★★★ Bitcoin Video Casino ★★★ - ||| Over 500 BTC in Progressive Jackpots! |||

[AcePuppy]

so here to all that blame only bots win jackpots

https://i.imgur.com/B8JlGim.jpg?1


this was me and im not a bot.so its possible to win.i was using autobet setting @ fast.

but still i think it might be annoying if u try for a bigger one and then the bots log in.

Jackpots normally don't occur on the smallest bet when it comes to any of the games, except of course Roulette, where it isn't a choice.

[1714234491]

1714234491

[1714234491]

1714234491

[1714234491]

1714234491

[1714234491]

1714234491

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

so here to all that blame only bots win jackpots




this was me and im not a bot.so its possible to win.i was using autobet setting @ fast.

but still i think it might be annoying if u try for a bigger one and then the bots log in.

Wow nice jackpot! Congratulations!

Thanks for putting in the good word about our site. Much appreciated.

[Eisenhower34]

I understand the technical aspect of the problem with the bots and being able to prevent them. I do believe somehow inserting a captcha if X amount of rolls are generated within Y time.

By limiting the API calls to the same amount of time that a regular user can achieve by using auto would also help. I don't mind the idea that someone can run a ton of screens and win, I just dislike the idea that others are having an unfair advantage (spinning 100x faster than me). I was literally at a loss of words when I was running over 16 browser sessions trying to hit a jackpot on full speed auto and a bot owner comes in and is spinning 100x faster than me.

[AcePuppy]

I understand the technical aspect of the problem with the bots and being able to prevent them. I do believe somehow inserting a captcha if X amount of rolls are generated within Y time.

By limiting the API calls to the same amount of time that a regular user can achieve by using auto would also help. I don't mind the idea that someone can run a ton of screens and win, I just dislike the idea that others are having an unfair advantage (spinning 100x faster than me). I was literally at a loss of words when I was running over 16 browser sessions trying to hit a jackpot on full speed auto and a bot owner comes in and is spinning 100x faster than me.

Give it up, the site owners don't care to make changes as you can see from the weeks this has been going on. It's all about them making money, not us winning anything.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

I understand the technical aspect of the problem with the bots and being able to prevent them. I do believe somehow inserting a captcha if X amount of rolls are generated within Y time.

By limiting the API calls to the same amount of time that a regular user can achieve by using auto would also help. I don't mind the idea that someone can run a ton of screens and win, I just dislike the idea that others are having an unfair advantage (spinning 100x faster than me). I was literally at a loss of words when I was running over 16 browser sessions trying to hit a jackpot on full speed auto and a bot owner comes in and is spinning 100x faster than me.

If you see a user playing at an unfair rate, please email us at admin@bitcoinvideocasino.com and we will take a closer look. We can disable bots that are playing too quickly.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Congratulations user 0790199144 on your double double bonus royal flush! (45.19 BTC!)

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

We just had our second biggest jackpot ever! Congratulations user f377979ed8 on your enormous 634.53 BTC jackpot!!!

[AcePup]

Please confirm this was not a bot won. The jackpot was only at 337 at around 11pm EST.

[muldoonski]

I don't mind the idea that someone can run a ton of screens and win, I just dislike the idea that others are having an unfair advantage (spinning 100x faster than me).

What about people who can't run 16 screens at once?   Don't you have an advantage over them?

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Please confirm this was not a bot won. The jackpot was only at 337 at around 11pm EST.

This was not a bot win. The rate of games played by this user was not high. There were also periods of time when the jackpot was very big (500+ BTC) and nobody was going for the jackpot, which means that everybody had a fair chance to win this jackpot.

[AcePup]

Please confirm this was not a bot won. The jackpot was only at 337 at around 11pm EST.

This was not a bot win. The rate of games played by this user was not high. There were also periods of time when the jackpot was very big (500+ BTC) and nobody was going for the jackpot, which means that everybody had a fair chance to win this jackpot.

Please explain how one person managed to move the jackpot up over 300 BTC in a period of 6 hours?

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

Please confirm this was not a bot won. The jackpot was only at 337 at around 11pm EST.

This was not a bot win. The rate of games played by this user was not high. There were also periods of time when the jackpot was very big (500+ BTC) and nobody was going for the jackpot, which means that everybody had a fair chance to win this jackpot.

