users.

1) you included account iCEBREAKER who abused trust and tagged someone without bringing any evidence of theft, contract violation...

1 a) as Icebreaker was/is in your trust network, there is no chance that you didn't notice that negative on nutildah's trust page therefore you don't care about anything you want others to care about, only thing you care about is your ass, that's why this thread


I don't even want to read the rest of thread.

It just shows very poor judgement and this is what should be in topic of this thread:

~TECSHARE
971  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Bitcoin: "Lakše je prevariti ljude nego ih uvjeriti da su prevareni"(Mark Twain) on: February 20, 2020, 02:06:21 PM

Mislim da nije prošlo godinu dana, znači opet se nisi dovoljno educirao. Znaš što bi mogao napraviti? Uzmeš si još vremena za edukaciju pa dođeš opet za jedno godinu dana  Kiss
972  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Posebna ponuda tjedna on: February 20, 2020, 01:34:11 PM
Ne smiješ glasati za svoje postove, mislim da sam to vidio negdje u OP ne da mi se sada opet čitati Smiley
Moram priznati da sam zaboravio da je ovo u pravilima  Embarrassed zato mi i nije bilo jasno kako netko neće glasati za sebe. No,

3 boda za post #13
2 boda za post #15
1 bod za post #7
973  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Posebna ponuda tjedna on: February 19, 2020, 03:34:50 PM
Dobio sam privatnu poruku od jednog člana koji je zabrinut da bi moglo doći do manipulacije u glasovanju tj da bi ljudi mogli davati glas onima koji su glasali za njih
Ne vidim zašto bi netko dao svoj glas nekome drugome, to bi značilo manje glasova za vlastite postove.
ili namjerno glasati za postove koji nemaju šansu pobijediti da povećaju sebi šansu za pobjedu.
Ali opet bi sebi smanjili šansu. Što misliš pod ovim "postovi koji nemaju šansu pobijediti"? Nisam baš ovo najbolje shvatio.

Što ako recimo glasamo za najbolji od 3 posta (znači glasamo za svakog korisnika pojedinačno) i onda kad odaberemo najbolji post od svakog korisnika jednostavno napraviš poll sa postovima koji su izglasani?
974  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Porez 2 on: February 19, 2020, 02:52:30 PM
Kada ga jednom posedujes onda (barem sigurno i Nizozemskoj, ali me znaci sad bas zanima za RH) i te kako da se racuna kao kapital i slijedece godine se gleda dali si imao kapitalnu dobit na tu imovinu... ili jeli je u RH tako da koliko god posedovao zlata nikad ne placas kapitalnu dobit na njega...?
Koliko sam upućen, od 2016. se ne plaća porez na kapitalnu dobit kod prodaje investicijskog zlata.
Drugim rijecima, ako netko ima zaradu koja se isplacuje u kriptu, dok plati sve poreze moze biti sretan da mu ostane barem 50%, a vjerujem da je i manje kada se sve zbroji. Naravno da tu nije kraj, jer jos kada krenes trositi taj novac placas PDV pa te drzava dodatno opali po dzepu i uzme ti jos vise.
E upravo tako, ima još jedna ili dve teme o oporezivanju, pročitaj ih. Pazi sad apsurda, recimo kupiš danas btc u vrijednosti 5000 HRK, sutra bitcoin skoči 1.5X, odlučiš se na kupovinu mobitela koji vrijedi 7,500 HRK, platiš PDV i na kraju godine bi još dodatno trebao platiti porez na kapitalnu dobit na ovih 2,500 HRK, što je na kraju krajeva razlika uloženo-dobijeno.

Još bolje, zaradiš tih 5K, platiš sve moguće i nemoguće namete, btc skoči, ti kupiš mobitel, platiš PDV, na kraju godine platiš porez na kapitalnu dobit, pobogu, koliko je to poreza? Uglavnom, pročitaj one druge teme, ima tu podosta nejasnoća i nebuloza.
975  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 01:55:19 AM
Clown car gang jumps on the bandwagon with other clowns.

