Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 06:11:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 141 »
1121  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 05, 2014, 03:21:36 PM
I'm not sure if this was asked before. By the time they deliver the units, wouldn't the difficulty rate be at a point which would render the 5mhs or 25mhs you're getting useless?

The asics will not provide and exponential hash rate increase like we've seen with sha-256. In fact GPU's will be able to compete as far as hashing power goes, but the Asic will win on less energy consumption so the electric bill wont be so astronomical.

^-- This is the best reason for these machines. If I can cut down from using 100amps of power and get the same--even more--hashrate.. I'd be super thrilled.

Yeah great at what expense though? That is a hefty price to pay for a cut in the energy bill, upfront, and who knows where the price will be next year.

If I examine it purely from an electric bill standpoint, the unit would pay for itself instantly as soon as it began mining. How could you not see the benefit? Even if the machine only mined at half the estimated speed and took up 1,000watts, it's still ahead of the game. At least for me. I use scryptmining to pay for its electric bill, and to still provide profit. Something like this is a benefit, despite the cost.


You are all assuming that the company will deliver and will stand behind their promises. If they do deliver then yea, you will double your profit because you won't pay astronomical electric bills.

On the other hand but you are paying upfront 2-6 months in advance and that money isn't mining while you wait, meanwhile you could purchase GPUs and start mining, and by the 4 month mark your rig will have paid for itself even with the electric bills.

Keep funding them with your money for a promise that doesn't even have such a good return/risk ratio Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Such is the gamble. Speak with your wallet.
We get it, it is a no for you. It is a yes for many of us. We are taking the chance.
Being in Cryptos is a HUGE chance anyways for most people, getting into ASIC SHA256 mining is a chance on top of that and now into Scrypt mining (the FIRST one), is an even huger chance.
I like the chance. I like being a part of history, regardless of the results.
Such is life.
You say its a gamble. What do you think your odds are? 2-1, 5-1, 10-1,50-1? Based on what I've seen from this company I would say you're 10-1 against ever receiving anything from them. Is the reward 10x the stake? No at best you will break even or make a small profit. Scrypt Asics will just not give the kind of rewards SHA asics did. Any smart gambler knows you weight up the risk (money in/odds ) vs reward (total payout). So if the risk is £1000 at 10-1 I would expect £11000 back (£10000 +stake) You will never see that from this company.  Let me explain to you why I think the odds are so high.

1. No one knows who runs this company. They are just a figment of the internet. Who is their CEO, CFO, MD? They could fold at any time and disappear.
2. You have no idea where they are actually based apart from a photo of an abandoned kebab shop. All the update and forum time stamps point to them being in India although they claim to be in the UK.
3. You have not seen a legit prototype. Just an FPGA hashing that members of this forum could put together.
4.  Dexcell are their design partner, not business partner. They are paid for their services and have no link to Alpha other than that. If Alpha stop paying Dexcell go away.
5. KNC or other established companies could easily enter this market. KNC are already working on a scrypt ASIC http://www.coindesk.com/scrypt-miners-cryptocurrency-arms-race/
6. They are still at the design stage. All they have said is purely theoretical at this point, there is a long way to go from here to finished product. A lot could go wrong.
7. They are liars/incompetent. They have lied or misrepresented several things. Read through the posts. Most notably regarding their Registered address and their trading address, the VAT issues and DDos attacks.

Now I know a lot of people don't want to hear this but we as a community need to make sure people understand the risk. People are coming here and posting that they have bought these things, if those of us who thought it was unwise said nothing people new to the forum or the thread would think there was no risk at all.  There is a huge risk and it is our duty to point it out or expect another BFL, Payonix or TerraHash. Some of you people act as if they never happened. Maybe if they hadn't and no one had ever been scammed in cryptos I would understand your optimism. But they did and weighting up the odds against this company I would urge extreme caution.  

