Bitcoins have entered the Void.
It's my understanding that bitcoins sent to invalid addresses will bounce. Then he has less than 30 days to get in contact with MyBitcoin.
|
|
|
As well as things like the "CPU" isn't the box sitting on your table/floor. But well, it's generally waste of breath Almost spit my pop out, reading this. Yeah, I've heard this a lot as well.*facepalm* "can you take a look at my cpu, I'll bring it by" [expecting to inspect pins of the processor or something, turns out some people consider the tower a cpu] Well "theoretically speaking", I spend all my time centrally located around this processing unit.
|
|
|
Bitcoins have entered the Void.
|
|
|
/test is looking a LOT better then when you first showed it! Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
Your site doesn't let people buy or withdraw with Bitcoins?
|
|
|
I've read this whole thread (amfg, my life...). If you were to back this via a website (yes, I know. The whole idea for this was to get away from "trust" and establish a non-needed-trust system), then instead of sending micropayments that MAY or MAY NOT arrive at a timely fashion can just be established on the site.
{I'd like the ticker to say USD} U:0.00000085;S:0.00000083;D:0.00000068; + 0.00,000,003 Ticker NAME fee Have that on the website, and send... 0.00000239 to set the name.
{also have one for description....}
Yes, this could be done with a website too, but as you say, then there's no decentralization, and no point. The goal would be to clutter the bitcoin block-chain as little as possible. Once a ticker is in place, to offer coins to sell could happen in one transaction if desired (combining the number of coins for sale with the price desired). The purchaser can buy the coins in two transactions (lock + payment). A small price to pay for what is achieved (I assert). You could also just use 3 spots for each letter [ http://www.ascii-code.com/ ] (as for the name) to make less transactions. USD + fee would be... 850.83068003 I take that back...horrible idea.
|
|
|
If you want me to change the math around, give me a formula to work with. So far everyone keeps saying my math is wrong.
|
|
|
I've read this whole thread (amfg, my life...). If you were to back this via a website (yes, I know. The whole idea for this was to get away from "trust" and establish a non-needed-trust system), then instead of sending micropayments that MAY or MAY NOT arrive at a timely fashion can just be established on the site.
{I'd like the ticker to say USD} U:0.00000085;S:0.00000083;D:0.00000068; + 0.00000003 Ticker NAME fee Have that on the website, and send... 0.00000239 to set the name.
{also have one for description....}
|
|
|
There still needs to be an incentive for early adopters. Even if it's not big...something.
Maybe for the first 10k blocks, generate 1k coins per block...then you can start it at 1coin per block every 10 blocks raise it up 10%.
|
|
|
Hi,
Neat script, could even run it on my desktop using EasyPHP and the standard Bitcoin client.
Just two questions, how does it handle payments between two account holders and how do you set up an admin or main account - I see there is provision made for it in the database [is_admin]
Thank you,
Hamburger
Admin isn't coded yet.
|
|
|
Enjoy!
Perfect! Thanks. One question though...where is everyone getting .65%? When I trade on MtGox it shows: Mt Gox charges a small fee (0.30%) for each trade.And with .3% would it not be multiplying times .003? Or .006 for two trades. So a transaction of buying 100 BTC at $10 would be $1000 with a break even point of $1006? I had the assumption the fee was 0.65% per trade. That's why it's a modifiable field. I'll make some more modifications I guess.
|
|
|
Isn't a "hacker" anyone modifying something?
There are many forms of hacker's. Like... - Hack into a bank. How? - Social Engineering (Manipulating the human interface / bank teller). - Exploits / Backdoors (SQL Injection, XSS...etc). - Just borrow money from the safe, simple? You'd be modifying the number of [Currency] in the safe. - ...etc
Also, - Taking down a tree. How? - Hack at it... (You're modifying the stability of the tree).
|
|
|
As an end-user, we would have to VPN to use the service?
|
|
|
I just don't see it being logical to have it going anywhere near 500k/block. I like our current method. Once all the blocks are mined, the pools can force a minimum transaction fee to be allowed by them. I do think that 21million coins is a LOW amount, but that's why there a numbers bellow 0 (to the 8th).
|
|
|
Well done. It would help to add at the end "Price to sell back at to break even: " eg. 10.12
I wrote the script at 5am. Give me a few minutes and I'll add that. [Edit]: http://zombietoday.com/trade_calculator.php<?php echo "<center>What's the minimum price I would have to sell back at to break even?</center><br />"; if($_GET['volume']>0 && $_GET['ppb']>0 && is_numeric($_GET['volume']) && is_numeric($_GET['ppb']) && $_GET['fee']>0 && is_numeric($_GET['fee'])) { $volume = $_GET['volume']; $ppb = $_GET['ppb']; $fee = $_GET['fee']; $fee_c = ($fee / 1000); //yea, I know...decided to not use the full percentage $total_buy = $volume * $ppb; $min_sell = $total_buy + ($total_buy * $fee_c); $minMarket_low_sell = ($min_sell / $volume); echo "[Volume]: ".$volume."<br />"; echo "[Buy]: ".$total_buy."<br />"; echo "[Sell]: ".$min_sell."<br /><Br />"; echo "Minimum sell when Price Per Bitcoin is <u>".$minMarket_low_sell."USD</u> to break even.<br />"; } else { echo "<form method=get>"; echo "Buy <input type='text' name='volume' value='1' size='2'> @ <input type='text' name='ppb' value='".mtGoxAvg()."'><br />"; echo "Fee 0.<input type='text' name='fee' value='65' size='1'>%<br /> "; echo "<input type='submit' value='calculate'></form>"; }
function mtGoxAvg() { $opts = array( 'http'=> array( 'method'=> "GET", 'user_agent'=> "MozillaXYZ/1.0")); $context = stream_context_create($opts); $json = file_get_contents('https://mtgox.com/code/data/ticker.php', false, $context); $jdec = json_decode($json); return $jdec->{'ticker'}->{'avg'}; } ?> Enjoy!
|
|
|
I think it would be an interesting idea. I mean Bitcoin is the first of it's kind to combine computer power and a currency. And, I agree with the new/better coin idea. [NB]: I've more though on this, but can't be expressed as of yet. [PS]: Too bad Simplecoin is taken. [Edit] (See, I told you I had more though): Maybe instead of changing how much a block generates...just make it a decent static number? Maybe, base it off of...difficulty, number of miners, and/or hash/s of all the mienrs?
|
|
|
|