Cricket match prediction discussions

[Haunebu]

Problem with him is he do have self obsessed personality which led to fair amount of controversy throughout all his career, slowly everything is making sense too - Chappell-Ganguly- era.

Knew this way back ever since he ripped off his shirt and went crazy. He never had the guts to make big changes wherever necessary which all changed after MSD stepped in. He's a legendary cricketer which is the only good thing about him.

So if cricket is included in the Olympics then maybe more cricketers will come out and the popularity of cricket will go to another level.

True, but the ICC doesn't give a crap about such stuff. They only focus on the tournaments that generate high revenue.

[darewaller]

Problem with him is he do have self obsessed personality which led to fair amount of controversy throughout all his career, slowly everything is making sense too - Chappell-Ganguly- era.

Knew this way back ever since he ripped off his shirt and went crazy. He never had the guts to make big changes wherever necessary which all changed after MSD stepped in. He's a legendary cricketer which is the only good thing about him.

I have a good respect for Ganguly, but surely he misses golden opportunity for having write his name in golden words in Indian cricket history with first as skipper able to done few good changes, but sadly he fails and try to settle in running issues which were never been good for them and now as administrator I was having some big hopes, but sadly he has never done anything positive for any department and staying here just like we have few Presidents in past those are giving their duty and nothing special for anyone.

As Indian Captain and then as BCCI President, both times he fails completely and never been a revolutionary man for this game. As we were expecting good changes in ICC for better quality and system we need a good person with good heart, and now I am feeling we have Sangakara if he came and done something and system allow him for these changes.

[YinShuiSiYuan]

So if cricket is included in the Olympics then maybe more cricketers will come out and the popularity of cricket will go to another level.

True, but the ICC doesn't give a crap about such stuff. They only focus on the tournaments that generate high revenue.

Its discussed so many times here that ICC rather big 3 don't want more countries to join cricket ecosystem. If more countries join in then monopoly of big 3 will end. Thats why despite so much money involved in cricket, the game is still limited to 10 countries and I dont think it will reach out more countries in coming 10 years.

[rugrats]

But every year we see very good teams and very good players come out of the Olympics. If we notice then we will see that only few countries are participating in the game of cricket There are still many countries which are very good in cricket but due to lack of adequate facilities they are not able to expose their talent to ICC.So if cricket is included in the Olympics then maybe more cricketers will come out and the popularity of cricket will go to another level.

We can talk a very long chat about this issue here but this all could be useless because we are nothing just can give our comments and views with mostly peoples which are in power have their own mind set and will surely go with this all because right now things are changing drastically for many countries and regions which are creating new conflicts and personal links are also very important for this all.

Right now, ICC can't do anything for the promotion of this game because they have no enough authority and sources they are depended on few countries, and they never want to lose their hold which is important for them beyond this game and many other things Olympics could be better, but ICC need to bring some changes in their rules for having their case strong for this.

The problem is if ICC wants to do something they have to give a lot of importance to the opinion of the big four. And that is where we think ICC does not have its authority as it should for all the teams equally. And we all know that ICC is extremely concerned about the Big Four since they are the ones bringing in the actual amount of revenue for the ICC. Obviously, this is a situation created by the ICC themselves. And there are a lot of people in power at the ICC who want things to be like this forever. If things stay the same forever, it won't be long before we can say cricket is extinct. I am glad that you brought up the point of people in power being not helpful for cricket because that is something we generally discuss very little here. We generally give all the blame to the ICC.

[Sithara007]

The problem is if ICC wants to do something they have to give a lot of importance to the opinion of the big four. And that is where we think ICC does not have its authority as it should for all the teams equally. And we all know that ICC is extremely concerned about the Big Four since they are the ones bringing in the actual amount of revenue for the ICC. Obviously, this is a situation created by the ICC themselves. And there are a lot of people in power at the ICC who want things to be like this forever. If things stay the same forever, it won't be long before we can say cricket is extinct. I am glad that you brought up the point of people in power being not helpful for cricket because that is something we generally discuss very little here. We generally give all the blame to the ICC.

Unlike FIFA, the voting rights in ICC is skewed and favors the pig-4. In FIFA, each of the 211 national associations have equal voting powers. But in the ICC, there are only 3 votes allotted to the ~100 associate nations. On top of that the test nations outside pig-4 are not united and are dependent on boards such as BCCI and ECB for bilateral tours. Another issue is that 80% of the associate boards are fake, solely composed of foreigners with no representation from the natives. These people tend to be pro-BCCI and corrupt.

