Bitcoin Forum
October 18, 2019, 07:51:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 [318] 319 320 321 322 323 324 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Martin Armstrong Discussion  (Read 615552 times)
MTL4
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2019, 02:33:56 PM
 #6341

no, it's not exclusively about that. It's what you and a few other people have made out of this thread.
This thread is also for people  who believe to already know that Socrates works. Just leave them their opinion.
It is also possible to discuss small aspects of a topic without constantly taking the whole thing into question.


Alex, anyone has the right to have any opinion they want but if I come out and tell everyone that I believe aliens have visited earth, but when asked for proof I tell everyone I don't need to provide proof or tell them to find their own proof then I shouldn't be the least bit surprised that I may be ridiculed for holding that opinion.


olegrey, I suggest you restart all of your counts from zero, and post your trades in real-time.  On this page 317, you go from successful reversal 5 to 8, without posting ANY real-time trades.

If I make a claim about my magic formula combining moving average and MACD indicators, and simply post like you with some success & failure, but averaging out to be some good stuffs, NOBODY can tell whether I'm faking it or not, even when it is HINDSIGHT based.


I was going to ask the same thing, olegrey the trades should be in tab form so you can see when the call was made, what reversal, what was bought/sold, price paid, etc.  People want the ability to go back through the posts and verify the findings using the time stamps (ie you can't go back and edit posts after the fact).  Then at the end you can provide a summary like you have been to show the total results it achieved to date.
1571428317
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571428317

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571428317
Reply with quote  #2

1571428317
Report to moderator
1571428317
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571428317

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571428317
Reply with quote  #2

1571428317
Report to moderator
1571428317
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571428317

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571428317
Reply with quote  #2

1571428317
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571428317
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571428317

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571428317
Reply with quote  #2

1571428317
Report to moderator
1571428317
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571428317

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571428317
Reply with quote  #2

1571428317
Report to moderator
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 10, 2019, 02:38:40 PM
 #6342


I had another recent one: his bearish calls on saturday 24 August, just between the Trump Trade Tweet on Friday and the futures at lows on the Monday after that.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/china/china-v-us-trade-war/

Quote
China v US Trade War
Blog/China
Posted Aug 24, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

The way the markets respond to every issue with trade is really over-kill. But the market is in a bearish mode as the Economic Confidence Model heads into its business cycle low come January 2020.



Why does he tweets bearish things after already such a huge decline, while if he's such a pro, he much know that these are setups for huge (counter)rally's, and he's confusing traders with comments like that (probably lots of Armstrong-blog readers sold on Monday or gone short, and/or didn't buy anything for this huge rally). Whether his prediction still comes to fruition before February 2020 or not, Marty always seems to be a complete idiot on short time timing.

That's a good catch.  I have noticed that if you take Armstrong's post as a counter-indicator, it actually kind of works.  Armstrong is mostly WRONG at the turn of the market, when the market is at the most emotional moment.  He loves to trash-talk everyone else, and shows that he is a genius by hindsight.

That was how he called "The End of Crytocurrency" at the end of last year.

I haven't dared to trade against Armstrong, the self-proclaimed genius trader, but trading against him on bitcoin would have netted you more than double of the return easily, catching almost right at the bottom.

And these two examples of his terrible bad calls are not the only ones, but just two documented ones here.
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 10, 2019, 02:48:57 PM
 #6343

no, it's not exclusively about that. It's what you and a few other people have made out of this thread.
This thread is also for people  who believe to already know that Socrates works. Just leave them their opinion.
It is also possible to discuss small aspects of a topic without constantly taking the whole thing into question.


Alex, anyone has the right to have any opinion they want but if I come out and tell everyone that I believe aliens have visited earth, but when asked for proof I tell everyone I don't need to provide proof or tell them to find their own proof then I shouldn't be the least bit surprised that I may be ridiculed for holding that opinion.


olegrey, I suggest you restart all of your counts from zero, and post your trades in real-time.  On this page 317, you go from successful reversal 5 to 8, without posting ANY real-time trades.

If I make a claim about my magic formula combining moving average and MACD indicators, and simply post like you with some success & failure, but averaging out to be some good stuffs, NOBODY can tell whether I'm faking it or not, even when it is HINDSIGHT based.

