Je vais passer par Charles De Gaulle fin novembre si jamais...
Je ne sais pas si j'aurais le temps de passer par Paris Intramuros
Je peut conduire cette transaction sur Paris pour toi asche, si tu veux et si cela convient à R2-D2R2 aussi.
|
|
|
@ newalias : Sorry that you got scammed. I wish you the best of luck with retrieving the BTC owed to you. We are specialized for Curacao online casinos and successfully enforced several claims.
With that bozo you'll only lose more. Any BTC sent to the quoted user is to be considered lost. Not only you will not retrieve any part of your missing BTC, but you will lose some more that you currently hold. I invite you to get more insight and make your own opinion about how game-protect manages things. Game Protect flagPlease make your vote for the flag created against game-protectThat guy can't even read In the real world, if I need a court jugde, then h4ns also needs a court judge, right?
No, usually there is one judge in the courtroom. The opposing sides don't bring their own judges, they bring their lawyers. Thank you for confirming that both parties need a court judge to validate claims! Where is h4ns' court judge?
|
|
|
In closed psychiatric clinics, yes! You seem to know well and to be quite familiar with what happens inside a psychiatric clinic !
So if you are born September 3rd and someone asks for your birthday you will say that you are born around July!!! Yes. If I am born on the 3rd September 1975 and my girlfriend is born on the 15th of July 1975, we are born around the same date ! Do you need any more english words explained to you ?!
|
|
|
In the real world, if I need a court jugde, then h4ns also needs a court judge, right?
No, usually there is one judge in the courtroom. The opposing sides don't bring their own judges, they bring their lawyers. Thank you for confirming that both parties need a court judge to validate claims! Where is h4ns' court judge? Thanks for proving that you cannot read!
|
|
|
In the real world, the substantiation of a suspicion that something is a scam / show happens when the scam happens. Therefore, according to h4ns a scam happened September 3rd and not July 2019 as he false and misleading claims in his false and misleading scam accusation!
You falsely and mistakenly claim that h4ns' claim is the following "A scam happened in July 2019" when h4ns' claim clearly states "A scam happened around July 2019". The scam happened on April 30th as this BTC transaction shows : https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/88cea5e9935103e173e25483c1db298ab8ae7d9fa12e5572788134bb2cdb3c3fApril 2019 is around July 2019, as much as September 2019 is also around July 2019 ! Around does not mean "inside" and not necessarily "the previous" or "the next".
Despite of this, whether or not someone comitted the criminal offense of fraud is defined by the public criminal laws and not by personal and subjective opinions!
Just give me details to your sollicitors. Let's put this in motion ! So we'll see what the public criminal laws are about in this case !
|
|
|
In the real world, if I need a court jugde, then h4ns also needs a court judge, right?
Aren't you the legal expert ?! When you enforce a claim, what happens ? Don't you know ?
|
|
|
So... there is no "real world" court decision that instructs h4ns to pay 20,000€ to you ? In that case, you cannot hold h4ns' 210€ as a partial payment of the 20,000€ you are asking as a compensation ! Please quote the applicable law where it says that I am not allowed to hold the 210€ I received from h4ns? So, you're the "real world judge" who decides for himself ? As long as you don't have a court decision that instructs h4ns to send you 20,000€, the BTC you received from h4ns does not belong to you but to him !
|
|
|
Maybe the "real world judge" gave some instructions as to how you will recover your "real world" money ! Yes, the real world judge advised me to file a criminal complaint against h4ns! [/quote] So... there is no "real world" court decision that instructs h4ns to pay 20,000€ to you ? In that case, you cannot legally hold h4ns' 210€ as a partial payment of the 20,000€ you are asking as a compensation !
You don't even have 10€ to pay for your VPN ... How can you pay for a real world judge court case ? If you are a lawyer, you're a very bad one because you cannot see some words in the middle of statements. Good luck with your "real world criminal con-plant" !
|
|
|
In the real world, September 3rd is in September and maybe around September, but 100% sure not around July!!! In a closed psychiatric clinic, September 3rd can be around July 2019 and it also can be around 2019, but in the real world not! Thank you for the english lesson and your explanation of the words, but we know what around means. Do you have a "real world court order" also that allows you to withhold h4ns' Bitcoin ? How is h4ns supposed to pay you the rest of the 19790€ ? With a "real world bank transfer" or with BTC ? Maybe the "real world judge" gave some instructions as to how you will recover your "real world" money !
|
|
|
h4ns lies that Game Protect violated a written contract resulting in damages July 2019!
