A well decentralized Bitcoin would still continue to run even if the whole space is covered in debris because it won't be dependent on only space or satellite. It's not even reasonable for a decentralized network/system to depend only on on space or few other means for internet. You will need wide range of internet sources to be considered properly decentralized. And it's better to use some sort of decentralized internet/intranet. Decentralization has to touch all areas of Bitcoin Network, not just in mining, running nodes, with network participants, internet etc. This is important to eliminate a Single Point of Failure for the Bitcoin Network/System. Properly decentralized could also means it's anti-fragile and won't easily shutdown or break no matter what ia thrown at it. The only thing that can easily shut it down is a SUPREME BEING that is above all human intelligence and creations.
So, one of the best ways to prevent such scenario is to avoid depending on space or satellites alone

I think it's a bit similar to what Universal Basic Income is to future world. You are encouraged to be dependent on the system and spend more than you can afford to repay on things you like.
Something like that would only be allowed in my family if family members will be willing to spend the money on things that are profitable and they will have to know how to make profits from such things consistently. If it's for education, the education must be making them better people with proofs on their good works. If it's for car, the car must be making very useful contributions to the individual, etc.   The contributions/profitability should be enough to repay the loan.

I actually haven't used one. I'm not sure I have borrowed money from banks before. I don't really like the idea. I could borrow from people close to me though.

If there is anything right the manager and campaign owner would like to be helped with, just let me know.
Don't forget the bolded below.

I'm actually more interested in development of self-sustaining farming system that's well built to attract talented/passionate farmers, buyers, sellers, researchers, workers, investors etc to depend on one another. You could attract them on fraud-proof platforms (with the right agric-friendly tools/infrastructures) that focus more on local farming and allow participants to monitor and regulate themselves based on set rules, and help ensure that most things are done properly.
I don't think investors should consider making lots of money at the expense of cheap healthy foods. There could be other ways to make money to avoid affecting the cost of good quality food too much

I think it's better to have Crypto Community football Club competition that are independent of the system. That will probably mean starting from scratch or having clubs/investors that are willing to break away to join and fund an autonomous crypto football competitions.

Ofcourse. Sometimes I wonder why much attention has been paid to the bolded part. In my opinion, clustering lots of miners on one or few places happened so quickly and at the wrong time. It could be considered a single point of failure.
The Bitcoin Network should be encouraging properly distributed/decentralized mining to help in securing the Network. Once a Network is losing is decentralization, you could be right if you think it's becoming less secure. By the way, other Blockchain Principles are affected once a cryptocurrency start losing it's decentralization.

The only reason centralized organizations/companies appear safe is because we don't know much about what they do in secret, and they are kind of protected or are not too bothered by governments once they are licensed

Well, this is one of the reasons it was recommended that government pay those who are working or solving problems so you don't have to pay those creating the scarcity/inflation or those who aren't working well enough to contribute to society.
Paying able-bodied people to do nothing is such a dumb idea. Those who practice that as leaders are not worthy to continue to lead

I don't really think it's a good idea to sell your organ for money to save lives. That could translate to: "I will only save your life if you give me money".

I haven't really sat down to deeply consider the use of organs from strangers and the implications. Assuming it's moral, I would rather encourage donations and look for ways to get more people to donate. Maybe by offering their children/relatives some sort of beautiful certificates/cards that prove that their dead parents or relatives helped save the lives of those in need of organs. Donors could be treated with respect... That all the certificate can do
I don't like the idea of people selling part of their body for money, it could encourage all sort of abominable behaviors.
I think you could just publicly list those who need organs, with urgent cases at the top of the list. If someone on the list dies, it should be public too so that more people will be willing to apply to save others. Those on the list can be anonymous, but there should be ways to verify they are real humans in need of organs.

There is a reason why certain people dance around ancient trees, and that could be worth alot to them but meaningless and worthless to those who do not know the truth behind the whole thing.   If a mere image of a beautiful woman starring at you in your eyes could have a profound effect on your body and mind imagine what an intricately designed arts could do.
There is a good reason why our CREATOR forbids humans from arts idolatry.

I guess being "paranoid" is why we have Bitcoin in the first. I wonder if those who trust the system so much will be able to create something as revolutionary and secure (secure, by the world standard) as Bitcoin.


By the way, I think it's better to have the keys inscribed on hard objects and buried in multiple places you can remember, than having them controlled by centralized exchanges.  
I hope people also realize the need to control their private/sensitive data in similar manner .

