BTCST Defaulted on the 29th, get your facts straight.
Clearly YOU need to get YOUR facts straight. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1147937#msg1147937...but thanks for coming out. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I hereby declare the bet decided, in favor of Vandroiy. A withdrawal request made on August 15 2012, is still outstanding as of today, Aug 30 2012, which triggers default as specified in the contract, via "late by at least 14 calendar days, in disbursing either any regularly-scheduled interest payment, or any withdrawal request, by a valid account holder of BTCST." clause.In private communication, pirateat40 has agreed with this assessment and conceded the bet. Since Vandroiy is currently traveling, we have agreed via private communication to set up the 10k BTC disbursement of escrowed funds sometime in September, when he is back. For your easy reference, link to bet contract: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1013589#msg1013589-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlA/+lMACgkQ5/k4vslVlLJoVgCeP2/oEcVMrA9zLev1l8AMXrgY srkAn1yX8t8Y0ADJTPrKIFKOBk6e3skx =fnN2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Read it again brainiac. Where do you see the word default? It is not a default. He contractually defaulted when he announced it in BTCST-TRUST. Quoting someone near and dear to my heart, "Now fuck off" Stating the obvious AFTER IT HAS ALREADY PASSED does not set a new time for the event. Fucking idiot... Anything else you want to add, Brainiac ? Let's not let this one slip away..... Where's your 'brainiac' observation(s) on the situation now ?
|
|
|
here is a spreadsheet that shows if u invest $100 at 7%/wk compounding u have $130 trillion in 8 yrs
Since I seem to be a bit 'short' after this latest debacle, is there any way I can invest with you for 7% and still become a millionaire ? I can start with 50 BTC....so long as you can 'hold' the investment for a few years...LOL
|
|
|
BTCST Defaulted on the 29th, get your facts straight.
Clearly YOU need to get YOUR facts straight. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1147937#msg1147937...but thanks for coming out. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I hereby declare the bet decided, in favor of Vandroiy. A withdrawal request made on August 15 2012, is still outstanding as of today, Aug 30 2012, which triggers default as specified in the contract, via "late by at least 14 calendar days, in disbursing either any regularly-scheduled interest payment, or any withdrawal request, by a valid account holder of BTCST." clause.In private communication, pirateat40 has agreed with this assessment and conceded the bet. Since Vandroiy is currently traveling, we have agreed via private communication to set up the 10k BTC disbursement of escrowed funds sometime in September, when he is back. For your easy reference, link to bet contract: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1013589#msg1013589-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlA/+lMACgkQ5/k4vslVlLJoVgCeP2/oEcVMrA9zLev1l8AMXrgY srkAn1yX8t8Y0ADJTPrKIFKOBk6e3skx =fnN2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Read it again brainiac. Where do you see the word default? It is not a default. He contractually defaulted when he announced it in BTCST-TRUST. Quoting someone near and dear to my heart, "Now fuck off" Stating the obvious AFTER IT HAS ALREADY PASSED does not set a new time for the event. Fucking idiot... Anything else you want to add, Brainiac ?
|
|
|
BTCST Defaulted on the 29th, get your facts straight.
Clearly YOU need to get YOUR facts straight. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1147937#msg1147937...but thanks for coming out. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I hereby declare the bet decided, in favor of Vandroiy. A withdrawal request made on August 15 2012, is still outstanding as of today, Aug 30 2012, which triggers default as specified in the contract, via "late by at least 14 calendar days, in disbursing either any regularly-scheduled interest payment, or any withdrawal request, by a valid account holder of BTCST." clause. In private communication, pirateat40 has agreed with this assessment and conceded the bet. Since Vandroiy is currently traveling, we have agreed via private communication to set up the 10k BTC disbursement of escrowed funds sometime in September, when he is back. For your easy reference, link to bet contract: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91661.msg1013589#msg1013589-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlA/+lMACgkQ5/k4vslVlLJoVgCeP2/oEcVMrA9zLev1l8AMXrgY srkAn1yX8t8Y0ADJTPrKIFKOBk6e3skx =fnN2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
so everyone has a right to call it what it is, until proven otherwise. If they're wrong, then no harm done You're a faggot child raping tax evading meth smoking pedophile. Prove me wrong. If I was wrong, no harm done. I mean, it's not like people listen to what others say, that what they say can affect business, and that we have defamation laws for that exact reason. Hey Matthew, are you familiar with the term ' Dead Man Switch' ? Could you please explain to me, how Pirate's Dead Man Switch works exactly ? I wouldn't want to be accused of saying anything that would run the risk of being defaming. Remember, when Trendon told everyone about the Dead Man's Switch ? and said we would all be OK ? I am just unsure who, or which party exactly, is required to be dead, in order for the switch to engage. Clearly it has been over 2 weeks since BTCST defaulted now and if this Dead Man's Switch actually DID exist, how exactly did/does it work... in an 'end times' type of scenario...? Cheers.
|
|
|
He might have started off BTCST with good intentions, but got power hungry and greedy. He might have realized that he could easily run with the money. It will be easier for him than if he had run with the equivalent in USD. Much easier.
