Bitcoin Forum
January 28, 2020, 08:51:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Martin Armstrong Discussion  (Read 624477 times)
dow_wizard
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 12
Merit: 1


View Profile
December 06, 2019, 11:56:01 PM
 #6701

I wonder what is Gumbi's motivation for defending Martin Armstrong and writing one nonsense post after another. He is presumably so knowledgeable about Fake Socrates but cannot show how to make a successful trade. 

Me thinks that this forum is costing a lot of subscriptions to Martin Armstrong and MA knows this and is sweating.
I will not be surprised if Gumbi is Martin Armstrong's hired aid or even The Charlatan Forecaster himself. LOL ... how awesome is that!
1580244681
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580244681

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580244681
Reply with quote  #2

1580244681
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1580244681
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1580244681

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1580244681
Reply with quote  #2

1580244681
Report to moderator
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 07, 2019, 12:13:52 AM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 06:16:01 AM by AnonymousCoder
 #6702

I wonder what is Gumbi's motivation for defending Martin Armstrong and writing one nonsense post after another. He is presumably so knowledgeable about Fake Socrates but cannot show how to make a successful trade. 

Me thinks that this forum is costing a lot of subscriptions to Martin Armstrong and MA knows this and is sweating.
I will not be surprised if Gumbi is Martin Armstrong's hired aid or even The Charlatan Forecaster himself. LOL ... how awesome is that!


Gumbi has admitted here in this forum that he is part of the Armstrong team:

...
But I think in the end you are doing Armstrong a great service regardless because he has more than enough followers and subscribers to his service and probably would not be able to handle the influx of new people so on behalf of Armstrong and his team we thank you.

In his latest posts, he does not try to hide this fact any more. The most obvious proof that he is actually part of the clan is that very much like Martin Armstrong himself, he argues based on the ambiguity of the system. You need years of experience and practice with this, to be a good charlatan. Unfortunately for him, this is the place where all this is being debunked. Some days I have engaged him here non-stop full time, so he is wasting a lot of his time posting at bitcointalk. He complains that I am taking over this forum, but when we count his posts ...

Apart from that, he would be better off not posting here any more. Every time he posts, he either talks nonsense or blames other people. This is not good promotion. Without him, this forum would be very quiet because most subjects have already been covered.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
dibley8899
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2019, 03:01:48 AM
 #6703

Well Gumbi I would like your comments on the video Mr A posted a while back on EURCHF.

It missed a 2000 pip 1 month move and is currently miles away from Armstrongs forecast some 5 years later.....surely socrates couldn't be so wrong?

Or

it could have been a suppository event like the gold short....they are quite painful sometimes..... Grin Grin Grin
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 07, 2019, 06:04:22 AM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 06:16:53 AM by AnonymousCoder
 #6704

Well Gumbi I would like your comments on the video Mr A posted a while back on EURCHF.

It missed a 2000 pip 1 month move and is currently miles away from Armstrongs forecast some 5 years later.....surely socrates couldn't be so wrong?

Or

it could have been a suppository event like the gold short....they are quite painful sometimes..... Grin Grin Grin

BTW that was

Martin Armstrong answers questions about the Swiss PEG at the 2014 WEC




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
Gumbi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 07, 2019, 03:54:32 PM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 04:38:01 PM by Gumbi
 #6705

Well Gumbi I would like your comments on the video Mr A posted a while back on EURCHF.

It missed a 2000 pip 1 month move and is currently miles away from Armstrongs forecast some 5 years later.....surely socrates couldn't be so wrong?

Or

it could have been a suppository event like the gold short....they are quite painful sometimes..... Grin Grin Grin



dibley8899 I do not know about the EURCHF trade but if it does not include reversals and is just Armstrong being bullish/bearish then it is meaningless. You simply cannot trade without reversals and how can you know the computer missed unless you had the reversals? The pro version of socrates gives all the reversals and array's only since 2019 why don't we have trade examples from then because prior to the release you needed Armstrong to continuously update you on the next level of reversals that had been generated and elected based on market price movement.

The most recent call by Armstrong on his private blog is if we exceed the November high this month we can rally into the ECM(18 January) price target on the Dow is 30 000. IF we see a high in January in line with the ECM, Armstrong calls for a drop going into the 1st quarter 2021.


AnonymousCoder continues to promote his own agenda regarding Armstrong and links to his website every post. He simply responds to every post with the same message to distort google analytics, this guy is a disgrace. This is why I will not continue to post. He desperately wants to silence anyone who thinks differently. I guess if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes the truth...

