Et dès que ma société pourra faire de l'optimisation fiscal je ne me gênerait pas. Change de mindset  C'est très judicieux de ta part. Pourquoi s'en priver, puisque c'est possible et pas illégal ? Tant que le gouvernement fermera les yeux sur ce genre de pratiques, tout le reste n'est que de la poudre de perlimpinpin aux yeux des plus crédules. (Gilets jaunes ?) |
|
|
|
Yogg, connais-tu ces comptables compétents ?  Désolé du temps de la réponse, j'ai du louper ta question. Yes. Je peut te recommander un comptable, le très bon Jeremy Lellouche. ( https://foxaudit.com/blockchain-cryptodevises-ico/) Il est expert-comptable et aussi commissaire aux comptes, alors pour les start-ups novatrices dans le domaine, c'est intéressant.  |
|
|
|
How can you go from 0.5 mbtc to 10mbtc? You need to do steps!!!
If I am not mistaken, the previous Red Cardinal release was 5m BTC and not 0.5m BTC. The previous release of this particular serie (Zug) was also 5m BTC. 10m BTC is twice as much as the previous one, not 20 times, as your post suggests.
Can't wait to see this one ! |
|
|
|
De toute façon j'en suis sur que même avec toutes les preuves du monde pour te démontrer qu'il y a effectivement un réchauffement climatique en partie engendré par l'homme tu ne changerais pas d'avis.
Et tu la sort d'où cette preuve ? Du chapeau de Merlin l'enchanteur.  Après, tant que nous ne sommes pas omniscient (et je doute que nous le devenions un jour) il faut considérer toutes les possibilités / scénarios. Ce qui est intéressant, ce sont les faits. Individuellement nous sommes impuissants face à ces phénomènes de toute façon alors bon. Nous sommes aux premières loges de ce qui est en train de se passer, quoi que ce soit, et autant en profiter car il n'y aura pas de bis repetita. |
|
|
|
Do you know what Schizophrenia is?
You sir seem to perfectly know what it is. |
|
|
|
Donc quand bien même on ne serait pas totalement sûr que ce réchauffement soit dû à l'activité humaine, ne faut-il pas appliquer le principe de précaution?
Oui, mais certainement pas à coup de taxes punitives, de lois idiotes, d'incitations stupides, de prédictions apocalyptiques et autres niaiseries quasi religieuses et surtout sectaires. T'a oublié les vignettes Crit'Air. |
|
|
|
yogg je veux bien ta source.
Personne ne sait si la procédure est lancée ou non. La seule news concrète c'est que 2 sénateurs démocrates supplémentaires ont annoncé qu'ils supporteraient un impeachment.
Ce n'est pas ce lien là ? http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll483.xmlEn tout cas, une majorité de représentants ont votés pour. Après je ne sais pas si ça va vraiment occasionner son départ de la Maison Blanche. |
|
|
|
Now a brain should be able to understand the difference between beliefs and facts!
Yes. Thus bringing the question : maybe you lack one ?  (a brain, in case you don't understand) Fact :  Belief : 
If you mistake something like this, how possibly can you win a case in court ? |
|
|
|
Le type est milliardaire. Le type n'a pas de culture, mais il est pas bete. C'est vraiment le sous estimer que de le prendre pour un idiot.
Mouais, c'est pour ça que 6 de ses boites on fait faillite. Heureusement qu'il y'avait papamaman pour lui donner ses sousous. 1991: Trump Taj Mahal 1992: Trump Castle Hotel & Casino 1992: Trump Plaza Casino 1992: Trump Plaza Hotel 2004: Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts 2009: Trump Entertainment Resorts ... [troll] 2019 : USA ? [/troll] Je ne le prend pas pour un idiot. Je le prend pour un incompétent. D'ailleurs c'est pour cette raison qu'une procédure de destitution a été lancée. |
|
|
|
I suppose it could mean Yogg and I misunderstood the meaning of "Not active".
Or their database is faulty.
here are a few more card numbers and what denomination they are:
10000008 1000 Doge (used)
10002937 1000 Doge (not used, not active)
10011505 0.5 btc (used)
10020829 0.001 btc (not used, active)
Checked them against the tracker and added the status here for easy reference. The 10002937 one is the most interesting one to me, as it shows the same status as mine. These are guesses, but in my opinion, there was a mandatory step once you got the physical card : you had to "Activate" it. This is when they become available to be redeemed. About the "Not used, not active" state, you can input any random number (such as 65341651651651651) and it will always state "Not used, not active". So we could speculate that either the cards were non-existent, or not activated (which doesn't change much regarding the scam, except we won't be able to quantify the amounts linked to those) So .. There would be 4 different cases : - Activated and redeemed loaded Prypto card (Used, active) - Activated and not redeemed loaded Prypto card (Not used, active) SKAM !!- Non-active and not redeemed loaded Prypto card (Not used, not active) SKAM !!