But this is not h4ns claim ! You are a "legal expert" but you skip words in legal terms ! Who can trust you to defend them ? You can't see the nose in the middle of someone's face ! h4ns claim is that Game Protect violated a written contract resulting in damages around July 2019 which is true !
|
|
|
~
Mr Protect, you forgot to address my request. It is only 2 posts above. Do you have problems with your eyes in addition to your brain being extremely mentally ill or dead ? Where is the legal court order requiring h4ns to pay you back the amount of 20,000€ ? This number comes from your extremely mentally ill or brain dead bitcointalk account What payment method do you accept for the remaining 19790€ ? Since this is what you claim, it means that you admit to already hold 210€ belonging to h4ns, but you don't have any court order allowing you to do so
The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts! You're right. Nobody should take your words seriously!
|
|
|
The blockchain is not a law! Please quote the applicable laws where it says that this is not a valid transaction? You are the one talking about laws. Your refund transaction is invalid because it can't be found on the blockchain but h4ns transaction can be found on the blockchain. A BTC transaction that cannot be found on the blockchain is inexistant So your refund is inexistant !
You like talking about laws, don't you ? Do you have a court order instructing h4ns to pay you back 20,000€ ?
Where is the legal court order requiring h4ns to pay you back the amount of 20,000€ ? This number comes from your extremely mentally ill or brain dead bitcointalk account What payment method do you accept for the remaining 19790€ ? Since this is what you claim, it means that you admit to already hold 210€ belonging to h4ns, but you don't have any court order allowing you to do so
|
|
|
I say that I already refunded h4ns
Can you post the transaction id ? I can't find it. h4ns to GP 20,000€ current compensation demand for damages caused by his defamation campaign - GP to h4ns 210€ = h4ns to GP 19,790€ That is not a valid transaction. https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/h4nstoGP20,000€currentcompensationdemandfordamagescausedbyhisdefamationcampaign-GPtoh4ns210€=h4nstoGP19,790€:) This gives an error, so the transaction cannot be found on the blockchain. h4ns sent you BTC. Where is the transaction where you gave h4ns the BTC back ? Do you have a court order instructing h4ns to pay you back 20,000€ ? This number comes from your extremely mentally ill or brain dead bitcointalk account
|
|
|
I say that I already refunded h4ns
Can you post the transaction id ? I can't find it.
|
|
|
Yes, only extremely mentally ill and or brain dead brains claim that someone did something and are not able to quote it! Exactly! So, where did h4ns lie? After all, if he did not lie, then clearly, it is not defamation. My answer referred to marlboroza This doesn't remove any legitimacy to actmyname's claim which you did not address. So, where did h4ns lie? After all, if he did not lie, then clearly, it is not defamation.
|
|
|
Pirater c'est pas bien et mangez 5 fruits et légumes par jour. Voilà ça, c'est fait.
Genre ... un kebab salade, tomates, oignons, puis le ketchup ça recompte comme de la tomate et un orangina pour le fruit.
Autrement, je saurais sincèrement pas te répondre ni t'aider. Je regarde pas la télé.