[tomos81]

So if cricket is included in the Olympics then maybe more cricketers will come out and the popularity of cricket will go to another level.

True, but the ICC doesn't give a crap about such stuff. They only focus on the tournaments that generate high revenue.

Its discussed so many times here that ICC rather big 3 don't want more countries to join cricket ecosystem. If more countries join in then monopoly of big 3 will end. Thats why despite so much money involved in cricket, the game is still limited to 10 countries and I dont think it will reach out more countries in coming 10 years.

An event as big as the World Cup is too small to host only ten countries If we look at football world cup we will see that in football world cup many countries participate but not so in case of cricket A long time ago, I used to see that many countries participated in the World Cup in cricket. Currently most of the countries have learned from cricket, I think if they were taken care of then maybe cricket would never have been lost in those countries. I hope ICC will look into this matter and organize a big tournament like World Cup with more countries.

[rugrats]

Unlike FIFA, the voting rights in ICC is skewed and favors the pig-4. In FIFA, each of the 211 national associations have equal voting powers. But in the ICC, there are only 3 votes allotted to the ~100 associate nations. On top of that the test nations outside pig-4 are not united and are dependent on boards such as BCCI and ECB for bilateral tours. Another issue is that 80% of the associate boards are fake, solely composed of foreigners with no representation from the natives. These people tend to be pro-BCCI and corrupt.

I also think that I can say that in the ICC corruption runs very deep and that statement is not gonna be very wrong. ICC could have gotten out of this situation if they did not have so many corrupt personnel. And some personnel in the ICC have direct contact and good relations with the personnel of certain boards. So for obvious reasons, those cricket birds are going to be favored heavily instead of the others. And most of the associate teams are just some jokes because you cannot form a national team without having one native player. If you think you really don’t have any other option instead of making a team without a single native player you don’t need to or deserve to play cricket.

[YinShuiSiYuan]

I also think that I can say that in the ICC corruption runs very deep and that statement is not gonna be very wrong. ICC could have gotten out of this situation if they did not have so many corrupt personnel. And some personnel in the ICC have direct contact and good relations with the personnel of certain boards. So for obvious reasons, those cricket birds are going to be favored heavily instead of the others. And most of the associate teams are just some jokes because you cannot form a national team without having one native player. If you think you really don’t have any other option instead of making a team without a single native player you don’t need to or deserve to play cricket.

Its nothing new ICC is controlled by big 3 and its mandatory for ICC administration to have good relations with big 3 otherwise they will be replaced. Teams like Oman and UAE dont have a single native player and ICC have no objection in this matter that both countries have teams that dont have even a single player.

[GigaBit]

Unlike FIFA, the voting rights in ICC is skewed and favors the pig-4. In FIFA, each of the 211 national associations have equal voting powers. But in the ICC, there are only 3 votes allotted to the ~100 associate nations. On top of that the test nations outside pig-4 are not united and are dependent on boards such as BCCI and ECB for bilateral tours. Another issue is that 80% of the associate boards are fake, solely composed of foreigners with no representation from the natives. These people tend to be pro-BCCI and corrupt.

I also think that I can say that in the ICC corruption runs very deep and that statement is not gonna be very wrong. ICC could have gotten out of this situation if they did not have so many corrupt personnel. And some personnel in the ICC have direct contact and good relations with the personnel of certain boards. So for obvious reasons, those cricket birds are going to be favored heavily instead of the others. And most of the associate teams are just some jokes because you cannot form a national team without having one native player. If you think you really don’t have any other option instead of making a team without a single native player you don’t need to or deserve to play cricket.

ICC does not care about any kind of good or bad decisions. Because they have a secret relationship with some boards. Any agreement they make is confidentially mutual with those boards. But gradually many things are becoming clear. Hopefully, this corruption may decrease in the future.

[Haunebu]

As Indian Captain and then as BCCI President, both times he fails completely and never been a revolutionary man for this game. As we were expecting good changes in ICC for better quality and system we need a good person with good heart, and now I am feeling we have Sangakara if he came and done something and system allow him for these changes.

He simply turned out to be just another puppet who was manipulated by powerful individuals on top, but this is what happened to the majority of BCCI presidents before him which is why this isn't really surprising.