Please explain how one person managed to move the jackpot up over 300 BTC in a period of 6 hours?

The slots jackpot grows quite quickly!

1.6% of all bets goes towards the progressive jackpot. So for every 0.2 BTC bet, 0.0032 BTC gets added to the jackpot. If the user is playing autoplay, it will quickly increase the size of the jackpot.

[gambian-]

I've sent you an email regarding my account being lost
My browser crashed on private browsing and my link was lost. I emailed you and never got a response.
I also sent you a PM with a signed message from my deposit address.

Edit - received my account info promptly after providing necessary info, thanks!

[bitboy1x]

I have checked the rules everywhere - and this is unfair no matter how it is sliced.

You don't have dealer peek for blackjack
You don't offer surrender
You allow resplitting of aces.
When the dealer has a blackjack, you take ALL the bets?

Even casinos with the same supposed advantage of you consider A10 on splits to be a push against a dealer blackjack.

Not the first time it has happened to me - and it's crazy that you hide behind "we only have 0.5% advantage" when rules like this are blatantly a ripoff.

I understand variance, and I won't even ask how it is that the last 200 hands I had 12, 174 of them I get a face card, but the last 200 times I double down against a 9, I get a face card 44 times.   That's variance huh?  I'll take your word on "provability", but the aces thing is BS.

Be fair about this.  It's the 3rd time it happened and it really affects a bankroll.

http://s1.postimg.org/nv2mz9b7z/aces.jpg
screen cap

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

I've sent you an email regarding my account being lost
My browser crashed on private browsing and my link was lost. I emailed you and never got a response.
I also sent you a PM with a signed message from my deposit address.

We just sent you a PM with you account information.

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

I have checked the rules everywhere - and this is unfair no matter how it is sliced.

You don't have dealer peek for blackjack
You don't offer surrender
You allow resplitting of aces.
When the dealer has a blackjack, you take ALL the bets?

Even casinos with the same supposed advantage of you consider A10 on splits to be a push against a dealer blackjack.

Not the first time it has happened to me - and it's crazy that you hide behind "we only have 0.5% advantage" when rules like this are blatantly a ripoff.

I understand variance, and I won't even ask how it is that the last 200 hands I had 12, 174 of them I get a face card, but the last 200 times I double down against a 9, I get a face card 44 times.   That's variance huh?  I'll take your word on "provability", but the aces thing is BS.

Be fair about this.  It's the 3rd time it happened and it really affects a bankroll.


screen cap

The cards are completely random. Because of our provably fair code, we can't do anything to change which cards will get dealt.

You can check the blackjack rules by clicking the red help button, and then the yellow rules button. The current set of rules gives a house edge of 0.5%, and then after the 0.1% jackpot contribution we are giving an expected return of 99.6%. We have considered enabling dealer peeking for blackjacks, but then we'd need to change another rule to balance this.

[bitboy1x]

You add towards the bonus even from people who don't play the bonus game?

[BitcoinVideoPoker]

You add towards the bonus even from people who don't play the bonus game?

Correct, we add 0.1% of all bets towards the jackpot. If a user is paying 1 credit to play the bonus game, we add 37.1% of that side bet towards the progressive jackpot.

You can check the expected return for all games by clicking the "expected returns" link at the top of your screen. All of our games have at least a 99.5% expected return. Craps comes in at the top with a 99.8% expected return, while video poker has the second best returns at 99.75% (0.25% house edge).

[bitboy1x]

Here's the rules you list
Minimum bet is 0.0001 BTC
Maximum bet is 1 BTC
Blackjack pays 3:2
Insurance pays 2:1
Number of decks is 5
Number of allowed splits is 3
Dealer does not hit on soft 17
Can double after split
Can not hit split aces
Can resplit aces
Can double on first two
Dealer does not peek

-----------------
Where does it say that you lose both bets when you double down and the dealer has blackjack?
Where does it say that you lose all split aces that are 10A (KA etc) vs a dealer blackjack?

Are more rules listed somewhere else?

[bitboy1x]

Losing black jacks to black jacks? Shouldn't that be a push? Not liking this one bit...I'll just not play blackjack!

On splits.  Other casinos that don't offer dealer peek, don't offer surrender, all consider a split blackjack to be a push against a dealer blackjack.

Same with double down and dealer has a BJ.  1st hand loses, double down gets returned.

Not here.