Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 09:11:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 139 »
1361  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 03:45:25 PM
That English shit Eamon de Valera was gay as Liberace.
Charles was the biggest faggot the royals had for some time, although Diana was a bit of a horse, Charles had no interest and wanted the company of a right old knackers yard hoofer Camilla, like a bloke in drag altogether.

Especially Edward number one poof. Andrew was a bit more of a hardcore swordsman out of the three brothers, prob fucked Diana if he had half a chance plus most of the loose skirt about in his day. Still he married and divorced a fat hoofer. All feckin' queers the lot of them.
1362  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 03:41:34 PM
That English shit Eamon de Valera was gay as Liberace.
As gay as a may flower dandy as they say.
Auld Pilgrim Poem ..

I came on the boat to see americee,

I was rodgered by injuns in two's and three's,

I sucked a tribe dry ooh ma belly ached good,

I did it again for the whole neighbourhood.


chorus ..

Stockings and garters, ruffs and cuffs,

Stuff me hard up the chuff so rough,

Laces and bows and frills all dandy,

Fuck ma ass hard and call me Mandy.


repeat chorus ..

Stockings and garters, ruffs and cuffs,

Stuff me hard up the chuff so rough,

Laces and bows and frills all dandy,

Fuck ma ass hard and call me Mandy.
1363  Other / Politics & Society / Re: The US is bombing Syria to destroy ISIS. on: September 24, 2014, 03:21:38 PM
It is nice that these countries finally came to Bashar's help and destroyed the evil they had started and nurtured themselves. Destroying AQ and ISIS is good, no matter who does it. the Syrian Government is probably very grateful. Warning to all terrorists and such. The fact that the West might help you doesn't mean that they will not destroy you later.
1364  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 03:17:55 PM
Just think though in the future if young English royals turn out to be gay ? What will happen if royal sons and daughters turn out to be chutney ferrets and carpet munchers ?

Will royal bosses ban gay boys and lesbo's and get less gay royals further down the chain to step up to the plate ? Is english royalism all a load of anti-gay fascist and gay bashing power hoarding, dashing for the big cash with no regard for sexual orientation ?
1365  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 03:15:03 PM
With Scotland re-affirming their wedding vows to their UK masters, ole' Cameron will be lifting a few kilts from the back and slipping his rod firm up the Scots for good measure.

With Catalonians and the Basques getting restless in Spain, also the wealthy Bavarians and Venetians in Germany and Italy wanting a bit of independent action, what would the likeliest states in the US be on a list of 1 to 10 for those wanting to separate from their federal US masters ?
Scotland have their own laws, their own Parliament, we even let them keep the stone of scone so it was all nonsense anyway because all they are dependant on is money from the treasury via the Barnett formula which is base on current population figures.
The stone of scone known as The Stone of Destiny or The Coronation Stone of the Kings of Tara (Ireland) was originally robbed from Ireland by one of the AWOL kings of Ireland.

It was taken across to Argyll (Scotland) by Scotland's first Irish King Fergus son of Erc in 1200 odd when many a ruling clan of Ireland would pop over to Scotland to sort things out there as the Irish had been populating Scotland for most of the last seven centuries from the 5th century, hence the familiar Gaelic language the Scots speak based on old Irish.
Scottish had  the stone for over 6 centuries in England, it was captured by king Edward I and stored in Westminster Abbey and it was used for coronations because the Kings and Queens of England were also the Kings and Queens of Scotland . They gave the stone back to the Scottish in 96' as a symbolic gesture and there was a handover ceremony before it was taken to Edinburgh Castle.
It was offered back on loan to the Scots, but will still be taken when needed for royal coronations. More so, especially now the Scots are UK bitches and whoever needs to get crowned south of the border will just holler at the scots to get the feckin stone back down.
1366  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 03:02:16 PM
The scots probably robbed bagpipes off the Irish or Europeans ...

Actual examples of bagpipes [in Scotland] from before the 18th century are extremely rare; however, a substantial number of paintings, carvings, engravings, manuscript illuminations, and so on survive.