An event as big as the World Cup is too small to host only ten countries If we look at football world cup we will see that in football world cup many countries participate but not so in case of cricket A long time ago, I used to see that many countries participated in the World Cup in cricket. Currently most of the countries have learned from cricket, I think if they were taken care of then maybe cricket would never have been lost in those countries. I hope ICC will look into this matter and organize a big tournament like World Cup with more countries.

FIFA is on another level when compared to the ICC which is why there are big differences between their respective World Cups. However, Cricket World Cups are usually quite entertaining despite the small number of international teams.

[rugrats]

ICC does not care about any kind of good or bad decisions. Because they have a secret relationship with some boards. Any agreement they make is confidentially mutual with those boards. But gradually many things are becoming clear. Hopefully, this corruption may decrease in the future.

The corruption is not going to decrease. Unless there are some big changes in the personnel of the ICC. And I don’t think that is going to happen soon. And at this point, everyone already knows that ICC does not care about cricket. They just care about money and as long as the money is flowing they don’t have any problems. And that is the reason why the cricket boards Which can bring in a good amount of money are the dearest to ICC. If you cannot bring “amount of money you will not get as much help from the ICC as the other teams or cricket boards generally get.

[dezoel]

ICC does not care about any kind of good or bad decisions. Because they have a secret relationship with some boards. Any agreement they make is confidentially mutual with those boards. But gradually many things are becoming clear. Hopefully, this corruption may decrease in the future.

Right now, ICC is surely caring alone about B-4 which is clearly mean they are not going to give up with their this corrupt system here only one solution is possible and that is if other boards feeling uncomfortable with this all they leave this ICC and try to manage by their own or threat to quite ICC if they have enough sources then surely ICC will do something positive for development of this, but sadly this is also having very small chance of success because most of the other boards are relatively not strong enough for managing this all which is another issue here.

With this all most chances we are surely not going to have any revolutionary change in this all in near future because IPL is giving enough money to BCCI which is giving to England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand so these all are living happily which is enough for them and their strong control on this game, and it's all system which is surely decreasing teams with native players.

[YinShuiSiYuan]

ICC does not care about any kind of good or bad decisions. Because they have a secret relationship with some boards. Any agreement they make is confidentially mutual with those boards. But gradually many things are becoming clear. Hopefully, this corruption may decrease in the future.

Right now, ICC is surely caring alone about B-4 which is clearly mean they are not going to give up with their this corrupt system here only one solution is possible and that is if other boards feeling uncomfortable with this all they leave this ICC and try to manage by their own or threat to quite ICC if they have enough sources then surely ICC will do something positive for development of this, but sadly this is also having very small chance of success because most of the other boards are relatively not strong enough for managing this all which is another issue here.

With this all most chances we are surely not going to have any revolutionary change in this all in near future because IPL is giving enough money to BCCI which is giving to England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand so these all are living happily which is enough for them and their strong control on this game, and it's all system which is surely decreasing teams with native players.

I am sure that with such policies cricket will lose its charm in coming few years. As new team are not joining in so it will be difficult to attract large audience for WC of 8 teams. But Big-3 monopoly is that new teams must not be allowed to join in. So thats why we have only few teams so far in the ICC pool.

[ilovealtcoins]

ICC does not care about any kind of good or bad decisions. Because they have a secret relationship with some boards. Any agreement they make is confidentially mutual with those boards. But gradually many things are becoming clear. Hopefully, this corruption may decrease in the future.

Right now, ICC is surely caring alone about B-4 which is clearly mean they are not going to give up with their this corrupt system here only one solution is possible and that is if other boards feeling uncomfortable with this all they leave this ICC and try to manage by their own or threat to quite ICC if they have enough sources then surely ICC will do something positive for development of this, but sadly this is also having very small chance of success because most of the other boards are relatively not strong enough for managing this all which is another issue here. With this all most chances we are surely not going to have any revolutionary change in this all in near future because IPL is giving enough money to BCCI which is giving to England, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand so these all are living happily which is enough for them and their strong control on this game, and it's all system which is surely decreasing teams with native players.

I am sure that with such policies cricket will lose its charm in coming few years. As new team are not joining in so it will be difficult to attract large audience for WC of 8 teams. But Big-3 monopoly is that new teams must not be allowed to join in. So thats why we have only few teams so far in the ICC pool.

I believe that once the money begins flowing from the other cricket boards, and the other cricket boards will no longer be dependent upon bigger cricket boards for their help, this situation will change as soon. However, that has already happened, and it will be very difficult for them to be able to come out of that situation in the future.

