do you know any good projects where i don't have to invest any money and can earn crypto by playing (p2e)? im looking for such crypto projects. thanks in advance for good suggestions.
MIR4 That's the only P2E that I know that you don't have to invest in and yet, you can earn. But you know what. P2E projects are like passage that you need to pay for to have a shortcut way of earning. It's like the more favorable path if you get to play and pay at the beginning because it's like the ticket before you can enter it. I don't play that game but I've seen people that have paid inside the game for the upgrades and not just all about earning. |
|
|
|
The only thing one can focus on these days is to get finical freedom by cutting down extra expenses and focusing on the needful items only.
The best approach is to find the way of passive income and get some extra money to pay your bills and other expenses.
It's just part of money management that you need to cut down your expenses and remove unnecessary things that you buy within your budget. That's part one but if you can't cut them down then you need to improve your cash flow and add more source of income for you to sustain those things that you are not willing to cut down. You choose with any of them and what you can afford to do. It's effective and if you're the type that you're not going to decrease your way of living, choose the latter. |
|
|
|
|
Well, a former GSW player, Payton II is no longer going to be part of his champ team. He'll be out of the team and will play for Portland Blazers. This is like a week old news but I've just seen it.
I thought that most of them will be retained by the management but it seems only those that had really contributed a lot. Thus, this is part of the business, letting go is a must and happens most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
That's even more than a bank that charges in my accounts that do charge $5 for 2 years of being dormant.
That dormancy fee is like a suicide on their own, yeah, just push away those customers that they have and they only want the active ones to stay.
They shouldn't be surprised if the number of users goes low by the next month of audit. There will be sure those that will be charged $10 and it will totally make them dismay.
|
|
|
|
This will still depend on the developer of that wallet because not all of them will have to get that feature and integration just like the given example you've got as Exodus wallet.
That is exactly the question. At this moment every connection to blockchain needs a lot of work and development. The wallet uses Dapps which limited by lack of interoperability, and Quant offers Mapps (multichain applications) I don't have deep knowledge about it. But it seems that's what you really are for. Eventually, as year goes by we'll see those interoperability and multichains available for many wallets but not for all. Each wallet has their own subject of operations and they have their own and main goals on how they'll operate together with the features they have. |
|
|
|
If you're an active trader, you do need to have a stop loss. You don't see what's about to happen in split seconds. If you're in spot or margin, having a stop loss is very important.
Specially, if you're into margin trading. Having no stop loss will make you loss all that you've got there as funded.
The problem with stop losses is that when there is a big market downturn they are useless and leveraged positions are cascaded and liquidated, as we are sick and tired of seeing. For those leveraged positions, they're sort of helpful but yeah, if it's a big one that's different. Sometimes it's better to sell with minimal losses than to wait for something incomprehensible...
That's cutting losses and in trading, if you're relying to your day to day or week to week trades. It may be painful but you have to do it to avoid further losses. Because if you don't do that, you need to have to recover more than twice or thrice the percentage with your losses made. |
|
|
|
I'm not fond of the jargon words and technicalities but as I understand your explanation, that seems to be it. every wallet will offer to delegate any coin with ease and very user friendly way.
This will still depend on the developer of that wallet because not all of them will have to get that feature and integration just like the given example you've got as Exodus wallet. |
|
|
|
I think those questions were not enough to have a conclusion if the person is non-problematic, low risk or high. Because someone who answers the survey can choose the answers that are not for real to themselves.
It could just be a way to give the result of that person and have a validation that he's not a high risk gambler.
The questions are well constructed enough to reach a reasonable to conclusion as what level of a gambler one is provided that the questions are answered appropriately, but maybe there could be a little changes to the questions or the number of options to pick from, I'd say some of the question needed to be a Yes/No options while some needed the severity options as available there in the survey. I ended up as Moderate-risk gambler, I know for sure that I'm never a lose chaser. I consider each bet as independent one and the chances of losing has nothing to do with previous outcomes. I guess it's for overall surveys that someone can choose any answer that's not honest to the questionnaire. But still, this is a good measure for those who want to look at on what type of gambler they are and if they're on the severe stage of gambling already. It will still depend on us on how we'll accept the answer and we know the reality on what type we really are. |
|
|
|
What everyone to know is even Bitcoin face a crash every 4 years until now, but the price keep increased!
That's the whole point. Percentage of bitcoin being low is getting lower and the all time low is getting higher in terms of pricing as the years passes by. Looking for the past bear markets, each price for the all time low are increasing. And this is something positive that the others don't want to look at or they miss checking out. Just as what the person said when I've read something the same about years of all time lows, it's really encouraging to have and check the stats about it. |
|
|
|
|
@OP before you think of any simulation about the effect of having an unemployment rate of 50%, you should provide first the source where you have read it.
Thus, it's just a topic that you want to discuss and want to look at what people think if we ever see that rate being hit. Well, we're in a crisis now and this is going to be another hit and will be adding more problem if there's a certain news and stats that unemployment rate for USA or even for any country hits that number.
|
|
|
|
|
My result is, I'm a low risk gambler.