You got me totally confused now. It was a beetle, a trailer, a lambo, a cabrio of some sort, now a wagon? If you don't get your story straight no one is going to take your clown gang seriously.
Listen carefully, I will say this only once.

Clown leader drives tricycle, 2 closest associates drive lambo, old clown members are in cabrio and the rest of the clown gang is in clown car (note: unofficial clow car is WW beetle) and when one clown jumps on the wagon other clowns jump as well.

Trailer was only a suggestion, but as we all fit in clown car, trailer is not required. Get real, how many clowns can actually be in trailer? 10? That's nothing comparable to clown car.

~
^^ @OP, can you please update topic with "off topic gang"?

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.
Grin
976  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 01:34:43 AM
Tricycle is for clown car gang leader only.

I know I will regret asking but who's the leader?
Clown who drives tricycle, of course. I am just regular clown car gang member, they don't tell me anything...




 Grin

Well, in order to join the car clown gang, you need to lie in wait in a gutter until someone makes a post that is not to your liking. Then you must strike by painting them red and having them for lunch.
No, that is what mob gang is doing (OP didn't mention that gang for obvious reason). Clown car gang jumps on the bandwagon with other clowns.
977  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 19, 2020, 12:04:05 AM
Well, can we at least upgrade to a Lambo?  I have terrible childhood memories of a vacation that I took in a Volkswagen Bug with my aunt. During the trip, we got into two accidents. One was a rollover, while everyone slept (including my aunt) and the second involved a Semi dragging the Bug for about a block because my aunt decided in the last minute to go straight in a double turn lane. If all of us clowns are going to cram into a car, it might as well be in style.
Well, we already have clown lambo but it is basically for 2 clowns (those 2 clowns are "right hand" of clown leader). Hm, clown car gang could make exception and put you in clown cabrio:



(clown cabrio is for oldest members btw)

Also, why cram in a car at all? Wouldn't a fleet of funny looking tricycles be more practical?
Tricycle is for clown car gang leader only.
978  Local / Altcoins (Hrvatski) / Re: Set protokol – automatizirano trgovanje kriptom upotrebom pametnih ugovora on: February 18, 2020, 11:40:00 PM
Vidiš da su im to najbolji trejderi Smiley
Ako hoćeš i ti da imaš divnu kožu, kosu i bradu pridruži se Set družini da postaneš top-set-trejder.
Oću pratit ovu stockphoto žensku što ima divnu kožu! Ona zna dobro trejdat!
Inače ovo ide u Shit Altcoins sekciju
Ma što iskriža ovo shit? Pa ono, imaš bitcoin i imaš shitcoine  Smiley
979  Other / Meta / Re: Gangs of BitcoinTalk :) on: February 18, 2020, 11:20:57 PM
Don't forget the worst gang around here, TMG aka "The Moderation Gang", if you do something against the rules of the gang, you will be punished. Misc: they are everywhere!
This list is in error. All above are riders of the clown car. Vod isn't a clown tho, he is a sad children's party magician that gets mad when you say he can't really pull quarters from his ears. As for Direwolf, he was granted his clown nose last summer.
TECSHARE is jealous, he actually wants to get in clown car gang but unfortunately this circus doesn't accept idiots.

Well, maybe we need to get a tractor trailer rather than a Volkswagen Bug. 100 clowns is an awful lot to cram into a such a small space, not to mention the hundreds of friends the clowns bring along for the ride.
Hey, we are talking about clown car here! There is more than enough room for every clown and their 500+ friends! Except room for tecshare, of course, he has his own jester gang.
980  Local / Altcoins (Hrvatski) / Re: Set protokol – automatizirano trgovanje kriptom upotrebom pametnih ugovora on: February 18, 2020, 10:42:02 PM
Kakav bogati protokol, sve neke lažne slike



Jel ima tema na ovom forumu? Ova ženska trejda u pozitivi a zapravo se (možda) bavi njegom kože:



A evo i bradonje:


izvor: https://rockettheme.com/docs/joomla/templates/koleti/particle_team.md

Bavi se njegom kose i bradurine:

piše na yandex.com da je ovo izvor slike https://edayfm.com/tag/hairclinic
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!