|
Sure would like to know why the source for this coin is no longer available on github.
|
|
|
|
You raise some excellent points. The more I look at your site the less inclined I am to think anything shady is going on. Apologies if I came across a bit too harsh in first few posts. (can you say displaced aggression? :p)
Certainly doesn't look like a ponzi, that's for sure. Truth be known, if you where running a ponzi, realistic maintenance fee's are the last thing you would want to charge.
We sold out of our capacity. If it was a ponzi we would not have sold out. Thanks for setting me straight regarding the service you fellas are offering. Guess it's a bit easy to start viewing everything through poo-colored-goggles. I don't see anything scammy or ponzi like in ZoomHash's behavior. As a matter of fact I've bookmarked your site JIC I ever need to get ahold of any decently priced Motherboards in the future  *Once again, thanks for the clarification. |
|
|
|
|
You raise some excellent points. The more I look at your site the less inclined I am to think anything shady is going on. Apologies if I came across a bit too harsh in first few posts. (can you say displaced aggression? :p)
Certainly doesn't look like a ponzi, that's for sure. Truth be known, if you where running a ponzi, realistic maintenance fee's are the last thing you would want to charge.
|
|
|
|
anyone that would like to review her account please use teamviewer
partner id= 913768907
password is= 123456789
thank you.
Just logged into system and looks like his posted results are legit. I'm interested in hearing what ZoomHash has to say about this. BTW, I sure hope you don't have anything too critical on that system or at the very least your actively monitoring it. Alotta people that will try to take advantage of your granting remote access like that. Well, I am back after not posting for a while. Anyways our cloud service is real and not a ponzi. We can not increase payouts just because we wanted to. Especially when LTC is at sub $3 and BTC is at ~$315. We even dropped the price of maintenance fee. The payouts are correct according to the www.clevermining.com. The maintenance fees are paid in BTC at a rate locked in Fiat as agreed upon when you bought the virtual miner. When BTC drops the maintenance fee eats up a bigger portion of your payout. The maintenance fees are actually more than the payouts right now with the crappy markets so instead of the balance going negative we just cancel out the payout. We never promised anything in regards to how much coin you would earn. No one can and you can not expect us to. The only thing we promised was: 1. Speed of the virtual miner 2. Term of the virtual miner 3. Uptime of the virtual miner 4. Maintenance Fees This is like buying Bitcoin from coinbase at $1000 last year and then calling coinbase a scammer because bitcoin is at ~$315 right now. What do you expect us to do? Admittedly I'm really not all that familiar with your service. After re-reading your OP it's pretty obvious why your maintenance fee's aren't exactly inline with other cloud scrypt-based mining offerings (600 GPUS, dang, my hats off to you for keeping such a beast running for as long as you have). But it's pretty obvious, the writing is on the wall for GPU mining in general, if your offering a service that no longer even offers your customers any kind of break-even opportunity, but worse yet actually costs them money wouldn't the moral thing to do be to shut her down? Don't get me wrong, I see where your coming from insofar as actually providing what your advertising, and obviously the burden lays with the potential purchaser insofar as determining whether or not something is a good buy, but if your providing a service that you know to be unprofitable (and is likely to remain so for the forseeable future) given the current bitcoin/altcoin price situation doesn't that seem a bit shady to you? |
|
|
|
anyone that would like to review her account please use teamviewer
partner id= 913768907
password is= 123456789
thank you.
Just logged into system and looks like his posted results are legit. I'm interested in hearing what ZoomHash has to say about this. BTW, I sure hope you don't have anything too critical on that system or at the very least your actively monitoring it. Alotta people that will try to take advantage of your granting remote access like that. *Logged in a 2nd time to scan a bit further back in your payment history. It definitely looks seriously screwed/skewed with some days even resulting in negative satoshi's being applied to the overall balance. ZoomHash, you really need to chime in on this one I'm thinking. |
|
|
|
Less than a 2% chance bitcoin difficulty drop will be anywhere near 10% this upcoming change. Paycoin hash will undoubtedly be redirected back to bitcoin by the end of today. *Assuming titcoin doesn't end up stealing it away |
|
|
|
Is there an exchange for this coin yet?