- I remember having internet stocks and my family and friends saying "Sell now! That is a lot of money!" But it wasn't about the money, it was about taking a chance on something new and innovative. I ended up being right.
- I remember, just last year being told "That BTC thing is such a risk, no way should you get involved." I bought in and sold a small portion at 800 to pay for my initial investment." Regardless of the outcome, I ended up being right again.
- I got involved in a few Group Buy hosted mining ventures and there were lots of scams out there. Not the best investment but it paid for itself (already and still going). Just fun, not about the money. Just playing.
- I got involved in a Group Buy for a physical BTC miner (Bitfury chips). Again, I just got "lucky" and found 80 GH/s that uses 80 watts only. Already paid for itself again.
- I was told "Don't get in LTC. It is a scam." But I bought a few at $3... You know.
- I bought a BFL Jalapeno - was never being delivered so I upgraded it to 48GH/s of "mining by the GH" - It looks like I lost on that one!

I won't lose a penny on my purchase, all a part of a bigger chance from my profits (if you want to look at it that way.) To me, again, it is not the money. It is fun.
I don't care what you think. I've done fine on my own. I'm just having fun. I think you are taking it all too seriously. It is just money. I live simply and actually don't make much money, not at all. Money to me is energy, exchange, etc. What comes around goes around. If I am wrong and you are right, then I get to say "I was wrong." and congrats to you. Ok? Let's wait and find out.

If you want to go on protecting people, by all means do so. Probably a good thing. But some of us live a bit more outside the mind, outside of reason, outside of the rational. (To a point).
I like the mystery and the chances in life. I listen. I adjust, I adapt...
1122  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: January 05, 2014, 02:36:15 PM
digitalindustry - It seems you would have a better idea than anyone here, regarding the question I posed on the page before. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg4237501#msg4237501

Quote
Is there any information available regarding how many nodes Quark has?
How many GPU's/Cpu's does Quark have defending it?
How can we make sense of Quarks Gh/s in relation to BTC, LTC, etc. considering that Quark has 6 algoriths? Does that matter much?

I'm trying to get a picture of it's network strength, regarding my post above. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg4226452#msg4226452

Can you answer this, add some direction, etc?

Appreciated,
IAS

sure - i will post back here - i will find out -

Not to put any pressure on digitalindustry, but can someone answer the above questions?
And also, can someone suggest, the best bang for the buck regarding building a mining rig to support the network (primarily)?
Something like an AMD FX-8350 8 core chip in a cheap rig? (Don't think we need anything more than on board video and 1GB of ram, small HD, etc.

Thanks,
IAS
1123  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - Thumbs (Temp NA), 8 Boards (0 left) on: January 05, 2014, 02:20:04 PM
I haven't seen any posts from Barntech here since before Xmas, anyone know what's happening with more product? A few weeks ago it was suggested that a ASICminer gen 2 based boards may be being produced but I can't find any details either here or on the Drillbit forums.

Anyone know what's happening?


I think Barntech mentioned getting those Avalon chips out with boards sometime in January.
I think there will be an announcement as the difficulty keeps going up, so of course the sooner the better.

IAS
1124  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Holy Grail! I wish I could kiss the author of Bitmessage on his face. on: January 05, 2014, 12:49:29 PM
Holy shit balls, how did I miss this?

Sort of how Black Swans work.
I did see BTC at cents, but how did I miss getting in then?  Grin
1125  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 05, 2014, 11:15:01 AM
I'm not sure if this was asked before. By the time they deliver the units, wouldn't the difficulty rate be at a point which would render the 5mhs or 25mhs you're getting useless?

The asics will not provide and exponential hash rate increase like we've seen with sha-256. In fact GPU's will be able to compete as far as hashing power goes, but the Asic will win on less energy consumption so the electric bill wont be so astronomical.

^-- This is the best reason for these machines. If I can cut down from using 100amps of power and get the same--even more--hashrate.. I'd be super thrilled.

Yeah great at what expense though? That is a hefty price to pay for a cut in the energy bill, upfront, and who knows where the price will be next year.

If I examine it purely from an electric bill standpoint, the unit would pay for itself instantly as soon as it began mining. How could you not see the benefit? Even if the machine only mined at half the estimated speed and took up 1,000watts, it's still ahead of the game. At least for me. I use scryptmining to pay for its electric bill, and to still provide profit. Something like this is a benefit, despite the cost.


You are all assuming that the company will deliver and will stand behind their promises. If they do deliver then yea, you will double your profit because you won't pay astronomical electric bills.