[noormcs5]

Do we have any other method instead of DLS to determine the results of rain-delayed or rain affected matches ?
If there is no alternative available then i am afraid we have no option but to keep using this DLS method to determine the result of the matches.
If you say that DLS method decisions are not good but keep in mind they are for both teams and not just applicable to one team.

Yes, I know that but we have also come a long way and that technology has also improved a lot. So, I believe there should have been another system in place of the DLS system. I agree that we don’t have anything better right now than the DLS system. However, anything that gets old is bound to become obsolete. So, I really hope that there will be something to replace this system. But with the updated system, there will be new problems. And I don’t know if ICC has anything planned about it but if they are looking to try something else from now on, I believe it’s probably going to be too late.


Thank you

duke

I wonder from where ICC found this DLS method to implement in the cricket matches.

For all these years, everyone is complaining about this DLS method but there have been no efforts to change it or revise it. Why does ICC never give a thought to this or they are happy with the DLS results 

[YinShuiSiYuan]

I wonder from where ICC found this DLS method to implement in the cricket matches.

For all these years, everyone is complaining about this DLS method but there have been no efforts to change it or revise it. Why does ICC never give a thought to this or they are happy with the DLS results 

Its mainly because no one did any effort to replace DLS. Its in place since early 90s and its known for giving surprises. Cricket is an outdoor game thats constantly interrrupted by events like rain, bad lights etc so we need some kind of support But I have to admit that this DLS has not given any support rather giving confusion.

[Haunebu]

Its mainly because no one did any effort to replace DLS. Its in place since early 90s and its known for giving surprises. Cricket is an outdoor game thats constantly interrrupted by events like rain, bad lights etc so we need some kind of support But I have to admit that this DLS has not given any support rather giving confusion.

The thing is that DLS has actually been effective in producing fair results majority of the time which is why the ICC decided to simply stick with it even though some fans absolutely detest it.

The same is true when it comes to similar mechanisms in other sports like Soccer etc. Am not expecting any major changes to it anytime soon.

[Newlifebtc]

Hello Everyone,

In this thread, we can discuss all cricket match and players performances, match results and betting tips. 

Thank you.

I just wanted to say that it's not everybody that predict the match of cricket because cricket game is not well known in every country that is why I don't see some people are getting or taking cricket game very serious like other games. I believe that we have to take the one we know very serious like me I don't know anything concerning cricket but I would like it a situation whereby I will know how to predict cricket

[BobK71]

Do we have any other method instead of DLS to determine the results of rain-delayed or rain affected matches ?
If there is no alternative available then i am afraid we have no option but to keep using this DLS method to determine the result of the matches.
If you say that DLS method decisions are not good but keep in mind they are for both teams and not just applicable to one team.

Yes, I know that but we have also come a long way and that technology has also improved a lot. So, I believe there should have been another system in place of the DLS system. I agree that we don’t have anything better right now than the DLS system. However, anything that gets old is bound to become obsolete. So, I really hope that there will be something to replace this system. But with the updated system, there will be new problems. And I don’t know if ICC has anything planned about it but if they are looking to try something else from now on, I believe it’s probably going to be too late.


Thank you

duke

I wonder from where ICC found this DLS method to implement in the cricket matches.

For all these years, everyone is complaining about this DLS method but there have been no efforts to change it or revise it. Why does ICC never give a thought to this or they are happy with the DLS results 

Actually I am not support the DLS method. Although this method is more dynamic than before, I think it's best to keep reserve days for absolute clarity. The DLS method has some disadvantages. However, reserve day is not possible due to logistics support and schedule disruption. As a result, public opinion is high on this method.

[noormcs5]

Its mainly because no one did any effort to replace DLS. Its in place since early 90s and its known for giving surprises. Cricket is an outdoor game thats constantly interrrupted by events like rain, bad lights etc so we need some kind of support But I have to admit that this DLS has not given any support rather giving confusion.

The thing is that DLS has actually been effective in producing fair results majority of the time which is why the ICC decided to simply stick with it even though some fans absolutely detest it.

The same is true when it comes to similar mechanisms in other sports like Soccer etc. Am not expecting any major changes to it anytime soon.

If DLS method was able to produce effective results then everyone would have been happy with it and we would not be discussing changing this system.
The problem is that majority of the people agree that DLS does not produce the best results and gives an unfair sort of advantage to one team over the other.