Evidence of the bagpipe in Ireland occurs in 1581, when John Derrick's The Image of Irelande clearly depicts a bagpiper. Derrick's illustrations are considered to be reasonably faithful depictions of the attire and equipment of the English and Irish population of the 16th century. The "Battell" sequence from My Ladye Nevells Booke (1591) by William Byrd, which probably alludes to the Irish wars of 1578, contains a piece entitled The bagpipe: & the drone.

In the early part of the second millennium, bagpipes began to appear with frequency in European art and iconography. The Cantigas de Santa Maria, compiled in Castile in the mid-13th century, depicts several types of bagpipes. Though evidence of bagpipes in the British Isles prior to the 14th century is contested, bagpipes are explicitly mentioned in The Canterbury Tales (written around 1380): A baggepype wel coude he blowe and sowne, /And ther-with-al he broghte us out of towne.
1367  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 24, 2014, 02:32:53 PM
The Scots robbed whiskey off the Irish too.

The word whisky (or whiskey) is an anglicisation of the Gaelic word uisce/uisge meaning water.

The first confirmed written record of whisky comes from 1405 in Ireland. In the Irish Annals of Clonmacnoise in 1405, the first written record of whisky attributes the death of a chieftain to "taking a surfeit of aqua vitae" at Christmas.

In Scotland, the first evidence of whisky production comes from an entry in the Exchequer Rolls for 1494 where malt is sent "To Friar John Cor, by order of the king, to make aquavitae", enough to make about 500 bottles.

With a licence to distil Irish whiskey from 1608, the Old Bushmills Distillery in Northern Ireland is the oldest licenced whiskey distillery in the world.
1368  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Scotland's silent majority decides against separation on: September 23, 2014, 06:53:22 PM
With Scotland re-affirming their wedding vows to their UK masters, ole' Cameron will be lifting a few kilts from the back and slipping his rod firm up the Scots for good measure.

With Catalonians and the Basques getting restless in Spain, also the wealthy Bavarians and Venetians in Germany and Italy wanting a bit of independent action, what would the likeliest states in the US be on a list of 1 to 10 for those wanting to separate from their federal US masters ?
Scotland have their own laws, their own Parliament, we even let them keep the stone of scone so it was all nonsense anyway because all they are dependant on is money from the treasury via the Barnett formula which is base on current population figures.
The stone of scone known as The Stone of Destiny or The Coronation Stone of the Kings of Tara (Ireland) was originally robbed from Ireland by one of the AWOL kings of Ireland.

It was taken across to Argyll (Scotland) by Scotland's first Irish King Fergus son of Erc in 1200 odd when many a ruling clan of Ireland would pop over to Scotland to sort things out there as the Irish had been populating Scotland for most of the last seven centuries from the 5th century, hence the familiar Gaelic language the Scots speak based on old Irish.
1369  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why is obama purging generals from the military? on: September 23, 2014, 06:10:57 PM
Why?  Why all those top commanders?  To weaken our strength?  To let the radical muslim world consume us?
I've read articles that have talked about how some of the cuts are due to sequestration....meeting the bottom line meets cutting those who are paid more.
I'm pretty damned sure that there are enough pencil pushers that could be eliminated to make ends meet.

You do realize that the Iraqi army laid done their weapons and went home because they didn't have any combat officers-- just a bunch of political appointees from Malaiki that the military didn't trust in a fire fight.  We are headed to the same place.
1370  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why is obama purging generals from the military? on: September 23, 2014, 05:58:09 PM
Why?  Why all those top commanders?  To weaken our strength?  To let the radical muslim world consume us?
1371  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How do we defeat ISIS without U.S. Ground Troops? on: September 23, 2014, 04:23:15 PM
The only people able to stand against ISIS right now are the Kurds, and they are only succeeding because of U.S. Airstrikes. But the Kurds only defend their own territory. It is unlikely they will go further south to fight ISIS. Most of the rest of the Iraqi Army is turning and fleeing at the first sight of ISIS.