I was going to ask the same thing, olegrey the trades should be in tab form so you can see when the call was made, what reversal, what was bought/sold, price paid, etc.  People want the ability to go back through the posts and verify the findings using the time stamps (ie you can't go back and edit posts after the fact).  Then at the end you can provide a summary like you have been to show the total results it achieved to date.

Somehow, it's hard to make Alex to understand that "Extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence".  About 99% of the hedge fund managers cannot beat the market over long term.  Anyone making such claim on outstanding performance requires to provide extraordinary evidence.  Anyone claiming that just because he did "AI" or he runs his stuffs on "super-computer", and that it will be perfectly observing world capital, without any documented proof, is obviously non-sense.
AnonymousCoder
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 10, 2019, 03:40:50 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2019, 04:41:51 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6344

...
olegrey, I suggest you restart all of your counts from zero, and post your trades in real-time.  On this page 317, you go from successful reversal 5 to 8, without posting ANY real-time trades.

Honestly, I can't recall most of your past posted real-time trades either.

If I make a claim about my magic formula combining moving average and MACD indicators, and simply post like you with some success & failure, but averaging out to be some good stuffs, NOBODY can tell whether I'm faking it or not, even when it is HINDSIGHT based.

I'm not accusing you of anything.  But if the formula works, it will continue to work.  I just want to see some 100% clean record.

And if you refuse to do that, it's fine.  But that number is just good for you (or anyone else who wants to take it up by faith).


I think this response is appropriate. It is commonsense to be considerate, as simple as that. With considerate, I mean to be respectful of the need of others to verify what I say. For example, I posted a trade here which is now verifiable because it has been quoted here , and therefore I cannot modify this without being caught.

In olegrey's case, the reversals would need to be posted in advance at a minimum, and it would need to be clear whether they are daily or weekly. I cannot see that, so the quality of what olegrey is doing is exactly zero. I don't know why he is doing it. We know that many reversals are phantom reversals which Socrates creates after the fact. This has never been challenged successfully, and now olegrey is exposing himself to this hat trick. Wash, rinse and repeat.

And let's not forget that olegrey has built his strategy based on the data posted here by bikefront in tabular form , so we are not requesting something that has not been shown to him before.


Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
s29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2019, 10:01:57 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2019, 10:12:42 PM by s29
 #6345


That's a good catch.  I have noticed that if you take Armstrong's post as a counter-indicator, it actually kind of works.  Armstrong is mostly WRONG at the turn of the market, when the market is at the most emotional moment.  He loves to trash-talk everyone else, and shows that he is a genius by hindsight.

That was how he called "The End of Crytocurrency" at the end of last year.

I haven't dared to trade against Armstrong, the self-proclaimed genius trader, but trading against him on bitcoin would have netted you more than double of the return easily, catching almost right at the bottom.

And these two examples of his terrible bad calls are not the only ones, but just two documented ones here.


Yes, Armstrong also ramps up the posting on his Private Blog when the market made a huge move. Never before the move of course. Maybe that sells extra subscriptions when traders are emotional.

His calls on Bitcoin and Gold have been horrendous, especially those year-end closings and "what it means". Gold has been in a bottoming process for years, but still all these posts about gold going below 1000 bucks. The Dow also elected a bearish reversal on the last trading day of 2018; also didn't work out well at all.
bikefront
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 21


View Profile
September 11, 2019, 01:06:51 AM
 #6346

Look at this fraud.

https://www.mininginteractive.com/archived-messages

He ends each message with:

To ensure you will become rich

you should become a Paid-for subscriber to the

“From the Desk of Nick Nicolaas” letter.

Outside of the people directly working directly with Martin Armstrong,

I am probably the best person in the world interpreting his work.

Subscribe Here

https://www.mininginteractive.com/subscribe

He did say Armstrong was wrong... at least, his interpretation of Socrates: https://www.mininginteractive.com/archived-messages/klondike-silver-private-placement-update-cad6-billion-private-capital-to-invest-in-mining-gold-wrong-interpretation-by-martin-armstrong-of-socrates-and-the-dow-points-to-ponder The reason is because he had been calling for sub 1000 gold for a long time and thus had no option but to admit when the date came, that it was wrong.

Keep in mind, these are all archived messages and therefore HINDSIGHT, thus ignoring any failures. I doubt he even actually daytrades and just claims he does for clients (perhaps it is 'closed' as so to avoid).
etoimene
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2019, 10:08:55 AM
 #6347

Look at this fraud.


