Flat Earth

[DimitrisLodirogas]

Any new photoshopped NASA photos ? keep the thread alive

[notbatman]

@DimitrisLodirogas

[Cryptotourist]

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30209127-the-stupidity-paradox

[odolvlobo]

@notbatman, I will be traveling to Antarctica in January. Is there anything you would like me to do for you while I'm there? It's a good opportunity to gather some FE evidence.

[presduterte]

@notbatman, I will be traveling to Antarctica in January. Is there anything you would like me to do for you while I'm there? It's a good opportunity to gather some FE evidence.

Can I fill in for him when he's gone? He would probably say, yeah, you can go hang yourself off the edge of the earth with a rope.

No but seriously. That's really cool, no pun intended. Do they have tours there? Don't forget to bring a jacket!

I want to go places where its cold. Its always a damn sauna over here.

[I31B1]

How as an individual can I know if the Earth is a sphere or a flat disc? What experiment can I do that doesn't involve trusting information from a 3rd party that would prove what the geometry really is?

https://i.imgur.com/O8IpMmi.jpg

flat eathers everywhere. Well, all I know is that earth is oblate spheroid.

[debitel]

Quite sad they didn't invade area51 and find flat earth maps.

[SheriffEl]

Imagine the aliens watching our flat planet and having fun on their forums with "Earth is round" topics.

[notbatman]

'Earth is 100% flat': Boxing legend Carl Froch accuses NASA of being 'fake space agency'





"The Earth is flat, 100 per cent," Froch said. "There's no proof of the Earth's curvature and this fake space agency NASA use CGI images and everyone is different. I’m looking at them thinking, 'Hang on a minute, they’re like cartoons.'"

Read more: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/boxing/

[Cryptotourist]

100% retarded newspaper, article, post & Batty.

[Cryptotourist]

What doesn't make sense is that there are people - so fucking dumb - that advocate for flat Earth in the year 2019.

[BADecker]

The only proof for Flat Earth is talk. There is only one scientific proof for FE. Which scientific proof is that? The same one that exists for evolution. Political science. Political science says that out-talking your opponent is proof. Political science also accepts lies as proof.

When you get into actual physical proof, there are so many holes in FE science that it is non-existent.

[notbatman]

We can see too far for Earth to have any curvature, that's one solid proof the world is flat that anybody with a good zoom lens can verify.

A gyroscope tested/proven to maintain it's position in space when rotated at 15°/hr provides solid proof the world is motionless, this is something anybody with a precision mechanical gyroscope can verify.

[Cryptotourist]

We can see too far for Earth to have any curvature, that's one solid proof the world is flat that anybody with a good zoom lens can verify.

A gyroscope tested/proven to maintain it's position in space when rotated at 15°/hr provides solid proof the world is motionless, this is something anybody with a precision mechanical gyroscope can verify.

Hey don't turn all wacky now Batty. Do you even know what a gyroscope is?

Only your brain cells are motionless indeed. And that would be the single only thing on the planet.
Try to keep up.

[notbatman]

^^^ "They" claim the Earth has a radius of 3,963 miles.

Either the ship is going up, over and behind a hump of curved water 3 miles miles from an observer at sea level or we're not stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum.

The fact is, it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that a ship disappears due to the resolution limit of the eye/camera (atmospheric refraction not withstanding).

[Cryptotourist]

^. The fact is, proved beyond any doubt, that you are as dumb as they come. Bravo Batty.

[BADecker]

^^^ "They" claim the Earth has a radius of 3,963 miles.

Either the ship is going up, over and behind a hump of curved water 3 miles miles from an observer at sea level or we're not stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum.

The fact is, it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that a ship disappears due to the resolution limit of the eye/camera (atmospheric refraction not withstanding).

You are playing a shell game.

Get on the ship as it goes up and over the horizon. To someone watching from a stationary position NOT on the ship, it sure looks like the ship is going up and over the horizon. But at the same time, to someone on the ship, it doesn't look like it at all. You are a tricky talking con artist playing with the facts.

The fact that you would even talk about a spinning ball in a vacuum, shows that you aren't being honest. The earth is not a ball. It is not spinning; rather, it is turning slowly. And it is not in a vacuum; you can feel the wind blowing at times, anywhere on planet Earth. You are a tricky talking con artist playing with the facts.

If you think that there isn't any horizon, prove it rather than simply talking like you have proven it. You are a tricky talking con artist playing with the facts.

[bkbirge]

You do know how big the globe is don't you? 

That's the problem I see with many science deniers, and it's difficult even for science proponents. Scale, either really small or really large is just so far out of our realm of personal reference that it can become meaningless. And without a sense of reference it is very easy to draw the wrong conclusions from observations. Even attempts to link to our intuition like "more stars than grains of sand in all the beaches" quickly saturate our brains.

[notbatman]

After browsing 4chan.org for a few minutes I eventually came across the Flat Earth thread, a string of confused users suffering from cognitive dissonance.

In an attempt to alleviate their confusion I attempted post some proofs and explanations. However to my dismay Google Captcha refused to let me pass and allow posting unless I paid them $20 BTC. I don't know what kind of racket these faggots are running so I'm going to make the economical choice and post it here.

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/227941547

This is currently what is known about our realm:

Flat | We see too far, a Nikon P900 for example has such a low angular resolution limit it can observe an horizon at a distance of 30+ miles while viewing only inches above sea/ground level.

On a globe the horizon is a physical barrier ~3 miles from a 6 foot observer. This is because the globe hijacks the 1 min angular resolution limit of the human eye, when the resolution limit is lowered through use of a zoom lens the whole globe model falls to pieces.

Stationary |  A mechanical gyroscope tested and proven to maintain its position in space when rotated at 15 deg/hr provides absolute proof the earth doesn't rotate, the earth is motionless.

Steel Dome | Density and buoyancy with the Coulomb force explains why objects fall/sink. It works like electromigration between the negatively charged ground and positive dome/firmament.

[davidayalav4444]

how will the rotation of sun occur if the earth is flat?