He actually links to Wikipedia as if that is a reliable source and then says the stupidest thing you could say, Armstrong spent 11 years in jail for a reason, when the federal conviction rate exceeds 98% and he spent 7 years in contempt before pleading guilty, what kind of criminal spends 7 years in prison before pleading guilty and does that really sound like a choice to you?


If you have a question then send a private message as you can see AnonymousCoder has completely lost it as Alex has previously pointed out. I must of hit a nerve  Kiss
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 07, 2019, 04:07:45 PM
Last edit: December 07, 2019, 05:59:09 PM by AnonymousCoder
 #6706

Now Gumbi writes that it is worthless to spend thousands of dollars on a Martin Armstrong WEC seminar / conference because what Martin Armstrong says there is meaningless. Even while he says he does not know about this EURCHF trade.

Who wants to even consider these people who try to promote themselves with such nonsense? How much worse can it get?

More. He says that Martin Armstrong is innocent because "the federal conviction rate exceeds 98%". Meaningless nonsense.


This has already been discussed

here
- no point repeating.



As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan.

The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda.

Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.

Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.

The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing.

I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.


AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.

The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.

Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."

Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.  Kiss

Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!

Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that


He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?

In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!

If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.

You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!


And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!

More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.



Here is a detailed time line of the events:


Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
dibley8899
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2019, 05:03:40 AM
 #6707

Now hedging his bets on gbpusd I see

No more 100 parity lol

Conservatives in the lead so model back in the garbage


nonsense gumbi and alex thats all you spew
s29
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 3


View Profile
December 08, 2019, 12:37:52 PM
 #6708

Marty going full doom porn again (which is funny, because a lot of major issues seems to be resolving themselves):

Quote
The Mother of All Financial Crises on Schedule
Posted Dec 6, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

The Rising Tide of Civil Unrest Globally
Posted Dec 6, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

BREXIT & Pound Rally
Posted Dec 7, 2019 by Martin Armstrong
One of the major distinctions is how politics has degenerated into who knows what, all we need to do is look at BREXIT and the chaos of the British elections come

And can anyone summarize what Armstrong is saying on his private blog on the Dow, for the record?

Quote
The Dow into the ECM
Posted Dec 7, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

PRIVATE BLOG – The Dow into the ECM Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers. To sign-up for Socrates or to learn more, please [...]
Read More
Lindegas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2019, 09:50:15 PM
 #6709

Collins Dictionary meanings
Gumbie
So true
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 08, 2019, 09:55:07 PM
 #6710

Collins Dictionary meanings
Gumbie
So true

 Wink
DanB1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 1


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 07:55:51 AM
 #6711

Now Gumbi writes that it is worthless to spend thousands of dollars on a Martin Armstrong WEC seminar / conference because what Martin Armstrong says there is meaningless. Even while he says he does not know about this EURCHF trade.

Who wants to even consider these people who try to promote themselves with such nonsense? How much worse can it get?

More. He says that Martin Armstrong is innocent because "the federal conviction rate exceeds 98%". Meaningless nonsense.


This has already been discussed

here
- no point repeating.



As previously said, Gumbi's posts get replied to in a way that will remind him of the context in which we showed him that he is a charlatan.

The context is the ambiguity that he uses to defend his ever changing position, claiming he is always right and we are wrong. He does this by picking any one of the many conflicting signals that suits his agenda.

Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.

Whatever smokescreen Gumbi and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know Gumbi just wants this message to go away but I am not going to do him the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.

The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this model case as a standard response reply to show what these charlatans are doing.

I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.


AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.

The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up.

Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level."

Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.  Kiss

Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!

Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that


He had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?

In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!

If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.

You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!


And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!

More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.



Here is a detailed time line of the events:


Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog


@AC, can you please stop copying and pasting your messages? We are all grown-ups here and once we have read it then we have read it.
No need to keep copying the same message over and over IMHO.
Thanks!
etoimene
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 12:34:45 PM
 #6712


@AC, can you please stop copying and pasting your messages? We are all grown-ups here and once we have read it then we have read it.
No need to keep copying the same message over and over IMHO.
Thanks!

+1 Thank you!
etoimene
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 12:35:40 PM
 #6713


The way to use the model is the merger of Reversals and TIME(array)

Can you elaborate this? How to "merge"?