Who is committing this fraud?
bikefront
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 21


View Profile
September 11, 2019, 02:42:22 PM
 #6348

Look at this fraud.


Who is committing this fraud?

If you can't tell, I'm not going to tell you.
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 11, 2019, 07:53:37 PM
 #6349

My opinion, it's a small liar piggyback riding on a big liar.  And of course the big liar constantly wants to make sure that money goes to him, instead of going to other small liars.

One of things that's kind of revealing is what Nick said here:
Quote
Or is the question does Marty not always interpret the Socrates AI correctly.

First of all.  Socrates AI is a piece of computer software, AND software/math goes by numbers.  There should NEVER be any need to "interpret" it.  The fact that we are all here, constantly interpreting Socrates output is just weird and wrong, since the software would just require adding some lines of codes and conclude using its database & AI to tell you whether it is a BUY or SELL.

Then Armstrong comes in here to play out the salient point of his "Art of Lies".    Armstrong as the "second" person, interprets "Socrates" who is the "first" person.  So guess what, whenever Armstrong gets it wrong, he just needs to say that it was his human "guess" that went beyond Socrates.  So zero point for Armstrong, and one point for Socrates.  And whenever Armstrong gets it right, then one point for Armstrong, and one point for Socrates.

THEN when the subscribers come in, the salient point of lying becomes fractalized, and if the subscriber get the market right, that's one point for subscriber, one point for Armstrong, and one point for Socrates.  If the subscriber gets the market wrong, that's zero point for subscriber, still one point for Armstrong and Socrates.

So Socrates is never wrong.  Armstrong is only wrong when he gets ahead of himself.  And subscribers, based on the randomness, some will simply flourish based on pure luck, some will survive, but ALL will continue to confirm that Socrates/Armstrong are right with positive bias.


So is Socrates actually Armstrong?

My parents used to tell me that if my friend tries to borrow money from me, just tell them that your parents (or now your wife) don't allow it.  The parents are NOT there, and the friend cannot ask the absent person any questions.

My buyer's real estate agent tells me that even if you like the house, tell the seller that your wife doesn't like it for better price negotiation.  The wife is NOT there, and the seller cannot ask the absent person any questions.

In the WEC presentation, Armstrong has ANOTHER guy presents the "methodologies".  Armstrong is NOT there.  You cannot ask him questions.  If the guy cannot answer, it is not Armstrong's problem.

In most of the blog posts, Armstrong is the voice, and "Socrates is NOT there".  What does the "computer" think?  You cannot ask a question to someone that is NOT there.

You cannot lay a blame on an absent person.

If anything, everyone else is stupid and trash, but Socrates is always right, don't you get it (shouted out by Armstrong, not me)?

But shall you buy or sell today for making a profit?  Well, you can't even ask that simplest question to Socrates.

s29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 12, 2019, 11:33:45 AM
 #6350


That's a good catch.  I have noticed that if you take Armstrong's post as a counter-indicator, it actually kind of works.  Armstrong is mostly WRONG at the turn of the market, when the market is at the most emotional moment.  He loves to trash-talk everyone else, and shows that he is a genius by hindsight.

That was how he called "The End of Crytocurrency" at the end of last year.

I haven't dared to trade against Armstrong, the self-proclaimed genius trader, but trading against him on bitcoin would have netted you more than double of the return easily, catching almost right at the bottom.

And these two examples of his terrible bad calls are not the only ones, but just two documented ones here.


Yes, Armstrong also ramps up the posting on his Private Blog when the market made a huge move. Never before the move of course. Maybe that sells extra subscriptions when traders are emotional.

His calls on Bitcoin and Gold have been horrendous, especially those year-end closings and "what it means". Gold has been in a bottoming process for years, but still all these posts about gold going below 1000 bucks. The Dow also elected a bearish reversal on the last trading day of 2018; also didn't work out well at all.

Seems like Marty is reading this forum Grin:

Quote
PRIVATE BLOG – Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far
Posted Sep 11, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

PRIVATE BLOG – Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers.

Maybe he's right this time, since Gold seems to be early in a further correction.
AnonymousCoder
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 12, 2019, 03:30:51 PM
Last edit: September 12, 2019, 03:58:03 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6351

...

Quote
PRIVATE BLOG – Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far
Posted Sep 11, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

PRIVATE BLOG – Gold Elected 3 Daily Bearish So Far Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers.