Not exactly. When I spoke to him on the telephone, he explained to me that he was initially using the funds to feed starving children in 3rd world countries, but due to Donation problems and UN Sanctions, he was unable to replenish his 'working wallet' bitcoins that were an integral part of the operation. He recognized everything beginning to go 'down hill' following the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.
|
|
|
Zyk, I apologize, but you are officially the FIRST person that I have used the IGNORE feature on. Every time I attempt to read one of your posts, I want to poke my eyes out and hit my head against a wall.....
Sorry, bitlane
Thanks for the honor bitlane, hopefully not angry that am breaking your records The best feature to the ""ignore" button is that the "very-established users" , can be proven of not having been ignorant to the facts they read, but rather want to be oblivious to them !! Kind of funny that the created groupthink doesn´t refute arguments and prefers clive - diving, when needing to hear the jokes of an incontinent alcoholic Apologies Zyk I un-ignored.... I couldn't keep it on...I felt bad... Here's an idea: how about, rather than posting text, you record your thoughts and post a Youtube or audio link ? I can bet that what you try to get across makes far more sense in your head. This way, we can hear it the way it was intended, instead of requiring the use of a Super Hero Decoder Ring to decipher your messages...... what do you think ? ( please record your response and post a link to the audio, if you can)
|
|
|
^ that idea above, but writing 'coin' with the stream, as if peeing in the snow.
|
|
|
Is PPCoin ready for the collapse of Bitcoin ?
|
|
|
But I think I said it funnier.
I give you props. Your's was funny. I must know one thing though - Do you really resemble the love child of Jesus Christ and the Unibomber in real life ? ( I had to ask, no offence intended)....
|
|
|
Is this the Bitcoin Savings & Trust C.S.I. thread ?
Should I assume that other than myself, all other users that have posted in this thread have a grand total of 3.762 BTC 'invested' combined ?
Way to go ! Save us....this is a PERFECT time for an in depth study and breakdown of the situation. NEW news is always comforting.
|
|
|
So, does this mean that since Pirate was HONEST enough to LOSE the bet, that he will remain an OP in the #bitcoin-otc IRC channel ?
This concession should definitely help boost his OTC ratings as well, as he was completely honest in regards to the bet. He deserves +10 Ratings from EVERYONE.
....it only makes sense, right ?
|
|
|
But.... I was using sarcasm as well...LOL
|
|
|
So, you are holding on your shares and getting dividends while we are getting nothing?
Have you had your head buried in the sand for the past 2 weeks ? ....perhaps away on another planet ?
|
|
|
Wrong. I know for a fact that he has the required information for at least 2 sub-accounts and has made no effort whatsoever to contact those 2 persons to confirm the information as accurate and proceed to payment.
Please tell me that you are NOT 'psykick' on OTC....PLEASE TELL ME IT'S NOT TRUE.
|
|
|
I knew it....nothing but more stall tactics.
I just don't understand the thought process behind this all.
WHO would purposely want to be the most hated person in this community, while leaving themselves so exposed ?
|
|
|
~boatstat show the same BS: " Total Accounts Repaid: 22/459 (subject to required information) "
WTF ? Does the bot actually report: " subject to required information" ? That si what Pirate added to imply that getting a BTC address and internet handle is required information in order for any more payouts. Well, HE HAS ALL MY INFO....WHERE the hell is MY payout ? I was direct and not even a Passthrough account, who signed up in January.
|
|
|
Either do I. I also want to be put on record and state that I don't have any issues with Bitlane, and apologize for slightly derailing this thread with that BB stuff. This is a nice thread, but for the record, please allow my comments to stand, if that's possiple (@mods).
As long as you know that I was joking, about 'Integra Girl' being my wife....lol The last thing I want to happen is for me to somehow be implicated or blamed for why Al Gore lost the Presidential Race, or Florida more specifically Please be gentle.
|
|
|
~boatstat show the same BS: " Total Accounts Repaid: 22/459 (subject to required information) "
WTF ? Does the bot actually report: " subject to required information" ?
|
|
|
Zyk, I apologize, but you are officially the FIRST person that I have used the IGNORE feature on. Every time I attempt to read one of your posts, I want to poke my eyes out and hit my head against a wall.....
Sorry, bitlane
|
|
|
|