Buddy, Fattcatt's feedback shows as "Untrusted" for a reason.
Don't let yourself be derailed by people attacking you.
Given how high you fly, there is quite a few angles to get to you, and it's always easier to hurt people rather than pulling out fingers and do something constructive.

I don't want to analyze the fatty antisocial behavior further, ain't nobody got time for that, but they certainly are irritated by something you do or did, for whatever reason.
I believe if they were a bit less egocentric and agreed to let go auctioned items at not satisfactory prices for them, there wouldn't be so much drama.
In the end, they can only blame themselves because they ruined it all.
They didn't understand that it should be better to publicly apologize in Reputation, state they understood what happened and promise it won't happen again.
They still don't, since they resort to trashing people. That won't fix a thing.
Ultimately, it's up to them to decide if they want to fit in and respect the consensus or rules that is established, or don't respect it.
If they don't, well it's only them to blame, it means this place is not right for them.
Leaving feedbacks to warn other people that this user doesn't care about the set of rules that is established as a consensus is good, since different parties can't expect a "regular" trade with Fattcatt.

Now about Be Your Own Bank.
I think the project is cool.
BYOB stands for "Bring Your Own Bottle" initially, and I like how you turned that festive acronym to apply it to physical bitcoins.

We are in a such particular time and place (regarding crypto-currencies and the technology of money since the dawn of humanity as we know it).
I believe that any project today in this space is niche and should be encouraged. It has lots of potential and is much more important than what we perceive.

Sure, there will always be controversed artists but you cannot be appreciated by everybody and abide to your own sense of morality at the same time.

TL;DR : It's easy to break stuff and hurt people, not that easy to build something. Keep doing what you're doing. You are nailing it.

Effectivement. Il y a de la concurrence.



Okay, il faut chopper des Monetary Units, et puis tout le catalogue d'Amazon est pas dispo contre des MUE, mais tout de même il y'a pas mal de choses.

Bon courage avec ton offre !

Lot 4 @ 0.007BTC

I agree that accounts shouldn't be bought or sold, but how to prevent that from happening ?
I must remind that, DT resort to leave neg feedbacks for account traders because such events aren't (and probably won't be) monitored by the staff in the near future.
Same goes with scams ; they aren't moderated.

It this were to be established (banning for account trade), I believe this opens the door for numerous different attacks towards staff.

As I understand it, accounts trades are frowned upon but not explicitly forbidden because it would be nearly impossible to enforce whatever consequences efficiently.  

That happened 3 years ago.
Why do you dig it up now ? 

This ends tomorrow !
Bid now to grab some cool physical bitcoin 

This is a very interesting topic and a very vast subject.

These NFC wallets are quite different. I am not sure how they run. There might be several types :
- Some that come with privkeys already in them.
- Some that are blank of data, with a mechanism to generate a privkey.

There is always a possibility for hardware backdoors. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_backdoor)

First thing : The possibility is limited since NFC stands for Near Field Communication, which doesn't allow for use on a wide area. So a massive sweep attack wouldn't work.
Unless the private keys are recorded or generated upon a set of data (seed) belonging to the maker, no massive sweep is possible. (and unless the 5G and 6G networks don't use the same frequencies as the ones used in NFC)

Second : Unless each and every part of what makes the chip (electronic circuitry, micro-controller code, components wiring, etc ...) are open-source, published, and reviewed by peers, why not.
I'd be very weary with any proprietary wallet solution anyway.

Third thing : What is stored on the chip ? Is it the private key in plain text ? If not, then there should be a mechanism to sign transactions with privkey and only transfer the transaction raw hex code to whatever appliance that is communicating with the chip.
And if it is the private key in plain text, it is very vulnerable to exploit. You just need a NFC reader to extract the privkey. (most smartphones are capable of it)

People can charge your card with contactless quite easily. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EONQdQOzphI)
If the privkey is in plain text on the NFC chip, what prevents someone to make a copy of it ?

I believe there might be an NFC bitcoin wallet someday. There are already Bluetooth ones.

In the end, it is a complicated topic, much more than simply printing the private key. So many solutions are possible, but it should be shaped as an international, standardized, brand new protocol.
When ISO for BTC wallets ?

Seems like you end up making your own definitions for some of the terms your using.
You are soo above all. Aren't you on Mars or something ?

You know even better than us, mere mortals, the definitions of the words you are using.
Keep on with your rants. That's going nowhere.. or maybe going above-all, who knows ? 
It goes above my head, that's for sure.

And ..?

Hmmm ... I would say Hhampuz or krogothmanhattan but these are just guesses.
I have no certainty about thyis but I must say, I'm very curious to know

Yesterday evening, I got a PM from DebitMe asking for my BTC address.
Today, a 0.05BTC transaction arrived at my primary address.

I assume this is DebitMe since I wasn't expecting any other 0.05BTC transaction.
I just PMed him.

I am going to remove the negative I left and PM people that left one to ask to remove theirs as well.

Thanks a lot !

Hello !

Donc si je comprend bien ton service, tu vend une carte cadeau Amazon de 50€ contre 50€ en bitcoin ?

Si c'est ça, je ne comprend pas vraiment l'utilité de passer par ton service.
A moins que tu t'adresses seulement à ceux qui ont des BTC et pas de moyens bancaires classiques ?

Bienvenue sur bitcointalk


Ouah, -10% Ca c'est un argument de poids !
De quoi se réconforter après un dump, autant aller lâcher nos cryptos chez toi

Pour des considérations d'ordre pratique, à quelle distances est-tu de la gare ? ^^

Superbe initiative en tout cas ! Bonne chance à toi !!

To me, a "Physical Bitcoin" is any item bearing a private key that is obfuscated in a tamper-evident manner, with the public address linked to the private key carrying funds on the blockchain. (loaded)
Then, the items come in different shapes : a coin, a chip, an art piece, a cereal box ... but what makes it a physical bitcoin is the hidden privkey & funds on blockchain.

The whole run of 21 Coinfest 2019 Coldkeys are funded with 0.001BTC 

Here are the addresses for both cards :

COINFEST-20.19.11 : 1GiL4V8b8RmRWmhLZFBamRRv6Z9w3eNpxK
COINFEST-20.19.19 : 1JiprYnxAQABMxpWfTHNjMFtwpUMXG2huV

Good luck to bidders !

Scams as well as trust are not moderated.

Signature campaign == abusers lose power.



Whose nonsense posting ?

Are you talking to yourself ?
I must agree with hilariousetc ; my opinion is that is a sign of mental illness.

argument invalid

I wasn't in a sig campaign when I negged crtyopuhtner
being or not in one won't change me and how I interract with the board

That's very nice of you. So much benevolent care.  
I have two points :

1)
May I ask, who did you protect from a scam ? What shady business did you uncover ?
"The DT system" is not an answer. "The DT system" is not a business.

So, let me ask again, what shady business, stealing coins from customers, did you uncover ?
Who did you protect ?

2)
What do you propose, as a solution, for the issues you see ?
There is no such things as a perfect system, and I am always on my lookout whenever someone introduces a "perfect system" to me.

If how the trust works is an issue to you, you should try to trade with people having their trust scores very far in the negative.
According to your standards, isn't this a sign of trustworthiness ?

Maybe I am getting that wrong, so what do you propose as an alternative to how the trust is currently handled ?
I am sure that we will agree on the fact that, when there is money involved, there must be some way to show the collective perception and recognition of users.
Otherwise, any trade would be impossible.

So, we hear your points ; how should that be handled according to you ?