Maybe he's right this time, since Gold seems to be early in a further correction.


These ramblings are meaningless as has been shown in this forum many times before. He reports elected reversals in hindsight. An elected reversal as he reports cannot not necessarily be traded because many reversals are  reported late (phantom reversals) after the close, in hindsight. Then ask yourself what happens AFTER the election? Bad trade? In this case, the Gold market bounced by more than $20, so they could all be bad. Again, the number 3 does not mean anything either, because reversals could be bunched as double and triple reversals, or generally reversals very close together, all elected at the same time. Can you figure out whether he was wrong or right? No? What is the point then?

So if he is wrong here or not, that does not even matter. Meanwhile, what about all the bad reversals, about failure to elect reversals in markets that had significant moves? What Martin Armstrong writes is all pointless because out of 1,000 markets covered by Socrates, he will definitely, always be able to pick the ones that look best to him and brag about them - in hindsight. He will NEVER ADVISE to trade a specific market based on an elected reversal because that would expose him to the random mess that Socrates is.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
Alex-11
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2019, 08:35:54 PM
 #6352

These ramblings are meaningless as has been shown in this forum many times before.
I'd rather say that your posts are meaningless

He reports elected reversals in hindsight. An elected reversal as he reports cannot not necessarily be traded because many reversals are  reported late (phantom reversals) after the close, in hindsight.
unproved nonsense.  IMHO 95% or most likely more are published in advance.

Again, the number 3 does not mean anything either, because reversals could be bunched as double and triple reversals, or generally reversals very close together, all elected at the same time. Can you figure out whether he was wrong or right? No? What is the point then?
It was always said that short term trading exclusively on blog post is not the best idea. It needs to be closely monitored with the latest Socrates data.

So if he is wrong here or not, that does not even matter. Meanwhile, what about all the bad reversals, about failure to elect reversals in markets that had significant moves?
MA always said that Socrates is not 100%. You just need to always consider that you may loose a few trades.

of 1,000 markets covered by Socrates, he will definitely, always be able to pick the ones that look best to him and brag about them -
but he doesn't do it. Most of the time he comments on Metals , the Dow and the EURUSD
Often he would write something  after big move, and this can also have it's meaning because investors may want to know how far the move can go.
s29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 14, 2019, 02:39:36 PM
 #6353

Here he goes again:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/trump-on-interest-rates-omg/

Quote
Sorry, I do not agree with this and more than 10-years of low to stupidly low interest rates have FAILED to reverse the economic declines in Europe or Japan. Europe is approaching its 13th year of economic recession. When we look at the German share market, the strongest in Europe, it still has not exceeded the 2000 high on the Price Index.

https://i.imgur.com/tduddaI.png

1) 13th year of economic recession in Europe? Armstrong is outright lying here.
2) The relative sluggish European economic recovery has not much to do with that lower rates or that QE didn't work; but rather with demographics, bad loans on bank's balance sheets and the relative high amount of socialism in Europe. Also we don't know what the economic numbers would be without lower rates or without QE (probably a lot worse or even a depression).
3) Comparing European share markets from the 2000-bubble top is ridiculous in itself, but even more ridiculous without taking into account dividends. The DAX with dividend topped around 8000 points in the year 2000 and is now above 12000 points. Not too shabby since Armstrong says Europe has been in a recession for 13 years straight. Also we don't know what the DAX would be without lower rates or without QE (probably a lot lower).

Armstrong is just outright lying, or not telling the full story. But if it's about Europe, he can only bash it seems.

Marty also seems to be a total drama queen being on a period when it comes to taxation. Corporate and top income rates in general have been declining for decades around the world.
hv_
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 552

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2019, 09:03:14 AM
 #6354

Here he goes again:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/interest-rates/trump-on-interest-rates-omg/

Quote
Sorry, I do not agree with this and more than 10-years of low to stupidly low interest rates have FAILED to reverse the economic declines in Europe or Japan. Europe is approaching its 13th year of economic recession. When we look at the German share market, the strongest in Europe, it still has not exceeded the 2000 high on the Price Index.



