Think you missed the part here that I added back in perhaps you may want to re-read those lines.

But dont forget, Artforz and Coblee have been GPU mining every other cryptocoin from the start just to scam you all, not like we did with Reraper, we accidently found a GPU miner and of course released it in an instant instead of making thousands of coins

Wasn't Litecoin supposed to be CPU exclusive? Whatever happened to that?

that's not the impression you gave him.

you gave him the impression that ASICs are only possible if GPU mining is possible... but GPU mining has nothing to do with it.

My post's aim was not to critique your grammar or anything like that. I apologize if that was the impression I gave you.

I believe what you meant to say was: "If there is a Litecoin GPU miner, then Litecoin FPGAs/ASICS are also possible"

That's as good as it gets at the moment. Reaper is not yet optimized for the 7xxx series.

If the LTC difficulty rises to 12 billion, many people might say that is too high! Others might say it is too far!
But if LTC are worth $12 Billion each...is the difficulty too far or too high?

No

Coblee has multiple options.

1) Drop support for litecoin1 and start litecoin2 or whatever, and give people all the existing coins in Litecoin1 into Litecoin2 (I did this with SolidCoin v2). Of course this also means the guys GPU mining still have their new coins in the new network but it potentially means you can start fresh with a new algorithm. It's a lot of work however.

2) Do a forking change in litecoin itself. The problem with this is the "old network" will continue in parallel with the "new litecoin". Which leads to a lot of support issues "Which litecoin are you on?".

3) Start an entirely new coin. Like he did with Litecoin over fairbrix. Probably the second easiest option to pull off since you don't have to support multiple old things and allows him to do some things from scratch a bit better. However the downside is the original Litecoins probably decrease in value due to no more developer (like tenebrix and fairbrix).

4) Do nothing. The easiest option.

The hardest thing is, unless you are well versed in understanding CPU and GPU architecture making a CPU hard coin is very difficult. Given Coblees failure to know if Scrypt was GPU hard are we going to believe he can now make one that is? This will require a lot of work and a lot of testing to verify. And you're going to need talented C++ and OpenCL coders to help you out I think.

naw, its windows

I'm going 50/50 with BTC/LTC right now (for every 1 BTC I mine, I buy 1 BTC worth of Litecoins).  IMHO they're really cheap at the moment and way down from the year high.  If only I could have bought Bitcoins this cheap.

Edit: Woops, I meant to post this in the other Litecoin thread.  Oh well, call the cops. I don't give a fk!

CoinHunter, please stop with your lies. I never scammed anyone and never GPU mined Litecoin. You have no proof because it never happened. Please stop spreading your lies.

Notice how the SoiledCoin sockpuppets revert to name calling after they can no longer dispute the facts. 

I wonder if the rumor that a tyrant node private key was stolen is true.
It would be interesting to see the SoiledCoin blockchain fight with itself.

Yeah so we already have it on record that you've lied about your identity before and that you pretended to be a woman you weren't. Thanks for putting it on the record.

By the way your childish stunt of proving you are "Kyley Wu" works how? How do you prove you are that person exactly? Why don't I just get one of my girlfriends to say they are me, look, now I'm a woman too!! I'd actually be surprised if you knew any women though, unless of course you bought a new one recently.

There is a difference between the volume of bids and asks, and the volume of trades. The trade volume of SC2 was always thin, now it is non-existent. You can move the price by trading a few BTC or USD for SC2. Since miners get almost zero rewards for finding a bock, the only people with significant amounts of SC2 right now are the founders. If they don't sell, the market is not liquid and thus no price discovery takes place.

Regarding RealSolid's "work": There was no pre-mine before SC2, so he could not have cashed out in SC1. Nobody here had an issue with SC1 being a scam. The only issue was that it had security flaws that required it be shut down. SC2 had the pre-mine and the tyrant nodes which guarantee double spending can happen as long as the tyrants bless the spend. Lots of people had an issue with that. RealSolid has not yet had an opportunity to cash out his 12 million SoiledCoins (or double spend the CPF into oblivion) because there have never been buyers out there for that sort of volume. So SC2 limps along.

The brand is so toxic at this point, nobody is likely to dump serious cash into it. Even if it was part of a pump and dump.

If realsolid had been a scammer, he'd cashed out within the first 3 weeks. When 1 SC was 0.03BTC, and there was a market volume > 200k on bitparking. Instead he sat down, reacted to threats, changed a lot in the networking of solidcoin, and released SC v2(and soon v3). Sorry, but putting much hard work into a scam after you missed the opportunity to cash out big just doesnt sound practical for a scammer.

FYI people, Ten98 and Bulanula are the same person unless they both use the same computer with Tesco Internet from London.

Pretty well explains the pro Solidcoin, CH ass kissing and hatred of Litecoin in addition to being afflicted sick with a jealous rage that they aren't ArtForz LOL...

~BCX~