It's on Bleutrade and Coin-Swap. Also on Poloniex as well *EDIT Cryptsy recently added this coin as well |
|
|
|
If you are a BTC miner, you will have to keep on buying more tech to keep up with the rise in the difficulty? Also does it always go up by a certain percentage? Or just by random? If its by random, how is it selected? I would like to see what your answers are.  you need to mine with a different tactic. you need to understand under volt and under clock are your friends. as is cold winter. and you need to realize this is a 100 to 200 dollar a month profit for the home miner at best. This part seem's pretty high to me. The sheer amount of hardware you would need to pull a $100-$200/month profit (even with dropping difficulty) is still enormous. I really doubt most houses/apt's are wired for 15+kwh's. Agree with the undervolting/underclocking statements though |
|
|
|
how do you think is it still worth to invest in here a little or is it way too late ?  Avoid this asset at all costs. Far better out there with far less unscrupulous behavior. |
|
|
|
So either ghash is having terrible luck, not paying out correctly or cryptx is not pointing all its hashrate at the pool. So I checked its stats, and WTF ? http://www.petamine.co/stats/I guess they are moving to another pool and didnt feel the need to tell anyone? Either way, until yesterday the chart does still show the full ~1150TH at ghash, so for now Im gonna blame either ghash or bad luck at ghash and assume thats why cryptx is moving to another pool. But it would be wise to follow this up and ask him to comment. Ooops, so my idea of analyzing ghash.io blocks will be useless if he left the pool... Apparently they have left ghash.io in favor of Slush (  ) CryptX announcement from today on havelockinvestments: December 11th, 2014 - Dear unit holders, We switched pools from ghash.io to Slush pool as we have slightly improved performance there and the pool also has a better historical variance compared to ghash.io (although this is no guarantee for future variance). The switch hasn't caused any mining downtime and we have already received the first payouts. Payouts occur after 100 confirmations of finding a block. We are still working on the stats page as we need to alter our code to match the API of Slush pool. Team CryptX |
|
|
|
What's the difference b/w adding altcoin center's additional nodes and not adding it?
I got lazy and didn't add the nodes, but I am staking fine so I am just wondering.
Thanks
My understanding is that if you don't specifically list the nodes you want added via either addnode or connect rpc parameters that the system basically queries all currently open nodes and connects with as many as possible unless -maxconnections parameter is specified. Basically, either you provide IP addresses to trusted nodes (that you know have valid blockchain) or you trust bitcoindark-qt to find appropriate nodes for you to connect to. adding addnodes doesn't limit you to just those nodes nor should you consider them "trusted". Adding some simply tells your wallet a list of known nodes to try first and saves the wallet from having to discover active nodes and try each one, which is why sometimes it takes a while to initially sync a wallet for the first time. This can be problematic on machines that are behind firewalls/internal networks. Thanks for the clarification. Looks like everything back to normal for me here. Wallet unlocked for staking and everything looks good. Oh happy day! |
|
|
|
What's the difference b/w adding altcoin center's additional nodes and not adding it?
I got lazy and didn't add the nodes, but I am staking fine so I am just wondering.
Thanks
My understanding is that if you don't specifically list the nodes you want added via either addnode or connect rpc parameters that the system basically queries all currently open nodes and connects with as many as possible unless -maxconnections parameter is specified. Basically, either you provide IP addresses to trusted nodes (that you know have valid blockchain) or you trust bitcoindark-qt to find appropriate nodes for you to connect to. |
|
|
|
Adding trusted node's listed in OP has not resulted in my wallet syncing properly either  Hey nwfella, I'm not sure what's going on with your wallet. BTCDdev should be able to help with any wallet issues. Hey Azeh. Finally managed to get it synced properly after adding additional nodes specified in OP it just took sometime to actually start syncing. It looks like the root of the cause might've been the systems local clock getting out of sync somehow. Looks like all is well again |
|
|
|
Adding trusted node's listed in OP has not resulted in my wallet syncing properly either |
|
|
|
What exactly is it you are supposed to do now if your wallet is slow to sync? anybody? a tutorial would be nice.. Slow to sync? or not syncing at all? If you're on a windows machine you need to download the new config file found on the OP and copy it to your bitcoindark folder. 1) Go to windows start menu type %appdata% this brings up your roaming folder. 2) Navigate to bitcoindark folder 3) Download the Config file from OP and put into wallet folder If your on a mac, I've been able to connect to more peers without the config file, however the mac client is pretty slow to sync for the first time. Just leave it running for a few hours. Ok, thanks for the information, I should be able to handle that. But listen, I have a full time job that is not on the computer so when you say "OP" I have no idea what you're talking about. I guess I'm showing my ignorance here. I searched it and couldn't find anything about OP. So, I don't know where to find this config file. He's referring to the Opening Post (or first posting) on this thread. I'll try adding those node's into my config file to see if that resolves the syncing issue. Just added trusted nodes into my .conf file from OP. Connected to 6 peers currently and still not syncing :/ |
|
|
|
Also have sync problem
Same here. Something definitely wrong it seems :/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
