|
What has fundamentally changed that Bitcoins had to go to 266? The infrastructure is shit, the client is shit, the network scales like shit and the first serious possible future Bitcoin competitor has emerged.
There's SR, and now there's SD. Anything significant besides that?
|
|
|
|
|
Why won't he turn up here and explain the endgame to us? Surely we are nearing it.
Also, isn't it funny how the chart from the past just keeps updating and may apply to the current situation again?
|
|
|
|
WHAT IS THE ENDGAME?  |
|
|
|
Let's see how cocky bulls will be in the following minutes and hours. If you're a bull after this you are mentally challenged. It all depends on the price. Buying at 10 cents! |
|
|
|
Let's see how cocky bulls will be in the following minutes and hours. |
|
|
|
|
Congratulations, that's some impressive precision!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be bothered by TA skeptics and always bullish people, this is a rich and extensive analysis considering it's free. Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
Let me counter all of your retarded conspiracy theories with a post of mine from the moderator forum way back from July, where I am suggesting the ban of Rarity. |
|
|
|
You better get your shit together, or people will hunt me for vouching for you. I'm sorry for this and I know we have never really conversed on the forum before but I fucking hate you now. Honestly, things were much worse when he registered a new account every day that had to be spotted, ignored and banned every time anew. |
|
|
|
You better get your shit together, or people will hunt me for vouching for you. |
|
|
|
Agreed. As I recently posted, Well, I can't say that the most successful bitcoin ventures haven't consisted of hacking, stealing and defrauding people. It's easy, risk free and extremely lucrative. Kind of too good to be true. Grin
If it's true and people don't find a way to make it more risky (find and punish some of the criminals, for instance), I guess Bitcoin would constitute a negative sum game in which all honest participants lose. I wonder how long such a thing could last. I think I said similar things back when Bitcoinica was hacked. If the winners of a systems are those that destroy value, the system will not last. |
|
|
|
|
I retract my statement, he is not mentally ill.
Just an ordinary scammer.
|
|
|
|
That's not that funny... Why pried yourself on such a thing?
Because he is mentally ill. He shouldn't have the ability to enter contracts. |
|
|
|
|
Should have a negative worth. The creators of scamcoins should pay the Bitcoin devs.
|
|
|
|
Well, I can't say that the most successful bitcoin ventures haven't consisted of hacking, stealing and defrauding people. It's easy, risk free and extremely lucrative. Kind of too good to be true. If it's true and people don't find a way to make it more risky (find and punish some of the criminals, for instance), I guess Bitcoin would constitute a negative sum game in which all honest participants lose. I wonder how long such a thing could last. Its pretty much dead for me now for that reason. Im not interested in promoting a system where the richest people are scammers and my efforts go towards making them richer. I may as well use fiat in that case  Litecoin at least doesnt have one scammer with 2.5% of all the coins in existence. Sorry to hear you feel that way. I wish I had any arguments to convince you and myself otherwise.  |
|
|
|
Well, I can't say that the most successful bitcoin ventures haven't consisted of hacking, stealing and defrauding people. It's easy, risk free and extremely lucrative. Kind of too good to be true. If it's true and people don't find a way to make it more risky (find and punish some of the criminals, for instance), I guess Bitcoin would constitute a negative sum game in which all honest participants lose. I wonder how long such a thing could last. |
|
|
|
The forum post and agreement to enter the bet qualifies as contract. GPG or not doesn't matter.
Contracts need to be signed, or else they're just words. The signature proves that you agreed to it. Wow, I'll be sure to never do business with you then if you think this is not a contract, not binding, and not adhering to it is not a scam. |
|
|
|
|
The forum post and agreement to enter the bet qualifies as contract. GPG or not doesn't matter.
A contract is nothing but an agreement between parties. If Matthew entered the agreement with the intent to never honor it, he is a scammer. Simple.
|
|
|
|
Matt isn't defrauding anyone, even if he just posts "AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!" and logs off, never to be seen again. Welching on a bet is a dick move, but not a scam.
Why the hell do you think this is not defrauding anyone? He defrauded all parties who have entered his contract. He set up the contract with the knowledge that he doesn't have the money and with the intent to never pay out, but pocket possible winnings. To me, that is clear fraud. A clear scam. But perhaps in libertopia, things are different. |
|
|
|
I bet there will be a repeat of the pirate-default. A lot of FUD and then nothing.
Exactly. What will happen when Matt doesn't pay? Nothing at all. And THAT is his lesson to the community. So the lesson is that people can scam this community without fearing any consequences.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
