umad atlas

So basically, as long as you like what you see, it just has to be right. Gotcha!

I will never understand how one can even use it. It can be easily manipulated. Worthless data. Period.

The nodes are infinitely more reliable than that, because despite light clients taking hold, there should probably not be a DECREASE in the long-term as we see it now. Some of the alternative client devs have published numbers, and they are ridiculously low: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=76528.msg849506#msg849506

I will never trust the transaction data. It’s completely meaningless because it can and will be manipulated.

Has the Bitcoinica gambling gained you any money, net?

Hgh interest rates in Bitcoin are mainly due to high credit risk and currency risk. I’m sure they will decrease with time.

Awesome, I hoped to see this happen. Good on you guys!

I am satisfied and will reconsider my bond on Sunday.

Same for me. What’s going on here?

Do you need your own forum or why do you feel the need to create a new thread for every thought you have?

Also, what invisible wall?

Funny you say that, my Atlas Detector immediately started peeping as well.

Forecast is fully on track.

Pirate overpaid in the sense that he sent the interest payment to the withdrawal address as well as added it to the bank’s balance for accounting reasons, as should be evident from the explanations here and his thread.

I do. Do you understand the context he said it in (why 2000), and the other quote? I believe that if there is one of us who posts before he reads, it must be you.

I’ll be out of this thread now, it was meant for informational purpose to the public he gathers investments from.

I actually expect yours now, as well as for the cowardly deletion of your posting.

So, it seems that Goat just revealed his balance at Bitcoin Savings & Trust:


We can calculate his balance from the interest payment 285.97519541 / 0.07 = 4 085.35993 BTC.

As most people know, he runs TyGrr-Bank which promises 3% weekly dividends. The issue here is that Goat made explicit statements in his threads that he is not going to invest further into Pirate’s bank (bold emphasis mine):

Notice how he says he will not add to his bank account, the balance of which he reveals later on:

This does not sound like he will be adding anything later on either.

So, as of now he has over 4k there and even with 2k he only would have gained a balance of 2.68k.

The question is, did the difference come from TyGrr-Bank shareholders? I want to put that up to discussion, because if this is true, he must have lied.

Can a mod split this? It’s a really interesting discussion, and I want to continue. Reporting my post now.

1. At first, I agreed with you, but now I see how GLBSE makes price discovery and liquidity for shareholders possible. In giga’s case, his OTC sold bonds were clearly underpriced, and shareholders can already dump 1k or so into bids. It also makes dividend payment to lots of people easy.
2. Silk Road model will fail for GLBSE because anonymous asset issuers cannot be trusted for bigger/long-term operations. You spend 5 BTC on some weed vs. a few thousand on a shady venture. Guess which one will be more prone to scams?
3. You personally are not anonymous and law enforcement would own you regardless of TOR.

But do try this out, I want to see the range of scams it would attract and how you would deal with them.

That server is located in the US as well.

Go ahead and try setting up an anoymous stock market over TOR and see how it will degrade into a cesspool for scammers because asset issuers cannot be trusted. Maybe you can convince the Silk Road owner to help you out.

edit: Sorry for offtopic, could not resist.

I do business with people on the forums, and my online status changes nothing about that.

Let me suggest you seek another forum that will support your fascist leanings and control disorder to disable individual privacy.

Also, this:

You mad?

That is all.

With regards,
One Hiding Member

I just tried it out together with copumpkin, and indeed during signup it will not show the codes if you select any of the checkboxes for 2-factor auth. Then, when you go to settings, it will assume you have 2-factor set up already and you are locked. If you just do it via settings, it will work fine, though.

The solution is probably to reset the settings from people who have signed up recently and are affected by this (and of course to fix the bug).

I’ve made the experience that it has been pretty reliable to bet against the shorts when short interest was at its lowest – at the time -0.06 to -0.09, just as it has been reliable to bet against longs when the long interest was -0.21.

Now, the shorts are even heavier penalized than longs with -0.16. I have never seen it remotely this low. Are we looking at an epic short squeeze to happen?

I am always amazed how proudhon has transformed from his condition in fall/winter …