On the other hand but you are paying upfront 2-6 months in advance and that money isn't mining while you wait, meanwhile you could purchase GPUs and start mining, and by the 4 month mark your rig will have paid for itself even with the electric bills.

Keep funding them with your money for a promise that doesn't even have such a good return/risk ratio Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Such is the gamble. Speak with your wallet.
We get it, it is a no for you. It is a yes for many of us. We are taking the chance.
Being in Cryptos is a HUGE chance anyways for most people, getting into ASIC SHA256 mining is a chance on top of that and now into Scrypt mining (the FIRST one), is an even huger chance.
I like the chance. I like being a part of history, regardless of the results.
Such is life.
1126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 05, 2014, 12:37:34 AM
Their whole "30%" down deal is BS. WTF is it good for if you still have to put 70% down 8-10 weeks before shipment? YOU STILL HAVE TO PUT 100% DOWN WAY BEFORE YOU EVER SEE ANY PRODUCT!

The way I see it, the 30% funds the ASIC engineering development. Then the 70% funds the mask set and initial wafer batch (hence the 8-10 weeks which matches an optimistic version of the foundry turnaround time).

The way I see it:

30% of the funds are used for their expenses and manufacturing, this wey they don't have to invest a dime, they will receive the first batches and mine the hell outta them for a few months.
70% Then they receive the rest 70% which is their actual profit, keep mining for a few weeks and then they ship to you when the difficulty is already up and you will just break even a few years later.

LOL at all the idiots that preorder this shit.


The people who preordered the first two batches of Avalon, and the first batch of KnC, are LOL'ing all the way to the bank. You just have to weigh the risk vs. reward, but there's no reason to be a dick about this. If you don't want to participate, then don't. So sick of dealing with all of these pricks whose mommies didn't hug them enough. What is with the impulse to piss in everyone's Cheerios?

LOL with reason and wit - thx for that. Well said.
1127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: I created MyAltCoins to track all your cryptocurrency assets on: January 04, 2014, 11:07:12 PM

Questions:
- In MyAltCoins I entered the dollars that I used to buy the BTC with. Now those dollars have their own history and are red. Why? (Perhaps I did something wrong as the dollars (in red) show -1000% and perhaps that is throwing things off.)

That's normal behavior. The idea is that you spent X amount of dollars, therefore you are at the moment "in the red" of dollars. Whenever you sell your coins, you'll see that your USD will raise, hopefully to a positive value. It happens with every currency. If you think it's less confusing, i could remove the currencies that are in the red from the list. What do you think?

I am not sure which is better. Perhaps see what the community says. If it isn't a problem, perhaps just have a button that gives us a choice?

Requests:
-Can you separate our Bitcoin profits/loss from other alt coin profits/loss? (Still have the two connected as now, as we usually by alts with those same BTC.)
I don't think i understand your request, can you explain it in other words?

When I first signed up to your site, I just tracked my alt coins. The percentage given (overall) was nice as it was easy to compare the alt coin profit/loss to my already known Bitcoin profit/loss. Then I thought to add my bitcoins to your tracking page. Now it averages both together and that distorts what my alt coins have done in relation to my bitcoins. Does that make sense?
Perhaps I have it wrong, but doesn't the page average all the crypto's together, or just the alts and BTC is not included?

You are developing a tool that I can see growing huge. It is nice that you are listening to the users as it will just grow faster for all of us then.

Thanks for the quick reply and help,
IAS
1128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alpha Technology Viper Scrypt Miner List of Orders on: January 04, 2014, 10:02:06 PM
[quthor=Its About Sharing link=topic=398504.msg4313009#msg4313009 date=1388868658]
That site does not account for possible or probable scammed btc.

We need to see a record of btc paid vs reversible payment methods.

Is there even a real possibility of reversing payment after 2 months with PayPal? (Not that I am aware)
And, as stated on Alpha's website, your final payment can be made however you like.
Not sure exactly what you mean?

I can reverse a cc charge after years.

F PayPal just pay with a $0 liability cc.  Screenshot and save all tos receipt site etc.

This is about a 67% chance of being a complete scam.

Besides let's compare cc to btc odds of recovery.
[/quote]

They don't take credit cards. But, you can use your credit card when paying with paypal - Thx for the suggestion.

