Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:11:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 [116] 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 ... 196 »
2301  Economy / Speculation / Re: Confess double digit believers on: June 13, 2013, 10:36:53 PM
Once a bounce above 100 fades, we will be trading in the double digits for a long time.
This bounce is playing out now. Enjoy the hopium. Cheesy

What a confusing post

It's pure FUD, ignore it
Shouldn't have ignored it. This bounce has now faded.

Time to get comfortable with double digits.
2302  Economy / Speculation / Re: Hashrate VS Price on: June 13, 2013, 06:12:13 AM
the bottom line price of the pearl WOULD be determined by the cost of obtaining it.

If the hashrate goes up and up then it means it's becoming harder and more expensive to mine the bitcoins, which means the price will have to increase.
Really, labor theory of value? Cheesy
2303  Economy / Speculation / Re: Hashrate VS Price on: June 13, 2013, 06:06:15 AM
You're right. This is very much over the heads of most speculators.

I talked to a couple of guys at the conference looking to get involved by buying up alt coins. I warned them that speculative attacks could easily be carried out by bitcoin miners looking to destroy competitors. The thought clearly had never occurred to them.

Sure enough in the very next session crazyrabbit explained to everyone how freicoin had just gotten taken down by an attack. And now more recently we get another attack on feathercoin?

The mind of a miner is a unique thing.
Exactly, most people couldn't give a fuck, and that's why I find the idea questionable of there being lots of money on the sidelines but just waiting for difficulty to increase.

You are right on the money about the scamcoins, and that includes Blightcoin as well. There can be no second proof of work chain in the long term, doesn't even matter if the algorithm is different. Eventually, it will be attacked by people with vested interest in Bitcoin. It all amounts to sucking money from unsuspecting people.
2304  Economy / Speculation / Re: [STATS] Bitcoin bubble or are we here to stay? on: June 13, 2013, 05:55:59 AM
I believe a LARGE part of the booms come because its now summer.
Sell in May and go away.
2305  Economy / Speculation / Re: Hashrate VS Price on: June 13, 2013, 05:32:48 AM
One case that can be made though is that it's a cyclical alternation between investment in BTC and investment in mining hardware as the one gets unprofitable and the other more attractive. But I'm not sure, most of the time, both are attractive at the same time and unattractive at the same time.

Here is a great past analysis of it that begun in early May 2011.

Quote
the only real dip in hashrate that I witnessed was for a brief few months from about August to November 2011. Otherwise it's been steadily if not parabolically increasing.

There was another dip beginning December 2012 following a period of sideways. Two consecutive difficulty decreases, one increase and another decrease that ended up the bottom.

Quote
It's not purely profit driven.
Sure, some are more inclined to mine at a loss etc., but the upwards motion is first technology and second price driven.
2306  Economy / Speculation / Re: Hashrate VS Price on: June 13, 2013, 05:19:40 AM
Is the collective wisdom NOT buying Bitcoins purely because they deem the difficulty too low? If not, it has no effect on price.

Indeed.
I've yet to see a single person making that argument.

"Eh, Bitcoin is interesting, but the hashrate is too low for now... network isn't secure enough."

"Wow, Bitcoins look like an interesting hedge. Time to allocate a few % of my holdings and pour a few millions into it – ah, the difficulty is only 15 million and hashrate 150 TH/s. How overvalued. Will wait a couple months, then." Grin

Seriously, back when we routinely had people buying multimillion USD worth of BTC, I don't think the difficulty was of any consideration. I don't believe it is a metric people base investment decisions on, other than mining hardware.

One case that can be made though is that it's a cyclical alternation between investment in BTC and investment in mining hardware as the one gets unprofitable and the other more attractive. But I'm not sure, most of the time, both are attractive at the same time and unattractive at the same time.
2307  Economy / Speculation / Re: Hashrate VS Price on: June 13, 2013, 05:04:43 AM
Is the collective wisdom NOT buying Bitcoins purely because they deem the difficulty too low? If not, it has no effect on price.

