Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 01:29:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 183 »
1761  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 16, 2013, 02:04:23 PM
Do whats best for us? We didn't vote them in based off of their opinion of how the forum should be ran, who other than the people are to say what is best for us? Whats best for us is what WE say.
Trolling isn't that bad, I have a shaky memory, but didn't theymos try to sell off what was it $500,000 worth of shares of a scam business right before they were caught..?

Edit:Edit badmaths: $78k back then, 551k today.
There is no voting, this isn't a democracy. Banning someone from a private website isn't censorship, that's ridiculous and shows you don't truly understand what censorship and freedom of speech mean. It's a privately owned forum, and theymos is exercising his right as property owner/administrator to manage as he sees fit. If you disagree, you are free to leave. You are not free to try and take the property owner's rights away on a whim just because you disagree with something he did. 

Actually I'm just going to stop here and quote DeathandTaxes here, he said it perfectly. Edit: Actually you were a part of this conversation about another troll who was banned, I guess you just like infringing on the rights of others whenever you disagree with them. Nice, you should get a job in government work.  Roll Eyes

Property doesn't only apply to physical property.    You have no freedom of speech as it relates to other citizens and their private property.   No forum can violate your freedom of speech because ...
Quote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Who can't abridge the freedom of speech?  That's right Congress can't.  Last time I checked the mods on this forum aren't Congress, aren't duly elected or appointed officials of any state.  They aren't even the agents of the state. 

Rights start with ownership.  The forum is OWNED by its owners.  Those owners use admins and mods to (as they see fit) to maximize the value of their property.  Property they own and have every right to control.  There is no difference between kicking a hunter off your land and kicking a person off a forum.  Both involve lawfully controlling one's property.

You don't need a freedom of Speech from other citizens you know why?
1) Other citizens don't have a monopoly on violence.  Other citizens can't under the law use force to silence your speech. 
2) Sure maybe you can't speak on this forum without rules (much like you can't hunt on anyone's private property without permission) but until bitcointalk.org becomes the sole mechanism of speech for the human race you have other options.
 

TL/DR:
I hate "rights" hypocrits.  I bet even now you fail to see that your demands of freedom of speech are a violation of the rights of others ... the rights of property owners to be free in the ownership of what is theirs.

Bolded the important part, that's why banning someone isn't censorship. I don't know how much more simpler it can be made. The only valid point I've seen made is that there are others who should be banned, but that's hardly new. Unbanning Matthew doesn't seem like the best solution to that particular problem.
1762  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 16, 2013, 09:00:35 AM
I wonder how Matthew would feel of he was reading this now.

He's far too self centered to not be reading it daily.

And I'm sure he's laughing his ass off that you guys still buy his bullshit after all he's done.  Y'all getting trolled and don't even know it. Amazes me how dumb smart people can be when you press the right buttons.
1763  Other / Meta / Re: narayan - attempted code injection on: August 16, 2013, 08:52:33 AM
Someone told me to pass along the message that the IP 66.168.20.180 will be suffering from a DDoS soon Wink

Somebody sounds mad.
1764  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk++ script on: August 09, 2013, 03:52:53 AM
Suggestion: spoiler tags.

I was thinking that to, but what if someone without the script sees the tags, unintended bu the OP because they use the script?

Same as now, except that maybe someone might post something they wouldn't otherwise because of it.
1765  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Going after Trendon Shavers, Pirateat40, BTCST on: August 08, 2013, 04:22:31 PM
This will continue to be a precedent setting case and I believe we'll see criminal prosecution of Trendon and maybe even some of the pass throughs.
As well as an official US legal opinion that bitcoin is legal tender?

What does legal tender have to do with it?
1766  Other / Off-topic / Re: Does anyone know how I can insert a flash video in the post? on: August 08, 2013, 01:27:08 PM
Not possible. Take a screenshot of the video player and insert that as a linked image with http://tags.

Here's an example:





The code for that is:
[ url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjb9tb7EU3s][ img width=540]https://i.imgur.com/mfO9P.png[ /img][ /url]

Then it will open in another tab unless you set your computer up to open links in another window which you can resize and nest it in the post area, pretending...

Gotta do what you gotta do!
1767  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: launch of an bitcoin eShop Bitueuo24 on: August 08, 2013, 06:59:35 AM
Both stanlym and finkle are new members, and almost all their posts are talking about how totally legit this website is. I'd be wary if you plan on using it.
1768  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM ALERT - RoboCoder's account has been hacked(?) - phishing/malware on: August 07, 2013, 06:06:56 AM
Banned, thanks.

RoboCoder = banned..?

Yes.
1769  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM ALERT - RoboCoder's account has been hacked(?) - phishing/malware on: August 06, 2013, 05:59:46 PM
Banned, thanks.
1770  Other / Off-topic / Re: Someone please read this, an emergency for me. on: August 05, 2013, 11:52:52 AM
i don't got 10 dollars, but i'll give you a dollar.

post ur btc address

A dollar? Whatev, i'm desperate, here
15QWCviqYfp5Kr8txLCcanQiTxEHcDEaGJ

Kinda picky for a beggar aren't you?
1771  Other / Meta / Re: Return to where you were when last read a topic. on: August 03, 2013, 03:32:12 PM
Click the button.
1772  Other / Meta / Re: I was banned from sending PMs and posting then unbanned on: August 03, 2013, 08:26:23 AM
IP ban

This, just ignore it. If it becomes a problem contact theymos or john and they can check it out.
1773  Other / Meta / Re: +1 script on: August 02, 2013, 06:37:05 AM
Looks cool, might try it out, send me a pass. Address in your sig current?
1774  Other / Meta / Re: Unread threads link on: August 01, 2013, 02:17:38 PM
I did that once, confused me for a minute or two.
1775  Other / Meta / Re: Why has this site been going so slow? on: July 31, 2013, 03:05:41 PM
Lot faster now, for me anyway.
1776  Other / Meta / Re: Giveaway forum? on: July 30, 2013, 03:51:35 PM
Games and Rounds fits the best for threads like that. They're basically paying people to spam/bump their threads and advertise.
1777  Other / Meta / Re: An Error Has Occurred! = 360 seconds ( BUG ) on: July 30, 2013, 11:37:41 AM
Other actions can trigger it, such as logging in. Not sure what else would do it but it isn't just posting.
1778  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer sending PMs on: July 30, 2013, 06:23:47 AM
Yeah report those, we ban them when we see it. I banned him earlier.
1779  Other / Meta / Re: [SCAM] Ongoing attempt - Phishing link send around in PM, copy of the forum on: July 29, 2013, 11:51:12 PM
Report them, they're phishers.
1780  Other / Meta / Re: What is up with my trust list? on: July 27, 2013, 03:30:39 AM
Thanks for the explanation.
And DefaultTrust is a user that trusts a bunch of trustworthy people?

When looking at a user's feedback you will probably find yourself giving more weight to some people's feedback more than others. That's the people who should be on your trust list, because that's what it does. Default is a good start if you don't know anyone and don't have any trades. It can help point out scammers at the very least. Just because someone is on your trust list, or anyone's, doesn't mean you should trust them implicitly (my default recommendation is trust nobody  Wink), just that you value their feedback more than others.

Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 183 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!