My question is: If airstrikes can only do so much against ISIS, how can we defeat ISIS in Iraq without U.S. Ground Troops if most of the Iraqi Army does not want to fight?
US  arm them. Maybe not intentionally, but it has everything to do with unintentional consequences of poorly executed foreign policy. As far as funding, there's no real doubt Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Syria, and many other countries have given them funding for all kinds of reasons.....so lets stop funding and arming them.
And what foreign policy would that be? Invading Iraq? I agree, that was pure idiocy.
We agree on this.
But the next incident of pure idiocy was leaving no troops behind to stop groups like ISIS, because that is the situation that Obama inherited. He just made a bad scenario much worse.
We lost Iraq long before Obama was in office. Banning the Baathists dismantling Iraq's army and civil service wasn't a very good start, ignoring the lessons learned from the Gulf War was another poor start. Iraq was pretty much doomed. We had a chance, but the Maliki administration destroyed it and would have even if we had stayed (and it is likely he would still be in power if we had stayed which might have made long run change even worse off).
I can't say I agree with that conclusion, but it's easy to blame Bush.
1372  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How do we defeat ISIS without U.S. Ground Troops? on: September 23, 2014, 03:58:03 PM
The only people able to stand against ISIS right now are the Kurds, and they are only succeeding because of U.S. Airstrikes. But the Kurds only defend their own territory. It is unlikely they will go further south to fight ISIS. Most of the rest of the Iraqi Army is turning and fleeing at the first sight of ISIS.

My question is: If airstrikes can only do so much against ISIS, how can we defeat ISIS in Iraq without U.S. Ground Troops if most of the Iraqi Army does not want to fight?
US  arm them. Maybe not intentionally, but it has everything to do with unintentional consequences of poorly executed foreign policy. As far as funding, there's no real doubt Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Syria, and many other countries have given them funding for all kinds of reasons.....so lets stop funding and arming them.
And what foreign policy would that be? Invading Iraq? I agree, that was pure idiocy.
We agree on this.
But the next incident of pure idiocy was leaving no troops behind to stop groups like ISIS, because that is the situation that Obama inherited. He just made a bad scenario much worse.
1373  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How do we defeat ISIS without U.S. Ground Troops? on: September 23, 2014, 03:47:59 PM
The only people able to stand against ISIS right now are the Kurds, and they are only succeeding because of U.S. Airstrikes. But the Kurds only defend their own territory. It is unlikely they will go further south to fight ISIS. Most of the rest of the Iraqi Army is turning and fleeing at the first sight of ISIS.

My question is: If airstrikes can only do so much against ISIS, how can we defeat ISIS in Iraq without U.S. Ground Troops if most of the Iraqi Army does not want to fight?
US  arm them. Maybe not intentionally, but it has everything to do with unintentional consequences of poorly executed foreign policy. As far as funding, there's no real doubt Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Syria, and many other countries have given them funding for all kinds of reasons.....so lets stop funding and arming them.

Stop paying income taxes in the U.S.   Smiley
If we do that then you will find uncle sam knoking at your door.
1374  Other / Politics & Society / Re: How do we defeat ISIS without U.S. Ground Troops? on: September 23, 2014, 03:31:17 PM
The only people able to stand against ISIS right now are the Kurds, and they are only succeeding because of U.S. Airstrikes. But the Kurds only defend their own territory. It is unlikely they will go further south to fight ISIS. Most of the rest of the Iraqi Army is turning and fleeing at the first sight of ISIS.

My question is: If airstrikes can only do so much against ISIS, how can we defeat ISIS in Iraq without U.S. Ground Troops if most of the Iraqi Army does not want to fight?
US  arm them. Maybe not intentionally, but it has everything to do with unintentional consequences of poorly executed foreign policy. As far as funding, there's no real doubt Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Syria, and many other countries have given them funding for all kinds of reasons.....so lets stop funding and arming them.
1375  Other / Off-topic / Re: Purgatory on: September 22, 2014, 07:01:59 PM
I like the Book of Esther.  There's a lot to be learned from that story, but that does not mean we should do everything each of the characters in the story does.  I don't think we would want to our presidents choose a first lady in the same manner King Xerxes chose Esther.  Nor do I think that we would want to have a swordsman standing next to our president ready to kill anyone, including the first lady, who approached him without being sent for.....unless he offered that person his scepter as a signal for the swordsman to let that person live.
I understand...just the bits that you find acceptable.  I ask again (and again) with no answer.  Since there are so many varying interpretations in conflict...who is correct?  Everyone or no one?.  I understand the inability to answer this unanswerable question as basically makes organized religion hogwash.
1376  Other / Off-topic / Re: Purgatory on: September 22, 2014, 06:49:19 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Purgatory

 Actually, the concept of Purgatory dates back even before Christ.  Praying for the dead and their afterlife purification is found in history of Jews. 