How can you say that these two companies who have been in business, for a fairly long time (10 years for the UK company I believe) and notable (the Indian company is supposedly a pretty trustworthy company and has been working with other notable companies) are scammers? That sounds a bit extreme. And how do you come up with your 67% figure? They have been in communication for a while before accepting payments so it doesn't seem like a typical scam.

Perhaps we should take this to the original thread btw.
1129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 04, 2014, 09:24:47 PM
there's no product prototyping?

all i see was a fpga unit hashing. I'm not an engineer, but with the experience of butterfly labs, they had FPGA miners out decently okay, but could not made ASICs worth any shit until their 3rd or 4th revision.

This is what their last message stated:

You may note that we had bettered hashing speed per core as compared to last time we published our results in our Prototyping Design Document.

As stated in the following video, our ASIC design POC has not been optimised for any specific FPGA, instead optimised for multi-core scalability with ASIC in mind. That's why it's important we show our core speed and number of cores we are targeting as per the final ASIC chip. Based on this design and global foundries process node, die sizes and the associated costs have been arrived at and we will be going ahead with the fabrication, post final back end verification.

Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69P2RHG2pIA
1130  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Holy Grail! I wish I could kiss the author of Bitmessage on his face. on: January 04, 2014, 08:57:04 PM
Just a big WOW. This is something really incredible you are working on. Keep us updated!
Does seem a bit complicated, but surely things will be made a bit more easy for the average user.

Any issues with the app on IOS (being that it integrates payments) or do you see Apple giving in here?
1131  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alpha Technology Viper Scrypt Miner List of Orders on: January 04, 2014, 08:50:58 PM
That site does not account for possible or probable scammed btc.

We need to see a record of btc paid vs reversible payment methods.

Is there even a real possibility of reversing payment after 2 months with PayPal? (Not that I am aware)
And, as stated on Alpha's website, your final payment can be made however you like.
Not sure exactly what you mean?
1132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 04, 2014, 08:48:23 PM
I'm not sure if this was asked before. By the time they deliver the units, wouldn't the difficulty rate be at a point which would render the 5mhs or 25mhs you're getting useless?

Near impossible if you consider there are no ASICs now. Look at the difficulty level of LTC, it has actually been leveling (not that I expect that to remain). More of a steady growth.
The LARGEST growth we saw with BTC was right when the ASIC's came online. I really think we will see that happen again, with LTC.

Not that I am pro ASIC, even though I have one on order, but here in Germany the costs of electricity for a regular LTC rig are over half the LTC you could mine. Just not efficient.
These ASICs do not give the HUGE advantages over GPU's that BTC saw, but you are looking at 1/2 the price and 1/20th the energy compared to Video Cards. A no brainer considering my location.
Not to make money, but as usual to break even and for the hobby aspect.
1133  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 04, 2014, 04:24:27 PM
you people are pathetic, keep dreaming that you will get rich over night  Roll Eyes

Mr. 7 Activity man.  Grin

Clearly not about getting rich - anyone could see buying coins is cheaper. I hope to just break even and support the network. And it is a fun hobby.
Have you thought of that, supporting the network? Why would you think of getting rich? Projection?

Here in Germany electricity is expensive, for me to run a 1.2 Mh/s rig (650-700 watts or so) would cost around 140 Euro a month (@ .28 cents per Kw/h).
That means, now, to generate 11 or so coins a month, would cost me well over half of those coins (7 coins at 20 Euro per coin). Plus 1k or so for the rig.

IAS
1134  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alpha Technology Viper Scrypt Miner List of Orders on: January 04, 2014, 04:18:58 PM
Order Number : 54xx
Pay date : 2014.01.4 1:08pm UTC
Method payment: PayPal
Machine ordered: 1x 5 MH/s
Country : Germany
1135  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 04, 2014, 01:38:45 PM
Would be nice to know how many of each model in batch # 1!

I for one wonder if 5400+ individual orders have been placed in the few hours the ordering did work.

My 52xx order was placed @ 12:17 UTC, and from what I can see the pre-order was live for 2 hours, then after 8 hours "back live" tweet was published. Now it's been up for ~2hrs, which looks like a total uptime of 5 hours or so. That's 1000 order per hour...

Hope Alpha-T can clarify as to the total numbers in batch 1.