However, I believe there is another effect, and it's that an increase in profit margin is bullish because miners can afford to speculate with a larger portion, ie hold them. Currently, the profit margins are of course rapidly decreasing due to sideways/downwards price action and still skyrocketing difficulty. My assumption is that the percentage of the daily mining subsidy (3600 BTC) that is released to the market is increasing because the costs that have to be covered are rising.

I don't expect hashrate to top out very soon, and that's thanks to the incompetence of the suppliers who are lagging extremely. There's already hardware for multiple hundreds of TH/s it seems. I do expect it to top out again sometime, as always, people will order far more ASICs than profitable for some of them in this arms race and some of them will have to drop out. Funny thing though that the prices for ASICs can plummet far further on the open market than GPUs because they have no other purpose than generating profits in Bitcoin's POW. Quite risky particularly when you have no clue when they will ship.
2308  Economy / Speculation / Re: price will pop back up to $120 monday morning on: June 12, 2013, 01:50:06 AM
Discussion on scammer tag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232145.0
2309  Economy / Speculation / Re: Nagle on: June 10, 2013, 09:57:52 PM
Nagle? Huh

http://www.downside.com/

Needs an update, man!
2310  Economy / Speculation / Re: Confess double digit believers on: June 10, 2013, 09:48:57 PM
Once a bounce above 100 fades, we will be trading in the double digits for a long time.
This bounce is playing out now. Enjoy the hopium. Cheesy
2311  Economy / Speculation / Re: My last Warning to the Bears on: June 10, 2013, 09:27:00 PM
yep some so called "permabulls" turned out to be not perma enough. Should have held, now I only have this for you http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7TuFy0fcuw

Actually I'm good on that front, I never missed a major Bitcoin wave up and I don't have any plans to do so in the future. Grin At the time, it was simply useless to sell into the market because it was too easily moved at those points. Back then, we really did have manipulators. Somewhere from $4 on the way down I just stopped trading it to make BTC while losing USD, held the BTC and went away. I was sitting on profits, but of course it still hurt.

Only thing I try to do is hedge my risks for the major waves and position myself. If this market goes back to a good value proposition (and a similar despair!), I will see things similarly again as I move a good portion to a paper wallet. If I am wrong, I will see it and buy back. I don't fight the market. Everyone has his strategies, I prefer a more active approach to managing my risk (BTC gains are actually only secondary) while riding the long-term bull and it's working well for me.

Any non-trader must admit that there are hype cycles with Bitcoin as a bunch of newbies quickly flow in and then many of them slowly flow out as they get bored, and it's expressed in the bubbles. What remains at the end is the long-term trend.

BTW, this topic was created on a day when Bitcoin ranged from 3.8 to 4.5 and was on its way up to 7.22 where it would then consolidate for many months around 5. 7.22 was broken only in July 2012, half a year after we topped out at 7.22.
2312  Economy / Speculation / Re: Looks more and more like a 2011 repeat on: June 09, 2013, 11:05:07 PM

Wow, those two fit nicely!

What's interesting in there are few who are calling Bitcoin dead this time.  :-)
People didn't start calling Bitcoin dead until Oct./Nov. Sentiment extreme occurs only near the bottom.
2313  Economy / Speculation / Re: Yet another analyst :) on: June 09, 2013, 07:08:37 PM
The Great Dollar Extraction is upon us.
2314  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 05:33:34 PM
You know, speaking of supernodes, it's kind of a pity reptilia isn't here to provide us with entertainment as to why we aren't making any progress to his 300k USD before Christmas.

BTW, does anybody have that epileptic black/white bear gif? It was a whole bunch of bears. This is important. Grin

I just found this, that's cool too:

Epilepsy warning https://i.imgur.com/YMeG4sX.gif
2315  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 05:06:57 PM
Sold some at 98ish, sold some at the bottomish around $90 (as usual).