Well, what is important is to know where the authority comes from, whether it's from the CREATOR of Heaven and Earth, or from an evil entity that controls the world and false religions.

We will know the truth in no-distant future. And there could be the desire to unban when the world is in choas. I predict that there will be regrets and shame for the foolish.

Sometimes I find it a bit difficult to wrap my mind around the thought patterns of the World and this happens once you are no longer one with the world.  One of the easiest way to figure things out is to bend low to their level again and that could mean going back to your vomit.

To be honest with you, what you bother yourself with will never be a problem once you are broken free from the system.
Let me give some idea what it's like to be really free, once you are free you eventually realize that what the world constantly strive to have is given to you freely & easily whenever you want as long as it's good and will be used for good. Nothing will become difficult anymore. You then realize that the dead world dwells in deep poverty.

Have you watched the worldly movies of superheros who just have whatever they think or want? that is nothing compared to what you benefit from when you have been united with your CREATOR and nolonger part of the system of slavery.



*This includes learning and benefitting from new skills. You learn inside your heart or in the Spirit, and you are not taught by world or people enslaved by the world anymore. Even the very wealthy or rich in the world of slavery will heavily depend you whether they know it or not

Hasn't the fee problem been solved already? Well, if the issue had been anticipated, they probably would have been careful growing the users to the level the network can't handle.
It should be able to Scale first before it fully opens for serious business. I think this is part of the reasons Bitcoin doesn't encourage things like defi yet.

Ofcourse. The intention of players/bettors matters. So that's probably why some would see nothing in it while others will see it as a bad thing. How the movie or entertainment industry portray it could also play a role. If they keep telling people that banana or pig is evil long enough, alot of people will definitely believe and probably start hunting down people who eat banana or pig.

I actually have couple of betting sites (probably alot) i bookmarked long ago to use later. I try to make sure the games/competitions are moral before bookmarking them. Interestingly betting are some of the few businesses I have bookmarked.

Money would not be needed in ideal World where people are honest and trust each other. When you need home in such world, people would help you build it for free knowing the kindness will be reciprocated. When you need to eat, you plunk corn from your neighbor's farm and the neighbor will be full of joy that someone has benefitted from his work. I think money/currency would be needed in society where people don't trust each other

I think it's more reasonable to have such company  exist as dapp on a Cryptocurrency Network. It's more like having companies existing on Nations. I typically consider well Decentralized Networks as autonomous Nations.
Does it have what it take to own a full crypto network and maintain it?

Ofcourse.
A better system would reward people according to how well they solve problems. You could create a reward system that encourages others to find faults in people works based on laid down rules/standards that should not be violated. Fault finders could be quite polite though, and probably discreet/anonymous. A worker's rewards could be retained or rewards automatically given to him/her if no one is able to find fault in his/her work. Fault finders could be given the rewards that's meant for those who fail to do their job properly. This reward system should encourage workers do their job properly especially on a decentralized crypto network.

In regards to the bolded parts of your post, anyone who is concerned about risk should be experienced enough to know how to manage risk. You could drastically reduce risk by not investing what you can't afford to lose, by investing longterm and you can still be profitable assuming it keeps improving. If Bitcoin investors are mostly long-term investors like we have in real estate, (with Bitcoin having a self-sustaining economy) the occasional extreme price volatility which people consider high risk will be moderated. Imagine if people are selling homes for short-term profits or almost immediately they buy them, that will likely create that kind of price volatility

Bitcoin is a Network designed for people fleeing the choas and lawlessness of failing centralized systems. And it's build to survive the choas, and not built to cause it considering the transparency, immutablity, privacy etc of the Network.

Nothing suggest it's a technology that will bring what you described. I wonder if you have observed or read how multicellular organisms function... Very organized, functional, automated, work in harmony, or rather achieve consensus in harmony
 It's abit similar to how Bitcoin Network/System works, though Bitcoin is very basic form of it nd not as complex.

I'm actually hoping to see a proper sidechian which should be an integral part of the Bitcoin Network, with Network Participants on the main network able to easily take part in the sidechains network consensus as they take part in main chain consensus. For the sake of security and decentralization, there are other important factors to look out for when considering proper sidechians.
I'm not sure if any I have seen so far is close to proper... Will probably go through those on your list later to see how close they are