1) 13th year of economic recession in Europe? Armstrong is outright lying here.
2) The relative sluggish European economic recovery has not much to do with that lower rates or that QE didn't work; but rather with demographics, bad loans on bank's balance sheets and the relative high amount of socialism in Europe. Also we don't know what the economic numbers would be without lower rates or without QE (probably a lot worse or even a depression).
3) Comparing European share markets from the 2000-bubble top is ridiculous in itself, but even more ridiculous without taking into account dividends. The DAX with dividend topped around 8000 points in the year 2000 and is now above 12000 points. Not too shabby since Armstrong says Europe has been in a recession for 13 years straight. Also we don't know what the DAX would be without lower rates or without QE (probably a lot lower).

Armstrong is just outright lying, or not telling the full story. But if it's about Europe, he can only bash it seems.

Marty also seems to be a total drama queen being on a period when it comes to taxation. Corporate and top income rates in general have been declining for decades around the world.

There is no way to predict future of weather, economics, the universe.

And that is good


Selling such, is red flag, close to scam

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Memo: 1AHUYNJKPfY7PjVK1hNQFo5LrdGixuiybw  -  https://metanet.icu/
The simple way is the genius way - in Moore's Law and Satoshi's WP we trust.
AnonymousCoder
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 15, 2019, 01:22:04 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2019, 05:58:53 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6355

Correlations

In one of his latest alarmist posts ,

Martin Armstrong praises his computer as usual for being able to sort out the correlations.

In one of his recent reports that carry a very high price tag, he made use of such a correlation as demonstrated here: The Martin Armstrong Gold / Silver Ratio Fallacy which indicates that such correlation may not hold for the future for long, only in hindsight.

And his results show that there is no value in correlating markets in the way that he does it.

And there is no evidence ANYWHERE in his writings that he used correlation between markets successfully to provide better forecasting.

For those who are interested in correlations between markets, this has been studied for years, see
Stock correlation network.

Correlation queries have been available as various online computer services like here at aistockcharts.com
and here . Correlation studies are standard part of broker services today.

Until this day, Martin Armstrong's so called correlation models have been unavailable. At best, single studies have been manual executions not reaching the level of complexity as seen elsewhere. Socrates still presents a flat earth model where each market is analyzed in isolation, merely based on its own time series, not correlated with anything.

Martin Armstrong planned in 2013 to build the Global Correlation Model.

Here in 2014, it becomes obvious that this, while still not available, aims to be no more than expressing technical analysis of markets in terms of various currencies.



Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
s29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2019, 07:29:06 PM
 #6356

Correlations

In one of his latest alarmist posts ,

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

Quote
There is NO PLACE left of the earth that is not moving into crisis mode. Normally, I have been running around the world getting called in from one crisis to another. But they have been isolated crises. Now we are facing crises on every continent and it is all simultaneous. To survive this total complete mess, it will take a computer to monitor everything and sort out the correlations.

Sounds we're facing total annihilation as a human kind but thank God Marty has a solution: his computer Cheesy
s29
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 18, 2019, 01:16:04 PM
 #6357

OMG at his latest post... I wonder if the question is made up by Marty himself to troll everybody who "doesn't understand his system".

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/reversals-energy-a-different-dimension/

Quote
Reversals – Energy – A Different Dimension
Blog/ECM
Posted Sep 18, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Hi Marty… I’ve been reading your blog for several years now.

I’ve been trying to understand the basics about your reversal system is with no luck.
Yet I’ve been trading stocks with only simple trend lines for years using basic tech A.

PS I still don’t even understand how the Federal Reserve works either… they don’t teach you that stuff in high school!

Yes, I’ve watched every video or post on reversals on your site and not getting it. I know I’m not that smart but I’m not that dumb either!

Can you pretty please post a very clear layman’s chart using a stock or a commodity with prices like gold to show us dummies so we “GET IT”

Thanks Marty….

A dumb Canuck

Awesome answer by the way... Roll Eyes

Quote
ANSWER: Look, the reversals are a black box and I keep it that way along with the Schema Frequencies. This is a physics solution to how the world ticks. It is not a simple moving average, stochastics, or one-dimensional formula. It is highly complex and many people have tried to reverse engineer it but have failed. They may think they have come close but they cannot account for the next number.

Traditionally, economists argue there is a business cycle, but nobody can forecast the cycle. Therefore, with tools of interest rates, taxes, and money supply, governments can manipulate the business cycle. The problem is that even Larry Summers admitted that he cannot forecast the economy. This stems from the problem of their failure to understand cyclical movement,to begin with. The Schema Frequencies resolve the complexity of cyclical movement.