IMO the case for the "correction" is officially debunked, we are officially in the bubble deflation process, thus I expect it to go lower. Testing $80, and if it falls, testing $50. I'll load the truck at that point.

I would love for it to be fast, as we could enter a mid term growth phase quicker, but I'm afraid it will be long process. I expect plenty of traps and mini sucker rallies, as usual during bubbles deflation.
Are you going for some more ASICs or are you just looking to buy lower? I thought you never wanted to sell precious BTC to speculate. Tongue
2316  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 04:00:41 PM
If i recall correctly, batch 3 was 600 units @ 5k each (3M)
Yep, that's what I had in the back of my mind. Thanks, so they were indeed responsible for 3 out of 5 million of Bitpay's volume that month.
2317  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 03:58:15 PM
You will find that the sales volume on miners will largely depend on the profitability of an ASIC which depends on difficulty/price. Historically, the miners' profit margin always went near zero or even to negative values during major corrections (difficulty itself went down due to this), so, I would not count on this sort of gold rush shovel "economic activity" to endure for very long, certainly not at volumes of the past.

What has Bitpay got anything to do with Avalon sales?  Avalon sales just accept bitcoin payment directly.. there is no need for bitpay to be in the equation at all.
AFAIK they accepted it in the past for at least one of their batches and accounted for the majority of Bitpay's volume on that month.

Bit-Pay was Avalons bitcoin processor for batch1: $1200x300= 360k
Walletbit for batch2: $1500x600= 900k
Hm, I had the impression it was 2-3 million. It's a while ago. Batch 2 maybe?
2318  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 03:51:30 PM
What has Bitpay got anything to do with Avalon sales?  Avalon sales just accept bitcoin payment directly.. there is no need for bitpay to be in the equation at all.
AFAIK they accepted it in the past for at least one of their batches and accounted for the majority of Bitpay's volume on that month.
2319  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 03:46:45 PM
Lucas, I dont read this thread much but when I do I come in here and read something and its always you making some statement when you have absolutely 0 to back it up. Have you even heard of bitpay? Do you know how much they are processing alone? All the way back in march (before the peak of the bubble even) they were adding thousands of new merchants a month and processing over 5 million in orders... per month. http://blog.bitpay.com/2013/04/bitpay-eclipses-silk-road-in-bitcoin.html This is only one payment processor (theres no way to actually gauge the total, but you can be sure its far higher than that when you consider its only one processor among thousands of others.

TLDR. Less typing out of your ass, more reading.
As I said, Bitpay figures are largely inflated by Avalon sales. Actual commerce figures from bitcoinstore, Reddit Gold and Humble Bundle show the harsh truth.
2320  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: June 09, 2013, 03:29:46 PM
As much as I would LOVE it to go to 50, what makes you people think its not a repeat from 3rd of May?

Huh? Why would you love that?

Because this will mean that bubble is largely over and I can buy bitcoins at a price that likely will not halve, split the wallet file into three separate files and forget about checking damn clark moody more often than facebook for a year or two.

So basically you want the whole Bitcoin economy to drop 50% so you can buy a few cheap coins. Did i read that right?

You read 100% correct. There is no Bitcoin economy. (except for silkroad of course) I hope you are not another of hippies preaching that.

The only reason why somebody would go and exchange fiat for bitcoin right now (not counting speculation, store of value) is to spend it on Silkroad. Nobody in right mind would go and exchange it to btc only to buy something they could have bought instantly with traditional methods. And the only thing that they can't, are silkroad goods. YES if you already have bitcoins then you might use them on other stuff, if you mine, you will use them. But this is minority of people. I'm talking about general public. I'm repeating myself but I enjoy seeing idealists try to desperately justify their opinion.

Exactly right. Bitcoin has never been a billion dollar market in the first place. The figures most people are touting from Bitpay are hugely inflated because of mining equipment, and the evidence like data on sales of Humble Bundle, Reddit Gold and bitcoinstore suggest that people don't use Bitcoin as a currency in any significant way.
Pages: « 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 [116] 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 ... 196 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!