Thanks!
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 01:55:55 PM
Last edit: December 10, 2019, 02:46:15 AM by AnonymousCoder
 #6714


The way to use the model is the merger of Reversals and TIME(array)

Can you elaborate this? How to "merge"?

Thanks!

Before he replies, this has been answered before in so many threads that I can summarize past responses easily as follows (sorry):

If the reversal was good in hindsight: Without turning point, no worries. With turning point in the array we say the turning point was a cycle inversion.

If the reversal was bad in hindsight: With turning point, we say the turning point negated the reversal so it was your fault if you traded it. With no turning point, we look into arrays of the next lower and next higher time frames and we will sure find a matching turning point so again that turning point negated the reversal so it was your fault if you traded it. If all of the above is not true than we will sure find a nearby major reversal in the current or higher time frame that was just not elected, so we say that all 4 reversals need to be elected for a change in trend so again it was your fault that you did not consider this. If all of the above does not hold then we will surely find an elected reversal on a lower time frame so we should have traded that and should have exited the failed reversal trade at the same time, generating a net profit. If all of the above is still not sufficient to explain the failure of the reversal, we employ the rule that a reversal trade duration is between one and 3 time units and you traded the wrong number of time units. If again all that failed to explain the failure, then perhaps you did not exit the reversal when the price level of the next reversal was reached (which could happen within a fraction of a time unit not just between 1 and 3).


This view is numerically backed up by the fact that on average, the number of turning points in an array is usually quite high relative to the number of columns in it, so if you use multiple time frames then you are likely to find a turning point in any given situation.

To sum it up: This designed ambiguity makes it extremely easy for Armstrong to follow the above script and always claim that the system is right even when the reversals fail, which they do in 50% of all cases.

It should be fairly obvious that these complex decisions cannot be made in advance because the future price movement is not known ahead of time. If we wanted to execute the complex rules without knowing the price ahead of time, then we are faced with a dilemma: The rules contradict each other, and there is no mother of all rules that would tell us which of the contradicting rules applies in any given situation.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Gumbi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 02:59:02 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2019, 03:38:41 PM by Gumbi
 #6715


The way to use the model is the merger of Reversals and TIME(array)

Can you elaborate this? How to "merge"?

Thanks!

Let's say there is a turning point on the Dow in this case January and it looks like a high you could sell against the monthly bullish reversal  which is a key PRICE target that needs to be achieved within a specified TIME period. If the market is unable to achieve the price target in time then you would have sold the high.  
As we move into 2020.05 we are facing a major TURNING POINT.
This strategy can also be used in line with the ECM and this is what awarded Armstrong hedge fund manager of the year when he sold $1 billion worth of yen against the Yearly Bullish Reversal at 147 on an MIT (Market If Touched)
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/trading-reversals-in-reverse/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/about/1113-2/track-record-hedge-fund-manager-of-the-year/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/trading-against-the-reversals/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/time-price-2/

"Price targets become more important when the current trading activity reaches such a level in conjunction with the TIME targets."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/why-are-we-all-so-confused/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/so-when-will-we-know/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/what-kind-of-trader-is-trading/

For the record
The most recent call by Armstrong on his private blog is if we exceed the November high this month we can rally into the ECM(18 January) price target on the Dow is 30 000. IF we see a high in January in line with the ECM, Armstrong calls for a drop going into the 1st quarter 2021.


AnonymousCoder
"Getting to the bottom of Martin Armstrong’s criminal case is about as difficult as proving, once and for all, that the Fibonacci sequence is God. It can be especially hard to achieve certainty in a complex white-collar case. Prosecutors can be financially unsophisticated, and defendants may lie and obfuscate. Imagine a masked man accused of robbing a bank who maintains, all along, that he was merely cashing a check."
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/10/12/the-secret-cycle?verso=true

Posted Oct 14, 2014 by Martin Armstrong
" In theory, if the market were to invert all the way into a low for 2015.75 next year, then we would be looking at a full blown cycle inversion with stocks moving up with the drop in the ECM. This would be a tremendous rally, but it would come at the cost of a real serious collapse in the confidence of government. This may be what we are facing. Instead of a Phase Transition that doubles the Dow Jones from the 2009 low of 6,440 (12,000), which we have already achieved, we are looking at a rally into 2017-2018 with the Dow reaching the 25,000-28,000 level. "
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/so-when-will-we-know/

This is exactly what happened in 2015.75 the next Major Turning point on the ECM we crashed going into it which indicated a  full blown cycle inversion with stocks moving up with the drop in the ECM(2020.05) So it looks like a high in 2020.05 and a sharp drop thereafter.  I believe trading in line with the ECM(TIME) and the reversals(PRICE) will yield the best results as it is a much stronger cycle and due to the difficulty reading the array and having it change so much.