Did they mention how many of each miner would be made available in total? (And then the pre-order is closed.)
Think I saw that somewhere.

A friend of mine said his 54xx order was placed @ 13:08 UTC.
1136  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: I created MyAltCoins to track all your cryptocurrency assets on: January 04, 2014, 12:03:01 PM
ABSOLUTELY incredible tool you got there. Thanks so much.
.01 BTC Donation Just Sent.

Questions:
- In MyAltCoins I entered the dollars that I used to buy the BTC with. Now those dollars have their own history and are red. Why? (Perhaps I did something wrong as the dollars (in red) show -1000% and perhaps that is throwing things off.)
-The BTC's I bought with those dollars were bought on average (I used average price) of $150 or so, but under BTC it shows a profit of 135% (should be over 500%, perhaps the USD above is causing it?).


Requests:
-Can you separate our Bitcoin profits/loss from other alt coin profits/loss? (Still have the two connected as now, as we usually by alts with those same BTC.)
-On the Dashboard page, can the colors of the coins listed below (they are all black) match the colors on the exchange rate graph?
-Export/Save - That way we can play with importing date from exchanges and not losing all our data for not.
-Print function or format - Paper Copy, just in case.

Again, thanks for this, will tell others, beautiful site. BEST in this regards.

Its about sharing
1137  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 04, 2014, 10:32:13 AM
Website is offline The server may be down for maintenance, there may be a network problem, or the site may be experiencing excessive load.
Error 522 Ray ID: e759e3ffa1e099a
Connection timed out

Still down - perhaps there are those who don't want ASIC coming to LTC?
1138  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Doge goes back to 0.00000045 again on: January 03, 2014, 08:04:27 PM
Sorry, but 20 billion coins so far with another 80 billion on the way is not attractive.
All for alt coins, but something is wrong here...
Anyway, another nice experiment.

It's not you that decides what is attractive or not, its the larger masses that love dogecoin
 Smiley

Notice, I didn't say "Sorry, but 20 billion coins so far with another 80 billion on the way is not attractive for me."
Your point is taken but the problem, to a degree, remains. That is a hyper inflated currency. Maybe it takes off, for you
said the key word - "larger masses" and those are the people that made AOL succeed when I couldn't figure out why
those plastic CD's were much needed and they were everywhere! LOL

I don't see how a currency with so many "bits" can hold value (without an army). But, such is the experiment.
1139  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Development on: January 03, 2014, 12:57:22 PM
Does anyone with a good background in FPGA/chip design support Alpha's claims or think they are feasible? My spidey senses are tingling.

I have some background, but there are better experts than me on these forums.

128 cores, 1024Mbit of RAM each core (TMTO=1, WTF!!). Its going to be a huge chip and the 28nm foundry node is not cheap. Feasible, probably, but I think their costing figures were pulled from the wrong direction (marketing rather than production). Also have a look at Dexcel's web site. Plenty of experience in FPGA. Not a thing mentioned about ASICs.

Are you sure about those numbers? WOW. We are talking 131,072Mbit of ram for 128 cores!
Go on...
1140  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [QRK] Quark | Super secure hashing | CPU mining on: January 03, 2014, 12:55:22 PM
Considering the very small amount of new coins, does is worth mining quarks?

I was initially interested in this coin, because I only have a bunch of old PCs with no GPUs at all. So, the fact of being a CPU only coin made me think that mining this coin I could compete with other miners.

The fact is that I am obtaining higher profitability mining other alt coins, even those being mined mostly by GPU miners.

So, I do not catch the point of mining quark.

I am missing something???

There will be around 1 million coins mined a year going forward. So, yes, it "could still" be profitable to mine.
This, in a sense, is the experiment (in part) of Quark. Instead of it being about money to mine and mine to money, it is an earlier (mostly) mine and then distribution.
We will see if the network can withstand that. I would think it does as we are early in the game, but no telling what happens.
If Quarks price goes up too much, too soon AND we hit the 247.6 million coins made (and 1 million mined per year there after) it will be an open target for supporters of other coins to attack (the network).
The network better stay strong and get stronger. I have been harping on this and get little response from the community. It is #1 as far as importance goes.
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 ... 141 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!