I think those questions were not enough to have a conclusion if the person is non-problematic, low risk or high. Because someone who answers the survey can choose the answers that are not for real to themselves.
It could just be a way to give the result of that person and have a validation that he's not a high risk gambler.
|
|
|
|
But that's not ETH. Eventually, if the market pushes back again to what it used to be like last year. Then we will be able to see that market cap. Right now it's $35 but once the market is up again. Those SOL holders are likely to celebrate as that could be the time that you'll see it on the top again. |
|
|
|
|
First time to hear about that relevance during the afternoon but I believe that there's no connection with that time. What I've observed was about when we're approaching the weekends.
Usually, most investors are gonna try to cash out at that time for expenditures during the day offs. That's what I've seen in the past but yeah, still counts that you've shared those points and thank you.
|
|
|
|
Having a stop loss is standard practice when trading in any traditional market because the recovery may take some time. However, in the cryptocurrency market, the market can go either way and recover in a short period of time, so I never dare to put a stop loss; however, if you're aware that a major correction is underway, you can sell your coins and wait for something to happen.
If you're an active trader, you do need to have a stop loss. You don't see what's about to happen in split seconds. If you're in spot or margin, having a stop loss is very important. Specially, if you're into margin trading. Having no stop loss will make you loss all that you've got there as funded. That's why for active traders, it's one of the important things to remember. But for holders and investors, this won't matter that much and we'll not sell at loss. |
|
|
|
|
In terms of dollar, I'm not YET a millionaire. I'm leaning forward towards to the greatest price of bitcoin that we will see in the future. I didn't ride the hype of ICOs and I'm sure that's where most of the people got their fortune in life.
I'm not rushing into that fortune.
But I know that someday that by holding bitcoin, I'm going to be there and if not, I'll be close to that goal by everyone that will make us wealthy or be financially free.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've seen already this somewhere like a sneakers brand and it's going to be really helpful for those brands to collab with each other to protect their brands and sale.
It's actually one of the usage of blockchain in having that intact record for the customers if they have the actual and legitimate brand and is not a copy that they've got in the market.
Sounds good and this is just one of the use that these companies to have with blockchain.
|
|
|
|
You will agree with me that society and the environment can have a great influence on the lifestyle of every individual, you often can find yourself doing, or being involved in that activity that almost everyone is involved with in that your locale as a result of influence. There is certainly a big impact for each of us in terms of environment and the society where we live on. The society that's near you can hone you to become better or get the worse of you. Now considering someone who is a gambling addict, is there any possibility of him/her becoming better if they are relocated to another environment or society where people around are not involved in gambling?
Possible. If that addict is being placed to a society where there are no gamblers and they all speak about better living. There's a big chance that addicted gambler will change eventually and will also be influenced by that society where he is. Can someone still develop the habit of gambling and become an addict even though no one around gambles?
Yes, it's a personal decision and behavior whether you have someone influenced you or none. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin has played an important role in making the system more popular in paperless economic transactions. In paperless economic transactions, any amount of currency can be exchanged quickly without any hassle. There is no interference from anyone and no one can know any information about this transaction. So in this transaction system many people feel comfortable to do the transaction.
In modern transactions, you'll know the sender and the receiver. With bitcoin, it's true that we've got anonymous transactions and it's a good thing if you're for it. As we do the transaction, we can set the fee and how much it will be. In return, that will play the part of the speed of confirmation, whether you do it with priority or not. |
|
|
|
You don't have to be surprised.
Most of the altcoins right now are heavily "punished" because we're in a common bear market. Bitcoin drops too much and everything is affected and that has included FLOW token.
Despite with good proposals and executions, nothing can really beat when bitcoin goes ahead of the drop and the entire market is going through a bear.
I should have added apart from the obvious bear market  It’s normal it goes down with the rest but % wise it performed worse than other projects with much less traction. Surprisingly, despite that worse performance still it's on the top. And that's not just the top but being ranked at 33 is high to be said. Well, once everything turns back again. You might see it go retrieve itself and recovers just like those that at the top but having that said, not all of them recovers very well. |
|
|
|
It's not them to decide if they want to stay with the Warriors.
But it's the Warriors management to decide and it has been decided that they'll stay because it's said that they'll get a priority of staying and the management will spent a lot for them to stay.
That's why most of us are excited to see how they'll do with the next season because we'll still see Wiggins and Poole with Steph, Klay and Dray.
But their performance is worthy to look at if the Warriors management wanted them to stay or not. However, the argument that they will spend way too much just for their big 5 might bite them later. Because there are still things like injuries that could really affect their performance. Hard decision, but hopefully, if Wiggins and Poole are willing to have a pay cut just to stay in the team and then make a run again, then much better. But still up to them, for sure other teams might offer them a better pay. True. There's no debate for that, we all want them to see stay with the same team because of their contribution to the ring that they've got for the past season. Well, those problems will certainly exist eventually. But it's for them to tackle it and they have just to lean on what they've said of keeping most of these players. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