"The descriptions and doctrine regarding purgatory developed over the centuries.[2] Advocates of belief in purgatory interpret Bible passages such as 2 Maccabees 12:41-46 (not accepted as Scripture by Protestants but recognized by Orthodox and Catholics), 2 Timothy 1:18, Matthew 12:32, Luke 16:19-26 and 23:43, 1 Corinthians 3:11-15 and Hebrews 12:29 as support for prayer for the dead, an active interim state for the dead prior to the resurrection, and purifying flames after death.[2] "


Medievalist Jacques Le Goff defines the "birth of purgatory", i.e. the conception of purgatory as a physical place, rather than merely as a state, as occurring between 1170 and 1200.[38] Le Goff acknowledged that the notion of purification after death, without the medieval notion of a physical place, existed in antiquity, arguing specifically that Clement of Alexandria, and his pupil Origen of Alexandria, derived their view from a combination of biblical teachings, though he considered vague concepts of purifying and punishing fire to predate Christianity.[39] Le Goff also considered Peter the Lombard (d. 1160), in expounding on the teachings of St. Augustine and Gregory the "Great, to have contributed significantly to the birth of purgatory in the sense of a physical place.

While the idea of purgatory as a process of cleansing thus dated back to early Christianity, the 12th century was the heyday of medieval otherworld-journey narratives such as the Irish Visio Tnugdali, and of pilgrims' tales about St. Patrick's Purgatory, a cavelike entrance to purgatory on a remote island in Ireland.[40] The legend of St Patrick's Purgatory (Tractatus de Purgatorio Sancti Patricii) written in that century by Hugh of Saltry, also known as Henry of Sawtry, was "part of a huge, repetitive contemporary genre of literature of which the most familiar today is Dante's";[41] another is the Visio Tnugdali. Other legends localized the entrance to Purgatory in places such as a cave on the volcanic Mount Etna in Sicily.[42] Thus the idea of purgatory as a physical place became widespread on a popular level, and was defended also by some theologians.
So who is correct?  Everyone?  Do you lilke the other parts of the Old testament as well?  If so, when can we get together and stone my neighbor for shaving his beard?
1377  Other / Off-topic / Re: TeamSpeak or Skype ? on: September 22, 2014, 06:46:15 PM
I was wondering what do you guys prefer ? Skype or TeamSpeak ?  Embarrassed I prefer Skype .
Skype is the best, i never heard of TeamSpeak
1378  Other / Off-topic / Re: Purgatory on: September 22, 2014, 06:42:11 PM
This is now a Supernatural thread


lol good one....
1379  Other / Off-topic / Re: Purgatory on: September 22, 2014, 04:26:58 PM
First,  we need to get our facts straight....

Purgatory was never a part of early/ primitive Christian culture, and wasn't invented until about 1500 years AFTER the formation of The Holy Roman Church. And all it is is a "catholic cop-out" visa vie.....  If you die in a car crash on your way to confession, you have a second chance. That is a Catholic version of a,  "state of grace".
It is purley a religious invention with absolutley no basis in biblical scripture.
But, just like all the other religious BS available...  if it makes you feel better, then go for it. What have you got to lose ( except a whole lots of wasted emotional stress)?
Hey...its just as valid as everything else ....or perhaps invalid was the term I was looking for.  But today Im going to behave like a christian and believe the bits that make me happy and reject the other parts as figurative.  I get a second chance if all this crap is right....yahoo!!!
1380  Other / Off-topic / Re: Purgatory on: September 22, 2014, 04:03:49 PM
Good news for sure.  Thats me.  Im a marine biologist and I just want to understand how things work.  I am an ecological detective.  I have put about 5000 hours into the BP spill thus far. I put coral reefs back together after they are hit by ships.  Im sure if this religion turns out to be real God could appreciate that.
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 139 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!