|
|
|
Si la technologie stagne Je t'arrête car ça c'est juste impossible On le voit très bien et la loi de moore bien que légèrement obsolète, reste vraie sur le principe. Surtout si l'on considère notre système (la terre) au niveau global. Les capacités de calcul augmentent a une vitesse largement exponentielle, et n'importe quel scientifique du domaine sait très bien que n'importe quelle puissance de calcul sera atteinte à un moment donné. La loi de Moore indique que le nombre de transistors sur la même surface dans les microprocesseurs va doubler tout les 18 mois. Yes, on voit que ça se vérifie encore, mais ce n'est en aucun cas une "loi" car ça ne se prouve pas scientifiquement. C'est plus un constat, une observation. C'est comme Newton avec la pomme quoi. Seulement il aura fallu Einstein pour boucler le dossier. Il faut garder en tête que Moore est un cofondateur d'Intel et a été PDG de cette société. Sa "loi" aurait pu servir pour mettre un objectif de croissance chez Intel ? Je me demande dans quelle mesure est-ce qu'il a poussé Intel pour coller au postulat qu'il a énoncé, ou est-ce que le postulat s'est vérifié de lui même avec le temps. Il a annoncé sa fameuse "Loi de Moore" en 1965 avant qu'Intel ne sorte un microprocesseur, en constatant que bah le nombre de circuits logiques doublent tout les ans sur les microprocesseurs à son époque et que le cout de production était grosso-modo le même. En 1975, quelques années après avoir sorti le 4004 (premier CPU d'Intel), il a revu sa "loi" pour parler seulement de transistors (et non plus de circuits logiques). A un moment, soit on arrivera continuellement à faire des transistors plus petits, soit on arrive à les placer plus densément sur la même surface, mais il y'a une limite à la miniaturisation. En gros, tu visualises la fibre optique seulement tout le monde utilise encore une ligne en cuivre et c'est seulement dans quelques labos très pointus qu'ils imaginent la transmission d'infos par la fibre & la lumière. Je suis d'accord avec toi qu'en théorie tout est possible, seulement entre la théorie et la pratique il y'a .. une réalité.
A moins d'un changement complet de paradigme (inutilité de la puissance de calcul) cette course là n'a pas de fin.
Cela signifie qu'elle continuera à recevoir des financements et continuera à progresser à son rythme infernal.
Même suite à un changement de paradigme, je vois pas comment la puissance de calcul peut être inutile ? Certes; il y a plein de secteurs qui reçoivent des financements sans pour autant produire quoi que ce soit. C'est un peu risqué à avancer mais je pense que les clés Legacy ne sont pas en danger avec l'informatique/électronique conventionnelle telle qu'on la connaît.
|
|
|
Hey DarkStar I need another loan. Please can you help me ? Request For a No Collateral Loan from DarkStarRequired BTC Amount: 0.03 BTCEstimated Loan Duration: 30 days BTC Address: 3LgfoUHRCwnPh2bdVLSR9qURbpyLQuMP54 Signed Message: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is yogg from bitcointalk and today is the 29th of October 2019. I am asking DarkStar_ for a 0.03 BTC loan. Duration : 30 days max. If accepted, please send korns to : 3LgfoUHRCwnPh2bdVLSR9qURbpyLQuMP54 -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1yogg7RkwrSsh1UNi5jw3oUALHBaP4KrX IDCZWQKK1qJJuScsjqQxEL3+G3ut1hrSqE+rY22Vl2M9Jn2J1P7Rai+sFfEwwK/lVlbNWPaOKFxSlleKKD6gmHU= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Thanks a lot ! I wish you a great day.
|
|
|
Non je parle juste de ce qui existe. Il n'existe pas d'ordinateur capable de casser une adresse. Ca existera peut-être un jour ou peut-être jamais. Et rien ne dit que nous serons encore de ce monde si ça se produit. Il y a des articles qui affirment que même si on pouvait atteindre la puissance de calcul nécessaire pour cela, la quantité d'énergie nécessaire est tellement phénoménale que ça reste physiquement impossible. Il faudrait l'énergie de plusieurs étoiles pour cela d'après leurs calculs.
Yes, c'est pour ça que l'aspect hypothétique de ce qui a été avancé sur ce fil de discussion est très important. Il est tout autant possible de miner des blocks à la main (tout comme craquer des addresses BTC). Seulement il faudra un sacré coup de bol pour trouver un block (et aujourd'hui, un "sacré-coup-de-bol"² pour trouver la privkey d'une adresse BTC spécifique). Genre tu as plus de chances de gagner à l'Euromillions 10 fois durant toute ta vie que de trouver un block BTC à la mano, aujourd'hui. Si la technologie stagne et que la cryptographie que l'on connaît aujourd'hui tiens la route, il est possible que les privkeys de satoshi ne soient jamais cassées.
C'est donc là que vos avis divergent, ok. Perso je ne suis pas assez documenté pour me prononcé... et puis au pire, on verra bien Les deux tournures que peuvent prendre les évènements sont plausibles. On ne sait pas ce qui va exister demain ou pas. A moins de savoir lire les signes dans le marc de café.
|
|
|
|