"Day Trading is a full-time job and many people produce more in fees than they earn. The real TRADING is simply moving with the overall trend. You would be long primarily from a strategic position that may be held for months or years…The point is if you LEARN how the business cycle moves, you will be successful.  "
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/what-kind-of-trader-is-trading/
AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 05:45:09 PM
Last edit: December 10, 2019, 10:18:28 AM by AnonymousCoder
 #6716

...
For the record
The most recent call by Armstrong on his private blog is if we exceed the November high this month we can rally into the ECM(18 January) price target on the Dow is 30 000. IF we see a high in January in line with the ECM, Armstrong calls for a drop going into the 1st quarter 2021.
...

That's bullshit like everything else.

If we see a high in January then we see a drop into the first quarter. Of course. There MUST be a drop after the high otherwise it would not be a high!

So how do we know about the January high? Only ever possible in hindsight after the price has dropped into the first quarter!

That is the definition of a high - that the price is lower before and lower after it - do I need to say that?

But not only that, before, he says "we can rally". Notice CAN.

He truly must think we are all idiots (and pay the Socrates subscription to read this junk).




This is how many Armstrong "Predictions" work.


We need only this one example to show it.


See for yourself and check everything else.


If, after so much debunking here in this forum, you still can't see that Socrates is a scam, then you deserve to pay 10 of the most expensive Socrates subscriptions for the rest of your life.




So what is the tactic here? He decorates this statement with so much other irrelevant fluff that the superficial reader gets distracted and cannot see the nonsense in the statement. It is pure nonsense. This is Martin Armstrong in person, no doubt, the charlatan-in-chief.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.



See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
s29
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 3


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 06:08:39 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2019, 11:48:27 PM by s29
 #6717

For the record
The most recent call by Armstrong on his private blog is if we exceed the November high this month we can rally into the ECM(18 January) price target on the Dow is 30 000. IF we see a high in January in line with the ECM, Armstrong calls for a drop going into the 1st quarter 2021.

The Dow Going into the ECM
https://imgur.com/a/RPX9h5A

edit: Thanks both.
unwashed
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 09, 2019, 08:06:05 PM
 #6718



And can anyone summarize what Armstrong is saying on his private blog on the Dow, for the record?

Quote
The Dow into the ECM
Posted Dec 7, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

PRIVATE BLOG – The Dow into the ECM Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers. To sign-up for Socrates or to learn more, please [...]
Read More

The Dow Going into the ECM
https://imgur.com/a/RPX9h5A
StalemateNZ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 10, 2019, 02:13:02 AM
 #6719

Armstrong is a scammer. I recently reviewed one of his articles where he claims that his cycles can predict earthquakes. His claims in that article are demonstrably wrong. It is so wrong and misleading that he looses all credibility, and I would have no confidence in his economic predictions. 

Please find it on reddit or follow the link below:

https://www.reddit.com/r/aec/comments/e8jvja/review_of_climate_change_earthquakes_caused_by/

I urge you to demand evidence, and be skeptical.


AnonymousCoder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 10, 2019, 02:42:46 AM
Last edit: December 10, 2019, 09:46:05 AM by AnonymousCoder
 #6720

Armstrong is a scammer. I recently reviewed one of his articles where he claims that his cycles can predict earthquakes. His claims in that article are demonstrably wrong. It is so wrong and misleading that he looses all credibility, and I would have no confidence in his economic predictions.  

Please find it on reddit or follow the link below:

https://www.reddit.com/r/aec/comments/e8jvja/review_of_climate_change_earthquakes_caused_by/

I urge you to demand evidence, and be skeptical.




Thank you. Your conclusion that he is running a scam is absolutely correct.

He applies his so-called "model" which is no more than a primitive curve fitting machinery to whatever he can lay his hands on and then claims his computer has already predicted what scientists spent their lives on exploring. Climate, earthquakes, sports betting, election outcomes, economics, stock markets, currencies, commodities, everything. His Socrates software has been written to provide the ambiguity that allows interpretation in hindsight in such a way that the "model" is always right.

He creates with his forecasts doom and gloom scenarios which he offers his clients to survive or profit from when they buy his services, reports and seminars.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.



See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!