The Energy indicator is against based upon physics and it exposes the true opposing forces at work irrespective of the superficial price levels. The key to this is looking for the divergence when prices are rising and Energy is declining. This is a warning signal that such a rally is NOT sustainable. Likewise, when prices are falling but Energy begins to rise, once more there is a divergence warning that the decline is losing energy and a low is near. Just look at this daily chart on gold. You can see the divergence as Energy peaked well in advance.

These indicators are not your standard variety of analysis. They are entirely beyond the one-dimensional analysis world for the markets are not only all connected globally, but the entire system is fractal. So we have a fractal relationship within each market and then a fractal relationship on a global perspective.

The models do all the calculations that are humanly impossible to carry out before a market even closes. It allows us to stand back and see the overview which then reveals the trends. Many have tried to prevent our forecasts. They have tried to ignore what this computer has been doing in hopes that I will die and that will be the end of it. I see this as a means to an end — to help society manage the business cycle without destroying our human rights and our freedom. I have to protect this because there are those who would use it behind the curtain for personal gain against the world.

Sometimes in life, we stumble upon something like the discovery of penicillin. It has saved lives. People just accept that and do not need to know the formula behind it.
AnonymousCoder
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 18, 2019, 04:43:13 PM
Last edit: September 18, 2019, 08:44:17 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6358

How to get the most out of Socrates


OMG at his latest post... I wonder if the question is made up by Marty himself to troll everybody who "doesn't understand his system".

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/understanding-cycles/reversals-energy-a-different-dimension/
...


While the person asking the question apparently struggles with understanding how to use Socrates, Martin Armstrong does not provide any help. He makes it clear that he is not going to reveal any details of it. Totally missing the point. Instead he brags about the internal obscure features of the system (schema frequency, reversal numbers) without reference to their utility. After explaining the utility of the energy indicator which surely will add to the confusion, he then he equates his achievements with the invention of penicillin.

How would you rate such a behavior?

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
Alex-11
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2019, 06:04:06 PM
 #6359

My interpretation of his answer is this:
If you don't get how the reversals work, despite all the documentation then check out the energy indicators and try to use it with tech analysis (as the Canuck indicates that he's doing). There is little that MA can respond to such a broad question. Reversals have been explained many times before.

Canuck:
Quote
Yet I’ve been trading stocks with only simple trend lines for years using basic tech A.
MA:
Quote
The Energy indicator is against based upon physics and it exposes the true opposing forces at work irrespective of the superficial price levels. The key to this is looking for the divergence when prices are rising and Energy is declining. This is a warning signal that such a rally is NOT sustainable. Likewise, when prices are falling but Energy begins to rise, once more there is a divergence warning that the decline is losing energy and a low is near. Just look at this daily chart on gold. You can see the divergence as Energy peaked well in advance
MA_talk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 18, 2019, 10:03:40 PM
 #6360

Quote
Many have tried to prevent our forecasts.

Martin Armstrong always tries to play the victim role.  NOBODY is trying to "prevent his forecasts".  The only problem is he canNOT get the "fore"cast part BEFORE the event to make it a VALID forecast, instead of a hindsight.  He has his "computer", and his website that is not shut down in anyway.  He can put out real verifiable forecasts to demo for all, but he doesn't do that because he can't.

Quote
Look, the reversals are a black box and I keep it that way along with the Schema Frequencies.
Standard con artist operation.  Conceal and confound, and attempt to amaze people via "mystery".  He starts to mention his "Schema Frequencies" in 201x.  That's another "amazing" term after the PI date, both of which were NOT found anywhere in his writings pre-2010.  So his super-computer MUST be stupid before 2010 then without such key concepts, don't you think?  Well, the more false technical terms that Armstrong can make up, the more dazzling he can be to the un-suspecting people.

Quote
The Energy indicator is against based upon physics
Was that another typo by Armstrong, or a typo by the forum poster.  It probably should have been again, NOT against.
Regardless, we all know that Armstrong doesn't know his high school physics at all, when he believes in free creation of energy, his perpetual motion scooter that self-generates energy.  For such people who doesn't even understand energy conservation law, I would not trust his  "energy" indicator at all.  Yeah, and he can't even round PI=3.1416 to 3.142.  Instead, he uses 3.141.


Pages: « 1 ... 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 [318] 319 320 321 322 323 324 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!