Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 11:12:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
  Print  
Author Topic: python OpenCL bitcoin miner  (Read 1239104 times)
bolapara
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 23, 2011, 06:04:28 PM
 #781


Okay, I tested the H == 0 mod on linux ubuntblow 10.10, HD5970 and it is 1-2% SLOWER. (Wonder why it is faster on Win?)

... poclbm fork for Win users ... ?

I have a Ubuntu 10.10 box and it gets about 1.1Mh/s faster with this mod.

Ubuntu 10.10, 5870, and this mod consistently knocks me down 5MH/s.
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
April 23, 2011, 09:45:31 PM
 #782

What the heck ... it must be the SDK or fglrx driver version.

ubuntu 10.10 (x86_64)
ATIstreamSDK 2.1
fglrx driver 11.2
HD 5970

H == 0 mod
SLOWER 1-2% (4-5 Mhas/s)


eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
April 24, 2011, 01:11:43 AM
 #783

My results (+7 mHash/sec per GPU) were from:

Ubuntu 10.10 (x86_64)
ATIStream SDK 2.1
fglrx driver 11.3
HD 5870s

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
April 24, 2011, 01:23:36 AM
 #784

poclbm_py2exe_20110325.7z
If i just edit the bitcoinminer.cl in the above zip file, from
this
Code:
#ifdef VECTORS
if (belowOrEquals(H.x, targetH, G.x, targetG))
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce.x & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce.x;
}
else if (belowOrEquals(H.y, targetH, G.y, targetG))
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce.y & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce.y;
}
#else
if (belowOrEquals(H, targetH, G, targetG))
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce;
}
#endif
}


to this
Code:
#ifdef VECTORS
if (H.x == 0)
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce.x & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce.x;
}
else if (H.y == 0)
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce.y & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce.y;
}
#else
if (H == 0)
{
output[OUTPUT_SIZE] = output[nonce & OUTPUT_MASK] = nonce;
}
#endif
}

& RUN pocblm.exe with options to mine in a pool, will i may get more hash?
Or i have to compile something?
Using windows & have zero programming knowledge.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
April 24, 2011, 02:03:36 AM
 #785

That's all you have to do.  Open it in notepad/wordpad, change the lines in BitcoinMiner.cl, and see if your speed goes up or down.  At this point nobody has been able to pinpoint exactly why it is slower for some and faster for others.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
rezin777
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 24, 2011, 04:19:00 AM
 #786

4 Mhash/s GAIN
Win7 64
5870s
cat 11.4
nster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 24, 2011, 05:24:35 AM
 #787

4 Mhash/s GAIN
Win7 64
5870s
cat 11.4

same here but 5Mh, 2* 6870s and sdk 2.4 cat 11.4

167q1CHgVjzLCwQwQvJ3tRMUCrjfqvSznd Donations are welcome Smiley Please be kind if I helped
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
April 24, 2011, 05:36:17 AM
 #788

2 Mhash/s gain.

HD 6870 core 1038, mem 345 272Mhash/s
Now 274 Mhash/s
win7 32, cat 11.4 & 2.4 beta
drgr33n
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 251



View Profile
April 24, 2011, 11:09:45 AM
 #789

That's all you have to do.  Open it in notepad/wordpad, change the lines in BitcoinMiner.cl, and see if your speed goes up or down.  At this point nobody has been able to pinpoint exactly why it is slower for some and faster for others.

I think I do Cheesy I think its got to do with what SDk you are using I think this is faster using v2.4 and slower with v2.2. My theory anyway Cheesy
SteveB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 170
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 24, 2011, 10:34:24 PM
 #790

With the H == 0 mod, I get about a 2.5 Mhash/s gain on my non overclocked HD 5770.
From about 166 Mhash/s to about 168.5 Mhash/s using -f 7.
If I lower the -f switch to less than 7, I can get a couple more Mhash/s but the cpu usage will rise and increase the power consumption.

Intel Core i7 860 with 8gb ram
Windows 7 64bit
HD 5770 (not overclocked)
Catalyst Version:   11.2   
Stream Version: Not sure. Whatever came with the driver. Probably 2.4
Garrett Burgwardt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 256


View Profile
April 24, 2011, 11:05:26 PM
Last edit: April 25, 2011, 02:37:11 AM by TheKid
 #791

6990, 2.4 11.4, 7 x64 Ultimate, +8 mh/s or so, from 327 to 335

1.15v, 900 core 1350 mem, I play games so I don't gimp the memory clock Wink
ghost
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 25, 2011, 02:07:33 AM
 #792

6990, 2.4 11.4, +8 mh/s or so, from 327 to 335

What OS is this on?
kindle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 25, 2011, 02:26:37 AM
 #793

6990, 2.4 11.4, +8 mh/s or so, from 327 to 335

Wow great hash rate, besides the OS whats your core and mem clock speed. Have you tried downvolting the vcore?

I am running dual 6990 at 0.935 vcore with 750 core and 625 mem clockspeed. Apparently down memclock only works when core is at 750. Running at -v -w 128 -f 0 on unmod poclbm I get 288 mhash/s per core.

Garrett Burgwardt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 256


View Profile
April 25, 2011, 02:37:24 AM
 #794

Fixed my old post with some more infos.
EgoPaintedGrey
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 25, 2011, 03:04:43 AM
 #795

With the mod i got  + 8 M hash/sec on my 5870.

Windows 7 pro x64
Catalyst 11.4 pre release
SDK 2.4
5870 @980/300
kaitink00man
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 26, 2011, 07:57:45 AM
 #796

With the mod i got  + 8 M hash/sec on my 5870.

Windows 7 pro x64
Catalyst 11.4 pre release
SDK 2.4
5870 @980/300

Impressive stats  Shocked
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
April 27, 2011, 12:47:18 AM
 #797


m0mchill,

just sent you a donation for all the sterling work that your miner has done for me .... moved over to phoenix now but your efforts were appreciated.

cheers,

moa

IlbiStarz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 28, 2011, 04:33:48 AM
Last edit: April 28, 2011, 05:27:56 AM by IlbiStarz
 #798

I see a lot of people talking about the "mod" and playing around with a bunch off -v -w, etc. How do you use them, and what do they do? Do they give you higher mh/s?

Also, why am I not able to have any other programs open while mining? If I have anything open, or open an application during mining, my computer freezes and I have to reboot.
m0mchil (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 127


View Profile
April 28, 2011, 07:59:53 AM
 #799

New version is up. Changes:

- BFI_INT (~10% performance improvement)
- TCP keep-alive

Grinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1284
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 28, 2011, 08:14:13 AM
 #800

I'm getting verification failed, check hardware on the first block it finds every time. Same setup worked with the old version and works with phoenix. Debian, OpenCL 2.1, 5970.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!