- Non-existent security code // Prypto card (Not used, not active) If there is no record of release, this is going to be very complicated to separate the not activated loaded and the non-existent Prypto cards. |
|
|
|
So, I ran a script to get some data. (Thanks sat0shisgh0st for the idea !) Here are the logs : http://archive.fo/GwztIFor a sample of 134641 prypto security codes (allegedly a different one per card) : 30,646 Prypto cards that are Not Used and Activated. (22,77%) 9,789 cards were Used. (7,27%) And 94,206 are Not Used and Not Activated. (69,96%) If you try to input a completely random security number, it will not tell you that the card doesn't exist, it will tell you that it isn't activated and not used. So there might as well be "non-existant" cards in the last numbers. I scrapped some data off the http://cryptoscratchcards.com/ website. Started with Security Code 10000000 and went up. (As they started with 50 prototypes of 1k DOGE, one was auctioned with number 10000007. The highest security code that has been used and that I found is : 10103984 So it means there are ranges of activated/used prypto cards. So basically, the 94,206 not used and not activated cards may be non existent. Luckily we know there were at least 30,646 activated ("funded") and not used ! I will keep the script running, see if we find anything more in the higher numbers. |
|
|
|
0.0 BTC |
|
|
|
Quand Trump dit qu'il est anti-Bitcoin c'est qu'il en achète.
Ce type a fait fortune parce qu'il sait comment manipuler les medias et s'enrichir.
Il va pas dire la vérité et faire monter le cours!
Tu le crois vraiment doté d'une intelligence hors du commun, à savoir prévoir les prochaines moons ? La raison qui l'a poussé à être élu est soit ça, soit .. c'est le peuble qui en manque, d'intelligence. Je crois qu'il réalise tout doucement que les cryptos peuvent poser un problème au dollar. A suivre. (mais que ce serait bien qu'il soit déstitué !) |
|
|
|
On en a strictement rien à foutre de savoir qu'il faisait peut-être +60° sur la terre il y a 200 millions d'années.
Au contraire, c'est plutôt important. Si ça s'est produit une fois, c'est qu'il n'est pas impossible que cela se produise à nouveau. Et aussi si ça s'est déjà produit dans le passé, ça veut dire que ce n'est pas forcément l'activité humaine qui en est la cause. A moins qu'on soit la 3è "humanité" à respawn sur terre.. Mais j'y crois moyen. |
|
|
|
This is why you have a type 1 flag.
You don't have a scammer flag.
You have one where people massively say they believe you are a scam and this is different. Where do I have a type 1 flag? My trust page states: This user has inactive flags, which may be totally inaccurate. Hey bozo, check your thread when being logged out of the forum. This is how it appears to everyone that is logged out or that has less than 7 days of "Total time logged in" : http://archive.fo/Tfqij#selection-71.9-75.0You can change your own trust list settings so it appears that you have an inactive flag, but you cannot change the defaults settings for the forum and all the users. If you see it as an inactive flag, this is only your custom view of the forum. Because you don't see the flag doesn't mean it's not here. their own separate fantasy dream world definition does not apply for Game Protect. You are right, keep denying the current situation and keep acting as if nothing has happened. You're gonna go far.
 Please keep negging me. You didn't put enough on here. Criminal offense of stating that you have a type 1 flag ? There's no lie since you have one but you keep denying it, that will certainly help you.  According to what jurisdiction ? Shitholistan ? My extremely ill brain can't tell. |
|
|
|
Definition suggestion: An idea or plan put forward for consideration. A suggestion is not a fact and therefore the suggestion that game-protect is a scam confirms that game-protect is not a scam! This is why you have a type 1 flag. Type 2 and type 3 are for contract violation : Use-case #1 is the old trust system, but I made the descriptions on the rating types a bit more general and removed the concept of a trust score. You should give these ratings for anything which you think would impact someone's willingness to trade with the person, but you should not use trust ratings to attack a person's opinions or otherwise talk about things which would not be relevant to reasonable prospective traders.
Use-cases 2 and 3 will be handled by a new system of flags. You can create a flag using a link on a person's trust page.
A newbie-warning flag is active if there are more people supporting such a flag than opposing it. It shows a banner on topics started by the flagged user for guests and for users with less than 7 days of login time. For all users, a "#" is shown next to their trust scores.
For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created.
You don't have a scammer flag. You have one where people massively say they believe you are a scam and this is different. Unfortunately, I'm afraid words have different meanings for you, and for the rest of the forum. How is your protection racket doing lately ? |
|
|
|
Also u have read information online that suggests gameprotect itself if a scam (she refers to bitcointalk.org). That "victim" may not be that wrong here ! There is a lot of informations suggesting game-protect is a scam; starting with the flag every new user and guest will see. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=435If you like that read, wait until you get to the part where someone paid game-protect upfront a percentage of the "scammed amount" to represent the player. (or "gave a donation", sorry me no talk coocoo fluently) Guess what ? Money gone, no investigation, victim got slandered twice. Do you really think some shady 3rd party service can protect you from your lacks of due diligence ? |
|
|
|
Can I have Table 1 - spot #4 please Thanks Kryptowerk  |
|
|
|
Pourquoi ne pas utiliser le serveur RPC qui est inclus dans Ethereum ? https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/JSON-RPCJe ne sais pas si c'est possible de programmer Metamask pour qu'il fasse ça. :/ A mon avis, ton besoin ne doit pas être trop compliqué à automatiser mais tu risques d'avoir besoin de changer certaines choses. Par eemple ... Est-ce que Metamask est un pré-requis indispensable ? Autrement, passes sur une autre solution qui est intégrable un peu plus simplement. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
